Are Navigation Systems Accurate Enough to Predict the Correction Angle During High Tibial Osteotomy?

Abstract

Background:

Unpredicted overcorrection of the mechanical axis can occur during navigation-assisted high tibial osteotomy (HTO). It is not clear whether the erroneous overcorrection stems from the navigation system itself or from other causes.

Purpose:

To evaluate the accuracy of the navigation system in HTO by comparing the change in the femorotibial angle provided by the navigation system with the bony correction angle of the proximal tibia on 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) and with the change in mechanical femorotibial alignment on standing whole-leg radiographs.

Study Design:

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

A total of 16 knees underwent navigation-assisted HTO, and their alignment data were obtained before and after correction. For comparison, preoperative and follow-up standing whole-leg anteroposterior radiographs, lateral knee radiographs, and preoperative and postoperative 3D CT scans were taken. The medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), posterior tibial slope, and mechanical femorotibial angle (mFTA) were measured in these images, and the 3 coronal and 3 sagittal correction angles were compared with each other.

Results:

In the coronal plane, the mean correction angle of the navigation system was 9.3° ± 2.0° valgus (range, 6°-13°), and the mean MPTA on 3D CT increased 9.7° ± 2.0° (range, 6.7°-13.8°) after correction. The mean correction angle of the mFTA on standing radiographs was 11.9° ± 3.2° valgus (range, 6.9°-16.5°). There was no statistical significance between the navigation system and 3D CT (P = .187), but there was a statistically significant difference between the navigation system and standing radiographs (P = .001). The results of the correction angle in the sagittal plane were similar to those in the coronal plane.

Conclusion:

The correction of the femorotibial angle by the navigation system was not different from the bony correction angle on 3D CT. There was a discrepancy between the correction angle of the navigation system and that of the standing radiograph.

Clinical Significance:

Surgeons must be cautious about the tension of soft tissue, even when using the navigation system during HTO.

Keywords

navigation high tibial osteotomy correction angle accuracy computer-assisted surgery

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akagi

Nonaka

Tsujimoto

Asano

Hamanishi

. An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:213-219.

Akamatsu

Mitsugi

Mochida

. et al. Navigated opening wedge high tibial osteotomy improves intraoperative correction angle compared with conventional method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(3):586-593.

Blakeney

Khan

Wall

. Computer-assisted techniques versus conventional guides for component alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(15):1377-1384.

Chin

Yang

Yeo

. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(5):618-626.

Coventry

Ilstrup

Wallrichs

. Proximal tibial osteotomy: a critical long-term study of eighty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(2):196-201.

El-Azab

Morgenstern

Ahrens

Schuster

Imhoff

Lorenz

. Limb alignment after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and its effect on the clinical outcome. Orthopedics. 2011;34(10):e622-e628.

Fleiss

. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: Wiley; 1986.

Fujisawa

Masuhara

Shiomi

. The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee: an arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints. Orthop Clin North Am. 1979;10(3):585-608.

Goleski

Warkentine

Gyuricza

Kendoff

Pearle

. Reliability of navigated lower limb alignment in high tibial osteotomies. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(11):2179-2186.

10.

Hankemeier

Hufner

Wang

. et al. Navigated open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: advantages and disadvantages compared to the conventional technique in a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(10):917-921.

11.

Hankemeier

Hufner

Wang

. et al. Navigated intraoperative analysis of lower limb alignment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125(8):531-535.

12.

Hernigou

Medevielle

Debeyre

Goutallier

. Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity: a ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(3):332-354.

13.

Huang

Hsu

Peng

Hsu

Weng

Shen

. Total knee arthroplasty with use of computer-assisted navigation compared with conventional guiding systems in the same patient: radiographic results in Asian patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(13):1197-1202.

14.

Insall

Shoji

Mayer

. High tibial osteotomy: a five-year evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56(7):1397-1405.

15.

Insall

Joseph

Msika

. High tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis: a long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(7):1040-1048.

16.

Ivarsson

Myrnerts

Gillquist

. High tibial osteotomy for medial osteoarthritis of the knee: a 5 to 7 and 11 year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(2):238-244.

17.

Jackson

. Osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee in Proceedings and Reports of Universities, Colleges, Councils and Associations. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1958;40(4):826.

18.

Jackson

Waugh

. Tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. Proc R Soc Med. 1960;53(10):888.

19.

Jakob

Murphy

. Tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis: indication, planning, and operative technique. Instr Course Lect. 1992;41:87-93.

20.

Kawakami

Sugano

Yonenobu

. et al. Effects of rotation on measurement of lower limb alignment for knee osteotomy. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(6):1248-1253.

21.

Kendoff

Board

Citak

. et al. Navigated lower limb axis measurements: influence of mechanical weight-bearing simulation. J Orthop Res. 2008;26(4):553-561.

22.

Kendoff

Citak

Pearle

. et al. Influence of lower limb rotation in navigated alignment analysis: implications for high tibial osteotomies. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(8):1003-1008.

23.

Kim

Koh

Chun

Kim

Park

Sung

. Medial opening wedge high-tibial osteotomy using a kinematic navigation system versus a conventional method: a 1-year retrospective, comparative study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(2):128-134.

24.

Lee

Nha

Park

Han

. Preoperative and postoperative comparisons of navigation and radiologic limb alignment measurements after high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(12):1842-1850.

25.

Marti

Gautier

Wachtl

Jakob

. Accuracy of frontal and sagittal plane correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(4):366-372.

26.

McDaniel

Mitchell

Charles

Kraus

. A comparison of five approaches to measurement of anatomic knee alignment from radiographs. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18(2):273-277.

27.

Molli

Anderson

Buehler

Markel

. Computer-assisted navigation software advancements improve the accuracy of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(3):432-438.

28.

Reising

Strohm

Hauschild

. et al. Computer-assisted navigation for the intraoperative assessment of lower limb alignment in high tibial osteotomy can avoid outliers compared with the conventional technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(1):181-188.

29.

Sabharwal

Zhao

. Assessment of lower limb alignment: supine fluoroscopy compared with a standing full-length radiograph. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(1):43-51.

30.

Schröter

Ihle

Mueller

Lobenhoffer

Stöckle

van Heerwaarden

. Digital planning of high tibial osteotomy: interrater reliability by using two different software. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(1):189-196.

31.

Sim

Kwak

Yang

Choi

Lee

. Effect of weight-bearing on the alignment after open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(7):874-878.

32.

Sprenger

Doerzbacher

. Tibial osteotomy for the treatment of varus gonarthrosis: survival and failure analysis to twenty-two years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(3):469-474.

33.

Utzschneider

Goettinger

Weber

. et al. Development and validation of a new method for the radiologic measurement of the tibial slope. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(10):1643-1648.

34.

Wang

Bae

Lim

Shon

Kim

Cho

. Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(12):2411-2418.

35.

Yoo

Chang

Shin

Seong

Kim

. Anatomical references to assess the posterior tibial slope in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of 5 anatomical axes. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(4):586-592.

36.

Zhang

Chen

Chai

Liu

Wang

. Comparison between computer-assisted navigation and conventional total knee arthroplasties in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral procedures: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(13):1190-1196.