To introduce stepped care as a method of organizing the delivery of treatments, and to consider the factors necessary for implementation.
Method:
Stepped care is described within the context of strategies such as collaborative care that aim to increase access to mental health care through the improved coordination of care between primary and specialist mental health services. Results from the implementation of stepped care in the United Kingdom and elsewhere are used to highlight the factors required for introducing stepped care into routine services. Issues to address when implementing high-volume services for common mental health problems are derived from this experience.
Results:
Stepped care sits within the continuum of organizational systems, from situations where responsibility rests almost entirely with primary care clinicians to systems where all patients are managed by specialists for the entire duration of their treatment. Its core principles of delivering low-burden treatments first, followed by careful patient progress monitoring to step patients up to more intensive treatment, are easy to articulate but lead to considerable implementation diversity when services attempt to work in this manner. Services need to ensure they have specific staff competency training, including skills in delivering evidence-based treatments, access to telephony, and smart patient management informatics systems.
Conclusions:
Stepped care can provide the delivery system for supported self-management. To be successful, health systems need high levels of clinical outcome data and appropriately trained workers. Further attention is required to ensure equity of access and to reduce patient attrition in these systems.
BilskerDGoldnerEMAndersonE.Supported self-management: A simple, effective way to improve depression care. Can J Psychiatry. 2012;57(4):203–209.
2.
GrolRWensingMEcclesM.Improving patient care. The implementation of change in clinical practice. London (GB): Elsevier; 2005.
3.
AntmanELauJKupelnickBComparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts: Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1992;268(2):240–248.
4.
GilbodySWhittyPGrimshawJEducational and organizational interventions to improve the management of depression in primary care: A systematic review. JAMA. 2003;289(23):3145–3151.
5.
GullifordMFigueroa-MunozJMorganMWhat does ‘access to health care’ mean?J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002;7(3):186–188.
6.
CampbellSRolandMBuetowS.Defining quality of care. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(11):1611–1625.
7.
National Institute for Mental Health in England. New ways of working for psychiatrists: Enhancing effective, person-centred services through new ways of working in multidisciplinary and multi-agency contexts. London (GB): Department of Health; 2005.
8.
Von KorffMGoldbergD.Improving outcomes in depression. BMJ. 2001;323:948–949.
9.
National Mental Health Development Unit. New ways of working for primary care mental health: A briefng document. London (GB): Department of Health; 2009.
10.
KatonWUnützerJ.Consultation psychiatry in the medical home and accountable care organizations: Achieving the triple aim. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011;33(4):305–310.
11.
GaskLKhannaT.Ways of working at the interface between primary and specialist mental healthcare. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;198(1):3–5.
12.
BowerPGilbodyS.Managing common mental health disorders in primary care: Conceptual models and evidence base. BMJ. 2005;330:839–842.
13.
HarknessEFBowerPJ. On-site mental health workers delivering psychological therapy and psychosocial interventions to patients in primary care: Effects on the professional practice of primary care providers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD000532.
14.
CapeJWhittingtonCBowerP.What is the role of consultation- liaison psychiatry in the management of depression in primary care? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010;32(3):246–254.
15.
GilbodySBowerPFletcherJCollaborative care for depression: A cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(21):2314–2321.
16.
Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). A national agenda for research in collaborative care. Rockville (MD): AHRQ; 2011.
17.
American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP). Joint principles of the patient-centered medical home [Internet]. [place of publication unknown]: AAFP; 2007 [cited 2011 Sep 29]. Available from: www.acponline.org/hpp/approve_jp.pdf.
18.
BowerPGilbodySRichardsDACollaborative care for depression in primary care. Making sense of a complex intervention: Systematic review and meta regression. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;189(6):484–493.
19.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Depression: The treatment and management of depression in adults (update) (clinical guideline 90). London (GB): NICE; 2009.
20.
RichardsDLovellKGilbodySCollaborative care for depression in UK primary care: A randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med. 2008;38(2):279–287.
21.
KatonWUnützerJWellsKCollaborative depression care: History, evolution and ways to enhance dissemination and sustainability. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010;32(5):456–464.
