One challenge surgeons face when using certain suture knot techniques is where the forces concentrate along the central axis of the tissue, making the suture knot prone to failure due to suture pull-through and tissue shredding. New reinforcement techniques have been developed (suture tape augmentation) and are becoming popular to minimize tissue damage.
Purpose:
To assess biomechanical performance of whipstitch reinforcement techniques (locking stitch method or additional suture material) in human cadaveric semitendinosus tendons (STs).
Study Design:
Controlled laboratory study.
Methods:
A total of 42 STs were harvested and divided into 6 groups consisting of a standard whipstitch and varying reinforcement techniques based on stitch pattern (whipstitch [WS], whipstitch through tag [WT], locking whipstitch [WL], or locking whipstitch through tag [WLT]), and products from varying manufacturer samples were preconditioned and then loaded from 50 to 200 N at 1 Hz for 500 cycles, followed by load to failure. Elongation, stiffness, ultimate load, and failure mode were compared across groups.
Results:
No significant differences were observed between whipstitch groups WS1 and WS2. Addition of suture material for reinforcement (WT2) significantly improved biomechanical performance across all metrics compared with WS2. Reinforcement using a new locking whipstitch method (WL) resulted in significant increase in ultimate load compared with WS1. All reinforcement groups (WL, WT1, WT2, and WLT) achieved a similar level of biomechanical performance, with no significant differences across any metric. Addition of a second reinforcement (WLT) did not significantly enhance biomechanics beyond those achieved with a single reinforcement (WL). The failure mode for no-reinforcement groups was tissue pull-through, while reinforcement groups utilizing either material or locking method failed from suture breakage.
Conclusion:
Whipstitch alone offers limited biomechanical security, but reinforcement with either a locking method or additional suture material significantly enhances biomechanical performance.
Clinical Relevance:
Reinforcement may help limit tissue damage. The locking whipstitch method offers a promising alternative to reinforce a stitch with relatively less suture material.
ArnerMUngeLFrankoMASvingenJ.Inflammatory reaction to suture materials after flexor tendon repair. A retrospective study of 594 patients. Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2023;10(1):2222807.
3.
ArnoldMPCalceiJGVogelN, et al. ACL Study Group survey reveals the evolution of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft choice over the past three decades. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(11):3871-3876.
4.
BarberFAHowardMSPiccirilloJSpencinerDB.A biomechanical comparison of six suture configurations for soft tissue-based graft traction and fixation. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(4):1163-1169.
5.
BarrowAEPiliaMGudaTKadrmasWRBurnsTC. Femoral suspension devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2013-10-24;42(2).
6.
BediASmithBLMitchellJJFrankRMHauckOLWijdicksCA.Effect of quadriceps tendon autograft preparation and fixation on graft laxity during suspensory anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2024;12(10):23259671241288578.
7.
BlumenthalAMBou-AklTRossiMDWuBRenWPMarkelDC.FiberWire vs FiberTape: comparison of bacterial adherence in a murine air pouch wound model. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(12):2325967120964480.
8.
BurkartAImhoffABRoscherE.Foreign-body reaction to the bioabsorbable Suretac device. Arthroscopy. 2000;16(1):91-95.
9.
CamardaLGiambartinoSLauriaMSaporitoMTrioloVD’ArienzoM.Surgical time for graft preparation using different suture techniques. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2016;6(2):236-240.
10.
CarrBJOchoaLRankinDOwensBD.Biologic response to orthopedic sutures: a histologic study in a rabbit model. Orthopedics. 2009;32(11):828.
11.
CheruvuBNeidhard-DollAGoswamiT.Gender-specific anterior cruciate ligament—gait forces. Adv Gen Pract Med. 2022;4(1):42-47.
12.
CognettiDJMcDermottERSongDJTennentDJ.Minimally invasive distal biceps tendon reconstruction with semitendinosus allograft and dual unicortical button fixation. Arthrosc Tech. 2023;12(6):e943-e949.
13.
DanielDMStoneMLSachsR.Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Am J Sports Med. 1985;13(6):401-407.
14.
DeramoDMWhiteKLParksBGHintonRY.Krackow locking stitch versus nonlocking premanufactured loop stitch for soft-tissue fixation: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(5):599-603.
15.
DiazMABranchEADunnJGBrothersAJordanSE.Whip-lock stitch is biomechanically superior to whipstitch for semitendinosus tendons. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024;6(1):100853.
16.
DiazMABranchEADunnJGBrothersAJordanSE.Whipstitch and locking stitch show equivalent elongation and load to failure across 3 suture systems in a biomechanical model of quadriceps tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024;6(5):100968.
17.
DomnickCWieskotterBRaschkeMJ, et al. Evaluation of biomechanical properties: are porcine flexor tendons and bovine extensor tendons eligible surrogates for human tendons in in vitro studies?Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(10):1465-1471.
18.
EguchiAOchiMAdachiNDeieMNakamaeAUsmanMA.Mechanical properties of suspensory fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of the fixed-length loop device versus the adjustable-length loop device. Knee. 2014;21(3):743-748.
19.
EjerhedLKartusJSernertNKohlerKKarlssonJ.Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective randomized study with a two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(1):19-25.
