Gemcitabine and synthesized silver nanoparticles impact on chemically induced hepatocellular carcinoma in male rats

Abstract

Objective: Gemcitabine (GEM) is a deoxycytidine analog chemotherapeutic drug widely used to treat many cancers. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are important nanomaterials used to treat many diseases. Using gamma radiation in nanoparticle preparation is a new eco-friendly method. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of co-treating gemcitabine and silver nanoparticles in treating hepatocellular carcinoma. Method: The AgNPs were characterized using UV-visible spectroscopy, XRD, TEM, and EDX. The MTT cytotoxicity in vitro assay of gemcitabine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide was assessed against Wi38 normal fibroblast and HepG2 HCC cell lines. After HCC development, rats received (10 µg/g b.wt.) of AgNPs three times a week for 4 weeks and/or GEM (5 mg/kg b.wt.) twice weekly for 4 weeks. Liver function enzymes were investigated. Cytochrome P450 and miR-21 genes were studied. Apoptosis was determined by using flow cytometry, and apoptotic modifications in signaling pathways were evaluated via Bcl-2, Bax, Caspase-9, and SMAD-4. Results: The co-treatment of GEM and AgNPs increased apoptosis by upregulating Bax and caspase 9 while diminishing Bcl2 and SMAD4. It also improved cytochrome P450 m-RNA relative expression. The results also proved the cooperation between GEM and AgNPs in deactivating miR21. The impact of AgNPs as an adjuvant treatment with GEM was recognized. Conclusions: The study showed that co-treating AgNPs and GEM can improve the efficiency of GEM alone in treating HCC. This is achieved by enhancing intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways while diminishing some drawbacks of using GEM alone.

Keywords

hepatocellular carcinoma gemcitabine γ-radiation silver nanoparticles apoptosis

Introduction

Liver cancer, an asymptomatic disease. It is the fourth most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths globally.^1,2 Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common primary liver cancers.³ It is the third leading cause of death worldwide and is usually the result of chronic liver disease, fibrosis, and cirrhosis.⁴ HCC is also associated with inflammation and oxidative stress.⁵ Unfortunately, there are few effective treatments for HCC, and surgical intervention usually has a poor prognosis. Chemoprevention is often the best approach to combat HCC,⁶ and nanoparticle-mediated targeted therapy is a promising new option.⁷ Nanoparticles have unique properties that make them potentially more effective than traditional chemotherapeutics,⁸ due to their small size and high surface area to volume ratio.⁹ Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), in particular, have exceptional antimicrobial and antibacterial properties, making them an ideal material for medical products.^10,11 They also offer a novel approach to treating hepatic carcinoma.¹² AgNPs are less toxic to normal cells and have a wide range of applications.¹³ Gamma irradiation (γ-irradiation) is a powerful technique for synthesizing nanoparticles, and it is particularly effective for producing silver nanoparticles of controlled size and shape.^14,15 Gemcitabine (GEM; 2′-deoxy-2′, 2′- difluorocytidine) is a nucleoside analog that is commonly used to treat various cancers; ovarian, bladder, non-small cell lung, pancreatic, and breast carcinoma¹⁵ and promising therapy for HCC.¹⁶ In this study, HCC was induced by the carcinogen diethyl-nitrosamine (DEN), which can cause severe liver damage leading to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), oxidative DNA damage, and ultimately lead to cancer.¹⁷ The combination of AgNPs and GEM has not been studied before in the treatment of HCC. Combining nanoparticles with traditional chemotherapy can improve treatment outcomes.¹⁸ This study aims to investigate the potential of this combination therapy to manage the drawbacks associated with traditional chemotherapeutic drugs like Gemcitabine, using nanoparticles that are synthesized by a unique and eco-friendly method.

Materials and methods

Materials

Chemicals

Gemcitabine [C9H11F2N3O4], obtained from Eli Lilly Company. Indianapolis, Indiana 46285 USA. Silver nitrate (MW 169.87), PVP (MW ≈ 40,000), isopropyl alcohol, and diethyl-nitrosamine (DEN) were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (USA). Normal human fibroblast cells (Wi-38) and human liver cancer cells (HepG2) were obtained from the National Research Center, (the tissue culture unit of the Holding Company for Biological Products and Vaccines (VACSERA), Giza, Egypt.

Gamma irradiation source

Irradiation was performed at NCRRT, EAEA, Cairo; within a γ-irradiation system using Canadian Gamma cell-40 (⁶⁰Co source) as a reducing source, with a dose rate of 1.06 kGy/h at irradiation dose 25 kGy.

Animals

Fifty-six male albino rats according to (Song et al. and Kerdput et al.,)^19,20 weighing between 110 and 130 g, were acquired from the National Center for Radiation Research and Technology (NCCRT). They were kept in a clean-air room with controlled environmental conditions and a standard 12-h light/dark cycle. The rats were fed standard food pellets with all necessary nutrients and had access to water ad libitum as described by (MS et al. and Charan and Kantharia).^21,22 All animal procedures were conducted following NCCRT guidelines and the appropriate treatment and use of laboratory animals.

Synthesis and characterization of the AgNPs

AgNPs were manufactured using ⁶⁰Co- γ-irradiation as a clean tool for synthesis. Silver nitrate (AgNO3) was used as an Ag⁺ ions precursor, PVP as a stabilizer, and 2-propanol as a scavenging oxidizing agent. Typically, (5 mL) of 0.1 M AgNO3 was added to 50 mL of 1% PVP solution and 0.5 mL isopropanol then the mixture was stirred well. After being purged by N₂ for 20 min, the mixture was sealed and exposed to a 25 kGy dose using γ-rays at room temperature. Following irradiation, Ag^oNPs were separated by centrifugation, to remove the free PVP and excess silver ions. The precipitated Ag^oNPs were thoroughly washed with ethanol, dried at room temperature then stored for further investigations. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the obtained Ag^oNPs were studied using XRD 6000 diffractometer with a Cu target. The XRD runs were carried out over 2θ ranging from 10° to 80° at a scan speed of 8°/min. The UV-visible wavelength scan for the absorption spectra was obtained using a UV/Vis spectrometer model UV-Analytic Jena AG specord 210 plus (Germany) at a wavelength of (190−900) nm. EDX analysis was performed using energy dispersive X-ray unit microprobe EDX (Oxford, England - ISIS). The size of Ag^oNPs was estimated using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEOL, JEM 100CX, Japan). The obtained Ag^oNPs were dispersed in methanol followed by sonication then a drop of the obtained solution was dropped on an ultrathin carbon-supported Cu grid and air-dried at room temperature.

