Sex-Specific Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All–Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft in a Young Active Population
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2024
Sex-Specific Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All–Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft in a Young Active Population
The ideal graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) in young athletes has a high return-to-sport (RTS) rate and a low reinjury rate. Quadriceps tendon autografts are being used with increasing frequency for ACLR in this population, despite a paucity of evidence to support their use.
Purpose:
To report the RTS rate, ipsilateral reinjury rate, and contralateral ACL injury rate in a young athletic population undergoing primary ACLR using an all–soft tissue quadriceps tendon (ASTQT) autograft.
Study Design:
Cases series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods:
Patients aged 14 to 22 years who underwent primary ACLR using an ASTQT autograft by a single surgeon between January 1, 2005, and April 30, 2020, were identified via electronic medical records and contacted ≥24 months after ACLR to complete a survey regarding subsequent ipsilateral or contralateral ACL injuries and RTS. Patients who had undergone previous ACLR (ipsilateral or contralateral) were excluded.
Results:
A total of 656 patients (330 male, 326 female; mean age, 17.9 years) were identified, and 395 patients completed the survey (60.2%; 174 male, 221 female; mean age, 17.8 years) with a mean follow-up of 73 ± 29 months (range, 24-139 months). The RTS rate was high (male: 87.7%; female: 82.8%; P = .19). Male and female patients had similar rates of revision ACLR (male: 12.6%; female: 10.0%; P = .40) and contralateral ACL injuries (male: 13.8%; female: 11.3%; P = .46).
Conclusion:
A high RTS rate and similar rates of ipsilateral and contralateral ACL injuries were found for male and female patients in a young athletic population undergoing primary ACLR using an ASTQT autograft. These results help one to better understand the utility of ASTQT grafts to support successful ACLR in young athletic populations, for which ASTQT grafts appear to yield favorable outcomes.
AllenMMPareekAKrychAJ, et al. Are female soccer players at an increased risk of second anterior cruciate ligament injury compared with their athletic peers?Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(10):2492-2498.
2.
ArnoldMPCalceiJGVogelN, et al. ACL Study Group survey reveals the evolution of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft choice over the past three decades. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(11):3871-3876.
3.
BelkJWKraeutlerMJMarshallHAGoodrichJAMcCartyEC. Quadriceps tendon autograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of comparative studies with minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(5):1699-1707.
4.
BrittEOuilletteREdmondsE, et al. The challenges of treating female soccer players with ACL injuries: hamstring versus bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(11):2325967120964884.
5.
CavaignacECoulinBTschollP, et al. Is quadriceps tendon autograft a better choice than hamstring autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A comparative study with a mean follow-up of 3.6 years. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(6):1326-1332.
6.
CruzAIBeckJJEllingtonMD, et al. Failure rates of autograft and allograft ACL reconstruction in patients 19 years of age and younger: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JB JS Open Access. 2020;5(4):e20.00106.
7.
CruzCAGoldbergDWakeJ, et al. Comparing bone-tendon autograft with bone-tendon-bone autograft for ACL reconstruction: a matched-cohort analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(12):232596712097022.
8.
DeFazioMWCurryEJGustinMJ, et al. Return to sport after ACL reconstruction with a BTB versus hamstring tendon autograft: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(12):2325967120964919.
9.
DodwellERLamontLEGreenDW, et al. 20 years of pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in New York State. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(3):675-680.
10.
EllisHBMathenyLMBriggsKKPennockATSteadmanJR. Outcomes and revision rate after bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged 18 years or younger with closed physes. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(12):1819-1825.
11.
EngelmanGHCarryPMHittKGPolouskyJDVidalAF. Comparison of allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft survival in an active adolescent cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2311-2318.
12.
FabricantPDKocherMS. Management of ACL injuries in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(7):600-612.
13.
FaunøPRahr-WagnerLLindM. Risk for revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is higher among adolescents: results from the Danish Registry of Knee Ligament Reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014;2(10):232596711455240.
14.
FonesLKostyunROCohenADPaceJL. Patient-reported outcomes, return-to-sport status, and reinjury rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adolescent athletes: minimum 2-year follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(11):2325967120964471.
15.
GalanHEscalanteMDella VedovaFSlullitelD. All inside full thickness quadriceps tendon ACL reconstruction: long term follow up results. J Exp Orthop. 2020;7(1):13.
16.
HardyACasabiancaLAndrieuKBaverelLNoaillesT. Complications following harvesting of patellar tendon or hamstring tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systematic review of literature. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(8):S245-S248.
