The incidence of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is high. Often, return-to-sport (RTS) tests of strength and functional hopping rely on limb symmetry indices (LSIs) to identify deficits, although the utility of these measures in athletes with bilateral ACL injuries is unknown.
Purpose/Hypothesis:
The aim of this study was to investigate if LSIs used as RTS criteria in female patients after unilateral ACLR were appropriate for female patients with bilateral ACL involvement. The hypothesis tested was that asymmetries with traditional LSI measures would be present in a population after unilateral ACLR but would not be present in a population with bilateral ACLR due to the lack of a healthy internal control limb.
Study Design:
Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
A total of 45 female subjects were classified into 3 groups: after second (contralateral) ACLR (ACLR-B; n = 15); after primary unilateral ACLR (ACLR-U; n = 15); and uninjured controls (CTRL; n = 15). After being cleared for RTS, each subject completed a single-legged hop for distance (SLHD), triple hop for distance (THD), and triple-crossover hop for distance (CHD) test, in addition to an isometric quadriceps strength test on both limbs. Means and LSI ([involved limb/uninvolved limb] × 100) were calculated for each test. Limb symmetry deficits were defined by LSI <90%.
Results:
Analysis of functional hop testing revealed a side × group interaction for SLHD (P = .001), THD (P = .019), and CHD (P = .04). Side-to-side differences were found in the ACLR-U group for all hop tests (P = .001-.003) and in the ACLR-B group for SLHD (P = .002) and THD tests (P = .024). No side-to side differences were seen in the CTRL group (P > .05). A side × group interaction was found for isometric quadriceps strength (P = .006), with lower LSI seen in the ACLR-U group (81% ± 17.6%) compared with the CTRL group (102.2% ± 10.8%) and the ACLR-B group (95.6% ± 24.9%). Although no interaction was seen, side-to-side differences were noted in the THD in the ACLR-U group (P = .013) and ACLR-B group (P = .024) and in the CHD in the ACLR-U group (P = .001). Despite absence of an LSI deficit, bilateral peak quadriceps strength in the ACLR-B group was comparable to the involved limb of the ACLR-U group and less than in the CTRL group (P = .012).
Conclusion:
Both the ACLR-U and the ACLR-B groups demonstrated side-to-side deficits during functional hop tests; however, these deficits were not identified according to the clinically accepted LSI values of ≥90%, calling into question the efficacy of current RTS criteria. At the time of RTS, only individuals in the ACLR-U group demonstrated an altered LSI in quadriceps strength. Significantly lower quadriceps strength of both limbs in the ACLR-B group was seen compared with the CTRL group, despite no LSI deficits in quadriceps strength. Current use of LSIs during strength and performance tests may not be an appropriate means of identifying residual deficits in female patients after bilateral ACLR at time of RTS. Furthermore, a better indicator of strength performance in this population may need to include a comparison of strength performance values to the normative values of healthy controls.
AdamsDLogerstedtDSHunter-GiordanoAAxeMJSnyder-MacklerL. Current concepts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a criterion-based rehabilitation progression. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(7):601-614.
2.
AgebergEPetterssonAFridenT. 15-year follow-up of neuromuscular function in patients with unilateral nonreconstructed anterior cruciate ligament injury initially treated with rehabilitation and activity modification: a longitudinal prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(12):2109-2117.
3.
AgebergERoosHPSilbernagelKGThomeeRRoosEM. Knee extension and flexion muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft or hamstring tendons graft: a cross-sectional comparison 3 years post surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(2):162-169.
4.
AgebergEThomeeRNeeterCSilbernagelKGRoosEM. Muscle strength and functional performance in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury treated with training and surgical reconstruction or training only: a two to five-year followup. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(12):1773-1779.
5.
AgelJArendtEABershadskyB. Anterior cruciate ligament injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association basketball and soccer: a 13-year review. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(4):524-530.
6.
ArdernCLTaylorNFFellerJAWebsterKE. Return-to-sport outcomes at 2 to 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(1):41-48.
7.
ArdernCLWebsterKETaylorNFFellerJA. Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(7):596-606.
8.
BarberSDNoyesFRMangineREMcCloskeyJWHartmanW. Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;255:204-214.
9.
Barber-WestinSDNoyesFR. Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(12):1697-1705.
10.
Barber-WestinSDNoyesFR. Objective criteria for return to athletics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and subsequent reinjury rates: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed. 2011;39(3):100-110.
11.
BaumgartCSchubertMHoppeMWGokelerAFreiwaldJ. Do ground reaction forces during unilateral and bilateral movements exhibit compensation strategies following ACL reconstruction [published online May 10, 2015]?Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3623-7.
