This paper criticizes Moseley's claim that the cause in the fall in the conventional rate of profit in the postwar U.S. is due to the rise in unproductive labor over this period. I argue that Moseley employs a one-sided and static conception of unproductive labor. Unproductive labor is seen by Moseley to be simply a drag on surplus value production. In contrast, I argue that unproductive labor should be understood as both a drag and as an enhancement for the dynamic production of surplus value. I show in a model of the distribution of surplus value how the redistribution of unproductive labor can have contradictory effects on the value rate of profit.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cuyvers, Ludo
. 1978. A Mathematical Interpretation of Marxian Unproductive Labour. Economica45 (February): 71-81.
2.
Marx, Karl
. 1909. Capital, Volume III. Chicago: Charles Kerr and Company.
3.
Marx, Karl
. 1981. Capital, Volume II. New York: Vintage Books.
4.
Moseley, Fred
. 1990. The Decline in the Rate of Profit in the Postwar U.S. Economy. Review of Radical Political Economics22 (Summer-Fall): 17-37.
5.
Moseley, Fred
. 1991. The Falling Rate of Profit in the Postwar United States Economy. London: Macmillan.
6.
Nichols, Len
and Bruce Norton. 1991. Overhead Workers and Political Economy Macro Models. Review of Radical Political Economics23 (Spring-Summer): 47-54.
7.
Resnick, Stephen
and Richard Wolff. 1987. Knowledge and Class. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
8.
Shaikh, Anwar
and Ahmet E. Tonak. 1989. National Accounts and Marxian Categories. Unpublished Manuscript, New School for Social Research.