17.
HarrisPATaylorRMinorBL, et al. The REDCap Consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.
18.
HarrisPATaylorRThielkeR, et al. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap): a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377-381.
19.
HerbortMMichelPRaschkeMJ, et al. Should the ipsilateral hamstrings be used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the case of medial collateral ligament insufficiency? Biomechanical investigation regarding dynamic stabilization of the medial compartment by the hamstring muscles. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(4):819-825.
20.
HerzogMMMarshallSWLundJL, et al. Trends in incidence of ACL reconstruction and concomitant procedures among commercially insured individuals in the United States, 2002-2014. Sports Health. 2018;10(6):523-531.
21.
JayanthiNAPostEGLauryTCFabricantPD. Health consequences of youth sport specialization. J Athl Train. 2019;54(10):1040-1049.
22.
KayJMemonMMarxRG, et al. Over 90% of children and adolescents return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(4):1019-1036.
23.
KooyCEVWJakobsenRBFenstadAM, et al. Major increase in incidence of pediatric ACL reconstructions from 2005 to 2021: a study from the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register. Am J Sports Med. 2023;51(11):2891-2899.
24.
LundBNielsenTFaunøPChristiansenSELindM. Is quadriceps tendon a better graft choice than patellar tendon? A prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(5):593-598.
25.
MarxRGHsuJFinkC, et al. Graft choices for paediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: state of the art. J ISAKOS. 2023;8(3):145-152.
26.
MatzkinECurryEJWhitlockK. Female athlete triad: past, present, and future. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(7):424-432.
27.
McCulloughKAPhelpsKDSpindlerKP, et al. Return to high school- and college-level football after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(11):2523-2529.
28.
MOON Knee Group; SpindlerKPHustonLJZajichekA, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in high school and college-aged athletes: does autograft choice influence anterior cruciate ligament revision rates?Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(2):298-309.
29.
PaschosNKHowellSM. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: principles of treatment. EFORT Open Rev. 2016;1(11):398-408.
30.
PennockATJohnsonKPTurkRD, et al. Transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the skeletally immature: quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendon autograft. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;7(9):2325967119872450.
31.
PetitCBDiekfussJAWarrenSM, et al. Allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction fails at a greater rate in patients younger than 34 years. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023;5(4):100741.
32.
RahardjaRLoveHClatworthyMGMonkAPYoungSW. Higher rate of return to preinjury activity levels after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone versus hamstring tendon autograft in high-activity patients: results from the New Zealand ACL Registry. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(13):3488-3494.
33.
RenfreeSPBrinkmanJCTummalaSVEconomopoulosKJ. ACL reconstruction with quadriceps soft tissue autograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft in cutting and pivoting athletes: outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023;11(9):23259671231197400.
34.
RunerACsapoRHeppergerC, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with quadriceps tendon autograft result in lower graft rupture rates but similar patient-reported outcomes as compared with hamstring tendon autograft: a comparison of 875 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(9):2195-2204.
35.
RunerAKeelingLWagalaN, et al. Current trends in graft choice for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part II: in-vivo kinematics, patient reported outcomes, re-rupture rates, strength recovery, return to sports and complications. J Exp Orthop. 2023;10(1):40.
36.
RunerASuterARoberti Di SarsinaT, et al. Quadriceps tendon autograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction show comparable clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcome measures, but lower donor-site morbidity compared with hamstring tendon autograft: a matched-pairs study with a mean follow-up of 6.5 years. J ISAKOS. 2023;8(2):60-67.
37.
RunerAWiererGHerbstE, et al. There is no difference between quadriceps- and hamstring tendon autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 2-year patient-reported outcome study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(2):605-614.
38.
SalemHSVarzhapetyanVPatelN, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young female athletes: patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(9):2086-2092.
39.
SandersTLMaradit KremersHBryanAJ, et al. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: a 21-year population-based study. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(6):1502-1507.
40.
SheeanAJMusahlVSloneHS, et al. Quadriceps tendon autograft for arthroscopic knee ligament reconstruction: use it now, use it often. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(11):698-701.
41.
SloneHSRomineSEPremkumarAXerogeanesJW. Quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive review of current literature and systematic review of clinical results. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(3):541-554.
42.
SteinDAHuntSARosenJEShermanOH. The incidence and outcome of patella fractures after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(6):578-583.
43.
VaughnNHDunleavyMLJacksonTHennrikusW. The outcomes of quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adolescent athletes: a retrospective case series. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022;32(4):739-744.
