Replacement of the meniscus by an implant could potentially avoid cartilage degeneration.
Hypothesis:
An implant of degradable polycaprolacton-polyurethane should act as a temporary scaffold enabling regeneration of a new meniscus by slow degradation of the polymer and simultaneous in-growth and differentiation of tissues into the typical cartilage-like tissue of the meniscus.
Study Design:
Controlled laboratory study.
Methods:
In 13 dogs' knees, the lateral meniscus was replaced with a porous polymer implant (6 and 7 for 6- and 24-month follow-up, respectively); in 7 knees only a meniscectomy was performed. In 6 knees, no surgery was performed. After 6 and 24 months, the implants and the articular cartilage were histologically evaluated. Compression-stress tests were performed on implant biopsy specimens.
Results:
The implants were fully integrated into the tissue without formation of a capsule. The foreign body reaction did not exceed grade I. Differentiation from fibrous- to cartilage-like tissue was pronounced after 24 months. Viable cells were particularly absent after 24 months in central parts of the most anterior part of the scaffold. The mechanical properties of the implants were intermediate between the scaffold before implantation and native meniscus tissue and were not different between 6 and 24 months. After both 6 and 24 months, small areas of the implant were not covered with tissue. Cartilage degeneration was not prevented.
Conclusion:
A final remodeling of tissue into neomeniscus tissue could not take place since the original structure of the polymer was still present after 24 months. The implant did not prevent cartilage degradation. Several factors are discussed that may be responsible for this.
Clinical Relevance:
Although clinical application of a polymer implant for the replacement of the entire meniscus is not supported by this study, the authors strongly believe in the concept, but further improvements in the implant and surgical technique are needed before such an implant can be recommended for human clinical use.
AmentaPSGaySVaheriAMartinez-HernandezA. The extracellular matrix is an integrated unit: Ultrastructural localization of collagen types I, III, IV, V, VI, fibronectin, and laminin in human term placenta. Coll Relat Res. 1986;6(2):125–152.
2.
BrunsJKahrsJKampenJBehrensPPlitzW. Autologous perichondral tissue for meniscal replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(5):918–923.
3.
CheungHS. Distribution of type I, II, III, and V in the pepsin solubilized collagens in bovine menisci. Connect Tissue Res. 1987;16(4):343–356.
4.
CoxJSNyeCESchaeferWWWoodsteinIJ. The degenerative effects of partial and total resection of the medial meniscus in dogs' knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;109:178–183.
5.
CumminsJFMansourJNHoweZAllanDG. Meniscal transplantation and degenerative articular change: An experimental study in the rabbit. Arthroscopy. 1997;13(4):485–491.
6.
de GrootJHde VrijerRPenningsAJKlompmakerJVethRPJansenHW. Use of porous polyurethanes for meniscal reconstruction and meniscal prostheses. Biomaterials. 1996;17(2):163–173.
7.
de GrootJHde VrijerRWildeboerBSSpaansCJPeningsAJ. New biomedical polyurethane ureas with high tear strengths. Polymer Bulletin. 1997;11(38):211–218.
8.
de GrootJHNijenhuisAJBruinP. The use of biodegradable porous polymer implants in meniscus reconstruction. 1. Preparation of porous biodegradable polyurethanes for the reconstruction of meniscus lesions. Colloid & Polymer Science. 1990;268:1073–1081.
9.
de GrootJHSpaansCJDekensFGPenningsAJ. On the role of aminolysis and transesterification in the synthesis of ε-caprolactone and L-lactide-based polyurethanes. Polymer Bulletin. 2007;41:299–306.
10.
DeHavenKE. The role of the meniscus. In: EwingJW, ed. Articular Cartilage and Knee Joint Function: Basic Science and Arthroscopy. New York, NY: Raven Press Ltd; 1990:103–115.
11.
FithianDCKellyMAMowVC. Material properties and structure-function relationships in the menisci. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;252:19–31.
12.
GhoshPTaylorTK. The knee joint meniscus: A fibrocartilage of some distinction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;224:52–63.
13.
HeijkantsRGCalckRVvan TienenTG. Uncatalyzed synthesis, thermal, and mechanical properties of polyurethanes based on poly(epsilon-caprolactone) and 1,4-butane diisocyanate with uniform hard segment. Biomaterials. 2005;26(20):4219–4228.
14.
HeijkantsRGvan CalckRVDe GrootJH. Design, synthesis, and properties of a degradable polyurethane scaffold for meniscus regeneration. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004;15(4):423–427.
15.
JaureguitoJWElliotJSLietnerTDixonLBReiderB. The effects of arthroscopic partial lateral meniscectomy in an otherwise normal knee: A retrospective review of functional, clinical, and radiographic results. Arthroscopy. 1995;11(1):29–36.
16.
KahnARKahaneJC. India ink pinprick assessment of age-related changes in the cricoarytenoid joint (CAJ) articular surfaces. J Speech Hear Res. 1986;29(4):536–543.
17.
KambicHEMcDevittCA. Spatial organization of types I and II collagen in the canine meniscus. J Orthop Res. 2005;23(1):142–149.