22.
BowerPGilbodyS.Stepped care in psychological therapies: Access, effectiveness and efficiency: Narrative literature review. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;186(1):11–17.
23.
DavisonG.Stepped care: Doing more with less?J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(4):580–585.
24.
PillingSWhittingtonCTaylorCIdentification and care pathways for common mental health disorders: Summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2011;342:1203–1206.
25.
PattenSBBilskerDGoldnerE.The evolving understanding of major depression epidemiology: Implications for practice and policy. Can J Psychiatry. 2008;53(10):689–695.
26.
Medical Research Council (MRC). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: New guidance. London (GB): MRC; 2008.
27.
van StratenATiemensBHakkaartLStepped care vs matched care for mood and anxiety disorders: A randomized trial in routine practice. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006;113(6):468–476.
28.
RichardsDWeaverAUtleyMDeveloping evidence based and acceptable stepped care systems in mental health care: An operational research project. Final report. Southhampton (GB): National Institute of Health Research Service Delivery and Organisation programme; 2010.
29.
GloverGWebbMEvisonF.Improving access to psychological therapies. A review of the progress made by sites in the frst rollout year. Durham (GB): North East Public Health Observatory; 2010.
30.
National Health Service (NHS). Improving Access to Psychological Therapies [Internet]. London (GB): NHS; 2012 [cited 2011 Sep 29]. Available from: http://www.iapt.nhs.uk/iapt.
31.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Depression: Management of depression in primary and secondary care (clinical guideline 23). London (GB): NICE; 2004.
32.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Anxiety: Management of anxiety (panic disorder, with or without agoraphobia, and generalised anxiety disorder) in adults in primary, secondary and community care. London (GB): NICE; 2004.
33.
RichardsDASucklingR.Improving access to psychological therapies: Phase IV prospective cohort study. Br J Clin Psychol. 2009;48(Pt 4):377–396.
34.
ClarkDMLayardRSmithiesRImproving access to psychological therapy: Initial evaluation of two UK demonstration sites. Behav Res Ther. 2009;47(11):910–920.
35.
RichardsDABorglinG.Implementation of psychological therapies for anxiety and depression in routine practice: Two year prospective cohort study. J Affect Disord. 2011;133(1):51–60.
36.
Patient Case-Management Information Service (PC-MIS). PC-MIS [Internet]. Heslington, York (GB): University of York; 2007–2011 [cited 2011 Sep 29]. Available from: http://www.pc-mis.co.uk.
37.
SimonGELudmanEJRutterCM. Incremental benefit and cost of telephone care management and telephone psychotherapy for depression in primary care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(10):1081–1089.
38.
RichardsDA. Chapter 44. Training low intensity workers. In: Bennett-LevyJRichardsDFarrandP, editors. The Oxford guide to low intensity CBT interventions. Oxford (GB): Oxford University Press; 2010.
39.
GellatlyJBowerPHennessySWhat makes self-help interventions effective in the management of depressive symptoms? Meta-analysis and meta-regression. Psychol Med. 2007;37(9):1217–1228.
40.
StilesWBBarkhamMTwiggEEffectiveness of cognitive-behavioural, person-centred and psychodynamic therapies as practiced in UK National Health Service settings. Psychol Med. 2006;36(4):555–566.
41.
StilesWBBarkhamMMellor-ClarkJEffectiveness of cognitive-behavioural, person-centred, and psychodynamic therapies in UK primary care routine practice: Replication in a larger sample. Psychol Med. 2008(38):677–688.
42.
LayardR.The case for psychological treatment centres. BMJ. 2006;332:1030–1032.
43.
PirkisJBassiliosBFletcherJClinical improvement after treatment provided through the Better Outcomes in Mental Health Care (BOiMHC) programme: Do some patients show greater improvement than others?Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011;45(9):289–298.
44.
HarrisMGBurgessPMPirkisJEPolicy initiative to improve access to psychological services for people with affective and anxiety disorders: Population-level analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;198(2):99–108.
45.
RichardsDBowerP.Equity of access to psychological therapies. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;198(2):91–92.