12.
BeynnonBDJohnsonRJFlemingBC. The science of anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;402:9-20.
BroskyJAJrNitzAJMaloneTRCabornDNRayensMK. Intrarater reliability of selected clinical outcome measures following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999;29(1):39-48.
15.
ChandyTAGranaWA. Secondary school athletic injury in boys and girls: a three-year comparison. J Pediatr Orthop. 1985;5(5):629.
16.
ChmielewskiTL. Asymmetrical lower extremity loading after ACL reconstruction: more than meets the eye. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(6):374-376.
17.
Coats-ThomasMSMirandaDLBadgerGJFlemingBC. Effects of ACL reconstruction surgery on muscle activity of the lower limb during a jump-cut maneuver in males and females. J Orthop Res. 2013;31(12):1890-1896.
18.
DanielDMStoneMLDobsonBEFithianDCRossmanDJKaufmanKR. Fate of the ACL-injured patient: a prospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22(5):632-644.
19.
DeckerMJTorryMRNoonanTJRiviereASterettWI. Landing adaptations after ACL reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(9):1408-1413.
20.
EllmanMBShermanSLForsytheBLaPradeRFColeBJBachBR. Return to play following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(5):283-296.
21.
Engelen-van MelickNvan CingelRETijssenMPNijhuis-van der SandenMW. Assessment of functional performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of measurement procedures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(4):869-879.
FaltstromAHagglundMKvistJ. Patient-reported knee function, quality of life, and activity level after bilateral anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(12):2805-2813.
24.
FerrettiAPapandreaPConteducaFMarianiPP. Knee ligament injuries in volleyball players. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(2):203-207.
25.
FitzgeraldGKLephartSMHwangJHWainnerRS. Hop tests as predictors of dynamic knee stability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001;31(10):588-597.
26.
FitzgeraldGKPivaSRIrrgangJJ. A modified neuromuscular electrical stimulation protocol for quadriceps strength training following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(9):492-501.
27.
GoddardMSalmonLWallerAPapapetrosEPinczewskiLA. Incidence of graft rupture 15 years after bilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a case-control study. Bone Joint J. 2013;95(6):798-802.
28.
GokelerAHofALArnoldMPDijkstraPUPostemaKOttenE. Abnormal landing strategies after ACL reconstruction. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(1):e12-e19.
29.
GrindemHLogerstedtDEitzenI. Single-legged hop tests as predictors of self-reported knee function in nonoperatively treated individuals with anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(11):2347-2354.
30.
HarrisJDAbramsGDBachBR. Return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2014;37(2):e103-e108.
31.
HuiCSalmonLJKokAMaenoSLinklaterJPinczewskiLA. Fifteen-year outcome of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft for “isolated” anterior cruciate ligament tear. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(1):89-98.
32.
ItohHKurosakaMYoshiyaSIchihashiNMizunoK. Evaluation of functional deficits determined by four different hop tests in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6(4):241-245.
33.
KeaysSLBullock-SaxtonJENewcombePKeaysAC. The relationship between knee strength and functional stability before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Res. 2003;21(2):231-237.
34.
KvistJ. Rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament injury: current recommendations for sports participation. Sports Med. 2004;34(4):269-280.
35.
LephartSMKocherMSHarnerCDFuFH. Quadriceps strength and functional capacity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon autograft versus allograft. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21(5):738-743.
36.
LephartSMPerrinDHFuFHGieckJHMcCueFCIrrgangJJ. Relationship between selected physical characteristics and functional capacity in the anterior cruciate ligament-insufficient athlete. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1992;16(4):174-181.
37.
LeysTSalmonLWallerALinklaterJPinczewskiL. Clinical results and risk factors for reinjury 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(3):595-605.
38.
LynchADLogerstedtDSGrindemH. Consensus criteria for defining “successful outcome” after ACL injury and reconstruction: a Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort investigation. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(5):335-342.
39.
MattacolaCGPerrinDHGansnederBMGieckJHSalibaENMcCueFC3rd. Strength, functional outcome, and postural stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Athl Train. 2002;37(3):262-268.
40.
MihataLCBeutlerAIBodenBP. Comparing the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury in collegiate lacrosse, soccer, and basketball players: implications for anterior cruciate ligament mechanism and prevention. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(6):899-904.
41.
MollerEWeidenhielmLWernerS. Outcome and knee-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a long-term follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(7):786-794.
42.
MunroAGHerringtonLC. Between-session reliability of four hop tests and the agility T-test. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(5):1470-1477.
