Abstract
Background:
The buddy anchor technique is useful to reinforce loose anchors in the osteoporotic humeral head during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. However, theoretical parallel insertion of the buddy anchor to index a loose anchor is challenging in arthroscopy and can widen the entry site and decrease structural integrity.
Purpose:
To investigate and compare the biomechanical stability between 2 buddy anchor insertion techniques (parallel insertion vs divergent insertion) in the osteoporotic humeral head.
Study Design:
Controlled laboratory study.
Methods:
A total of 24 paired fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were used, and each pair was randomly assigned to either the parallel insertion group or the divergent insertion group. In the parallel insertion group, the buddy anchor was inserted parallel to the index loose anchor. In the divergent insertion group, the buddy anchor was inserted at a 20° angle in the medial direction to the index loose anchor. The insertion torque of the buddy anchor and ultimate pull-out strength of the index anchor were measured and compared between the 2 groups.
Results:
The mean maximum insertion torque was significantly higher in the parallel insertion group (16.1 ± 1.8 cN·m) compared with the divergent insertion group (12.0 ± 1.5 cN·m) (P < .001). The mean ultimate pull-out strength was significantly higher with divergent insertion (192.2 ± 28.6 N) than with parallel insertion (147.7 ± 23.6 N) (P < .001).
Conclusion:
For application of the buddy anchor system in the cadaveric osteoporotic humeral bone model, divergent insertion showed better ultimate pull-out strength than conventional parallel insertion, despite inferior maximum insertion torque.
Clinical Relevance:
The results of this study widen the applicability and accessibility for the buddy anchor system.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.