ACL Fibers Near the Lateral Intercondylar Ridge Are the Most Load Bearing During Stability Examinations and Isometric Through Passive Flexion

Abstract

Background:

The femoral insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has direct and indirect fiber types located within the respective high (anterior) and low (posterior) regions of the femoral footprint.

Hypothesis:

The fibers in the high region of the ACL footprint carry more force and are more isometric than the fibers in the low region of the ACL footprint.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were mounted to a robotic manipulator. A 134-N anterior force at 30° and 90° of flexion and combined valgus (8 N·m) and internal (4 N·m) rotation torques at 15° of flexion were applied simulating tests of anterior and rotatory stability. The ACL was sectioned at the femoral footprint by detaching either the higher band of fibers neighboring the lateral intercondylar ridge in the region of the direct insertion or the posterior, crescent-shaped fibers in the region of the indirect insertion, followed by the remainder of the ACL. The kinematics of the ACL-intact knee was replayed, and the reduction in force due to each sectioned portion of insertion fibers was measured. Isometry was assessed at anteromedial, center, and posterolateral locations within the high and low regions of the femoral footprint.

Results:

With an anterior tibial force at 30° of flexion, the high fibers carried 83.9% of the total anterior ACL load compared with 16.1% in the low fibers (P < .001). The high fibers also carried more anterior force than the low fibers at 90° of flexion (95.2% vs 4.8%; P < .001). Under combined torques at 15° of flexion, the high fibers carried 84.2% of the anterior ACL force compared with 15.8% in the low fibers (P < .001). Virtual ACL fibers placed at the anteromedial portion of the high region of the femoral footprint were the most isometric, with a maximum length change of 3.9 ± 1.5 mm.

Conclusion:

ACL fibers located high within the femoral footprint bear more force during stability testing and are more isometric during flexion than low fibers.

Clinical Relevance:

It may be advantageous to create a “higher” femoral tunnel during ACL reconstruction at the lateral intercondylar ridge.

Keywords

ACL direct insertion indirect insertion femoral footprint force isometry lateral intercondylar ridge

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Appel

Gradinger

Architektur des Kreuzbandaufbaus. Prakt Sport Traum Sportmed. 1989;1:19-23.

Araujo

Asai

Pinto

. ACL graft position affects in situ graft force following ACL reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(21):1767-1773.

Artmann

Wirth

CJ.

Investigation of the appropriate functional replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament [author’s transl]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1974;112(1):160-165.

Bedi

Musahl

Lane

Citak

Warren

Pearle

AD.

Lateral compartment translation predicts the grade of pivot shift: a cadaveric and clinical analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(9):1269-1276.

Bowers

Bedi

Lipman

. Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament tunnel position and graft obliquity with transtibial and anteromedial portal femoral tunnel reaming techniques using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(11):1511-1522.

Debski

Sakone

Woo

Wong

Warner

JJ.

Contribution of the passive properties of the rotator cuff to glenohumeral stability during anterior-posterior loading. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999;8(4):324-329.

Engebretsen

Wijdicks

Anderson

Westerhaus

LaPrade

RF.

Evaluation of a simulated pivot shift test: a biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(4):698-702.

Farrow

Chen

Cooperman

Victoroff

Goodfellow

DB.

Morphology of the femoral intercondylar notch. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(10):2150-2155.

Jordan

SS.

The lateral intercondylar ridge—a key to anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(10):2103-2104.

10.

Fujie

Livesay

Woo

Kashiwaguchi

Blomstrom

The use of a universal force-moment sensor to determine in-situ forces in ligaments: a new methodology. J Biomech Eng. 1995;117(1):1-7.

11.

Gabriel

Wong

Woo

Yagi

Debski

RE.

Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(1):85-89.

12.

Hara

Mochizuki

Sekiya

Yamaguchi

Akita

Muneta

Anatomy of normal human anterior cruciate ligament attachments evaluated by divided small bundles. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(12):2386-2391.

13.

Harner

Baek

Vogrin

Carlin

Kashiwaguchi

Woo

SL.

Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions. Arthroscopy. 1999;15(7):741-749.

14.

Hefzy

Grood

ES.

Sensitivity of insertion locations on length patterns of anterior cruciate ligament fibers. J Biomech Eng. 1986;108(1):73-82.

15.