Methods

MTT cytotoxicity assay

Cell cytotoxicity was measured using the MTT assay on two cell lines, Wi-38 and HepG2, following the method described by van de Loosdrecht et al.²³ and MTT reagent [3-(4,5-dimethyl-thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide] was used. Initially, 1 × 10⁵ cells were seeded and incubated at 37°C, 10% CO₂ for 24 h to develop a complete monolayer sheet. Next,100 μL of various concentrations of drugs, including Gemcitabine (GEM) Doxorubicin (Doxo), and Cyclophosphamide (Cyclo) (ranging from1000 - 7.81 μg/mL) were added to RPMI 1640 complete media in a 96-well -plate. The plate was incubated for 24 h at 37°C, 10% CO₂. For control purposes, HepG2 and Wi38 cells in RPMI media were considered as control (100% viable). Then, 10 μL of freshly prepared MTT solution (0.5 mg/mL) was added to each well. The plate was incubated in the dark for 4 h to develop color. Finally, 200 μL of DMSO/well was added to dissolve MTT formazan, and the absorbance was measured at 570 nm. The percentage of cell cytotoxicity was calculated using the following equation:

Viability % = sample abs / control abs \times 100 and Cytotoxicity % = viability % - 100

Experimental design

In this study, rats were randomly assigned to eight groups (n = 7), with each group receiving different treatments. The purpose was to determine statistically significant differences (p < .05) between the treatments using the G-power.²² The groups were as follows: (1) Control group (C); normal male rats were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 0.9% saline solution. (2) AgNPs group (Ag); animals were i. p. injected with AgNPs (10 μg/g)/b. wt 3 times a week, for 4 weeks with some modifications.^24,25 (3) GEM (G); rats of this group were injected (i.p.) with GEM 5 mg/kg twice weekly, for 4 weeks with some modifications.²⁶ (4) Rats treated with AgNPs and GEM (AgG); rats of this group were injected with both AgNPs and GEM. (5) HCC group (T); rats were orally administered with 20 mg/kg b. wt. of DEN (dissolved in 0.9% normal saline), five times a week for 8 weeks, followed by 10 mg/kg for another two successive weeks according to the modified method.^27,28 (6) HCC-AgNPs treated rat group (TAg); rats were injected with AgNPs and then treated as in group 2 (7) HCC- GEM treated rat group (TG); rats developed HCC as in group 5 and were treated with GEM. (8) HCC-AgNPs-G treated rat group (TAgG); rats developed HCC as in group 5, were injected with AgNPs and treated with GEM.

Samples collection and preparation

After the treatments, blood and liver samples were collected for analysis. Blood was drawn from the heart and separated into two parts; whole EDTA blood for flow cytometry analysis and serum for other biochemical investigations. Liver tissues were excised and dissected for assessment of RT-qPCR and western blotting analysis. Another part of the liver was preserved in 10% formalin for histopathological studies.

Flow cytometry analysis

Apoptosis was measured as a FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (Cat. No: 556547), according to Casciola-Rosen, et al.²⁹ Whole blood samples from EDTA collection tubes were directly processed according to Yakimov et al.³⁰

Quantitative real-time PCR

The sequence of the PCR primer pair used for miR-21 and cytochrome c are shown in Table 1. Data were studied with the ABI Prism sequence detection system software and then quantified using the v1·7 Sequence Detection Software from PE Biosystems (Foster City, CA). Relative expression of the studied gene was measured using the comparative threshold cycle method. All values were normalized to the endogenous control Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (GAPDH).³¹

Table 1.

Sequence of primers for the selected genes.

Primers	Sequences of bases
Accession numbers	Sequences of bases
miR-21	F:5' - AGCTTATCAGACTGATGTTG -3′
MIMAT0000790	R:5′- GAACATGTCTGCGTATCTC -3′
Cytochrome c	F: 5′- GAGGCAAGCATAAGACTGGA-3′
XM_039087827.1	R: 5′- TACTCCATCAGGGTATCCTC -3′
GAPDH	F: 5′- CTCCCATTCTTCCACCTTTG-3′
NM_017008.4	R: 5′- CTTGCTCTCAGTATCCTTGC-3′

Western blot analysis

The protein expression of BCL2 (Cat. No: ab194583∼ 26kD a), Bax (Cat. No: ab182733∼ 21 kDa), SMAD4 (Cat. No: AF5247 ∼65 kDa), and Caspase-9 (Cat. No: AF6348 ∼46 kDa) was estimated in liver tissue. Data of the obtained protein levels were estimated using β-actin as a housekeeping arbitrary unit (A.U) β-actin (Cat. No: ab8227∼42 kDa).

Histopathological investigations

Specimen from liver tissue of all studied groups was washed, dehydrated in ascending grades of ethyl alcohol, cleared in xylene, and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections of 5–6 mm in thickness were cut out, deparaffinized, and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H & E) for examination under the light microscope.³²

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of results was executed via SPSS version 20.0. All data are given as means ± standard error (SE). Differences were considered significant at p < .05, and Data were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey as Post Hoc analysis.

Results

Radiation synthesis of silver nanoparticles Ag^o NPs

The irradiation preparation method has numerous advantages such as saving energy and materials, as well as being environmentally friendly. When Ag⁺ aqueous solution is exposed to gamma irradiation, the main initiating chemical step is radiolysis of water molecules. This results in the formation of hydrated electrons ( $e_{aq}^{-}$ ), primary radicals and molecules, such as hydroxyl radicals (•OH), hydrogen atoms (H•), H3O⁺ ions, and molecules like dihydrogen H₂ and hydrogen peroxide H₂O₂. The solvated electrons ( $e_{aq}^{-}$ ) and H^• atoms are strong reducing agents. To enhance the reducing conditions, 2-propanol was used to scavenge hydroxyl (^•OH) radicals.

These radicals can oxidize ions or atoms into a higher oxidation state, and thus compensate for the reduction reactions. In addition to hydrated electrons ( $e_{aq}^{-}$ ) the 2-propanol radicals (CH3)₂C^•OH are also reducing in nature. These reducing radicals will reduce Ag⁺ ions to Ag atoms, which will then form AgNPs. The formation of Ag^oNPs from aqueous solutions of AgNO₃ stabilized PVP in the presence of isopropanol using γ-irradiation involves the following reactions^33,34

H_{2} O ⇝ e_{aq}^{-} + H_{3} O^{+} + H^{\cdot} + {OH}^{\cdot} + H_{2} + H_{2} O_{2} + \dots

{Ag}^{+} + e_{aq}^{-} \to {Ag}^{o}

{Ag}^{+} + H^{\cdot} \to {Ag}^{o} + H^{+}

{Ag}^{+} + {({CH}_{3})}_{2} C^{\cdot} O H \to {Ag}^{o} + {({CH}_{3})}_{2} C O + H^{+}

{Ag}^{o} + {Ag}^{+} \to {Ag}_{2}^{+}

{Ag}_{n - 1} + {Ag}^{+} \to {Ag}_{n}^{+}

Characterization of the radiation-synthesized AgNPs

UV–vis spectrosecopy analysis

Ag^oNPs are readily detectable by UV-Vis spectroscopy because of their characteristic absorption maximum ranging between 380 and 430 nm. Figure 1 shows the UV/V absorption spectrum of the obtained colloidal Ag^oNPs. As clear, a characteristic absorption band of metallic Ag^oNPs surface plasmon resonance (SPR) absorption band appears at λmax (420 nm) which is compatible with the reported spherical AgNPs absorption band.³⁵ Interestingly, Ag^oNPs have a conduction band and a valence band that is very close to each other, allowing electrons to move freely between them. Owing to the collective oscillation of electrons of AgNPs in resonance with the light wave, the characteristic surface plasmon resonance (SPR) absorption occurs.³⁶

Figure 1.

UV absorption spectrum of the obtained Ag^oNPs.

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis

As clear from Figure 2(a), the XRD spectrum of the obtained Ag^oNPs shows well-defined characteristic diffraction peaks at 2θ values at 37.9°, 44.26°, 64.50°, and 77.29 assigned to diffractions planes (111), (200), (220), and (311), respectively confirming the formation of face centered cubic (fcc) structure of Ag^oNPs. The average crystallite size of the developed Ag^oNPs was calculated from XRD pattern using Scherrer’s equation³⁷:

D = \frac{k λ}{β \cos θ}

where D is the average crystallite size, β is the full width of the peak at half of the maximum intensity (rad), λ is the wavelength of the monochromatic X-ray beam (λ = 1.5406 Å), θ is the peak diffraction angle (Bragg’s angle), and K is a Scherrer constant defined as the crystallite shape and approximately equals 39 nm

Figure 2.

