Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) has demonstrated encouraging outcomes in treating patients with knee cartilage defects. Postoperatively, the time required to attain full weightbearing (WB) remains conservative.
Hypothesis:
We hypothesized that patients would have no significant clinical or radiological differences or graft complications after an 8-week or 6-week return to full WB after MACI.
Study Design:
Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
Methods:
A total of 37 knees (n = 35 patients) were randomly allocated to either an 8-week return to full WB that we considered current best practice based on the existing literature (CR group; n = 19 knees) or an accelerated 6-week WB approach (AR group; n = 18 knees). Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery, using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, visual analog pain scale, 6-minute walk test, and active knee range of motion. Isokinetic dynamometry was used to assess peak knee extension and flexion strength and limb symmetry indices (LSIs) between the operated and nonoperated limbs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was undertaken to evaluate the quality and quantity of repair tissue as well as to calculate an MRI composite score.
Results:
Significant improvements (P < .05) were observed in all subjective scores, active knee flexion and extension, 6-minute capacity, peak knee extensor torque in the operated limb, and knee extensor LSI, although no group differences existed. Although knee flexor LSIs were above 100% for both groups at 12 and 24 months after surgery, LSIs for knee extensor torque at 24 months were 93.7% and 87.5% for the AR and CR groups, respectively. The MRI composite score and pertinent graft parameters significantly improved over time (P < .05), with some superior in the AR group at 24 months. All patients in the AR group (100%) demonstrated good to excellent infill at 24 months, compared with 83% of patients in the CR group. Two cases of graft failure were observed, both in the CR group. At 24 months, 83% of patients in the CR group and 88% in the AR group were satisfied with the results of their MACI surgery.
Conclusion:
Patients in the AR group who reduced the length of time spent ambulating on crutches produced comparable outcomes up to 24 months, without compromising graft integrity.
AgebergEThomeeRNeeterCSilbernagelKGRoosEM. Muscle strength and functional performance in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury treated with training and surgical reconstruction or training only: a two to five-year followup. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:1773-1779.
2.
AugustssonJThomeeRKarlssonJ. Ability of a new hop test to determine functional deficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004;12:350-356.
3.
BartlettWGoodingCRCarringtonRWBriggsTWSkinnerJABentleyG. The role of the Short Form 36 Health Survey in autologous chondrocyte implantation. Knee. 2005;12:281-285.
Della VillaSKonEFilardoG. Does intensive rehabilitation permit early return to sport without compromising the clinical outcome after arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in highly competitive athletes?Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:68-77.
8.
DeszczynskiJSlynarskiK. Rehabilitation after cell transplantation for cartilage defects. Transplantation proceedings. 2006;38:314-315.
9.
DomayerSEWelschGHDorotkaR. MRI monitoring of cartilage repair in the knee: a review. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2008;12:302-317.
10.
EbertJRAcklandTRLloydDGWoodDJ. Accuracy of partial weight bearing after autologous chondrocyte implantation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1528-1534.
EbertJRFallonMRobertsonWB. Radiological assessment of accelerated versus traditional approaches to post-operative rehabilitation following matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI). Cartilage. 2011;2:60-72.
13.
EbertJRFallonMZhengMHWoodDJAcklandTR. A randomized trial comparing accelerated and traditional approaches to postoperative weightbearing rehabilitation after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation: findings at 5 years. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:1527-1537.
14.
EbertJRRobertsonWBLloydDGZhengMHWoodDJAcklandT. Traditional vs accelerated approaches to post-operative rehabilitation following matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI): comparison of clinical, biomechanical and radiographic outcomes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16:1131-1140.
15.
EbertJRRobertsonWBLloydDGZhengMHWoodDJAcklandT. A prospective, randomized comparison of traditional and accelerated approaches to postoperative rehabilitation following autologous chondrocyte implantation: 2-year clinical outcomes. Cartilage. 2010;1:180-187.
16.
EbertJRRobertsonWBWoodhouseJ. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging-based outcomes to 5 years after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation to address articular cartilage defects in the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:753-763.
17.
EbertJRSmithAEdwardsPKAcklandTR. The progression of isokinetic knee strength after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation: implications for rehabilitation and return to activity. J Sport Rehabil. 2014;23:244-258.
18.
EdwardsPKAcklandTREbertJR. Accelerated weightbearing rehabilitation after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation in the tibiofemoral joint: early clinical and radiological outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:2314-2324.
19.
ElderSHGoldsteinSAKimuraJHSoslowskyLJSpenglerDM. Chondrocyte differentiation is modulated by frequency and duration of cyclic compressive loading. Ann Biomed Eng. 2001;29:476-482.
20.
EnrightPL. The six-minute walk test. Respiratory Care. 2003;48:783-785.
21.
GenoveseERongaMAngerettiMG. Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee: mid-term and long-term follow-up by MR arthrography. Skeletal Radiol. 2010;40:47-56.
22.
GobbiAKonEBerrutoM. Patellofemoral full-thickness chondral defects treated with second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation: results at 5 years’ follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:1083-1092.
23.
GrindemHSnyder-MacklerLMoksnesHEngebretsenLRisbergMA. Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:804-808.
24.
GrumblesRMHowellDSHowardGA. Cartilage metalloproteases in disuse atrophy. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1995;43:146-148.
25.
