Medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries are common after elbow trauma and in overhead throwing athletes. A hinged elbow orthosis (HEO) is often used to protect the elbow from valgus stress early after injury and during early return to play. However, there is minimal evidence regarding the efficacy of these orthoses in controlling instability and their influence on long-term clinical outcomes.
Purpose:
(1) To quantify the effect of an HEO on elbow stability after simulated MCL injury. (2) To determine whether arm position, forearm rotation, and muscle activation influence the effectiveness of an HEO.
Study Design:
Controlled laboratory study.
Methods:
Seven cadaveric upper extremity specimens were tested in a custom simulator that enabled elbow motion via computer-controlled actuators and motors attached to relevant tendons. Specimens were examined in 2 arm positions (dependent, valgus) and 2 forearm positions (pronation, supination) during passive and simulated active elbow flexion while unbraced and then while braced with an HEO. Testing was performed in intact elbows and repeated after simulated MCL injury. An electromagnetic tracking device measured valgus angulation as an indicator of elbow stability.
Results:
When the arm was dependent, the HEO increased valgus angle with the forearm in pronation (+1.0°± 0.2°, P = .003) and supination (+1.5°± 0.0°, P = .006) during active motion. It had no significant effect on elbow stability during passive motion. In the valgus position, the HEO had no effect on elbow stability during passive or active motion in pronation and supination. With the arm in the valgus position with the HEO, muscle activation reduced instability during pronation (–10.3°± 2.5°, P = .006) but not supination (P = .61).
Conclusion:
In this in vitro study, this HEO did not enhance mechanical stability when the arm was in the valgus and dependent positions after MCL injury.
Clinical Relevance:
After MCL injury, an HEO likely does not provide mechanical elbow stability during rehabilitative exercises or when the elbow is subjected to valgus stress such as occurs during throwing.
AllumJHHoneggerF. Synergies and strategies underlying normal and vestibulary deficient control of balance: implication for neuroprosthetic control. Prog Brain Res. 1993;97:331-348.
2.
AmisADowsonDWrightV. Muscle strengths and musculoskeletal geometry of the upper limb. Eng Med. 1979;8:41-48.
3.
ArmstrongADDunningCEFaberKJDuckTRJohnsonJAKingGJW. Rehabilitation of the medial collateral ligament-deficient elbow: an in vitro biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25(6):1051-1057.
4.
ArmstrongADFerreiraLMDunningCEJohnsonJAKingGJ. The medial collateral ligament of the elbow is not isometric: an in vitro biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(1):85-90.
5.
BeynnonBDRyderSHKonradsenLJohnsonRJJohnsonKRenströmPA. The effect of anterior cruciate ligament trauma and bracing on knee proprioception. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27(2):150-155.
6.
BirminghamTBBryantDMGiffinJR, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of functional knee brace and neoprene sleeve use after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(4):648-655.
7.
BirminghamTBKramerJFKirkleyAInglisJTSpauldingSJVandervoortAA. Knee bracing after ACL reconstruction: effects on postural control and proprioception. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(8):1253-1258.
8.
BranchTPHunterRDonathM. Dynamic EMG analysis of anterior cruciate deficient legs with and without bracing during cutting. Am J Sports Med. 1989;17(1):35-41.
9.
ChenFSRokitoASJobeFW. Medial elbow problems in the overhead-throwing athlete. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001;9(2):99-113.
10.
DavidsonPAPinkMPerryJJobeFW. Functional anatomy of the flexor pronator muscle group in relation to the medial collateral ligament of the elbow. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(2):245-250.
11.
DigiovineNMJobeFWPinkMPerryJ. An electromyographic analysis of the upper extremity in pitching. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1992;1(1):15-25.
DonJoy Global. Mayo Clinic Elbow Brace Instructions for Use. Vista, CA: DonJoy Global; 2011.
14.
DonoghueDStokesE. How much change is true change? The minimum detectable change of the Berg Balance Scale in elderly people. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(5):343-346.
15.
