Background: The function of the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) during gait has not been reported.
Hypothesis: The AM and PL bundles have distinct functional behavior during the stance phase of treadmill gait.
Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study.
Methods: Three-dimensional models of the knee were created by magnetic resonance images from 8 healthy subjects. The contour of the 2 bundle attachments were constructed on each model. Each bundle was represented by a straight line connecting its tibial and femoral attachment centroids. Next, the knee kinematics during the stance phase of gait was determined with a dual fluoroscopic imaging system. The relative elongation, sagittal plane elevation, coronal plane elevation, and transverse plane deviation of the 2 bundles were measured directly from heel strike to toe-off.
Results: At heel strike, the AM and PL bundles had first peak elongation of 9% ± 7% and 9% ± 13%, respectively. At 50% progress of the stance phase, both bundles were maximally elongated, 12% ± 7% for the AM bundle and 13% ± 15% for the PL bundle. No significant difference was found for each bundle between 40% and 60% of the stance phase (P > .05). With increasing knee flexion, the sagittal plane and coronal plane elevations of the 2 bundles decreased, whereas the deviation angles increased.
Conclusion: Both bundles are anisometric and function in a similar manner during the stance phase of gait. They were maximally elongated throughout the midstance where they were stretched maximally to resist anterior tibial translation.
Clinical relevance: This information can be useful for further improving anatomical ACL reconstructions to better reproduce the 2 bundle functions. It may also be useful for designing postoperative rehabilitation regimens to prevent overstretch of the grafts.
AmisAADawkinsGP. Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament: fibre bundle actions related to ligament replacements and injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73(2):260-267.
2.
AsagumoHKimuraMKobayashiYTakiMTakagishiK. Anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using double-bundle hamstring tendons: surgical techniques, clinical outcomes, and complications. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(6):602-609.
3.
BeynnonBHoweJGPopeMHJohnsonRJFlemingBC. The measurement of anterior cruciate ligament strain in vivo. Int Orthop. 1992;16(1):1-12.
4.
BeynnonBDFlemingBC. Anterior cruciate ligament strain in-vivo: a review of previous work. J Biomech. 1998;31(6):519-525.
5.
BeynnonBDFlemingBCJohnsonRJ. Anterior cruciate ligament strain behavior during rehabilitation exercises in vivo. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(1):24-34.
6.
BeynnonBDJohnsonRJFlemingBCStankewichCJRenstromPANicholsCE. The strain behavior of the anterior cruciate ligament during squatting and active flexion-extension: a comparison of an open and a closed kinetic chain exercise. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25(6):823-829.
7.
BeynnonBDUhBSJohnsonRJ. Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of programs administered over 2 different time intervals. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(3):347-359.
8.
BlahaJDMancinelliCASimonsWHKishVLThyagarajanG. Kinematics of the human knee using an open chain cadaver model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:25-34.
9.
CerulliGBenoitDLLamontagneMCaraffaALitiA. In vivo anterior cruciate ligament strain behaviour during a rapid deceleration movement: case report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;11(5):307-311.
EdwardsABullAMAmisAA. The attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament. Part 2: femoral attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(1):29-36.
12.
FlemingBCBeynnonBDRenstromPA. The strain behavior of the anterior cruciate ligament during stair climbing: an in vivo study. Arthroscopy. 1999;15(2):185-191.
13.
FlemingBCBeynnonBDRenstromPAPeuraGDNicholsCEJohnsonRJ. The strain behavior of the anterior cruciate ligament during bicycling: an in vivo study. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26(1):109-118.
14.
FlemingBCOhlenGRenstromPAPeuraGDBeynnonBDBadgerGJ. The effects of compressive load and knee joint torque on peak anterior cruciate ligament strains. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(5):701-707.
15.
FlemingBCRenstromPABeynnonBD. The effect of weightbearing and external loading on anterior cruciate ligament strain. J Biomech. 2001;34(2):163-170.
16.
FreemanMAPinskerovaV. The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech. 2005;38(2):197-208.
17.
GabrielMTWongEKWooSLYagiMDebskiRE. Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(1):85-89.
18.
GirgisFGMarshallJLMonajemA. The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint: anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;106:216-231.
19.
HosseiniAGillTJLiG. In vivo anterior cruciate ligament elongation in response to axial tibial loads. J Orthop Sci. 2009;14(3):298-306.
20.
IwakiHPinskerovaVFreemanMA. Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(8):1189-1195.
