The National Trajectory Project of Individuals Found Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder. Part 5: How Essential are Gender-Specific Forensic Psychiatric Services?
Free accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2015
The National Trajectory Project of Individuals Found Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder. Part 5: How Essential are Gender-Specific Forensic Psychiatric Services?
To state the sociodemographic characteristics, mental health histories, index offence characteristics, and criminal histories of male and female forensic psychiatric patients. Clinicians and researchers advocate that mental health and criminal justice organizations implement gender-specific services; however, few studies have sampled forensic patients to evaluate the extent to which men's and women's treatment and management needs are different.
Method:
Data were collected from Review Board files from May 2000 to April 2005 in the 3 largest Canadian provinces. Using official criminal records, participants were followed for 3 to 8 years, until December 2008. The final sample comprised 1800 individuals: 15.6% were women and 84.4% were men.
Results:
There were few demographic differences, but women had higher psychosocial functioning than men. Both men and women had extensive mental health histories; women were more likely diagnosed with mood disorders and PDs and men were more likely diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and SUDs. The nature of the index offence did not differ by gender, except women were more likely to have perpetrated murders and attempted murders. For offences against a person, women were more likely to offend against offspring and partners and less likely to offend against strangers, compared with men. Women had significantly less extensive criminal histories than men.
Conclusions:
Not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder-accused women have a distinct psychosocial, clinical, and criminological profile from their male counterparts, which may suggest gender-specific assessment, risk management, and treatment in forensic services could benefit patients. The findings are also consistent with traditional models (Risk-Need-Responsivity) and ultimately demonstrate the importance of individual assessment and client-centred services.
NichollsTLCruiseKGreigD, Female offenders: Adults and juveniles in conflict with the law. In: ZapfPCutlerB, editors. American Psychological Association Handbook of Forensic Psychology. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; forthcoming 2015. p 79–124.
2.
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Crime in the United States, 1980–2000.Washington (DC): FBI; 2008.
3.
Statistics Canada. Women and the criminal justice system. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada; 2011.
4.
Chesney-LindMSheldenRG. Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice. 3rd ed.Belmont (CA): John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
5.
DalyK.Gender, crime, and punishment. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press; 1994.
6.
de VogelVde Vries RobbéMVan KalmthoutW, Female Additional Manual (FAM). Additional guidelines to the HCR-20 for assessing risk for violence in women. English version. Utrecht (NL): Van der Hoeven Kliniek; 2012.
7.
Van VoorhisPWrightEMSalisburyE, Women's risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of a gender-responsive supplement. Crim Justice Behav. 2010;37(3):261–288.
8.
LaishesJ.The 2002 mental health strategy for women offenders.Ottawa (ON): Correctional Service Canada; 2002.
9.
MessinaNGrellaC.Childhood trauma and women's health outcomes in a California prison population. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(10):1842–1848.
10.
NichollsTLBrinkJGreavesC, Forensic psychiatric inpatients and aggression: An exploration of incidence, prevalence, severity, and interventions by gender. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2009;32(1):23–30.
11.
BrennanPAGrekinERVanmanEJ. Violence among the mentally ill: Effective treatments and management strategies. In: HodginS, editor. Violence among the mentally ill.vol 90. Dordretcht (NL): Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000. p 3–18.
12.
HodginsS.Mental disorder, intellectual deficiency, and crime: Evidence from a birth cohort. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49(6):476–483.
13.
LandgrafSBlumenauerKOsterheiderM, A clinical and demographic comparison between a forensic and a general sample of female patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2013;210(3):1176–1183.
14.
HeilbrunKDematteoDFretzR, How “specific” are gender-specific rehabilitation needs? An empirical analysis. Crim Justice Behav. 2008;35(11):1382–1397.
15.
EmbryRLyonsPM. Sex-based sentencing: Sentencing discrepancies between male and female sex offenders. Fem Criminol. 2012;7(2): 146–162.
16.
HerzogSOregS.Chivalry and the moderating effect of ambivalent sexism: Individual differences in crime seriousness judgments. Law Soc Rev. 2008;42(1):45–74.
17.
MouldsE.Chivalry and paternalism: Disparities of treatment in the criminal justice system. In: DatesmanSKScarpittiFR, editors. Women, crime and justice. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1980. p 277–299.
18.
HeidensohnF.Women and violence: Myths and reality in the 21st century. CJM. 2000;42(1):20.
19.
CoidJKahtanNGaultS, Women admitted to secure forensic psychiatry services: I. Comparison of women and men. J Forensic Psychiatry. 2000;11(2):275–295.
20.