HamblyKBobicVWondraschBVan AsscheDMarlovitsS. Autologous chondrocyte implantation postoperative care and rehabilitation: science and practice. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1020-1038.
26.
HamblyKGrivaK. IKDC or KOOS? Which measures symptoms and disabilities most important to postoperative articular cartilage repair patients?Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1695-1704.
27.
HirschmullerABaurHBraunSKreuzPCSudkampNPNiemeyerP. Rehabilitation after autologous chondrocyte implantation for isolated cartilage defects of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:2686-2696.
28.
ItohHKurosakaMYoshiyaSIchihashiNMizunoK. Evaluation of functional deficits determined by four different hop tests in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6:241-245.
29.
JurisPMPhillipsEMDalpeCEdwardsCGotlinRSKaneDJ. A dynamic test of lower extremity function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997;26:184-191.
30.
KonEDi MartinoAFilardoG. Second-generation autologous chondrocyte transplantation: MRI findings and clinical correlations at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Eur J Radiol. 2011;79:382-388.
31.
KurkijarviJENissiMJKivirantaIJurvelinJSNieminenMT. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 characteristics of human knee articular cartilage: topographical variation and relationships to mechanical properties. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52:41-46.
32.
LeeDYKarimSAChangHC. Return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - a review of patients with minimum 5-year follow-up. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2008;37:273-278.
33.
MarlovitsSSingerPZellerPMandlIHallerJTrattnigS. Magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) for the evaluation of autologous chondrocyte transplantation: determination of interobserver variability and correlation to clinical outcome after 2 years. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57:16-23.
34.
MarlovitsSStriessnigGResingerCT. Definition of pertinent parameters for the evaluation of articular cartilage repair tissue with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2004;52:310-319.
35.
MattacolaCGPerrinDHGansnederBMGieckJHSalibaENMcCueFC3rd. Strength, functional outcome, and postural stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Athl Train. 2002;37:262-268.
MithoeferKHamblyKLogerstedtDRicciMSilversHDella VillaS. Current concepts for rehabilitation and return to sport after knee articular cartilage repair in the athlete. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42:254-273.
38.
NehrerSDorotkaRDomayerSStelzenederDKotzR. Treatment of full-thickness chondral defects with Hyalograft C in the knee: a prospective clinical case series with 2 to 7 years’ follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(suppl 1):81S-87S.
39.
NoyesFRBarberSDMangineRE. Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:513-518.
40.
OssendorfCKapsCKreuzPCBurmesterGRSittingerMErggeletC. Treatment of posttraumatic and focal osteoarthritic cartilage defects of the knee with autologous polymer-based three-dimensional chondrocyte grafts: 2-year clinical results. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9:R41.
41.
ReinoldMMWilkKEMacrinaLCDugasJRCainEL. Current concepts in the rehabilitation following articular cartilage repair procedures in the knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36:774-794.
42.
Riegger-KrughCLMcCartyECRobinsonMSWegzynDA. Autologous chondrocyte implantation: current surgery and rehabilitation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:206-214.
43.
RisbergMAHolmIEkelandA. Reliability of functional knee tests in normal athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1995;5:24-28.
44.
RobertsonWBFickDWoodDJLinklaterJMZhengMHAcklandTR. MRI and clinical evaluation of collagen-covered autologous chondrocyte implantation (CACI) at two years. Knee. 2007;14:117-127.
45.
RobertsonWBGilbeyHAcklandT. Standard Practice Exercise Rehabilitation Protocols for Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Femoral Condyles. Perth, Western Australia: Hollywood Functional Rehabilitation Clinic; 2004.
46.
RoosEMRoosHPLohmanderLSEkdahlCBeynnonBD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28:88-96.
47.
SarisDBVanlauweJVictorJ. Treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better clinical outcome at 36 months in a randomized trial compared to microfracture. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(suppl 1):10S-19S.
48.
ThomeeRKaplanYKvistJ. Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:1798-1805.
49.
TideriusCJTjornstrandJAkesonPSoderstenKDahlbergLLeanderP. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC): intra- and interobserver variability in standardized drawing of regions of interest. Acta Radiol. 2004;45:628-634.
50.
TrattnigSMillingtonSASzomolanyiPMarlovitsS. MR imaging of osteochondral grafts and autologous chondrocyte implantation. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:103-118.
51.
TrattnigSPinkerKKrestanCPlankCMillingtonSMarlovitsS. Matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair with Hyalograft((R))C: two-year follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57:9-15.
52.
Vunjak-NovakovicGMartinIObradovicB. Bioreactor cultivation conditions modulate the composition and mechanical properties of tissue-engineered cartilage. J Orthop Res. 1999;17:130-138.
53.
WareJEJrGandekB. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:903-912.
54.
WelschGHMamischTCZakL. Evaluation of cartilage repair tissue after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation using a hyaluronic-based or a collagen-based scaffold with morphological MOCART scoring and biochemical T2 mapping: preliminary results. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:934-942.
55.
WondraschBRisbergMAZakLMarlovitsSAldrianS. Effect of accelerated weightbearing after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation on the femoral condyle: a prospective, randomized controlled study presenting MRI-based and clinical outcomes after 5 years. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:146-153.
56.
WondraschBZakLWelschGHMarlovitsS. Effect of accelerated weightbearing after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation on the femoral condyle on radiographic and clinical outcome after 2 years: a prospective, randomized controlled pilot study. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(suppl 1):88S-96S.