21.
JordanSSDeFrateLENhaKWPapannagariRGillTJLiG. The in vivo kinematics of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament during weightbearing knee flexion. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(4):547-554.
22.
KondoEYasudaK. Second-look arthroscopic evaluations of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: relation with postoperative knee stability. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(11):1198-1209.
23.
KooSAndriacchiTP. The knee joint center of rotation is predominantly on the lateral side during normal walking. J Biomech. 2008;41(6):1269-1273.
24.
KopfSMusahlVTashmanSSzczodryMShenWFuFH. A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(3):213-219.
25.
KozanekMHosseiniALiuF. Tibiofemoral kinematics and condylar motion during the stance phase of gait. J Biomech. 2009;42(12):1877-1884.
26.
LiGDefrateLERubashHEGillTJ. In vivo kinematics of the ACL during weight-bearing knee flexion. J Orthop Res. 2005;23(2):340-344.
27.
LiGKozanekMHosseiniALiuFVan de VeldeSKRubashHE. New fluoroscopic imaging technique for investigation of 6 DOF knee kinematics during treadmill gait. J Orthop Surg Res. 2009;4:6.
28.
LiGRudyTWSakaneMKanamoriAMaCBWooSL. The importance of quadriceps and hamstring muscle loading on knee kinematics and in-situ forces in the ACL. J Biomech. 1999;32(4):395-400.
29.
LiGVan de VeldeSKBinghamJT. Validation of a non-invasive fluoroscopic imaging technique for the measurement of dynamic knee joint motion. J Biomech. 2008;41(7):1616-1622.
30.
LiGZayontzSMostEDeFrateLESuggsJFRubashHE. In situ forces of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments in high knee flexion: an in vitro investigation. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(2):293-297.
31.
LoJMullerOWunschelMBauerSWulkerN. Forces in anterior cruciate ligament during simulated weight-bearing flexion with anterior and internal rotational tibial load. J Biomech. 2008;41(9):1855-1861.
MarkolfKLGorekJFKaboJMShapiroMS. Direct measurement of resultant forces in the anterior cruciate ligament: an in vitro study performed with a new experimental technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(4):557-567.
34.
MarkolfKLParkSJacksonSRMcAllisterDR. Anterior-posterior and rotatory stability of single and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(1):107-118.
35.
MarkolfKLParkSJacksonSRMcAllisterDR. Contributions of the posterolateral bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament to anterior-posterior knee laxity and ligament forces. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(7):805-809.
36.
OtsuboHShinoKNakamuraNNakataKNakagawaSKoyanagiM. Arthroscopic evaluation of ACL grafts reconstructed with the anatomical two-bundle technique using hamstring tendon autograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(6):720-728.
37.
PearleADShannonFJGranchiCWickiewiczTLWarrenRF. Comparison of 3-dimensional obliquity and anisometric characteristics of anterior cruciate ligament graft positions using surgical navigation. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(8):1534-1541.
38.
RobinsonJStanfordFCKendoffDStuberVPearleAD. Replication of the range of native anterior cruciate ligament fiber length change behavior achieved by different grafts: measurement using computer-assisted navigation. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:1406-1411.
39.
RosenMAJacksonDWAtwellEA. The efficacy of continuous passive motion in the rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(2):122-127.
40.
SakaneMFoxRJWooSLLivesayGALiGFuFH. In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads. J Orthop Res. 1997;15(2):285-293.
41.
ShelbourneKBPandyMGAndersonFCTorryMR. Pattern of anterior cruciate ligament force in normal walking. J Biomech. 2004;37(6):797-805.
42.
SieboldREllertTMetzSMetzJ. Tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry, arthroscopic landmarks, and orientation model for bone tunnel placement. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(2):154-161.
43.
WuJ-LSeonJKGadikotaHR. In-situ forces in the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament under simulated functional loading conditions. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(3):558-563.
44.
YasudaKIchiyamaHKondoEMiyatakeSInoueMTanabeY. An in vivo biomechanical study on the tension-versus-knee flexion angle curves of 2 grafts in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of initial tension and internal tibial rotation. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(3):276-284.
45.
YasudaKKondoEIchiyamaH. Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(10):1015-1025.
46.
YooJDPapannagariRParkSEDeFrateLEGillTJLiG. The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on knee joint kinematics under simulated muscle loads. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(2):240-246.