20.
EsenyelCZDemirhanMKilicogluO, et al. Evaluation of soft tissue reactions to three nonabsorbable suture materials in a rabbit model. Article in Turkish. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2009;43(4):366-372.
21.
EttingerMDratzidisAHurschlerC, et al. Biomechanical properties of suture anchor repair compared with transosseous sutures in patellar tendon ruptures. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(11):2540-2544.
GarikaSSMahmoodAMittalRDiggeVK.Anatomical distal biceps tendon reconstruction with a semitendinosus autograft. J Orthop Rep. 2024;3(4):100345.
24.
GifstadTFossOAEngebretsenL, et al. Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2319-2328.
25.
GomideLCCamposDOAraujoCAMenegazGLCardosoRSSaad JuniorSC.Mechanical study of the properties of sutures used in orthopedics surgeries. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2019;54(3):247-252.
26.
HahnJMInceogluSWongworawatMD.Biomechanical comparison of Krackow locking stitch versus nonlocking loop stitch with varying number of throws. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(12):3003-3008.
27.
HowardMECawleyPWLosseGMJohnstonRB.Bone–patellar tendon–bone grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the effects of graft pretensioning. Arthroscopy. 1996;12(3):287-292.
28.
ItamiYLimpisvastiOMcGarryMH, et al. Biomechanical characterization of a new locking loop stitch for graft fixation versus Krackow stitch. Clin Orthop Surg. 2023;15(3):508-515.
29.
KearneyRSCostaML.Current concepts in the rehabilitation of an acute rupture of the tendo Achillis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(1):28-31.
30.
KrackowKA.The Krackow suture: how, when, and why. Orthopedics. 2008;31(9):931-933.
31.
MaffulliNTallonCWongJLimKPBleakneyR.Early weightbearing and ankle mobilization after open repair of acute midsubstance tears of the Achilles tendon. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(5):692-700.
32.
MarcusVARoyISullivanJDSuttonJR.Necrobiotic palisading suture granulomas involving bone and joint: report of two cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997;21(5):563-565.
33.
MarieswaranMJainIGargBSharmaVKalyanasundaramD.A review on biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament and materials for reconstruction. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2018;2018:4657824.
34.
MuscatelliSWalleyKCDaly-SeilerCS, et al. Biomechanical comparison of a novel multiplanar, perpendicular whipstitch with the Krackow stitch and standard commercial whipstitch. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022;10(8):23259671221107034.
35.
NilssonNStensötaINilsson HelanderK, et al. Both gastrocnemius aponeurosis flaps and semitendinosus tendon grafts are effective in the treatment of chronic Achilles tendon ruptures—a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24(1):951.
36.
NylandJCollisPHuffstutlerA, et al. Quadriceps tendon autograft ACL reconstruction has less pivot shift laxity and lower failure rates than hamstring tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(2):509-518.
37.
OllivereBJBosmanHABearcroftPWRobinsonAH.Foreign body granulomatous reaction associated with polyethelene ‘Fiberwire®’ suture material used in Achilles tendon repair. Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;20(2):e27-e29.
38.
OstranderRVSaperMGJuelsonTJ.A biomechanical comparison of modified Krackow and locking loop suture patterns for soft-tissue graft fixation. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(7):1384-1388.
39.
PerssonAFjeldsgaardKGjertsenJE, et al. Increased risk of revision with hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study of 12,643 patients from the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Registry, 2004-2012. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(2):285-291.
40.
RahardjaRZhuMLoveHClatworthyMGMonkAPYoungSW.Effect of graft choice on revision and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the New Zealand ACL Registry. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(1):63-69.
SakaguchiKTachibanaYOdaH.Biomechanical properties of porcine flexor tendon fixation with varying throws and stitch methods. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(7):1641-1645.
43.
ShelburneKBPandyMGAndersonFCTorryMR.Pattern of anterior cruciate ligament force in normal walking. J Biomech. 2004;37(6):797-805.
44.
ShomPVarmaARPrasadR.The anterior cruciate ligament: principles of treatment. Cureus. 2023;15(6):e40269.
TowBPChangPCMitraAKTayBKWongMC.Comparing 2-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either patella-tendon or semitendinosus-tendon autografts: a non-randomised prospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2005;13(2):139-146.
47.
WangRYArcieroRAObopilweEMazzoccaAD.A comparison of structural and mechanical properties of tubularized and native semitendinosus graft. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(6):1246-1249.
48.
WarmeWJBurroughsRFFergusonT.Late foreign-body reaction to Ticron sutures following inferior capsular shift: a case report. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(1):232-236.
49.
WhiteKLCamireLMParksBGCoreyWSHintonRY.Krackow locking stitch versus locking premanufactured loop stitch for soft-tissue fixation: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(12):1662-1666.
50.
WichernCRSkoglundKCO’SullivanJG, et al. A biomechanical comparison of all-inside cruciate ligament graft preparation techniques. J Exp Orthop. 2018;5(1):42.
51.
WuFNerlichMDochevaD.Tendon injuries: basic science and new repair proposals. EFORT Open Rev. 2017;2(7):332-342.