(a) X-ray diffraction patterns of the obtained (b) TEM image of the prepared Ag^o NPs.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

As clear from Figure 2(b), the TEM image confirmed the nanoscale size of the obtained Ag^oNPs. The Ag^oNPs were found to be spherical and a relatively narrow size distribution with an approximate average size ranged between 30 and 50 nm which correlates with the XRD measurements.

In addition, The XRD spectrum and TEM image confirmed the nanoscale size of the obtained Ag^o nanoparticles, which was in good agreement with the particle sizes calculated according to Scherrer’s equation. Finally, the successful preparation was confirmed by EDX analysis which showed the sharp signal peak of silver powerfully established the reduction of silver nitrate to Ag-NPs.³⁸

Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX)

As clear from Figure 3, the appearance of a strong signal for Ag atoms in the range of 3 keV, which is a typical signal of the absorption of metallic and spherical silver nanocrystals due to surface plasmon resonance, confirmed the elemental composition of the prepared Ag^oNPs according to the EDX analysis profile and attested to the success of the Ag^oNPs preparation.³⁹

Figure 3.

EDX spectrum of the obtained Ag^o NPs.

MTT cytotoxicity assay

The mitochondrial activity of Wi38 and HepG2 cell lines was evaluated through an in vitro MTT assay. The control group consisted of Wi38 and HepG2 cells in RPMI media and was considered to have 100% viability and 0% toxicity. Drug concentrations ranging from 7.8 to 1000 µg/ml was used. The cytotoxicity of all drugs was estimated first on the normal cell line Figure 4. The results showed that doxorubicin exhibited the highest cytotoxic effect on Wi38 cells (48.7%), followed by cyclophosphamide (30.6%), while gemcitabine recorded a cytotoxic effect of 34.65%. More interestingly, cyclophosphamide has a lesser cytotoxic effect on the HepG2 cells Oppositely, doxorubicin is the most cytotoxic drug among them but it is also the most cytotoxic drug to the normal cells. IC50 was assessed for the three drugs (Gemcitabine 44.5, Doxorubicin 6.45, and Cyclophosphamide 190.56 µg/ml) (Figure 5). Interestingly, cyclophosphamide had a lesser cytotoxic effect on the HepG2 cells. In contrast, doxorubicin was the most cytotoxic drug among them, but it also had the most cytotoxic effect on normal cells. The IC50 values for the three drugs were assessed as follows: Gemcitabine 44.5 µg/ml, Doxorubicin 6.45 µg/ml, and Cyclophosphamide 190.56 µg/ml (Figure 5).

Figure 4.

MTT cytotoxicity assay (% of cell viability, % of cell toxicity and IC50) of the chemotherapeutic drugs on Wi38 cell (the value displayed as means ± SE (n = 3) of two independent experiments.

Figure 5.

MTT cytotoxicity assay (% of cell viability) and IC50 of different chemotherapeutic drugs on HepG2 cells (the value displayed as means ± SE (n = 3) of two independent experiments.

Liver function enzymes examination

The enzyme activities related to liver function were examined in all groups that were tested (Figure 6). In the HCC (T) group, there were significant elevations (p < .05) compared to their equivalent values in the control group. However, treatment with Gem exhibited a potent decrease compared to the T group. In contrast, associated treatment with AgNPs showed a significant improvement (p < .05) in their activities in the TAg group compared to the T group. There was a synergistic impact between Gem and AgNPs observed in all enzyme activities.

Figure 6.

Liver function enzyme activities of serum (AST, ALT, and ALP (U/L)) in different male rat groups. Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 7). Columns over headed with different letters are considered significantly different (p < .05). (a): Different from control, (b): Different from Ag, (c): Different from G; and (d): Different from T.

Annexin V apoptosis analysis

Apoptotic Annexin V/PI lymphocyte distribution using flow cytometry analysis was shown in dot plots and histograms (Figures 7 and 8). Annexin V/PI staining defined the apoptotic and non-apoptotic population of cells. In the present work, the total apoptotic activity (V+/PI−) and (V+/PI+) significantly increased in T group (63.6 ± 0.32) comparing to the healthy control group (0.15 ± 0.08). However, our results demonstrated that Gem can reduce the total apoptosis of lymphocyte (50.07± compared to T group. In addition, the AgNPs administration showed a potent decrease in apoptosis (43.5 ± 0.46) compared to T group. Remarkably, the combination of AgNPs and Gem established a synergistic effect counter HCC development in TAgG (35.68 ± 0.58) contrary to the T group.

Figure 7.

Flow cytometric profile of blood lymphocytes of all tested groups stained with Annexin V/FITC in x-axis and Propidium Iodide (PI) in y-axis. Viable cells (lower left) Annexin V–/PI–, early cell apoptosis (lower right) Annexin V+/PI–, late cell apoptosis (upper right) Annexin V+/PI+, and necrotic cells (upper left) Annexin V–/PI+. The overall percentage of viable and dead cells comprises the total apoptotic cells (early and late) as well as the necrotic ones: (a)- normal control (C), (b)- HCC developed group (T), (c)- Animals developed HCC & treated with AgNPs (TAg), (d)- HCC developed rats & injected with Gem, (e)- HCC developed rats &treated with AgNPs and Gem (TAgG) Data are mean ± SE, at p < .05.

Figure 8.

Forward scatter (FSC) versus side scatter (SSC) plots after doublet exclusion. (a) Control (C); (b) HCC (T); (c) HCC-AgNPs treated group (TAg); (d) HCC-Gem treated group (TG); (e) HCC- AgNPs- Gem treated group (TAgG).

The distribution of apoptotic Annexin V/PI lymphocytes was analyzed using flow cytometry. The results were presented in dot plots and histograms (Figures 7 and 8). Annexin V/PI staining was used to differentiate between the apoptotic and non-apoptotic cell populations.⁴⁰ The study found that the total apoptotic activity (V+/PI-) and (V+/PI+) was significantly higher in the T group (63.6 ± 0.32) compared to the healthy control group (0.15 ± 0.08). However, the results showed that Gem can reduce the total apoptosis of lymphocytes (50.07± compared to the T group. Moreover, the administration of AgNPs led to a significant decrease in apoptosis (43.5 ± 0.46) compared to the T group. Interestingly, combining AgNPs and Gem resulted in a synergistic effect that countered the development of HCC in TAgG (35.68 ± 0.58), in contrast to the T group.

Mixed function cytochrome P-450 enzyme activity

In the present work, the expression of liver CYT P450 mRNA of the control(C) group was 1.06 ± 0.09 folds. The developed HCC group (T) exhibited a significant increase in CYT P450 mRNA compared to the control group. Nevertheless, the results revealed significant improvement in the HCC group treated with AgNPs (TAg) (5.31 ± 0.38) or Gem (TG) (4.51 ± 0.43) compared to the T group (9.20 ± 0.47) (p < .05). Moreover, the combined treatment of AgNPs and Gem (TAgG) observed a potent improvement (2.80 ± 0.22) compared to the T group (p < .05). (Figure 9)

Figure 9.

The relative gene expression of CYT-P450 m-RNA in different examined groups. Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 7). Columns over headed with different letters are considered significantly different (p < .05). (a): Different from control, (b): Different from Ag, (c): Different from G; and (d): Different from T.

Apoptotic pathway detections

The protein expression of Bax was significantly decreased (p < .05) in the T group (68.46%) compared to the control group (Figure 10(a)). On the other hand, the treatment by AgNPs alone (TAg), GEM alone (TG), or both (TAgG) significantly elevated (p < .05) (7.07-fold change, 9.5-fold change, and 14.56-fold change, respectively) compared to the T group. Similarly, Caspase9 protein expression demonstrated a significant decline (p < .05) in the T group (64.47%) compared to the corresponding control. However, the protein expression of Caspase9 significantly rise (p < .05) in groups TAg, TG, and TAgG (7.5-fold change, 11.08-fold change, and 16.25-fold change, respectively) compared to the T group (Figure 10(b)). Though, the protein expression of BCl₂ exhibited a potent increase in T group (p < .05) (5.5-fold change) in comparison to the respected control. Conversely, the data of the TAg, TG, and TAgG displayed a significant reduction (p < .05) (35.42%, 43.82%, and 63.59%, respectively) corresponding to tumor developed group (T) (Figure 10(c)).

