Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a quadrupled semitendinosus (ST4) graft is an evolution of the standard technique with 2 hamstring tendons (semitendinosus + gracilis [STG]). However, there is no published comparison of how well these 2 types of hamstring grafts are incorporated into the bone tunnels. Because the ST4 graft is shorter, there is less graft material inside the tunnels.
Purpose:
To use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to compare graft incorporation in the tibial bone tunnels 1 year after ACL reconstruction with either an STG graft or ST4 graft.
Study Design:
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
Methods:
Sixty-two patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were enrolled prospectively: 31 with an ST4 graft and 31 with an STG graft. The same surgical technique, fixation method, and postoperative protocol were used in both groups. Graft incorporation and ligamentization were evaluated with MRI after 1 year of follow-up. The following parameters were evaluated: signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ), tibial tunnel enlargement, signal intensity at the bone-graft interface, and graft signal according to the Howell scale. The number of participants needed to show that the mean SNQ did not differ between the 2 techniques was 31 in each group (with a 1-sided alpha of 2.5% and a 1-sided beta of 10.0%). The Student t test was used to compare the distribution of continuous secondary endpoints.
Results:
The mean SNQ was 5.2 ± 4.5 for the STG group and 5.9 ± 3.7 for the ST4 group (P = .5100). The mean tibial tunnel widening was 93.7% ± 51.7% for the STG group versus 80.0% ± 42.9% for the ST4 group (P = .2605). The groups did not differ in signal intensity at the bone-graft interface (P = .7502) or in graft signal according to the Howell scale (P = .4544).
Conclusion:
At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, incorporation and ligamentization of the STG and ST4 grafts were the same based on MRI analysis. The results were at least as good with the ST4 technique as with the standard STG technique in terms of incorporation and ligamentization.
AhnJHLeeSHChoiSHLimTK.Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring tendon autografts: comparison of remnant bundle preservation and standard technique. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(9):1768-1777.
3.
ArdernCLWebsterKETaylorNFFellerJA.Hamstring strength recovery after hamstring tendon harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison between graft types. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(4):462-469.
4.
Ayala-MejiasJDGarcia-GonzalezBAlcocer-Perez-EspañaLVillafañeJHBerjanoP.Relationship between widening and position of the tunnels and clinical results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction to knee osteoarthritis: 30 patients at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. J Knee Surg. 2017;30(6):501-508.
BiukEZelićZRapanSĆurićGBiukDRadićR.Analysis of biomechanical properties of patellar ligament graft and quadruple hamstring tendon graft. Injury. 2015;46 Suppl6:S14-S17.
7.
BlecherAMRichmondJC.Transient laxity of an anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee related to pregnancy. Arthroscopy. 1998;14(1):77-79.
8.
BriggsKKLysholmJTegnerYRodkeyWGKocherMSSteadmanJR.The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(5):890-897.
9.
CavaignacEPailhéRMurgierJReinaNLauwersFChironP.Can the gracilis be used to replace the anterior cruciate ligament in the knee? A cadaver study. Knee. 2014;21(6):1014-1017.
10.
ChenC-H.Graft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2009;1(1):21.
11.
ClaesSVerdonkPForsythRBellemansJ.The “ligamentization” process in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: what happens to the human graft? A systematic review of the literature. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(11):2476-2483.
12.
ColletteMCassardX.The Tape Locking Screw technique (TLS): a new ACL reconstruction method using a short hamstring graft. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97(5):555-559.
13.
ColombetPGraveleauNJambouS.Incorporation of hamstring grafts within the tibial tunnel after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: magnetic resonance imaging of suspensory fixation versus interference screws. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(11):2838-2845.
14.
DragooJLLeeRSBenhaimPFinermanGAMHameSL.Relaxin receptors in the human female anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(4):577-584.
15.
EjerhedLKartusJSernertNKöhlerKKarlssonJ.Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective randomized study with a two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(1):19-25.
16.
FulesPJMadhavRTGoddardRKNewman-SandersAMowbrayMAS. Evaluation of tibial bone tunnel enlargement using MRI scan cross-sectional area measurement after autologous hamstring tendon ACL replacement. Knee. 2003;10(1):87-91.
17.
GeYLiHTaoHHuaYChenJChenS.Comparison of tendon-bone healing between autografts and allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using magnetic resonance imaging. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(4):954-960.
18.
GobbiADomzalskiMPascualJZanazzoM.Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is it necessary to sacrifice the gracilis?Arthroscopy. 2005;21(3):275-280.
19.
GohilSAnnearPOBreidahlW.Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous double hamstrings: a comparison of standard versus minimal debridement techniques using MRI to assess revascularisation. A randomised prospective study with a one-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(9):1165-1171.
20.
HeftiFMüllerWJakobRPStäubliHU.Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993;1(3-4):226-234.
21.
HöherJMöllerHDFuFH.Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction?Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6(4):231-240.
22.
HowellSMClarkJABlasierRD.Serial magnetic resonance imaging of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament autografts during the first year of implantation: a preliminary study. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19(1):42-47.
23.
InagakiYKondoEKitamuraNet al. Prospective clinical comparisons of semitendinosus versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sci. 2013;18(5):754-761.
24.
IorioRVadalàAArgentoGDi SanzoVFerrettiA.Bone tunnel enlargement after ACL reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendons: a CT study. Int Orthop. 2007;31(1):49-55.
25.