DuckTRDunningCEArmstrongADJohnsonJAKingGJW. Application of screw displacement axes to quantify elbow instability. Clin Biomech. 2003;18(4):303-310.
16.
DuckTRDunningCEKingGJWJohnsonJA. Variability and repeatability of the flexion axis at the ulnohumeral joint. J Orthop Res. 2003;21(3):399-404.
17.
DunningCEDuckTRKingGJWJohnsonJA. Simulated active control produces repeatable motion pathways of the elbow in an in vitro testing system. J Biomech. 2001;34(8):1039-1048.
18.
FerreiraLMJohnsonJAKingGJW. Development of an active elbow flexion simulator to evaluate joint kinematics with the humerus in the horizontal position. J Biomech. 2010;43(11):2114-2119.
19.
FeuerbachJWGrabinerMDKohTJWeikerGG. Effect of an ankle orthosis and ankle ligament anesthesia on ankle joint proprioception. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22(2):223-229.
20.
GlousmanREBarronJJobeFWPerryJPinkM. An electromyographic analysis of the elbow in normal and injured pitchers with medial collateral ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(3):311-317.
21.
HijmansJMPostemaKGeertzenJHB. Elbow orthoses: a review of literature. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2004;28(3):263-272.
22.
JohnsonJARathDADunningCERothSEKingGJW. Simulation of elbow and forearm motion in vitro using a load controlled testing apparatus. J Biomech. 2000;33(5):635-639.
23.
JonesEJBishopPAWoodsAKGreenJM. Cross-sectional area and muscular strength: a brief review. Sports Med. 2008;38(12):987-994.
24.
JosefssonPOGentzCFJohnellOWendebergB. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of ligamentous injuries following dislocation of the elbow joint: a prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(4):605-608.
25.
KimSJKimSJChaYHLeeKHKwonJ-Y. Effect of personalized wrist orthosis for wrist pain with three-dimensional scanning and printing technique: a preliminary, randomized, controlled, open-label study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018;42(6):636-643.
26.
KingJWBrelsfordHJTullosHS. Analysis of the pitching arm of the professional baseball pitcher. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1969;67:116-123.
27.
KurodaSSakamakiK. Ulnar collateral ligament tears of the elbow joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;208:266-271.
28.
KusinsJRWillingRKingGJFerreiraLM. Development of a computational elbow model with experimental validation of kinematics and muscle forces. J Appl Biomech. 2016;32(4):407-414.
29.
LaScalzaSAricoJHughesR. Effect of metal and sampling rate on accuracy of Flock of Birds electromagnetic tracking system. J Biomech. 2003;36(1):141-144.
30.
LeeATSchrumpfMAChoiD, et al. The influence of gravity on the unstable elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(1):81-87.
31.
LuT-WLinH-CHsuH-C. Influence of functional bracing on the kinetics of anterior cruciate ligament–injured knees during level walking. Clin Biomech. 2006;21(5):517-524.
32.
LunsfordTRDiBelloTV. Principles and components of upper limb orthoses. In: HsuJDMichaelJWFiskJR, eds. AAOS Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices. 4th ed.St Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2008:179-190.
33.
ManochaRHKingGJWJohnsonJA. In vitro kinematic assessment of a hinged elbow orthosis following lateral collateral ligament injury. J Hand Surg Am. 2018;43(2):123-132.
34.
ManochaRHKKusinsJRJohnsonJAKingGJW. Optimizing the rehabilitation of elbow lateral collateral ligament injuries: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(4):596-603.
35.
MaurelMFitzgeraldLMilesAGiddinsG. Biomechanical study of the efficacy of a new design of wrist guard. Clin Biomech. 2013;28(5):509-513.
36.
MilneADChessDGJohnsonJAKingGJW. Accuracy of an electromagnetic tracking device: a study of the optimal operating range and metal interference. J Biomech. 1996;29(6):791-793.
37.
MinorSD. Use of back belts in occupational settings. Phys Ther. 1996;76(4):403-408.