Figure 10.

The protein expression of different apoptotic markers (Bax, BCL2, and Caspase9) in all examined rats. Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 7). Columns over headed with different letters are considered significantly different (p < .05). (a): Different from control, (b): Different from Ag, and (c): Different from G; (d): Different from T.

The protein expression of SMAD4 is presented in Figure 11. The expression of the T group was increased significantly (p < .05) (5.4-fold change) compared control group (C). Otherwise, the treatment by AgNPs or Gem alone or together TAgG demonstrated a significant decrease (p < .05) (34%, 45%, and 56.68, respectively) compared to the T group.

Figure 11.

The protein expression of SMAD 4 in all examined rats. Each value represents mean ± SE (n = 7). Columns over headed with different letters are considered significantly different (p < .05). (a): Different from control, (b): Different from Ag, (c): Different from G; and (d): Different from T.

The gene expression of miR-21 in the T was significantly elevated (p < .05) (8.40-fold change) compared to the control. Oppositely, miR-21 expression in TAg, TG, and TAgG groups was potently declined (32.36%, 39.2%, and 62.25%, respectively compared to the T group (Figure 12).

Figure 12.

The relative gene expression of miR-21 in different examined groups. Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 7). Columns over headed with different letters are considered significantly different (p < .05). (a): Different from control, (b): Different from Ag, (c): Different from G; and (d): Different from T.

Histopathological study

The normal histological structure of the hepatic tissue is shown in Figure 13. Remarkably, in the control group there is no pathological clues were shown. In rats treated with ANPs, there was no toxicity according to AgNPs treatment that the normal-sized portal tract surrounded by cords of average-sized hepatocytes with no degeneration or necrosis was presented (Figure 13(b)). The liver section of the G group is presented in Figure 13(c) showed central veins enclosed by cords of degenerated hepatocytes, some of them showed patchy necrosis. The combined administration of AgNPs and Gem in the AgG group showed a minor dilated central vein surrounded by cords of slightly degenerated hepatocytes, some showing pyknotic (dark stained small) nuclei and apoptotic bodies (Figure 13(d)). Nevertheless, rats that developed HCC revealed sheets of malignant hepatocytes exhibiting pleomorphism, hyperchromasia, abnormal mitotic figures, and focal areas of necrosis (Figure 13(e)). Additionally, Figure 13(f) presented the liver section of the TAg group showed malignant cells surrounded by 80% of tumor necrosis. In TG group the section of liver showed malignant cells surrounded by 60% of tumor necrosis (Figure 13(g)). But rats treated with AgNPs and Gem showed few residual malignant cells surrounded by 95% of tumor necrosis, illustrated in Figure 13(h).

Figure 13.

Photomicrograph of liver tissue sections. (a): Normal control liver section.(b): Ag group showed normal sized portal tract (blue arrow) surrounded by cords of average sized hepatocytes with no degeneration or necrosis (red arrow), (c): G group showed central veins (red arrows) surrounded by degenerated hepatocytes, some of them showed spotty necrosis (blue arrows), (d): AgG group showed mild dilated central vein (blue arrow) surrounded by cords of mild degenerated hepatocytes, some showing pyknotic (dark stained small) nuclei (red arrows) and apoptotic bodies (black arrow), (e): HCC group showed sheets of malignant hepatocytes exhibiting pleomorphism, hyperchromatisa and abnormal mitotic figures (blue arrows) and focal areas of necrosis (red arrows), (f) TAg group showed malignant cells (red arrow) surrounded by 80% of tumor necrosis (blue arrow), (g): TG group showed malignant cells (black arrow) surrounded by 60% of tumor necrosis (red arrow), and (h): TAgG group showed few residual malignant cells (blue arrow) surrounded by 95% of tumor necrosis (red arrows).

Discussion

Owing to the unique characteristics of nanoparticles, they may be one of the promising modalities for cancer treatment with traditional chemotherapeutic drugs. Gamma radiation is an eco-friendly method for AgNPs synthesis, compromising plentiful advantages over conventional chemical and photochemical procedures because of its simplicity and efficiency.⁴¹ The radiochemical process was achieved to reduce Ag + ions at ambient temperature without using excessive reducing agents or producing unwanted by-products of the reductant. In addition, the reducing agents were distributed uniformly in the solution, so AgNPs were formed in highly pure and stable forms.⁴² The size of nanoparticles is considered a vital factor in their cytotoxicity and cellular uptake.^43,44 It affects their interaction with mammalian cells and where NPs accumulated.⁴⁵ In the current work, AgNPs exhibited a diameter of 30-50 nm. Many reports documented that decreasing the size leads to an increase in the surface area of the particles, which facilitates the diffusion of the particles into the cell.⁴⁶ The polymeric materials coating AgNPs enhance their stability and reduces the Ag + ions dissolution from AgNPs surface.⁴⁷ Using different coating materials can affect AgNPs toxicity; Anderson et al.⁴⁸ documented that PVP-coated AgNPs directed to the lung get cleared faster than citrate-coated AgNPs, so surface coating has a vital role in the internal clearance and translocation of AgNPs. Therefore, we prepared PVP-coated AgNPs to sidestep any coating-dependent disparity in cellular response.^49,50 Fehaid et al.⁵¹ recommended PVP for AgNPs coating in vitro studies because of their higher stability with less aggregation and dissolution changes. Additionally, Pharmacokinetics of AgNPs were documented in previous works.^52–54

The efficiency of AgNPs on HCC-induced rats was studied by measuring liver function enzyme (ALT, AST, and ALP) activities; they are indicators of hepatocellular injury. In healthy (control) liver, organ homeostasis happens through cell death and tissue regeneration. Therefore, ALT and AST levels were maintained within a normal range.⁵⁵ However, a significant increase in liver enzyme activities was documented regarding HCC development due to hepatocyte injuries, so enzymes are released into the blood circulation.⁵⁶ ALT is a more specific biomarker for acute liver injury at its early stages and in some types of cancers, such as HCC.⁵⁷ But both enzymes’ activities were decreased after AgNPs treatment (TAg) which may confirm the AgNPs role in the probable regeneration of hepatocytes and possible healing of the hepatic parenchyma.⁵⁸ The comparative cytotoxic study was carried out by MTT assay to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of gemcitabine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide drugs on Wi38 and HepG2 cell lines. The results documented the dose-dependent inhibitory ability of GEM against HepG2 cells more than cyclophosphamide and less toxic on the normal Wi38 cells. Apoptosis is the first guard against cancer progression.⁵⁹

