Transcultural Group Analysis II. Use and Abuse of Cultural Differences: Analysis and Ethics

Abstract

It is proposed that a moral and ethical viewpoint can help us in analysing cultural differences in transcultural workshops and, by extension, in society at large. A developmental approach, from projection to mutual confrontation and concern, allows us to see these ways as ranging from primitive to more mature. Mature mutual respect for differences can be equated with the psychoanalytic concept of genitality. Some theoretical contributions are adduced to explain the development of this ideal state. The term `transculturality' could be used for it, implying that we can transcend culture-bounded prejudices and see at least some similarities between different cultures, and those processes which cross over and through them.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anzieu, D. (1984) (trans. B. Kilbourne) The Group and the Unconscious. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Atwood, G.E. and Stolorow, R.D. (1984) Structures of Subjectivity. Hillside, NJ: Analytic Press.

Balint, M. (1952) Primary Love and Psychoanalytic Technique. London: Tavistock.

Balint, E. (1972) `Fair Shares and Mutual Concern', International Jounmal of Psycho-Analysis 53: 61-65.

Brown, D.G. (1982) `Text, Content and Texture: Free Speech in the Service of Health and Healing', Group Analysis XV (3): 207-218.

Brown, D.G. (1987) `Change in the Group Analytic Setting', Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy 3: 53-60.

Brown, D.G. (1988) `Confrontation in the Group Matrix', Group 12: 191-197.

De Mart, P.B. , Piper, R. and Thompson, S. (1991) Koinonia: From Hate through Dialogue, to Culure in the Large Group. London: Karnac.

Dilthey, W. (1926) in H. Ricknan (ed.) Meaning in History. London: Allen and Unwin, 1961.

10.

Erikson, E.H. (1964) Insight and Responsibility. London: Faber and Faber.

11.

Foulkes, S.H. (1975) Group-Analytic Psychotherapy. London: Gordon and Breach. Reprinted London: Karnac, 1986.

12.

Freud, S. (1921) Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, Standard Edition, Vol 18. London: Hogarth Press, 1955.

13.

Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

14.

Gilligan, C. , Ward, J.V. and Taylor, J.Mc. (1989) Charting the Moral Domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

15.

KaEs, R. , Anzieu, D. , Bejarano, A. , Gorik, R. and Scaglia, H. (1975) Le Desir de former et la formation du savoir. Paris: Dunod.

16.

Kohut, H. and Wolf, E.S. (1978) `The Disorders of the Self and their Treatment', International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 59: 413-426.

17.

Larkin, M. (1991) `Some Ethical Issues in Feminist Oriental Therapeutic Groups for Women', Internaional Journal of Group Psychotherapy 41: 199-215.

18.

Levine, H.B. (1987) `The Psychology of the Nuclear Threat: A Bibliography', International Revue of Psycho-Analysis 14: 13-19.

19.

Milosz, C. (1968) (trans. C.S. Leech) Native Realm. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

20.

Mullan, H. (1991) `Inherent Moral Practice in Group Psychotherapy', International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 41: 185-197.

21.

Rouchy, J.C. (1990) `Malaise dans l'identification', Connexions 55: 45-56.

22.

Segal, H. (1987) `Silence is the Real Crime', International Review of Psycho-Analysis 14: 3-12.

23.

Todd, E. (1985) (trans. D. Darrioch) The Explanation of Ideology: Family Structures and Social Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.

24.

Winnicott, D.W. (1963) `The Development of the Capacity for Concern', in D.W. Winnicott (ed.) The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment, Ch. 6. London: Hogarth Press, 1965.