Second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears after reconstruction occur at a reported rate of 20% to 30%. This high frequency indicates that there may be factors that predispose an athlete to graft failure and ACL tears of the contralateral knee.
Purpose:
To determine the incidence of second ACL injuries in a geographic population-based cohort over a 10-year observation period.
Study Design:
Descriptive epidemiological study.
Methods:
International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes relevant to the diagnosis of an ACL tear and the procedure code for ACL reconstruction were searched across the Rochester Epidemiology Project, a multidisciplinary county database, between the years of 1990 and 2000. This cohort of patients was tracked for subsequent ACL injuries through December 31, 2015. The authors identified 1041 patients with acute, isolated ACL tears. These patients were stratified by primary and secondary tears, sex, age, activity level, side of injury, sex by side of injury, and graft type.
Results:
Of the 1041 unique patients with a diagnosed ACL tear in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from 1990 to 2000, there were 66 (6.0%) second ACL tears; 66.7% of these tears occurred on the contralateral side. A second ACL injury was influenced by graft type (P < .0001), election of ACL reconstruction (P = .0060), and sex by side of injury (P = .0072). Nonparametric analysis of graft disruption by graft type demonstrated a higher prevalence of second ACL tears with allografts compared with hamstring (P = .0499) or patellar tendon autografts (P = .0012).
Conclusion:
The incidence of second ACL tears in this population-based cohort was 6.0%, with 66.7% of these tears occurring on the contralateral side from the original injury. There was a high population incidence of second ACL injuries in female patients younger than age 20 years. The utilization of patellar tendon autografts significantly reduced the risk of second ACL injuries compared with allografts or hamstring autografts in this cohort.
BorchersJRPedrozaAKaedingC. Activity level and graft type as risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament graft failure: a case-control study. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(12):2362-2367.
2.
BozynskiCCKurokiKStannardJP. Evaluation of partial transection versus synovial debridement of the ACL as novel canine models for management of ACL injuries. J Knee Surg. 2015;28(5):404-410.
3.
Di StasiSMyerGDHewettTE. Neuromuscular training to target deficits associated with second anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2013;43(11):777-792, A1-A11.
4.
DodwellELaMontLGreenDPanTMarxRLymanS. 20 years of pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in New York state. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(3):675-680.
5.
FordKRMyerGDSchmittLCUhlTLHewettTE. Preferential quadriceps activation in female athletes with incremental increases in landing intensity. J Appl Biomech. 2011;27(3):215-222.
6.
FordKRMyerGDTomsHEHewettTE. Gender differences in the kinematics of unanticipated cutting in young athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(1):124-129.
7.
FreedmanKBGlasgowMTGlasgowSGBernsteinJ. Anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction among university students. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:208-212.
8.
FrobellRBRoosEMRoosHPRanstamJLohmanderLS. A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(4):331-342.
9.
GifstadTFossOAEngebretsenL. Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2319-2328.
10.
HewettTEDi StasiSLMyerGD. Current concepts for injury prevention in athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sport Med. 2013;41(1):216-224.
11.
HewettTEFordKRMyerGD. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes, part 2: a meta-analysis of neuromuscular interventions aimed at injury prevention. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(3):490-498.
12.
HewettTEMyerGDFordKR. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes, part 1: mechanisms and risk factors. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(2):299-311.
13.
HewettTEMyerGDFordKR. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(4):492-501.
14.
HewettTEMyerGDFordKRPaternoMVQuatmanCE. The 2012 ABJS Nicolas Andry Award. The sequence of prevention: a systematic approach to prevent anterior cruciate ligament injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(10):2930-2940.
15.
KaedingCCPedrozaADReinkeEK. Risk factors and predictors of subsequent ACL injury in either knee after ACL reconstruction: prospective analysis of 2488 primary ACL reconstructions from the MOON cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1583-1590.
16.
KesslerMABehrendHHenzSStutzGRukavinaAKusterMS. Function, osteoarthritis and activity after ACL-rupture: 11 years follow-up results of conservative versus reconstructive treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(5):442-448.
