Bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) grafts are generally believed to heal more quickly than soft tissue grafts after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but little is known about the time course of healing or motion of the grafts within the bone tunnels.
Hypothesis:
Graft-tunnel motion will be greater in hamstring (HS) grafts compared with BTB grafts and will be less at 1 year than at 6 weeks.
Study Design:
Controlled laboratory study.
Methods:
Twelve patients underwent anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction using HS or BTB autografts (6 per group) with six 0.8-mm tantalum beads embedded in each graft. Dynamic stereo x-ray images were collected at 6 weeks and 1 year during treadmill walking and stair descent and at 1 year during treadmill running. Tibiofemoral kinematics and bead positions were evaluated. Graft-tunnel motion was based on bead range of motion during the loading response phase (first 10%) of the gait cycle.
Results:
During treadmill walking, there was no difference in femoral tunnel or tibial tunnel motion between BTB or HS grafts at 6 weeks (BTB vs HS: 2.00 ± 1.05 vs 1.25 ± 0.67 mm [femoral tunnel]; 1.20 ± 0.63 vs 1.27 ± 0.71 mm [tibial tunnel]), or 1 year (BTB vs HS: 1.62 ± 0.76 vs 1.08 ± 0.26 mm [femoral tunnel]; 1.58 ± 0.75 vs 1.68 ± 0.53 mm [tibial tunnel]). During stair descent, there was no difference in femoral or tibial tunnel motion between BTB and HS grafts at 6 weeks or 1 year. With running, there was no difference between graft types at 1 year. For all results, P values were > .05. Knee kinematics were consistent with the literature.
Conclusion:
During walking and stair descent, ACL reconstruction using suspensory fixation yielded no difference between graft types in femoral or tibial tunnel motion at 6 weeks or 1 year. All subjects were asymptomatic with knee kinematics similar to that of the literature. The significance of persistent, small (1 to 3 mm) movements at 1 year for healing or graft performance is unknown.
Clinical Relevance:
These study results may have significant implications for graft choice, rehabilitation strategies, and timing for return to sports.
AlberiusP.Bone reactions to tantalum markers. A scanning electron microscopic study. Acta Anat (Basel). 1983;115(4):310-318.
2.
AllardPCappozzoALundbergA (eds). Three-Dimensional Analysis of Human Locomotion. New York, NY: Wiley; 1998.
3.
AnderstWZauelRBishopJDempsETashmanS.Validation of three-dimensional model-based tibio-femoral tracking during running. Med Eng Phys. 2009;31(1):10-16.
4.
ArakiDKurodaRMatsumotoT. Three-dimensional analysis of bone tunnel changes after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using multidetector-row computed tomography. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(9):2234-2241.
5.
BarrettGRBrownTD.Femoral tunnel defect filled with a synthetic dowel graft for a single-staged revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(7):796e1-796e4.
6.
BarrettGRNoojinFKHartzogCWNashCR.Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in females: a comparison of hamstring versus patellar tendon autograft. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(1):46-54.
7.
BeardDJMurrayDWGillHS. Reconstruction does not reduce tibial translation in the cruciate-deficient knee an in vivo study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(8):1098-1103.
8.
BeyMJZauelRBrockSKTashmanS.Validation of a new model-based tracking technique for measuring three-dimensional, in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics. J Biomech Eng. 2006;128(4):604-609.
9.
BeynnonBDFlemingBC.Anterior cruciate ligament strain in-vivo: a review of previous work. J Biomech. 1998;31(6):519-525.
10.
BrandssonSKarlssonJSwardLKartusJErikssonBIKarrholmJ.Kinematics and laxity of the knee joint after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: pre- and postoperative radiostereometric studies. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(3):361-367.
11.
BrownCHJrWilsonDRHeckerATFerragamoM.Graft-bone motion and tensile properties of hamstring and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament femoral graft fixation under cyclic loading. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(9):922-935.
12.
CarpenterRDMajumdarSMaCB.Magnetic resonance imaging of 3-dimensional in vivo tibiofemoral kinematics in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(7):760-766.
13.
ChenKYinLChengLLiCChenCYangL.In vivo motion of femoral condyles during weight-bearing flexion after anterior cruciate ligament rupture using biplane radiography. J Sports Sci Med. 2013;12(3):579-587.
14.
EricksonBJHarrisJDFillinghamYA. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(6):731-738.
15.
FellerJAWebsterKE.A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(4):564-573.
16.
GianottiSMMarshallSWHumePABuntL.Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury and other knee ligament injuries: a national population-based study. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12(6):622-627.
17.
GlantzPOBjorlinGSundstromB.Tissue reactions to some dental implant materials. An in vivo study in white rats. Odontol Revy. 1975;26(3):231-238.
18.
GoldsteinJLVermaNMcNickleAGZelaznyAGhodadraNBachBRJr.Avoiding mismatch in allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: correlation between patient height and patellar tendon length. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(5):643-650.
19.
GroodESSuntayWJ.A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng. 1983;105(2):136-144.
20.
GulottaLVRodeoSA.Biology of autograft and allograft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 2007;26(4):509-524.
21.
HofbauerMThorhauerEDAbebeEBeyMTashmanS.Altered tibiofemoral kinematics in the affected knee and compensatory changes in the contralateral knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(11):2715-2721.
22.
IrrgangJJEnsekiKR.Rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction. In: FuFHCohenS, eds. Current Concepts in ACL Reconstruction. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 2008.
