This article analyzes the temporal single-system interpretation (TSSI) of Marx’s economics. From a methodological viewpoint, the TSSI lacks both a clear definition of equilibrium and a rigorous analysis of disequilibrium dynamics, and the dynamic framework is incomplete. From a substantive viewpoint, temporal single-system (TSS) claims are trivially obtained by assuming that goods exchange at values, apart possibly from out-of-steady-state random deviations. Finally, the proof of the law of the tendential fall in the profit rate is tautologically true, but its theoretical relevance is unclear.
Caravale, G. A., ed. 1991. Marx and modern economic analysis, 2. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
2.
Desai, M.1991. The transformation problem. In Marx and modern economic analysis, 1, ed. G. A. Caravale. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
3.
Duménil, G.1980. De la valeur aux prix de production. Paris: Economica.
4.
Duménil, G., and D. Lévy. 2000. The conservation of value: A rejoinder to Alan Freeman. Review of Radical Political Economics32: 119–146.
5.
Foley, D. K.1982. The value of money, the value of labor power, and the Marxian transformation problem. Review of Radical Political Economics14: 37–47.
6.
Foley, D. K.1999. Response to David Laibman. Research in Political Economy17: 229–233.
7.
Foley, D. K.2000. Recent developments in the labor theory of value. Review of Radical Political Economics32: 1–39.
8.
Freeman, A.1996. Price, value and profit. A continuous, general treatment. In Marx and non-equilibrium economics, ed. A. Freeman and G. Carchedi. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
9.
Freeman, A.1998. A general refutation of Okishio’s theorem and a proof of the falling rate of profit. In Marxian economics: A reappraisal, ed. R. Bellofiore. London: MacMillan.
10.
Freeman, A., and G. Carchedi. 1996. Marx and non-equilibrium economics. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
11.
Freeman, A., and A. Kliman. 2000. Two concepts of value, two rates of profit, two laws of motion. Research in Political Economy18: 243–267.
12.
Groll, S., and Z. B. Orzech. 1989. From Marx to the Okishio theorem: A genealogy. History of Political Economy21: 253–272.
13.
Kliman, A.1996. A value-theoretic critique of Okishio theorem. In Marx and non-equilibrium economics, ed. A. Freeman and G. Carchedi. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
14.
Kliman, A.1997. The Okishio theorem: An obituary. Review of Radical Political Economics29: 42–50.
15.
Kliman, A.2001. Simultaneous valuation vs. the exploitation theory of profit. Capital and Class73: 97–112.
16.
Kliman, A., and T. McGlone. 1988. The transformation non-problem and the non-transformation problem. Capital and Class35: 56–83.
17.
Kliman, A., and T. McGlone. 1999. A temporal single-system interpretation of Marx’s value theory. Review of Political Economy11: 33–59.
18.
Laibman, D.1999. Okishio and his critics: Historical cost vs. replacement cost. Research in Political Economy17: 235–240.
19.
Laibman, D.2000. Rhetoric and substance in value theory: An appraisal of the new orthodox Marxism. Science and Society64: 310–332.
20.
Mohun, S.2003. On the TSSI and the exploitation theory of profit. Capital and Class81: 85–102.
21.
Mongiovi, G.2002. Vulgar economy in Marxian garb: A critique of temporal single-system Marxism. Review of Radical Political Economics34: 393–416.
22.
Okishio, N.1961. Technical changes and the rate of profit. Kobe University Economic Review7: 86–99.
23.
Roemer, J. E.1981. Analytical foundations of Marxian economic theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Skillman, G.2001. Anomalies in the “temporal single-system” interpretation of Marx’s value theory. Mimeo, Wesleyan University.
25.
Steedman, I.1977. Marx after Sraffa. London: New Left Books.
26.
Veneziani, R.2004. The temporal single-system interpretation of Marx’s economics: A critical evaluation. Metroeconomica55: 96–114.
27.
Vercelli, A.1991. Methodological foundations of macroeconomics: Keynes and Lucas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