Furthermore, much research defined the disturbance of apoptotic mechanisms during cancer development.^60,61 Annexin V is a protein that can detect the presence of phosphatidylserine (PS) on the outer surface of the cell membrane during apoptosis. On the other hand, propidium iodide (PI) can identify the loss of integrity of the nucleus, which is a characteristic of necrosis. Therefore, the Annexin V/PI technique can be effectively used to distinguish between apoptosis and necrosis.^62,63 Annexin-V results showed a value of (63.6 ± 0.32) in the lymphocytes of HCC-developed rats(T)due to the capability of cancer cells to alter the levels of proteins associated with lymphocyte function, including apoptosis.^64,65 The amount of apoptosis in the T group was approximately 1.5 times of rats treated with AgNPs (TAg) (43.5 ± 0.46). Farahani et al.⁶⁶ stated the ability of AgNPs to induce apoptosis in cancerous cell lines with low toxicity on normal liver cells and the lymphocytes. Mahjoub et al.⁶⁷ showed that AgNPs administration did not cause changes in the WBC formula, but it can induce which activation in murine lymphocytes after a few hours of exposure to AgNPs.⁶⁸ In addition, in the group treated with GEM, the apoptosis was markedly decreased (50.07 ± 0.32) regarding the T group. Furthermore, the combination of AgNPs and GEM exhibited a more pronounced effect on lymphocyte apoptosis (35.68 ± 0.58) as the co-treatment improves therapeutic efficiency that may be due to the ability of AgNPs and GEM to generate oxygen free radicals that cause substantial DNA damage, subsequently induce apoptosis.⁶⁹

Besides, our investigation exhibits the mechanism understood that AgNPs mediated extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic cell death. The proteins of apoptotic factors Bax, Caspase9, and the anti-apoptotic Bcl2 were isolated, and their expression levels were determined, as illustrated in Figure 10. The displayed results revealed that Bcl-2 expression was suppressed and Bax expression was up-regulated in rats treated with AgNPs compared to the control group. It has been proven that the boosted expression of Bax represents the main effector of the intrinsic pathway responsible for the induction of mitochondrial modifications that leads to cyt c and caspase −9 induction.⁶⁹ Kanipandian et al.⁷⁰ proved that the decreased Bcl2 level indicates that AgNPs effectively interfere with the intrinsic apoptotic activity by preventing the anti-apoptotic gene expression. Remarkably, it was demonstrated that the up-regulation of caspase 9 provokes caspase −3 levels in AgNPs treated cells.⁷⁰ Ahmadian et al.⁷¹ demonstrated that AgNPs induce Bax gene expression and decrease Bcl2 expression. Rakowski et al.,⁷² reported that depending on the size surface modification, and shape of AgNPs can induce cytotoxicity,⁷³ mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress also enhance apoptosis. Moreover, in this study, GEM enhanced apoptosis by up-regulation of Bax and caspase9 and downregulation of Bcl2 protein expression; this data is compatible with Yuan et al.⁷ documented that GEM single treatment can induce DNA fragmentation, also Teng et al.⁷¹ documented that GEM not only inhibits cell proliferation and angiogenesis in tumor cells but also induces apoptosis. Zhu et al.⁷⁴ verified that GEM induces apoptosis in pancreatic cell lines by inhibiting Bcl2. Moreover, many previous studies demonstrate that GEM induced apoptosis by improving Bax and decreasing Bcl2 expression in breast cancer cells⁷⁵ and gall bladder cancer cells.⁷⁶

Further, cytochrome P450 (CYP) is an enzyme family that plays vital roles in the endogenous and exogenous metabolism of many molecules.⁷⁷ They are the main enzymes incorporated in cancer development. The present results showed that AgNPs effectively decrease the elevation of CYP2E1 that increased in the HCC group activated by DEN. It was reported that CYP enzymes mediate the metabolic activation of many procarcinogens.⁷⁷ They can hydrolyze diethylnitroseamine in the liver into active metabolites.⁷⁸ Kang et al.⁷⁸ proved that CYP2E1 is the key diethylnitroseamine-activating P450 responsible for diethylnitroseamine-induced hepatocarcinogenesis. Also, Munger et al.⁷⁹ stated the impact of nanoparticle size on cytochrome P450 enzymes. The average size of AgNPs in this study is 30–50 nm, which verifies the data presented by Frȍhlich et al.⁸⁰ who documented that small (20–60 nm diameter) non-metallic, carboxy polystyrene particles inhibited the enzymatic activity of some CYP subtypes in normal liver microsomes. In addition, the treatment with AgNPs and GEM showed a potent amelioration in CYP2E1 corresponding to the tumor group. Munger et al.⁷⁹ displayed that CYP2E1 had intermediate inhibition caused by nano-silver exposure. Additionally, Li et al.⁸¹ showed that overexpression of CYP2E1 induced cytotoxicity to the HepG2 cell line. Further, miR-21 was studied in this work; microRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs of about 22 nucleotides,⁸² they participate in the post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms⁸³ in a wide variety of cellular functions, including apoptosis, cellular proliferation, DNA damage response, neovascularization, immunological response, stress response, and most vital is tumor progression.⁸⁴ miR-21 is an onco-miR frequently overexpressed in various cancer types.⁸⁵ The gained results revealed a significant elevation in miR-21 expression in tumor progressed group(T), that consistent with Pu et al.⁸⁶ who proved that miR-21 is related to HCC and considered an HCC serum biomarker. Xu et al.⁸⁷ stated that miR-21 participated in the carcinogenic process by targeting many vital signaling processes; apoptosis, cell proliferation, and invasion. It has been found previously that miR-21 is elevated in patients with hepatitis by downregulation of SMAD7, a negative regulator of (TGF)-β signaling which in turn induces miR-21.⁸⁸ Remarkably, Buscaglia and Li⁸⁹ reported that miR-21 inhibits apoptosis by downregulating Bax and upregulating Bcl2. Also, they postulated that, throughout hypoxia, miR-21 is down-regulated and FasL is activated due to lack of targeting of the FasL by miR-21. Oppositly, during cancer growth, miR 21 is activated which decreases FasL and its pro-apoptotic signaling. The down-regulation of miR-21 can cause apoptosis via increased amounts of caspases 9 and 3. So, using AgNPs alone or in addition to GEM showed a significant diminish in miR-21 expression through the enhancement of caspase9 and Bax and Bcl2 downregulation (Figure 10). SMAD4 is a transcription factor of the SMAD family which regulates TGF-β signal transduction.⁹⁰ The TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway is one of the most frequently transformed cellular pathways in human cancers and plays a twin role in tumorigenesis.⁹¹ Depending on the tumor stage, TGF-β/Smad4 signaling pathway works; in the early stage, it exhibits a suppressive role by inducing apoptosis, while later on in the late stage, TGF-β/Smad4 boosts tumor immunosuppression and simplifies tumor angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis.⁹² In this work, SMAD4 protein expression proves the role of SMAD4 in HCC progression, its protein expression was significantly elevated in the HCC group(T) compared to the control. This data was confirmed by Yao et al.⁹³ who stated that Smad4 protein is over-expressed in HCC and is correlated to poor prognosis. Also, Hernanda et al.⁹⁴ revealed a significant increase in nuclear SMAD4 localization in patient HCC tumors, which attached to tumor-promoting effects because of the simultaneous rise of p-SMAD2/3 in the subset. HCC is classified as an inflammation-related tumor⁹⁵ and showed a potent increase in TGF-β level controlled by Smad4 elevation; these results were published in our previous work.⁹⁶ Moreover, many previous studies documented the role of Smad4 and mir-21 in HCC-drug resistance, especially GEM resistance.²⁵ So, by AgNPs administration as co-treatment with GEM, Smad4 expression was significantly decreased (TAgG). The findings of this study suggest that AgNPs may be used to reduce the amount of gemcitabine and other chemotherapy drugs given to patients, thereby minimizing the harmful side effects of chemotherapy. However, further research is needed to explore the molecular and cellular mechanisms of the antitumor effects of AgNPs on other types of cancer cells. It is important to note that this study had a limited sample size per group, and future studies should aim to increase the number of animals and investigate the mechanisms of the treatments used in greater depth. Therefore, conducting more preclinical and post-clinical studies is recommended to assess the safety, effectiveness, and biodistribution of these drug leads.

