Background: Double-bundle ACL reconstruction popularity is increasing with the aim to reproduce native ACL anatomy and improve ACL reconstruction outcome. However, to date, only a few randomized clinical studies have been published.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the clinical results of single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction.
Study Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1.
Methods: Seventy patients with a chronic unilateral ACL rupture who underwent arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction using a hamstring graft were randomized to receive a single- (SB) or double-bundle (DB) reconstruction. Both groups were comparable with regard to preoperative data. A double-incision surgical technique was adopted in both groups. The graft was fixed by looping the hamstring tendons around a bony (DB) or a metallic (SB) bridge on the tibial side and with interference screws reinforced with a staple on the femur. The same rehabilitation protocol was adopted. Outcome assessment was performed by a blinded, independent observer using the visual analog scale (VAS) score, the new International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and KT-1000 arthrometer evaluation.
Results: All the patients reached a minimum follow-up of 2 years. No differences between the 2 groups were observed in terms of KOOS and IKDC subjective score. A statistically significant difference in favor of the DB group was found with the VAS ( P < .03). The objective IKDC final scores showed statistically significantly more “normal knees” in the DB group than in the SB group ( P = .03). There was 1 stability failure in the DB group and 3 in the SB group. The KT-1000 arthrometer data showed a statistically significant decrease in the average anterior tibial translation in the DB group (1.2 mm DB vs 2.1 mm SB; P < .03). The incidence of a residual pivot-shift glide was 14% in DB and 26% in SB (P = .08).
Conclusion: In the 2-year minimum follow-up, DB ACL reconstructions showed better VAS, anterior knee laxity, and final objective IKDC scores than SB. However, longer follow-up and accurate instrumented in vivo rotational stability assessment are needed.
Adachi N., Ochi M., Uchio Y., Iwasa J., Kuriwaka M., Ito Y.Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: single- versus double-bundle multi-stranded hamstring tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:515-520.
2.
Aglietti P., Giron F., Buzzi R., Biddau F., Sasso F.Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon-bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts. A prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am.2004 ;86:2143-2155.
3.
Aglietti P., Giron F., Cuomo P., Losco M., Mondanelli N.Single- and double-incision double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:108-113.
4.
Arnold MP, Kooloos J., van Kampen A.Single-incision technique misses the anatomical femoral anterior cruciate ligament insertion: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9(4):194-199.
5.
Carter C., Wilkinson J.Persistent joint laxity and congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1964;46:40-45.
6.
Colombet P., Robinson J., Christel P., et al. Morphology of anterior cruciate ligament attachments for anatomic reconstruction: a cadaveric dissection and radiographic study. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(9):984-992.
7.
Cuomo P., Rama KR, Bull AM, Amis AAThe effects of different tensioning strategies on knee laxity and graft tension after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction . Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(12):2083-2090.
8.
Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G., Stone ML, Sachs R., Burks R.Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:720-726.
9.
Edwards A., Bull AM, Amis AAThe attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament. Part 1: tibial attachment. KneeSurg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(12):1414-1421.
10.
Edwards A., Bull AM, Amis AAThe attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament. Part 2: femoral attachment. KneeSurg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(1):29-36.
11.
Ferretti M. , Ekdahl M., Shen W., Fu FHOsseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study . Arthroscopy . 2007;23(11):1218-1225.
12.
Flandry F., Hunt JP, Terry GC, Hughston JCAnalysis of subjective knee complaints using visual analog scales . Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:112-118.
13.
Gabriel MT, Wong EK, Woo SL, Yagi M., Debski REDistribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(1):85-89.
14.
Galway HR, MacIntosh DLThe lateral pivot shift: a symptom and sign of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 ;147:45-50.
Giron F., Buzzi R., Aglietti P.Femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using three techniques: a cadaver study. Arthroscopy. 1999;15(7):750-756.
Giron F., Cuomo P., Edwards A., Bull AMJ, Amis AA, Aglietti P.Double-bundle "anatomical" ACL reconstruction: a cadaver study of tunnel positioning with a transtibial technique. Arthroscopy . 2007;23(1):7-13.
19.
Hamada M., Shino K., Horibe S., et al. Single- versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with endoButton femoral fixation: a prospective study. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(8):801-807.
20.
Hoshino Y., Kuroda R., Nagamune K., et al. The effect of graft tensioning in anatomic 2-bundle ACL reconstruction on knee joint kinematics. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc . 2007;15(5):508-514.