JamesEWWilliamsBTLaPradeRF.Stress radiography for the diagnosis of knee ligament injuries: a systematic review. Clin Orthop. 2014;472(9):2644-2657.
26.
JardinCChantelotCMigaudHGougeonFDebrouckerMJDuquennoyA.[Reliability of the KT-1000 arthrometer in measuring anterior laxity of the knee: comparative analysis with Telos of 48 reconstructions of the anterior cruciate ligament and intra- and interobserver reproducibility]. Rev Chir Orthopédique Réparatrice Appar Mot. 1999;85(7):698-707.
27.
Karimi-MobarakehMMardani-KiviMMortazaviASaheb-EkhtiariKHashemi-MotlaghK.Role of gracilis harvesting in four-strand hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a double-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(4):1086-1091.
28.
KiapourAMFlemingBCProffenBLMurrayMM.Sex influences the biomechanical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a preclinical large animal model. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1623-1631.
29.
KyungH-SLeeH-JOhC-WHongH-P.Comparison of results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a four-strand single semitendinosus or a semitendinosus and gracilis tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(11):3238-3243.
30.
LiHChenJLiHWuZChenS.MRI-based ACL graft maturity does not predict clinical and functional outcomes during the first year after ACL reconstruction [published online August2, 2016]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-016-4252-5.
31.
LiHTaoHChoSChenSYaoZChenS.Difference in graft maturity of the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament 2 years postoperatively: a comparison between autografts and allografts in young men using clinical and 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(7):1519-1526.
LuiPZhangPChanKQinL.Biology and augmentation of tendon-bone insertion repair. J Orthop Surg. 2010;5:59.
34.
MaYMurawskiCDRahnemai-AzarAAMaldjianCLynchADFuFH.Graft maturity of the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament 6 months postoperatively: a magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of quadriceps tendon with bone block and hamstring tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(3):661-668.
MohtadiNGChanDSDaintyKNWhelanDB.Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(9):CD005960.
37.
MuramatsuKHachiyaYIzawaH.Serial evaluation of human anterior cruciate ligament grafts by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of allografts and autografts. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(9):1038-1044.
38.
NakamuraRHoriiEWatanabeKNakaoEKatoHTsunodaK.Proximal row carpectomy versus limited wrist arthrodesis for advanced Kienböck’s disease. J Hand Surg Br. 1998;23(6):741-745.
39.
NtouliaAPapadopoulouFRistanisSArgyropoulouMGeorgoulisAD.Revascularization process of the bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft evaluated by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging 6 and 12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(7):1478-1486.
40.
PailhéRCavaignacEMurgierJLaffosseJ-MSwiderP.Biomechanical study of ACL reconstruction grafts. J Orthop Res. 2015;33(8):1188-1196.
41.
PiaggioGElbourneDRAltmanDGPocockSJEvansSJW; CONSORT Group. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA. 2006;295(10):1152-1160.
42.
RougraffBShelbourneKDGerthPKWarnerJ.Arthroscopic and histologic analysis of human patellar tendon autografts used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21(2):277-284.
43.
SamuelssonKAnderssonDAhldénMFuFHMusahlVKarlssonJ.Trends in surgeon preferences on anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive techniques. Clin Sports Med. 2013;32(1):111-126.
44.
SánchezMAnituaEAzofraJPradoRMuruzabalFAndiaI.Ligamentization of tendon grafts treated with an endogenous preparation rich in growth factors: gross morphology and histology. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(4):470-480.
45.
SegawaHOmoriGKogaYKameoTIidaSTanakaM.Rotational muscle strength of the limb after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis tendon. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(2):177-182.
46.
SharmaAFlaniganDCRandallKMagnussenRA.Does gracilis preservation matter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(6):1165-1173.
47.
Sonnery-CottetBThaunatMFreychetBPupimBHBMurphyCGClaesS.Outcome of a combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction technique with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1598-1605.
48.
StreichNAReichenbacherSBariéABuchnerMSchmittH.Long-term outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with an autologous four-strand semitendinosus tendon autograft. Int Orthop. 2013;37(2):279-284.
49.
TashiroTKurosawaHKawakamiAHikitaAFukuiN.Influence of medial hamstring tendon harvest on knee flexor strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a detailed evaluation with comparison of single- and double-tendon harvest. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(4):522-529.
50.
TegnerYLysholmJ.Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop. 1985;198:43-49.
51.
TomczakRJHehlGMergoPJMerkleERieberABrambsHJ.Tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: MRI analysis as an important factor in the radiological report. Skeletal Radiol. 1997;26(7):409-413.
52.
WeilerAPetersGMäurerJUnterhauserFNSüdkampNP.Biomechanical properties and vascularity of an anterior cruciate ligament graft can be predicted by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a two-year study in sheep. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(6):751-761.
53.
WytrykowskiKSwiderPReinaNet al. Cadaveric study comparing the biomechanical properties of grafts used for knee anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(11):2288-2294.
54.
YamazakiSYasudaKTomitaFMinamiATohyamaH.The effect of intraosseous graft length on tendon-bone healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using flexor tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(11):1086-1093.
55.
YosmaogluHBBaltaciGOzerHAtayA.Effects of additional gracilis tendon harvest on muscle torque, motor coordination, and knee laxity in ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(8):1287-1292.
56.
ZantopTFerrettiMBellKMBruckerPUGilbertsonLFuFH.Effect of tunnel-graft length on the biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees: intra-articular study in a goat model. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(11):2158-2166.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