Conclusion

In the current work, we use γ –irradiation as an eco-friendly method in silver nanoparticle preparation. The size and quality of prepared silver nanoparticles were proved by different techniques (EDX, TEM, UV, XRD). It could be suggested that AgNPs can diminish the challenges of using Gemcitabine in HCC treatment via enhancing the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways as well as suppression of SMAD4 and miR-21 expression. Finally, this work highlighted that using AgNPs as a co-treatment with chemotherapeutics such as GEM accomplished of providing greater therapeutic effects than single-method treatment which is an advanced therapeutic strategy.⁹⁷

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledged the pre-print of our manuscript available at: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3068693/v1.pdf- .

Author contributions

“All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [Mahmoud Mohamed Refaat], [Asmaa Abukar Hassan] and [Amany Ismael Raafat]. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [Soheir Abdelazem Osman] [Shadia A Fathy] and [Mohamed Ragaa Mohamed] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical statement

Animal welfare

The present study followed international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for humane animal treatment and complied with relevant legislation from the National Center for Radiation Research and Technology (NCCRT)-Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority.

ORCID iDs

Asmaa A Hassan

Mahmoud M Refaat

Data availability statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.*

References

Singh

Yadav

, et al. (2018) Attenuation of diethylnitrosamine (DEN) - induced hepatic cancer in experimental model of Wistar rats by Carissa carandas embedded silver nanoparticles. Biomed Pharmacother 108: 757–765. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.09.066.

Yang

Hainaut

Gores

, et al. (2019) A global view of hepatocellular carcinoma: trends, risk, prevention and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 16(10): 589–604. DOI: 10.1038/s41575-019-0186-y.

Massalha

Bahar Halpern

Abu-Gazala

, et al. (2020) A single cell atlas of the human liver tumor microenvironment. Mol Syst Biol 16(12): e9682. DOI: 10.15252/msb.20209682.

Moreira

Ordoñez

Cerski

, et al. (2015) Melatonin activates endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis in rats with diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatocarcinogenesis. PLoS One 10(12): e0144517. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144517.

Wang

, et al. (2016) Oxidative stress and liver cancer: etiology and therapeutic targets. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2016: 7891574. DOI: 10.1155/2016/7891574.

Reddy

Gunasekar

(2009) A new acylated flavone glycoside from Colebrookea oppositifolia. J Asian Nat Prod Res 11(2): 183–186. DOI: 10.1080/10286020802674871.

Yuan

Peng

Gurunathan

(2017) Silver nanoparticles enhance the apoptotic potential of gemcitabine in human ovarian cancer cells: combination therapy for effective cancer treatment. Int J Nanomed 12(12): 6487–6502. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S135482.

Chung

Park

Seung-Hyun

, et al. (2016) Plant-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles: their characteristic properties and therapeutic applications. Nanoscale Res Lett 11(1): 40. DOI: 10.1186/s11671-016-1257-4.

Miresmaeili

Halvaei

Fesahat

, et al. (2013) Evaluating the role of silver nanoparticles on acrosomal reaction and spermatogenic cells in rat. Iran J Reproductive Med 11(5): 423–430.

10.

Zhu

Lin

, et al. (2016) Silver nanoparticles induce HePG-2 cells apoptosis through ROS-mediated signaling pathways. Nanoscale Res Lett 11(1): 198. DOI: 10.1186/s11671-016-1419-4.

11.

Liao

Tjong

(2019) Bactericidal and cytotoxic properties of silver nanoparticles. Int J Mol Sci 20: 449.

12.

Vasanth

Ilango

MohanKumar

, et al. (2014) Anticancer activity of Moringa oleifera mediated silver nanoparticles on human cervical carcinoma cells by apoptosis induction. Colloids Surf B Bio 117: 354–359.

13.

Jurkin

Gotić

Štefanić

, et al. (2016) Gamma-irradiation synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles in the presence of PEO, PVP or CTAB. Radiat Phys Chem 124: 75–83.

14.

El-Batal

El-Baz

Abo Mosalam

, et al. (2013) Gamma irradiation induces silver nanoparticles synthesis by Monascus purpureus. J Chem Pharmaceut Res 5(8): 1–15.

15.

, et al. (2016) Enhanced antitumor activity of monophosphate ester prodrugs of gemcitabine: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. J Pharmaceut Sci 105(9): 2966–2973.

16.

Devulapally

Paulmurugan

(2014) Polymer nanoparticles for drug and small silencing RNA delivery to treat cancers of different phenotypes. Wiley Inter Rev Nanomed Nanobio 6(1): 40–60. DOI: 10.1002/wnan.1242.

17.

Hayaza

Wahyuningsih

SPA

Susilo

RJK

, et al. (2021) Dual role of immunomodulation by crude polysaccharide from okra against carcinogenic liver injury in mice. Heliyon 7: e06183.

18.

Ghazy

Hanafy

(2024) Targeted therapies for breast and lung cancers by using Propolis loaded albumin protein nanoparticles. Int J Biol Macromol 260: 129338.

19.

Song

Ding

Liu

, et al. (2020) Anticancer effect of caudatin in diethylnitrosamine induced hepatocarcinogenesis in rats. Mol Med Rep 22(2): 697–706. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2020.11135.

20.

Kerdput

Kanjanapongkul

Itharat

, et al. (2022) Molecular changes following induction of hepatocellular carcinoma by diethylnitrosamine and thioacetamide, and subsequent treatment with Dioscorea membranacea extract. Int J Med Sci 19(12): 1806–1815. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.72987.

21.

, et al. (2004) Prophylactic effect of tamoxifen against induction of mammary carcinoma. The Egyptian J Hosp Med 14(1): 104–114.

22.

Charan

Kantharia

(2013) How to calculate sample size in animal studies? J Pharmacol Pharmacother 4(al): 303–306. DOI: 10.4103/0976-500X.119726.

23.

van de Loosdrecht

Beelen

Ossenkoppele

, et al. (1994) A tetrazolium-based colorimetric MTT assay to quantitate human monocyte mediated cytotoxicity against leukemic cells from cell lines and patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Immunol Methods 174(1-2): 311–320. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(94)90034-5.

24.

, et al. (2016) Effects of green-synthesized silver nanoparticles on lung cancer cells in vitro and grown as xenograft tumors in vivo. Int J Nanomed 11(1): 1879–1887. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S103695.

25.

Kadhim

Aldujaili

Homady

(2017) Assessment of hepatoprotective role of phenolic extract of urtica dioica and silver nanoparticles in male rat induced by carbon tetra-chloride. Rasayan Journal of Chemistry 10(2): 305–312.

26.

Liu

Xia

Zhou

, et al. (2015) Avastin® in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin significantly inhibits tumor angiogenesis and increases the survival rate of human A549 tumor-bearing mice. Exp Ther Med 9(6): 2180–2184.

27.

Karimov

Inoyatova

Mukhamedova

(2003) Changes in some indices of the synthesis of nitric oxide during the early stages of hepatocarcinogenesis. Exp Toxicol Pathol 55(1): 17–19. DOI: 10.1078/0940-2993-00267.

28.

Darwish

El-Boghdady

(2013) Possible involvement of oxidative stress in diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatocarcinogenesis: chemopreventive effect of curcumin. J Food Biochem 37: 353–361. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4514.2011.00637.x.

29.

Casciola-Rosen

Rosen

Petri

, et al. (1996) Surface blebs on apoptotic cells are sites of enhanced procoagulant activity: implications for coagulation events and antigenic spread in systemic lupus erythematosus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93(4): 1624–1629. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.4.1624.

30.

Yakimov

Gogoleva

Semenov

, et al. (2019) Label-free characterization of white blood cells using fluorescence lifetime imaging and flow-cytometry: molecular heterogeneity and erythrophagocytosis [invited]. Biomed Opt Express 10(8): 4220–4236. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.10.004220.