JanssenRPSchefflerSU.Intra-articular remodelling of hamstring tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(9):2102-2108.
25.
KimJGYangSJLeeYSShimJCRaHJChoiJY.The effects of hamstring harvesting on outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed patients: a comparative study between hamstring-harvested and -unharvested patients. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(9):1226-1234.
26.
LabouteESavalliLPuigP. Analysis of return to competition and repeat rupture for 298 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with patellar or hamstring tendon autograft in sportspeople. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;53(10):598-614.
27.
LiHTaoHChoSChenSYaoZChenS.Difference in graft maturity of the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament 2 years postoperatively: a comparison between autografts and allografts in young men using clinical and 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(7):1519-1526.
28.
LuiPZhangPChanKQinL.Biology and augmentation of tendon-bone insertion repair. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010;5:59.
29.
MascarenhasRTranovichMJKropfEJFuFHHarnerCD.Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the young athlete: a retrospective matched analysis with 2-10 year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(8):1520-1527.
30.
MillerSLGladstoneJN.Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop Clin North Am. 2002;33(4):675-683.
31.
MohtadiNGChanDSDaintyKNWhelanDB. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011(9):CD005960.
32.
MollerEWeidenhielmLWernerS.Outcome and knee-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a long-term follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(7):786-794.
33.
NoyesFRButlerDLGroodESZernickeRFHefzyMS.Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(3):344-352.
34.
PackerJDBediAFoxAJ. Effect of immediate and delayed high-strain loading on tendon-to-bone healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(9):770-777.
35.
PanniASMilanoGLucaniaLFabbricianiC.Graft healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in rabbits. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;343:203-212.
36.
PapageorgiouCDMaCBAbramowitchSDClineffTDWooSL.A multidisciplinary study of the healing of an intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament graft in a goat model. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(5):620-626.
37.
ParkMJLeeMCSeongSC.A comparative study of the healing of tendon autograft and tendon-bone autograft using patellar tendon in rabbits. Int Orthop. 2001;25(1):35-39.
38.
PinczewskiLADeehanDJSalmonLJRussellVJClingelefferA.A five-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(4):523-536.
39.
ReinhardtKRHetsroniIMarxRG.Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a level I systematic review comparing failure rates and functional outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010;41(2):249-262.
40.
RodeoSAArnoczkySPTorzilliPAHidakaCWarrenRF.Tendon-healing in a bone tunnel. A biomechanical and histological study in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(12):1795-1803.
41.
SalmonLRussellVMusgroveTPinczewskiLRefshaugeK.Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(8):948-957.
42.
SinghatatWLawhornKWHowellSMHullML.How four weeks of implantation affect the strength and stiffness of a tendon graft in a bone tunnel: a study of two fixation devices in an extraarticular model in ovine. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(4):506-513.
43.
SmithCHullMLHowellSM.Can markers injected into a single-loop anterior cruciate ligament graft define the axes of the tibial and femoral tunnels? A cadaveric study using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Biomech Eng. 2008;130(4):044503.
44.
SmithCKHullMLHowellSM.Does graft construct lengthening at the fixations cause an increase in anterior laxity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in vivo?J Biomech Eng. 2010; 132(8):081001.
45.
SmithCKHullMLHowellSM.Migration of radio-opaque markers injected into tendon grafts: a study using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). J Biomech Eng. 2005;127(5):887-890.
46.
TashmanSAnderstW.In-vivo measurement of dynamic joint motion using high speed biplane radiography and CT: application to canine ACL deficiency. J Biomech Eng. 2003;125(2):238-245.
47.
TashmanSCollonDAndersonKKolowichPAnderstW.Abnormal rotational knee motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(4):975-983.
48.
TashmanSKolowichPCollonDAndersonKAnderstW.Dynamic function of the ACL-reconstructed knee during running. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:66-73.
49.
TaylorDCDeBerardinoTMNelsonBJ. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial using similar femoral and tibial fixation methods. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(10):1946-1957.
50.
TomitaFYasudaKMikamiSSakaiTYamazakiSTohyamaH.Comparisons of intraosseous graft healing between the doubled flexor tendon graft and the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(5):461-476.
51.
TsudaEFukudaYLohJCDebskiREFuFHWooSL.The effect of soft-tissue graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on graft-tunnel motion under anterior tibial loading. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(9):960-967.
52.
VadalaAIorioRDe CarliA. The effect of accelerated, brace free, rehabilitation on bone tunnel enlargement after ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons: a CT study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(4):365-371.
53.
WagnerMKaabMJSchallockJHaasNPWeilerA.Hamstring tendon versus patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using biodegradable interference fit fixation: a prospective matched-group analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(9):1327-1336.
54.
WeberAEDelosDOlteanHN. Tibial and femoral tunnel changes after ACL reconstruction: a prospective 2-year longitudinal MRI study. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(5):1147-1156.
55.
WebsterKEFellerJAHameisterKA.Bone tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts with 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9(2):86-91.
56.
WenCYQinLLeeKMWongMWChanKM.Influence of bone adaptation on tendon-to-bone healing in bone tunnel after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a rabbit model. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(11):1447-1456.
57.
WestRVHarnerCD.Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(3):197-207.
58.
YasudaKvan EckCFHoshinoYFuFHTashmanS.Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 1: Basic science. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(8):1789-1799.
59.
ZitterHPlenkHJr.The electrochemical behavior of metallic implant materials as an indicator of their biocompatibility. J Biomed Mater Res. 1987;21(7):881-896.