17.
KimHSSeonJKJoAR. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2013;25(4):165-173.
18.
LevyYDHasegawaAPatilSKoziolJALotzMKD’LimaDD. Histopathological changes in the human posterior cruciate ligament during aging and osteoarthritis: correlations with anterior cruciate ligament and cartilage changes. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(2):271-277.
19.
MaletisGBInacioMCSFunahashiTT. Analysis of 16,192 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from a community-based registry. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(9):2090-2098.
20.
MaletisGBInacioMCSFunahashiTT. Risk factors associated with revision and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in the Kaiser Permanente ACLR registry. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(3):641-647.
21.
MallNAChalmersPNMoricM. Incidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2363-2370.
22.
MyerGDChuDABrentJLHewettTE. Trunk and hip control neuromuscular training for the prevention of knee joint injury. Clin Sport Med. 2008;27(3):425-448, ix.
23.
MyerGDFordKRKhouryJSuccopPHewettTE. Biomechanics laboratory-based prediction algorithm to identify female athletes with high knee loads that increase risk of ACL injury. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(4):245-252.
24.
MyerGDPaternoMVFordKRQuatmanCEHewettTE. Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: criteria-based progression through the return-to-sport phase. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(6):385-402.
25.
PaternoMVKieferAWBonnetteS. Prospectively identified deficits in sagittal plane hip-ankle coordination in female athletes who sustain a second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. Clin Biomech. 2015;30(10):1094-1101.
26.
PaternoMVRauhMJSchmittLCFordKRHewettTE. Incidence of contralateral and ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after primary ACL reconstruction and return to sport. Clin J Sport Med. 2012;22(2):116-121.
27.
PerssonAFjeldsgaardKGjertsenJ-E. Increased risk of revision with hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study of 12,643 patients from the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Registry, 2004-2012. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(2):285-291.
28.
Rahr-WagnerLThillemannTMPedersenABLindM. Comparison of hamstring tendon and patellar tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a nationwide population-based cohort study: results from the Danish registry of knee ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(2):278-284.
29.
RoccaWYawnBSt. SauverJGrossardtBMeltonL. History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project: half a century of medical records linkage in a US population. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(12):1202-1213.
30.
SchilatyNDNagelliCVHewettTE. Use of objective neurocognitive measures to assess the psychological states that influence return to sport following injury. Sport Med. 2015;46(3):299-303.
31.
Sri-RamKSalmonLJPinczewskiLARoeJP. The incidence of secondary pathology after anterior cruciate ligament rupture in 5086 patients requiring ligament reconstruction. Bone Joint J. 2013;95(1):59-64.
32.
St. SauverJGrossardtBYawnB. Data resource profile: the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) medical records-linkage system. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(6):1614-1624.
33.
St. SauverJGrossardtBYawnBMeltonLRoccaW. Generalizability of epidemiological findings and public health decisions: an illustration from the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(9):1059-1068.
34.
St. SauverJGrossardtBYawnBMeltonLRoccaW. Use of a medical records linkage system to enumerate a dynamic population over time: the Rochester Epidemiolgoy Project. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(9):1059-1068.
35.
SugimotoDMyerGDFossKDHewettTE. Specific exercise effects of preventive neuromuscular training intervention on anterior cruciate ligament injury risk reduction in young females: meta-analysis and subgroup analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(5):282-289.
36.
TejwaniSGChenJFunahashiTTLoveRMaletisGB. Revision risk after allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: association with graft processing techniques, patient characteristics, and graft type. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(11):2696-2705.
37.
VaishyaRAgarwalAKIngoleSVijayV. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review. Cureus. 2015;7(11):e378.
38.
WebsterKEFellerJALeighWBRichmondAK. Younger patients are at increased risk for graft rupture and contralateral injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(3):641-647.
39.
WigginsAJGrandhiRKSchneiderDKStanfieldDWebsterKEMyerGD. Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(7):1861-1876.
XieXLiuXChenZYuYPengSLiQ. A meta-analysis of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2015;22(2):100-110.