31.

Livak

Schmittgen

(2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-delta delta C(T)) method. Methods 25(4): 402–408.

32.

Bancroft

Stevens

Turner

(1996) Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. 4th ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone.

33.

Stamplecoskie

Scaiano

(2010) Light emitting diode irradiation can control the morphology and optical properties of silver nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 132(6): 1825–1827.

34.

Nasseri

Shahabi

Allahresani

(2019) Kazemnejadi. MEco-friendly biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using aqueous solution of Spartium junceum flower extract. Asian J Green Chem 3(3): 382–390. DOI: 10.22034/ajgc.2018.144365.1099.

35.

Raafat

Mahmoud

Ali

AE-H

, et al. (2018) In vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive and self-disinfection efficiency of (acrylic acid/polyethylene glycol)-silver nanocomposites for buccal drug delivery. J Bioact Compat Polym 33(1): 95–115. DOI: 10.1177/0883911517710665.

36.

Rodriguez

Azqueta

Cerain

(2020) Genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 10: 251. DOI: 10.3390/nano10020251.

37.

Rudrappa

Rudayni

Assiri

, et al. (2022) Plumeria alba-mediated green synthesis of silver nanoparticles exhibits antimicrobial effect and anti-oncogenic activity against glioblastoma U118 MG cancer cell line. Nanomaterials 12(3): 493. DOI: 10.3390/nano12030493.

38.

Raafat

Mahmoud

Mostafa

(2020) Efficient catalytic reduction of hazardous anthropogenic pollutant, 4-nitrophenol using radiation synthesized (polyvinyl pyrrolidone/acrylic acid)-silver nanocomposite hydrogels. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater 30: 3116–3125. DOI: 10.1007/s10904-020-01470-4.

39.

Akshay

Das

Joshi

, et al. (2018) γ-radiation induced synthesis of silver nanoparticles in aqueous poly (N-vinylpyrrolidone) solution. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 556: 148–156. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.08.028.

40.

Magdy

Sadaka

Hanafy

, et al. (2020) Green tea ameliorates the side effects of the silver nanoparticles treatment of Ehrlich ascites tumor in mice. Mol Cell Toxi 16: 271–282.

41.

Rudrappa

Nayaka

Kumar

(2023) In silico molecular docking approach of melanin against melanoma causing MITF proteins and anticancer, oxidation–reduction, photoprotection, and drug-binding affinity properties of extracted melanin from streptomyces sp. strain MR28. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 195: 4368–4386. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-023-04358-4.

42.

Yoksan

Chirachanchai

(2009) Silver nanoparticles dispersing in chitosan solution: preparation by γ-ray irradiation and their antimicrobial activities. Mater Chem Phys 115: 296–302. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.12.001.

43.

Sheikh

Akhavan

Kassaee

(2009) Synthesis of antibacterial silver nanoparticles by γ-irradiation. Phys E Low-dimens Syst Nanostruct 42: 132–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2009.09.013.

44.

Fehaid

Taniguchi

(2019) Size-dependent effect of silver nanoparticles on the tumor necrosis factor α-induced DNA damage response. Int J Mol Sci 20(5): 1038. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20051038.

45.

Sriram

Kalishwaralal

Barathmanikanth

, et al. (2012) Size-based cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in bovine retinal endothelial cells. Nanoscience Methods 1: 56–77.

46.

Abou El-Nour

Eftaiha

Al-Warthan

, et al. (2010) Synthesis and applications of silver nanoparticles. Arab J Chem 3: 135–140.

47.

Mishra

Zheng

Tang

, et al. (2016) Silver nanoparticle-induced autophagic-lysosomal disruption and NLRP3-inflammasome activation in HepG2 cells is size-dependent. Toxicol Sci 150(2): 473–487. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfw011.

48.

Anderson

Silva

Lee

, et al. (2015) Persistence of silver nanoparticles in the rat lung: influence of dose, size, and chemical composition. Nanotoxicology 9(5): 591–602. DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2014.958116.

49.

Peloquin

Baumann

Jr Luxton

(2020) Multi-method assessment of PVP-coated silver nanoparticles and artificial sweat mixtures. Chemosphere 249: 126173. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126173.

50.

Priya

Vijayakumar

Janani

(2020) Chitosan-mediated synthesis of biogenic silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), nanoparticle characterisation and in vitro assessment of anticancer activity in human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells. Int J Biol Macromol 149(149): 844–852. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.007.

51.

Fehaid

Fujii

Sato

, et al. (2020) Silver nanoparticles affect the inflammatory response in a lung epithelial cell line. Open Biotechnol J 14: 113–123. DOI: 10.2174/1874070702014010113.

52.

Dziendzikowska

Gromadzka-Ostrowska

Lankoff

, et al. (2012) Time-dependent biodistribution and excretion of silver nanoparticles in male Wistar rats. J Appl Toxicol 32(11): 920–928. DOI: 10.1002/jat.2758.

53.

Dong

Lai

Zhou

, et al. (2020) The biodistribution and transformation of nanoparticulate and ionic silver in rat organs in vivo. NanoImpact 20: 100265. DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2020.100265.

54.

Yang

Kuang

Zhang

, et al. (2017) Comparisons of the biodistribution and toxicological examinations after repeated intravenous administration of silver and gold nanoparticles in mice. Sci Rep 7: 3303. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03015-1.

55.

Katoonizadeh

(2017) Liver regeneration. In: En Muriel

(ed) Liver Pathophysiology. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 113–123. chapter 7. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804274-8.00007-2.

56.

Taha

Elfar

Haffez

, et al. (2020) Raptinal silver nanoparticles: new therapeutic advances in hepatocellular carcinoma mouse model. N Schmied Arch Pharmacol 394: 279–289. DOI: 10.1007/s00210-020-01973-4.

57.

Luedde

Kaplowitz

Schwabe

(2014) Cell death and cell death responses in liver disease: mechanisms and clinical relevance. Gastroenterology 147(4): 765–783. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.018.

58.

Zhang

Jacob

Jiang

, et al. (2019) Hepatoprotective effect of silver nanoparticles synthesized using aqueous leaf extract of rhizophora apiculata. Int J Nanomed 14: 3517–3524. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S198895.

59.

Salehi

Mirzaie

Sadat Shandiz

, et al. (2017) Chemical composition, antioxidant, antibacterial and cytotoxic effects of Artemisia marschalliana Sprengel extract. Nat Prod Res 31(4): 469–472. DOI: 10.1080/14786419.2016.1174234.

60.

Wong

(2011) Apoptosis in cancer: from pathogenesis to treatment. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 30(1): 1–14.

61.

Habibi

Sadat Shandiz

Salehzadeh

, et al. (2020) Novel pyridinecarboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazone conjugated magnetite nanoparticulates (MNPs) promote apoptosis in human lung cancer A549 cells. J Biol Inorg Chem 25: 13–22.

62.

Moshfegh

Salehzadeh

Sadat Shandiz

, et al. (2019) Phytochemical analysis, antioxidant, anticancer and antibacterial properties of the caspian sea red macroalgae, laurencia caspica. Iran J Sci Technol Trans A-Science 43: 49–56. DOI: 10.1007/s40995-017-0388-5.

63.

Moshfegh

Salehzadeh

Sadat Shandiz

, et al. (2017) Phytochemical analysis, antioxidant, anticancer and antibacterial properties of the Caspian Sea red macroalgae, Laurencia caspica. Iran J Sci Technol Trans A-Science 43: 49–56.

64.

