This article examines whether the passage of the 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) altered mothers' postpartum employment continuity, job retention, andwages. Data were drawn from the 1984-1997waves of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Women who had a child post-FMLA returned to work more quickly and were more likely to return to the same job. However, except for those who remained with the same employer, wages in the 2 years after birth declined. The results suggest that the FMLA increased employment and retention but reduced wages in the short term as mothers traded earnings for job flexibility.
Cantor, D., Waldfogel, J., Kerwin, J., Wright, M., Levin, K., Rauch, J., et al. (2002). Balancing the needs of families and employers: The Family and Medical Leave Surveys, 2000 update. Rockville, MD: Westat.
2.
Charles, M., Buchmann, M., Halebsky, S., Powers, J., & Smith, M. (2001). The context of women's market careers. Work and Occupations, 28, 371-396.
3.
Commission on Family and Medical Leave. (1996). A workable balance: Report to Congress on Family and Medical Leave policies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
4.
Desai, S., & Waite, L. (1991). Women's employment during pregnancy and after the first birth: Occupational characteristics and work commitment. American Sociological Review, 56, 551-566.
5.
Estes, S. B., & Glass, J. L. (1996). Job changes following childbirth. Work and Occupations, 23(4), 405-436.
6.
Felmlee, D. (1995). Causes and consequences of women's employment discontinuity, 1967-1973. Work and Occupations, 22, 167-187.
7.
Fitzgerald, J., Gottschalk, P., & Moffitt, R. (1998). An analysis of sample attrition in panel data: The MichiganPanel Study of Income Dynamics. Journal of Human Resources, 33(2), 251-299.
8.
Gerstel, N., & McGonagle, K. (1999). Job leaves and the limits of the Family and Medical Leave Act. Work and Occupations, 26(4), 510-534.
9.
Glass, J. L., & Riley, L. (1998). Family responsive policies and employee retention following childbirth. Social Forces, 76(4), 1401-1435.
10.
Gruber, J. (1994). The incidence of mandated maternity benefits. American Economic Review, 84(3), 622-641.
11.
Hakim, C. (2002). Lifestyle preferences as determinants ofwomen's differentiated labor market careers. Work and Occupations, 29(4), 428-459.
12.
Hayghe, H. (2000). [Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population by sex, age, presence and age of youngest child, and marital status]. Unpublished tables from the March 2000 Current Population Survey, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC.
13.
Hofferth, S. (1996). Effects of public and private policies on working after childbirth. Work and Occupations, 23(4), 378-404.
14.
Hofferth, S., Davis-Kean, P., Davis, J., & Finkelstein, J. (1999). 1997 user guide: The child development supplement to the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
15.
Hofferth, S. L., Stanhope, S., & Harris, K. M. (2002). Exitingwelfare in the 1990s: Did public policy influence recipients' behavior?Population Research and Policy Review, 21(5), 433-472.
16.
Hofferth, S. L., Stanhope, S., & Harris, K. M. (2004). Remaining off welfare in the 1990s: The influence of public policy and economic conditions. Social Science Research, 67, 426-453.
17.
Jacobs, J. A., & Gerson, K. (2001). Overworked individuals or overworked families?Work and Occupations, 28(1), 40-63.
18.
Joesch, J. (1994). Children and the timing ofwomen's paidwork after childbirth: Afurther specification of the relationship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 429-440.
19.
Klerman, J. A., & Leibowitz, A. (1997). Labor supply effects of state maternity leave legislation. In F. Blau & R. Ehrenberg (Eds.), Gender and family issues in the workplace (pp. 65-85. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
20.
Klerman, J. A., & Leibowitz, A. (1999). Job continuity among new mothers. Demography, 36(2), 145-155.
21.
Leibowitz, A., Klerman, J. A., & Waite, L. J. (1992). Employment of newmothers and child care choice: Differences by children's age. Journal of Human Resources, 27(1), 112-132.
22.
Levy, F. (1998). The new dollars and dreams: American incomes and economic change. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
23.
Lovell, V. (2003). Estimating the benefits of paid family and medical leave: A colloquium report. Washington, DC: Institute for Women's Policy Research.
24.
McGovern, P., Dowd, B., Gjerdingen, D., Moscovice, I., Kochevar, L., & Murphy, S. (2000). The determinants of time off work after childbirth. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 25(3), 527-564.
25.
Mennino, S. F., & Brayfield, A. (2002). Job-family trade-offs: The multidimensional effects of gender. Work and Occupations, 29(2), 226-256.
26.
O'Connell, M. (1990). Maternity leave arrangements, 1961-1985(Current Population Reports No. P-23). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
27.
Panel Study of Income Dynamics, Child Development Supplement. (1999). Description of the 1997 PSID child supplement weights. Ann Arbor, MI: Panel Study of Income Dynamics.
28.
Polachek, S. (1987). Occupational segregation and the gender wage gap. Population Research and Policy Review, 6, 47-67.
29.
Ross, K. E. (1998, April). Labor pains: The effects of the Family and Medical Leave Act on recent mothers'returns to work after childbirth. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Chicago.
30.
Ruckelshaus, C. K. (1997). Americans need a raise and a break: Promoting family leave at the state and local level. Washington, DC: National Employment Law Project.
31.
Ruhm, C. J. (1997). Policywatch: The Family and Medical Leave Act. Journal of EconomicPerspectives, 11(3), 175-186.
32.
Ruhm, C. J., & Teague, J. L. (1997). Parental leave policies in Europe and North America. In F. Blau & R. Ehrenberg (Eds.), Gender and family issues in the workplace (pp. 133-156. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
33.
Schwartz, F. (1989). Management women and the new facts of life. Harvard Business Review, 67, 65-76.
34.
Shaw, L. B., & Shapiro, D. (1987). Women's work plans: Contrasting expectations and actual work experience. Monthly Labor Review, 110, 7-13.
35.
Smith, K., Downs, B., & O'Connell, M. (2001). Maternity leave and employment patterns: 1961-1995. Current Population Reports, P-70(79), 1-21.
36.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1999). Statistical abstract of the United States, 1999. Washington, DC: Author.
37.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2001). Overview of race and Hispanic origin(Census 2001 Brief, CENBR/01-1). Washington, DC: Author.
38.
Waldfogel, J. (1997). Working mothers then and now: A cross-cohort analysis of the effects of maternity leave onwomen's pay. In F. Blau& R. Ehrenberg (Eds.), Gender and family issues in the workplace (pp. 92-129. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
39.
Waldfogel, J., Higuchi, Y., & Abe, M. (1999). Family leave policies andwomen's retention after childbirth: Evidence from the United States, Britain, and Japan. Journal of Population Economics, 12, 523-545.
40.
Wenk, D., & Rosenfeld, R. (1992). Women's employment exit and reentry. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 11, 127-150.