38.
MobergE. The role of cutaneous afferents in position sense, kinaesthesia, and motor function of the hand. Brain. 1983;106(pt 1):1-19.
39.
ParkMCAhmadCS. Dynamic contributions of the flexor-pronator mass to elbow valgus stability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(10):2268-2274.
40.
PichoraJEFraserGSFerreiraLMFBrownhillJRJohnsonJAKingGJW. The effect of medial collateral ligament repair tension on elbow joint kinematics and stability. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32(8):1210-1217.
41.
PinciveroDMRijkeAMHeinrichsKPerrinDH. The effects of a functional brace on medial joint stability: a case study. J Athl Train. 1994;29(3):232-235.
42.
RaabFBloodESteinerTJonesH. Magnetic position and orientation tracking system. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst. 1979;15(5):709-718.
43.
RamseyDKWretenbergPFLamontagneMNémethG. Electromyographic and biomechanic analysis of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency and functional knee bracing. Clin Biomech. 2003;18(1):28-34.
44.
RauxSKohlerRGarinCCuninVAbelin-GenevoisK. Tridimensional trunk surface acquisition for brace manufacturing in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(suppl 4):419-423.
45.
RettigACSherrillCSneadDSMendlerJCMielingP. Nonoperative treatment of ulnar collateral ligament injuries in throwing athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(1):15-17.
46.
RijkeAMGoitzHTMcCueFCAndrewsJRBerrSS. Stress radiography of the medial elbow ligaments. Radiology. 1994;191(1):213-216.
47.
SafranMAhmadCSElattracheNS. Ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(11):1381-1395.
48.
SeiberKGuptaRMcGarryMHSafranMRLeeTQ. The role of the elbow musculature, forearm rotation, and elbow flexion in elbow stability: an in vitro study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(2):260-268.
49.
ShawMYGribblePAFryeJL. Ankle bracing, fatigue, and time to stabilization in collegiate volleyball athletes. J Athl Train. 43(2):164-171.
50.
SitlerMRyanJWheelerB, et al. The efficacy of a semirigid ankle stabilizer to reduce acute ankle injuries in basketball: a randomized clinical study at West Point. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22(4):454-461.
51.
SwankKRBehnAWDragooJL. The effect of donor age on structural and mechanical properties of allograft tendons. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(2):453-459.
52.
SzekeresMChinchalkarSJKingGJW. Optimizing elbow rehabilitation after instability. Hand Clin. 2008;24(1):27-38.
53.
van RoyPBaeyensJPFauvartDLanssiersRClarijsJP. Arthro-kinematics of the elbow: study of the carrying angle. Ergonomics. 2005;48(11-14):1645-1656.
54.
WaltonDMacDermidJNielsonWTeasellRChiassonMBrownL. Reliability, standard error, and minimum detectable change of clinical pressure pain threshold testing in people with and without acute neck pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(9):644-650.
55.
WernerSLFleisigGSDillmanCJAndrewsJR. Biomechanics of the elbow during baseball pitching. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993;17(6):274-278.
56.
WilkKEArrigoCAndrewsJR. Rehabilitation of the elbow in the throwing athlete. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993;17(6):305-317.
57.
WilkKEMacrinaLCCainELDugasJRAndrewsJR. Rehabilitation of the overhead athlete’s elbow. Sports Health. 2012;4(5):404-414.
58.
WoltersB. Knee orthoses for sports-related disorders. In: HsuJMichaelJFiskJ, eds. AAOS Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices. 4th ed.St Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2008:379-390.
59.
WuGKNgGYMakAF. Effects of knee bracing on the sensorimotor function of subjects with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(5):641-645.
60.
YoonJJBaeH. Change in electromyographic activity of wrist extensor by cylindrical brace. Yonsei Med J. 2013;54(1):220-224.
61.
ZissimopoulosAFatoneSGardS. The effect of ankle-foot orthoses on self-reported balance confidence in persons with chronic poststroke hemiplegia. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014;38(2):148-154.
