To examine the longitudinal diagnostic efficiency of the DSM-IV criteria for borderline personality disorder (BPD).
Methods:
At baseline, we used semistructured diagnostic interviews to determine criteria and diagnoses; blinded assessments were performed 24 months later with 550 participants. Diagnostic efficiency indices (specifically, conditional probabilities, total predictive power, and kappa) were calculated for each criterion determined at baseline, with the independent BPD diagnosis at follow-up used as the standard.
Results:
Longitudinal diagnostic efficiencies for the BPD criteria varied, with the criteria of suicidality or self-injury and unstable relationships demonstrating the most predictive utility.
Conclusions:
BPD criteria differ in their predictive utility for the diagnosis of BPD when considered longitudinally. These findings have implications both for clinicians who are considering diagnoses and for researchers concerned with forthcoming revisions of our nosological system.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed.Washington (DC): APA; 1994.
3.
GundersonJGSingerMT. Defining borderline patients: An overview. Am J Psychiatry. 1975;132:1–10.
4.
SpitzerRLEndicottJGibbonM.Crossing the border into borderline personality and borderline schizophrenia: The development of criteria. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1979;36:17–24.
5.
FrancisAPincusHWidigerTDSM-IV: Work in progress. Am J Psychiatry. 1990;147:1439–1448.
6.
GundersonJGZanariniMCKisielCL. Borderline personality disorder: A review of data on DSM-III-R descriptions. J Personal Disord. 1991;5:340–352.
7.
BlashfieldRDragunsJ.Evaluative criteria for psychiatric classification. J Abnorm Psychol. 1976;85:140–150.
8.
WidigerTAHurtSWFrancesADiagnostic efficiency and DSM-III. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984;41:1005–1012.
9.
BaldessariniRJFinkelsteinSAranaGW. The predictive power of diagnostic tests and the effect of prevalence of illness. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40:569–573.
10.
FaraoneSVBiedermanJSprich-BuckminsterSEfficiency of diagnostic criteria for attention deficit disorder: Toward an empirical approach to designing and validating diagnostic algorithms. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1993;32:166–174.
11.
WaldmanIDLilienfeldSO. Diagnostic efficiency of symptoms for oppositional defiant disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59:732–738.
12.
BeckerDFGriloCMEdellWSDiagnostic efficiency of borderline personality disorder criteria in hospitalized adolescents: Comparison with hospitalized adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:2042–2047.
13.
FarmerRFChapmanAL. Evaluation of DSM-IV personality disorder criteria as assessed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV personality disorders. Compr Psychiatry. 2002;43:285–300.
14.
GriloCMMcGlashanTHMoreyLCInternal consistency, intercriterion overlap, and diagnostic efficiency of criteria sets for DSM-IV personality disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2001;104:264–272.
15.
GriloCMBeckerDFAnezLMDiagnostic efficiency of DSM-IV criteria for borderline personality disorder: An evaluation in Hispanic men and women with substance use disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72:126–131.
16.
GundersonJGSheaMTSkodolAEThe Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: Development, aims, design, and sample characteristics. J Personal Disord. 2000;14:300–315.
17.
GriloCMMcGlashanTH. Stability and course of personality disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 1999;12:157–162.
18.
GriloCMSheaMTSanislowCATwo-year stability and change in schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72:767–775.
19.
ZanariniMCFrankenburgFRHennenJThe longitudinal course of borderline psychopathology: 6-year prospective follow-up of the phenomenology of borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:274–283.
StuartSPfohlBBatagliaMThe co-occurrence of DSM-III-R personality disorders. J Personal Disord. 1998;12:302–315.
22.
ZanariniMCFrankenburgFRSickelAEThe Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders. Belmont (MA): McLean Hospital and Harvard Medical School; 1996.
23.
ZanariniMCSkodolAEBenderDThe collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study: Reliability of Axis I and Axis II diagnoses. J Personal Disord. 2000;14:291–299.
24.
FinnSE. Base rates, utilities, and DSM-III: Shortcomings of fixed-rule systems of psychodiagnosis. J Abnorm Psychol. 1982;91:294–302.
25.
MeehlPERosenA.Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychol Bull. 1955;52:194–216.
26.
GriloCMBeckerDFEdellWSStability and change of DSM-III-R personality disorder dimensions in adolescents followed up 2 years after psychiatric hospitalization. Compr Psychiatry. 2001;42:364–368.
27.
BeckerDFMcGlashanTHGriloCM. Exploratory factor analysis of borderline personality disorder criteria in hospitalized adolescents. Compr Psychiatry. 2006;47:99–105.
28.
MoreyLCOchoaES. An investigation of adherence to diagnostic criteria: Clinical diagnosis of the DSM-III personality disorders. J Personal Disord. 1989;3:180–192.