Kashyap

Garg

Goel

(2021) Intrinsic and extrinsic pathways of apoptosis: role in cancer development and prognosis. Adv Pro Chem Struc Bio 125: 73–120. DOI: 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2021.01.003.

65.

Bin-Alee

Arayataweegool

Buranapraditkun

, et al. (2020) Evaluation of lymphocyte apoptosis in patients with oral cancer. J Appl Oral Sci 28: e20200124.

66.

Farahani

Parivar

Hayati Roodbari

, et al. (2020) Comparative study of the cytotoxic effect of silver nanoparticles on human lymphocytes and HPB-all cell line: as an in vitro study. Iran Red Crescent Med J 22(2): e98803.

67.

Mahjoub

Chernine

Lahmar

, et al. (2022) Silver nanoparticle-induced lymphocyte activation in zebrafish. Nanomedicine Research Journal 7(2): 195–204. DOI: 10.22034/nmrj.2022.02.009.

68.

El-Sheikh

Khairy

Osama

, et al. (2021) Nanotechnology improves the therapeutic efficacy of gemcitabine against a human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line and minimizes its in vivo side effects. N Schmied Arch Pharmacol 394: 631–643.

69.

Jendrossek

(2013) Targeting apoptosis pathways by Celecoxib in cancer. Cancer Lett 332(2): 313–324.

70.

Kanipandian

Kannan

(2019) Induction of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in A549 lung cancer cells using silver nanoparticles from Gossypium hirsutum and evaluation of in vivo toxicity. Biotech Rep 23: e00339. DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00339.

71.

Ahmadian

Dizaj

Rahimpour

, et al. (2018) Effect of silver nanoparticles in the induction of apoptosis on human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cell line. Mater Sci Eng C 93: 465–471. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.08.027.

72.

Rakowski

Porębski

Grzelak

(2021) Silver nanoparticles modulate the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in estrogen-dependent breast cancer cells in vitro. Int J Mol Sci 22: 9203. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22179203.

73.

Teng

Yang

Zhu

, et al. (2018) Gemcitabine and cisplatin for treatment of lung cancer in vitro and vivo. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 22(12): 3819–3825. DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_201806_15266.

74.

Zhu

Chen

, et al. (2018) Gemcitabine induces apoptosis and autophagy via the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer cells. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 65(5): 665–671. DOI: 10.1002/bab.1657.

75.

Cao

Wang

, et al. (2018) β-sitosterol and gemcitabine exhibit synergistic anti-pancreatic cancer activity by modulating apoptosis and inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition by deactivating akt/GSK-3β signaling. Front Pharmacol 9: 1525. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01525.

76.

Ruan

Wang

(2021) HDAC6 inhibitor, ACY1215 suppress the proliferation and induce apoptosis of gallbladder cancer cells and increased the chemotherapy effect of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin. Drug Dev Res 82(4): 598–604. DOI: 10.1002/ddr.21780.

77.

Zhou

Wen

, et al. (2016) Significant change of cytochrome P450s activities in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget 7(31): 50612–50623. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9437.

78.

Kang

Wanibuchi

Morimura

, et al. (2007) Role of CYP2E1 in diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in vivo. Cancer Res 67(23): 11141–11146. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1369.

79.

Munger

Hadlock

Stoddard

, et al. (2015) Assessing orally bioavailable commercial silver nanoparticle product on human cytochrome P450 enzyme activity. Nanotoxicology 9(4): 474–481. DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2014.948092.

80.

Frȍhlich

Kueznik

Samberger

, et al. (2010) Size-dependent effects of nanoparticles on the activity of cytochrome P450 isoenzymes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 242: 326–332.

81.

Wang

Song

, et al. (2017) Cytochrome P450 2E1 increases the sensitivity of hepatoma cells to vitamin K2. Int J Oncol 50(5): 1832–1838. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2017.3932.

82.

Yang

Chen

, et al. (2019) MicroRNA-21 as a diagnostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pakistan J Med Sci 35(5): 1466–1471. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.35.5.685.

83.

Wang

Chu

, et al. (2019) Mir-21 promotes cell migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting Klf5. Oncol Lett 17: 2221–2227.

84.

Rhim

Baek

Seo

, et al. (2022) From molecular mechanisms to therapeutics: understanding MicroRNA-21 in cancer. Cells 11: 2791. DOI: 10.3390/cells11182791.

85.

Gheytanchi

Tajik

Razmi

, et al. (2023) Circulating exosomal microRNAs as potential prognostic biomarkers in gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Cell Int 23: 10. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-023-02851-8.

86.

Huang

Wang

, et al. (2018) Extracellular vesicle-associated mir-21and mir-144 are markedly elevated in serum of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Physiol 9: 930. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00930.

87.

Zhang

Wei

, et al. (2013) MicroRNA-21 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cell proliferation through repression of mitogen-activated protein kinase-kinase 3. BMC Cancer 13: 469. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-469.

88.

Oura

Morishita

Masaki

(2020) Molecular and functional roles of MicroRNAs in the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma—a review. Int J Mol Sci 21: 8362. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21218362.

89.

Buscaglia

(2011) Apoptosis and the target genes of microRNA-21. Chin J Cancer 30(6): 371–380. DOI: 10.5732/cjc.011.10132.

90.

Lin

Chang

Cheng

, et al. (2019) SMAD4 somatic mutations in head and neck carcinoma are associated with tumor progression. Front Oncol 9: 1379.

91.

Wang

Xue

Zheng

, et al. (2020) SMAD4 mutation correlates with poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer. Lab Inves J Tech Meth Pathol 101(4): 463–476. DOI: 10.1038/s41374-020-00517-x.

92.

Zhao

Mishra

Deng

. (2018) The role of TGF-β/SMAD4 signaling in cancer. Int J Biol Sci 14(2): 111–123. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.23230.

93.

Yao

Tang

, et al. (2012) Smad4 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma differs by hepatitis status. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13(4): 1297–1303. DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.4.1297.

94.

Hernanda

Chen

Das

, et al. (2015) SMAD4 exerts a tumor-promoting role in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 34(39): 5055–5068. DOI: 10.1038/onc.2014.425.

95.

Hiwatashi

Ueno

Sakoda

, et al. (2009) Strong Smad4 expression correlates with poor prognosis after surgery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 16: 3176–3182. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0614-2.

96.

Refaat

Fathy

Mohamed

, et al. (2023) Silver nanoparticles attenuate inflammation aggravation in hepatocellular carcinoma in rats. Arab J Nucl Sci Appl 56: 73–80. DOI: 10.21608/ajnsa.2023.180669.1698.

97.

Clarke

Coates

Eva

, et al. (1977) Dietary standards for laboratory animals: report of the laboratory animals Centre diets advisory committee. Lab Anim 11(1): 1–28. DOI: 10.1258/002367777780959175.

Gemcitabine and synthesized silver nanoparticles impact on chemically induced hepatocellular carcinoma in male rats

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and methods

Materials

Chemicals

Gamma irradiation source

Animals

Synthesis and characterization of the AgNPs

Methods

MTT cytotoxicity assay

Experimental design

Samples collection and preparation

Flow cytometry analysis

Quantitative real-time PCR

Western blot analysis

Histopathological investigations

Statistical analysis

Results

Radiation synthesis of silver nanoparticles Ago NPs

Characterization of the radiation-synthesized AgNPs

UV–vis spectrosecopy analysis

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX)

MTT cytotoxicity assay

Liver function enzymes examination

Annexin V apoptosis analysis

Mixed function cytochrome P-450 enzyme activity

Apoptotic pathway detections

Histopathological study

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Author contributions

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

Ethical statement

Animal welfare

ORCID iDs

Data availability statement

References

Radiation synthesis of silver nanoparticles Ag^o NPs