The RCPSC Oral Examination: Patient Perceptions and Impact on Participating Psychiatric Patients

Abstract

French

Objective:

To investigate patient perceptions and the impact of participating in the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) long case oral examination.

Method:

Immediately following the RCPSC exam, participating psychiatric patients completed a Participant Impact Questionnaire. We combined results for 2002 and 2003 from both the western and eastern sites.

Results:

Overall, there was a 93% response rate (132/142): 98% (65/66) for the western site and 88% (67/76) for the eastern site. Of the respondents, 94% said they would participate in the RCPSC oral exam again, if required. Most (92%) either agreed or strongly agreed that the exam was well organized; 76% either disagreed or strongly disagreed that the exam was stressful; only 9% agreed that they participated to earn extra money; and 82% strongly disagreed that they felt pressured by their psychiatrist to participate. Patients' written reasons for participating included, but were not limited to, helping to train future psychiatrists. We briefly discuss aspects of the use of real patients vs standardized patients in the RCPSC oral exam.

Conclusion:

Patients who participated in the RCPSC long case oral exam generally found this experience very positive. The exam did not appear to have a negative impact on patients.

Keywords

RCPSC long case oral exam patients'perceptions psychiatry

References

McNaughton

Tiberius

Hodges

Effects of portraying psychologically and emotionally complex standardized patient roles. Teach Learn Med 1999;11:135–41.

Norman

Tugwell

Feightner

. A comparison of resident performance on real and simulated patients. J Med Educ 1982;57:708–15.

Woodward

Gliva-McConvey

The effect of simulating on standardized patients. Acad Med 1995;70:418–20.

Yudkowsky

Should we use standardized patients instead of real patients for high-stakes exams in psychiatry?

Acad Psychiatry 2002;26:187–92.

Hodges

Hanson

McNaughton

Regehr

Creating, monitoring, and improving a psychiatry OSCE. Acad Psychiatry 2002:26;134–61.

McLay

Rodenhauser

Anderson

Stanton

Market

. Simulating a full-length psychiatric interview with a complex patient. Acad Psychiatry 2002;26:162–7.

Klamen

Yudkowsky

Using standardized patients for formative feedback in an introduction to psychotherapy course. Acad Psychiatry 2002;26:168–72.

Lewis

. On the use of standardized patients. Acad Psychiatry 2002;26:193–6.

Swartz

Colliver

. Using standardized patients for assessing clinical performance. Mt Sinai J Med 1996;63: 241–9.

10.

Tamblyn

Klass

Schnald

Kopelow

. Sources of unreliability and bias in standardized patient rating. Teach Learn Med 1991;3:74–85.

11.

Broquet

Using an objective structured clinical examination in a psychiatry residency. Acad Psychiatry 2002;26:197–201.

12.

Norton

The use of patient-actors on the oral psychiatric examination and in the residency training process. Acad Psychiatry 2000;24:176–7.

13.

Persaud

Meux

. Clinical examinations for professional qualifications in psychiatry: The patients' views. Psychiatr Bull 1990;14:65–71.

14.

Sharma

Katona

CLE

. Patients' perceptions of medical finals. Med Teach 1994;16:61–70.

15.

King

Perkowski-Roger

Pohl

Planning standardized patient programs: Case development, patient training and costs. Teach Learn Med 1994;6:6–14.

16.

Collins

Harden

. AMEE medical education guide no. 13: Real patients, simulated patients and simulators in clinical examinations. Med Teach 1998;20:508–21.