18.
KlompmakerJVethRPJansenHWNielsenHKde GrootJHPenningsAJ. Meniscal replacement using a porous polymer prosthesis: A preliminary study in the dog. Biomaterials. 1996;17(12): 1169–1175.
19.
KobayashiMToguchidaJOkaM. Preliminary study of polyvinyl alcohol-hydrogel (PVA-H) artificial meniscus. Biomaterials. 2003; 24(4):639–647.
KohnDWirthCJReissG. Medial meniscus replacement by a tendon autograft: Experiments in sheep. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74(6):910–917.
22.
LinsenmayerTFHendrixMJ. Monoclonal antibodies to connective tissue macromolecules: Type II collagen. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1980;92(2):440–446.
23.
MaletiusWMessnerK. The effect of partial meniscectomy on the long-term prognosis of knees with localized, severe chondral damage: A 12- to 15-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24(3): 258–262.
24.
MessnerK. Meniscal substitution with a Teflon-periosteal composite graft: A rabbit experiment. Biomaterials. 1994;15(3):223–230.
25.
MessnerKKohnDVerdonkR. Future research in meniscal replacement. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1999;9(3):181–183.
26.
MessnerKLohmanderLSGillquistJ. Cartilage mechanics and morphology, synovitis, and proteoglycan fragments in rabbit joint fluid after prosthetic meniscal substitution. Biomaterials. 1993;14(3): 163–168.
27.
MineTKimuraMSakkaAKawaiS. Innervation of nociceptors in the menisci of the knee joint: An immunohistochemical study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120(3–4):201–204.
28.
MowVCRatcliffeAChernKYKellyMA. Structure and function relationships of the menisci of the knee. In: MowVCArnoczkySPJacksonDW, eds. Knee Meniscus: Basic and Clinical Foundations. New York, NY: Raven Press Ltd; 1992:37–57.
29.
PuchtlerHMeloanSNWaldropFS. Are picro-dye reactions for collagens quantitative? Chemical and histochemical considerations. Histochemistry. 1988;88(3–6):243–256.
30.
ReguzzoniMManelliARongaMRaspantiMGrassiFA. Histology and ultrastructure of a tissue-engineered collagen meniscus before and after implantation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005;74(2):808–816.
31.
RijkPCTigchelaar-GutterWBernoskiFPVan NoordenCJ. Functional changes in articular cartilage after meniscal allograft transplantation: A quantitative histochemical evaluation in rabbits. Arthroscopy. 2006:22(2): 152–158.
32.
SaygiBYildirimYBerkerNOfluogluDKaradag-SaygiEKarahanM. Evaluation of the neurosensory function of the medial meniscus in humans. Arthroscopy. 2005:21(12): 1468–1472.
33.
SettonLAGuilakFHsuEWVailTP. Biomechanical factors in tissue-engineered meniscal repair. Clin Orthop. 1999;367:S254–S272.
34.
SpaansCJde GrootJHDekensFGPenningsAJ. High molecular weight polyurethanes and a polyurethane urea based on 1,4-butanediisocyanate. Polymer Bulletin. 1996;41:131–138.
StoneKRRodkeyWGWebberRMcKinneyLSteadmanJR. Development of a prosthetic meniscal replacement. In: MowVCArnoczkySPJacksonDW, eds. Knee Meniscus: Basic and Clinical Foundations. New York, NY: Raven Press Ltd; 1992:165–173.
37.
StoneKRRodkeyWGWebberRMcKinneyLSteadmanJR. Meniscal regeneration with copolymeric collagen scaffolds: In vitro and in vivo studies evaluated clinically, histologically, and biochemically. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(2):104–111.
StoneKRSteadmanJRRodkeyWGLiST. Regeneration of meniscal cartilage with use of a collagen scaffold: Analysis of preliminary data. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(12):1770–1777.
40.
TienenTGHeijkantsRGde GrootJH. Replacement of the knee meniscus by a porous polymer implant: A study in dogs. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(1):64–71.
41.
TienenTGHeijkantsRGde GrootJH. Meniscal replacement in dogs: Tissue regeneration in 2 different materials with similar properties. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006;76(2): 389–396.
42.
van ArkelERde BoerHH. Survival analysis of human meniscal transplantations. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(2):227–231.
43.
Van TienenTGHeijkantsRGBumaPde GrootJHPenningsAJVethRP. Tissue ingrowth and degradation of 2 biodegradable porous polymers with different porosities and pore sizes. Biomaterials. 2002;23(8):1731–1738.
44.
VerdonkRKohnD. Harvest and conservation of meniscal allografts. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1999;9(3):158–159.
45.
VethRPden HeetenGJJansenHWNielsenHK. An experimental study of reconstructive procedures in lesions of the meniscus: Use of synovial flaps and carbon fiber implants for artificially made lesions in the meniscus of the rabbit. Clin Orthop. 1983;181:250–254.
46.
WalkerPSErkmanMJ. The role of the menisci in force transmission across the knee. Clin Orthop. 1975;109:184–192.