43.
MyerGDSchmittLCBrentJL. Utilization of modified NFL combine testing to identify functional deficits in athletes following ACL reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(6):377-387.
44.
NeitzelJAKernozekTWDaviesGJ. Loading response following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during the parallel squat exercise. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002;17(7):551-554.
45.
NoyesFRBarberSDMangineRE. Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19(5):513-518.
46.
OberländerKDBrüggemannGPHöherJKaramanidisK. Altered landing mechanics in ACL-reconstructed patients. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(3):506-513.
47.
OrishimoKFKremenicIJMullaneyMJMcHughMPNicholasSJ. Adaptations in single-leg hop biomechanics following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(11):1587-1593.
48.
OtzelDMChowJWTillmanMD. Long-term deficits in quadriceps strength and activation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther Sport. 2015;16(1):22-28.
49.
PaternoMVFordKRMyerGDHeylRHewettTE. Limb asymmetries in landing and jumping 2 years following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin J Sport Med. 2007;17(4):258-262.
50.
PaternoMVRauhMJSchmittLCFordKRHewettTE. Incidence of contralateral and ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after primary ACL reconstruction and return to sport. Clin J Sport Med. 2012;22(2):116-121.
51.
PaternoMVRauhMJSchmittLCFordKRHewettTE. Incidence of second ACL injuries 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(7):1567-1573.
52.
PaternoMVSchmittLCFordKRRauhMJMyerGDHewettTE. Effects of sex on compensatory landing strategies upon return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(8):553-559.
53.
PetschnigRBaronRAlbrechtM. The relationship between isokinetic quadriceps strength test and hop tests for distance and one-legged vertical jump test following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28(1):23-31.
54.
PinczewskiLALymanJSalmonLJRussellVJRoeJLinklaterJ. A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(4):564-574.
55.
ReidABirminghamTBStratfordPWAlcockGKGiffinJR.Hop testing provides a reliable and valid outcome measure during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther. 2007;87(3):337-349.
56.
RisbergMAHolmI. The long-term effect of 2 postoperative rehabilitation programs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled clinical trial with 2 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(10):1958-1966.
57.
RisbergMAHolmIEkelandA. Reliability of functional knee tests in normal athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1995;5(1):24-28.
58.
RisbergMAHolmITjomslandOLjunggrenEEkelandA. Prospective study of changes in impairments and disabilities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999;29(7):400-412.
59.
RohmanESteubsJTTompkinsM. Changes in involved and uninvolved limb function during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: implications for limb symmetry index measures. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(6):1391-1398.
60.
RudolphKSAxeMJSnyder-MacklerL. Dynamic stability after ACL injury: who can hop?Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(5):262-269.
61.
SalemGJSalinasRHardingFV. Bilateral kinematic and kinetic analysis of the squat exercise after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(8):1211-1216.
62.
SalmonLRussellVMusgroveTPinczewskiLRefshaugeK. Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(8):948-957.
63.
SchmittLCPaternoMVFordKRMyerGDHewettTE. Strength asymmetry and landing mechanics at return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(7):1426-1434.
64.
SchmittLCPaternoMVHewettTE. The impact of quadriceps femoris strength asymmetry on functional performance at return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(9):750-759.
65.
SheaKGCareyJL. Management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries: evidence-based guideline. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(5):e1-e5.
66.
SheaKGGrimmNLEwingCKAokiSK. Youth sports anterior cruciate ligament and knee injury epidemiology: who is getting injured? In what sports? When?Clin Sports Med. 2011;30(4):691-706.
67.
TanSHLauBPKhinLWLingarajK. The importance of patient sex in the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(1):242-254.
68.
ThomasACVillwockMWojtysEMPalmieri-SmithRM. Lower extremity muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. J Athl Train. 2013;48(5):610-620.
69.
ThomeeRKaplanYKvistJ. Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(11):1798-1805.
70.
ThomeeRNeeterCGustavssonA. Variability in leg muscle power and hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(6):1143-1151.
71.
WilkKERomanielloWTSosciaSMArrigoCAAndrewsJR. The relationship between subjective knee scores, isokinetic testing, and functional testing in the ACL-reconstructed knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994;20(2):60-73.
72.
WojtysEMHustonLJ. Longitudinal effects of anterior cruciate ligament injury and patellar tendon autograft reconstruction on neuromuscular performance. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(3):336-344.
WrightRWDunnWRAmendolaA. Risk of tearing the intact anterior cruciate ligament in the contralateral knee and rupturing the anterior cruciate ligament graft during the first 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective MOON cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(7):1131-1134.