Imhauser

Mauro

Choi

. Abnormal tibiofemoral contact stress and its association with altered kinematics after center-center anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vitro study. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(4):815-825.

16.

Iwahashi

Shino

Nakata

. Direct anterior cruciate ligament insertion to the femur assessed by histology and 3-dimensional volume-rendered computed tomography. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(9)(suppl):S13-S20.

17.

Kanamori

Woo

. The forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and knee kinematics during a simulated pivot shift test: a human cadaveric study using robotic technology. Arthroscopy. 2000;16(6):633-639.

18.

Kawaguchi

Kondo

Takeda

Akita

Yasuda

Amis

AA.

The role of fibers in the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament in resisting tibial displacement. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(3):435-444.

19.

Lane

Warren

Pearle

AD.

The pivot shift. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(12):679-688.

20.

Livesay

Fujie

Kashiwaguchi

Morrow

Woo

SL.

Determination of the in situ forces and force distribution within the human anterior cruciate ligament. Ann Biomed Eng. 1995;23(4):467-474.

21.

Lubowitz

JH.

Anatomic ACL reconstruction produces greater graft length change during knee range-of-motion than transtibial technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(5):1190-1195.

22.

Markolf

Park

Jackson

McAllister

DR.

Anterior-posterior and rotatory stability of single and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(1):107-118.

23.

Mochizuki

Fujishiro

Nimura

. Anatomic and histologic analysis of the mid-substance and fan-like extension fibres of the anterior cruciate ligament during knee motion, with special reference to the femoral attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(2):336-344.

24.

Mochizuki

Muneta

Nagase

Shirasawa

Akita

Sekiya

Cadaveric knee observation study for describing anatomic femoral tunnel placement for two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(4):356-361.

25.

Noyes

Jetter

Grood

Harms

Gardner

Levy

MS.

Anterior cruciate ligament function in providing rotational stability assessed by medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartment translations and subluxations. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(3):683-692.

26.

Odensten

Gillquist

Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament and a rationale for reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(2):257-262.

27.

Pathare

Nicholas

Colbrunn

McHugh

MP.

Kinematic analysis of the indirect femoral insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament: implications for anatomic femoral tunnel placement. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(11):1430-1438.

28.

Rahr-Wagner

Thillemann

Pedersen

Lind

MC.

Increased risk of revision after anteromedial compared with transtibial drilling of the femoral tunnel during primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Register. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(1):98-105.

29.

Rudy

Livesay

Woo

FH.

A combined robotic/universal force sensor approach to determine in situ forces of knee ligaments. J Biomech. 1996;29(10):1357-1360.

30.

Sakane

Fox

Woo

Livesay

FH.

In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads. J Orthop Res. 1997;15(2):285-293.

31.

Sasaki

Ishibashi

Tsuda

. The femoral insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament: discrepancy between macroscopic and histological observations. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(8):1135-1146.

32.

Sidles

Larson

Garbini

Downey

Matsen

III . Ligament length relationships in the moving knee. J Orthop Res. 1988;6(4):593-610.

33.

Siebold

Ellert

Metz

Femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry and arthroscopic orientation models for double-bundle bone tunnel placement—a cadaver study. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(5):585-592.

34.

Smigielski

Zdanowicz

Drwiega

Ciszek

Ciszkowska-Lyson

Siebold

Ribbon like appearance of the midsubstance fibres of the anterior cruciate ligament close to its femoral insertion site: a cadaveric study including 111 knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(11):3143-3150.

35.

Wilson

Feikes

Zavatsky

O’Connor

JJ.

The components of passive knee movement are coupled to flexion angle. J Biomech. 2000;33(4):465-473.

36.

Woo

Gomez

Sites

Newton

Orlando

Akeson

WH.

The biomechanical and morphological changes in the medial collateral ligament of the rabbit after immobilization and remobilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(8):1200-1211.

37.

Liu

Kramer

. Comparison of in situ forces and knee kinematics in anteromedial and high anteromedial bundle augmentation for partially ruptured anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(2):272-278.

38.

Yasuda

Kondo

Ichiyama

. Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(10):1015-1025.

39.

Zavras

Race

Bull

Amis

AA.

A comparative study of ‘isometric’ points for anterior cruciate ligament graft attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9(1):28-33.