21.
Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, et al. Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(5):600-613.
22.
Järvelä T.Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.2007 ;15(5):500-507.
23.
Järvelä T., Moisala AS, Sihvonen R., Järvelä S., Kannus P., Järvinen M.Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation: prospective, randomized, clinical study with 2-year results. Am J Sports Med.2008;36(2):290-297.
24.
Kondo E., Yasuda K., Azuma H., Tanabe Y., Yagi T.Prospective clinical comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive patients . Am J Sports Med. 2008 ;36(9):1675-1687.
25.
Mae T., Shino K., Matsumoto N., Hamada M., Yoneda M., Nakata K.Anatomical two-bundle versus Rosenberg’s isometric bi-socket ACL reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison in laxity match pretension . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 ;15(4):328-334.
26.
Mae T., Shino K., Miyama T., et al. Single- versus two-femoral socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique: biomechanical analysis using a robotic simulator . Arthroscopy. 2001;17(7):708-716.
27.
Mochizuki T. , Muneta T., Nagase T., Shirasawa S., Akita KI, Sekiya I.Cadaveric knee observation study for describing anatomic femoral tunnel placement for two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(4):356-361.
28.
Muneta T., Koga H., Morito T., Yagishita K., Sekiya I.A retrospective study of the midterm outcome of two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadrupled semitendinosus tendon in comparison with one-bundle reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2006; 22(3):252-258.
29.
Outerbridge REThe etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43:752-757.
30.
Petersen W. , Zantop T.Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament with regard to its two bundles. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:35-47.
31.
Radford WJ, Amis AABiomechanics of a double prosthetic ligament in the anterior cruciate deficient knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 ;72(6):1038-1043.
32.
Roos E., Roos G., Lohmander S., Ekdahl C., Beynnon B.Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998; 2:88-96.
33.
Siebold R., Dehler C., Ellert T.Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(2):137-145.
34.
Siebold R., Ellert T., Metz S., Metz J.Femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry and arthroscopic orientation models for double-bundle bone tunnel placement. A cadaver study. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(5): 585-592.
35.
Streich NA, Friedrich K., Gotterbarm T., Schmitt H.Reconstruction of the ACL with a semitendinosus tendon graft: a prospective randomized single blinded comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle technique in male athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc . 2008;16(3):232-238.
36.
Takahashi M. , Doi M., Abe M., Suzuki D., Nagano A.Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 2006 ;34(5):787-792.
37.
Tsuda E., Ishibashi Y., Fukuda A., Tsukada H., Toh S.Comparable results between lateralized single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions . Clin Orthop Relat Res.2009;467(4):1042-1055.
38.
Tsukada H., Ishibashi Y., Tsuda E., Fukuda A., Toh S.Anatomical analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral and tibial footprints . J Orthop Sci. 2008;13(2):122-129.
39.
Yagi M., Kuroda R., Nagamune K., Yoshiya S., Kurosaka M.Double-bundle ACL reconstruction can improve rotational stability . Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:100-107.
40.
Yagi M., Kuroda R., Yoshiya S., Kurosaka M.Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the Japanese experience . Oper Tech Orthop. 2005;15(2):116-122.
41.
Yagi M., Wong EK, Kanamori A., Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SLY.Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction . Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(5):660-666.
42.
Yamamoto Y. , Hsu WH, Woo SLY, Van Scyoc AH, Takakura Y., Debski REKnee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a comparison of a lateral and an anatomical femoral tunnel placement. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(8):1825-1832.
43.
Yasuda K., Ichiyama H., Kondo E., Miyatake S., Inoue M., Tanabe Y.An in vivo biomechanical study on the tension-versus-knee flexion angle curves of 2 grafts in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of initial tension and internal tibial rotation. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(3):276-284.
44.
Yasuda K., Kondo E., Ichiyama H., et al. Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(10): 1015-1025.
45.
Yasuda K., Kondo E., Ichiyama H., Tanabe Y., Tohyama H.Surgical and biomechanical concepts of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Oper Tech Orthop. 2005;15(2):96-102.
46.
Zantop T., Herbort M., Raschke MJ, Fu FH, Petersen W.The role of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior tibial translation and internal rotation. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(2):223-227.
47.
Zantop T., Petersen W., Sekiya JK, Musahl V., Fu FHAnterior cruciate ligament anatomy and function relating to anatomical reconstruction . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 ;14(10):982-992.