CharetteYCrockerASetoMC, The National Trajectory Project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in Canada. Part 4: Criminal recidivism. Can J Psychiatry. 2015;60(3): 127–134.
21.
CrockerACharetteYSetoMC, The National Trajectory Project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in Canada. Part 3: Trajectories and outcomes through the forensic system. Can J Psychiatry. 2015;60(3):117–126.
22.
CrockerANichollsTLSetoMC, The National Trajectory Project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in Canada. Part 1: Context and methods. Can J Psychiatry. 2015;60(3):98–105.
23.
CrockerAGNichollsTLSetoMC, The National Trajectory Project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in Canada. Part 2: The people behind the label. Can J Psychiatry. 2015;60(3):106–116.
24.
KesslerRCBerglundPDernierO, Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):593–602.
25.
Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46, sect 16(1).
26.
MonahanJSteadmanHJSilverE, Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2001.
SmithJParkerJDonovanM.Female admissions to a regional secure unit. J Forensic Psychiatry. 1991;2:97–102.
29.
NichollsTGoossensIBrinkJ, Research to inform the development and evaluation of trauma-informed care for forensic psychiatry patients. College of Registered Psychiatric Nurses of British Columbia Education Day. Coquitlam (BC): College of Registered Psychiatric Nurses of British Columbia; 2014 May.
30.
SpitzerCChevalierCGillnerM, Complex posttraumatic stress disorder and child maltreatment in forensic inpatients. J Forensic Psychiatry. 2006;17(2):204–216.
31.
AngermeyerMCKuhnzL.Gender differences in age at onset of schizophrenia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sei. 1988;237(6):351–364.
32.
HäfnerHan der HeidenWBehrensS, Causes and consequences of the gender difference in age at onset of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1998;24(1):99–113.
33.
CrockerANichollsTLSetoMC, Going home: Recovery and community reintegration of mentally ill men and women discharged from hospital: A prospective, longitudinal study of forensic psychiatric patients. Montreal (QC): Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); 2011. Grant received from the CIHR.
34.
SteelZMarnaneCIranpourC, The global prevalence of common mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(2):476–493.
35.
O'ConnorRCSheehyNP. Suicide and gender. Mortality. 1997;2(3):239–254.
36.
ZhangJLiangBZhouY, Prison inmates' suicidal ideation in China: A study of gender differences and their impact. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2010;54(6):959–983.
37.
Dirks-LinhorstPLinhorstDM. Monitoring offenders with mental illness in the community: Guidelines for practice. Best Practice in Mental Health. 2012;8(2):47–70.
38.
SeigABallEMenningerJA. A comparison of female versus male insanity acquittees in Colorado. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1995;23(4):523–532.
39.
BontaJLawMHansonRK. The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1998;123(2):123–142.
40.
AndrewsDBontaJWormithJS. The Level of Service (LS) assessment of adults and older adolescents. In: OttoRKDouglasKS, editors. Handbook of violence risk assessment. New York (NY): Taylor & Francis Group; 2010. p 199–225.
41.
O'BrienAFahmyRSinghSP. Disengagement from mental health services. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009;44(7):558–568.
42.
SalaveraCTricásJMLuchaO.Personality disorders and treatment drop out in the homeless. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:379–387.
43.
CatonCLShroutPEEaglePF, Risk factors for homelessness among schizophrenic men: A case-control study. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(2):265–270.
44.
BallSACobb-RichardsonPConnollyAJ, Substance abuse and personality disorders in homeless drop-in center clients: Symptom severity and psychotherapy retention in a randomized clinical trial. Compr Psychiatry. 2005;46(5):371–379.
45.
FelittiMDVincentJAndaMD, Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14(4):245–258.
46.
AbramKWashburnJTeplinL, Posttraumatic stress disorder and psychiatric comorbidity among detained youths. Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58(10):1311–1316.
47.
AdsheadG.Damage: Trauma and violence in a sample of women referred to a forensic service. Behav Sci Law. 1994;12(3):235–249.
48.
HarlowCW. Prior abuse reported by inmates and probationers. Rockville (MD): US Department of Justice; 1999.
49.
FordJDCourtoisCASteeleK, Treatment of complex posttraumatic self-dysregulation. J Traum Stress. 2005;18(5):437–447.
50.
HarrisGTRiceMEQuinseyVL. Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders. Crim Just Behav. 1993;20:315–335.
51.
van der KolkBARothSPelcovitzD, Disorders of extreme stress: The empirical foundation of a complex adaptation to trauma. J Traum Stress. 2005;18(5):389–399.
52.
SkeemJSchubertCStowmanS, Gender and risk assessment accuracy: Underestimating women's violence potential. Law Hum Behav. 2005;29(2): 173–186.
