This study compares work–family policy use among low wage, predominately female call center workers and their more highly paid managers. Both formal policies and the informal work–family arrangements that employees negotiate with their supervisors were examined. Consistent with the work devotion perspective, it was found that formal work–family policies are more widely used among hourly workers than managers, and those with better performance evaluations are less likely than their otherwise similar coworkers to use formal work–family policies. The ability to negotiate informal work–family arrangements and use them as a supplement to formal policies is also important to workers in this study, especially women with children and those providing care to people with special needs. Access to informal arrangements may be limited to the high performers, however. Overall, this research suggests that the work devotion framework, which derives from studies of elite workers, may be more broadly applicable than previously assumed.
Batt, R., Hunter, L.W., & Wilk, S. (2003). How and when does management matter? Job quality and career opportunities for call center workers. In E. Appelbaum, A. Bernhardt, & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Low wage America (pp. 270-313). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
2.
Blair-Loy, M. (2003). Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Blair-Loy, M., & Jacobs, J.A. (2003). Globalization, work hours, and the care deficit among stockbrokers. Gender & Society, 17, 230-249.
4.
Blair-Loy, M., & Wharton, A.S. (2002). Employees' use of work-family policies and the workplace social context. Social Forces, 80, 813-845.
5.
Blair-Loy, M., & Wharton, A.S. (2004). Organizational commitment and constraints on work-family policy use: Corporate flexibility policies in a global firm. Sociological Perspectives, 47, 243-267.
6.
Buchanan, R., & Koch-Schulte, S. (2000). Gender on the line: Technology, restructuring, and the reorganization of work in the call centre industry . Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Status of Women Canada.
7.
Christensen, K. (1989). Flexible staffing and scheduling in U.S. corporations (Research Bulletin No. 240). New York: Conference Board.
8.
Davis, A.E., & Kalleberg, A.L. (2006). Family-friendly organizations: Work and family programs in the 1990s. Work and Occupations , 33, 191-223.
9.
Deitch, C.H., & Huffman, M.L. (2001). Family-responsive benefits and the two-tiered labor market. In R. Hertz & N. L. Marshall (Eds.), Working families: The transformation of the American home (pp. 103-130). Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
Eaton, S.C. (2003). If you can use them: Flexibility policies, organizational commitment, and perceived performance. Industrial Relations , 42, 145-167.
11.
Epstein, C.F., Saute, R., Oglensky, B., & Gever, M. (1995). Glass ceilings and open doors: Women's advancement in the legal profession. Fordham Law Review, 64, 291-449.
12.
Epstein, C.F., Seron, C., Oglensky, B., & Saute, R. (1999). The part-time paradox. New York: Routledge.
13.
Fraser, J.A. (2001). White collar sweatshop: The deteriorations of work and its rewards in corporate America. New York: W.W. Norton.
14.
Fredriksen-Goldsen, K., & Scharlach, A. (2001). Families and work: New directions in the twenty-first century. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
Fried, M. (1998). Taking time: Parental leave policy and corporate culture. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
16.
Galinsky, E., & Bond, J.T. (1998). The business work-life study: A sourcebook. New York: Families and Work Institute.
17.
Gerstel, N.R., & McGonagle, K. (1999). Job leaves and the limits of the family and medical leave act. Work and Occupations, 26, 510-534.
18.
Glass, J. (2004). Blessing or curse? Work-family policies and mother's wage growth over time. Work and Occupations, 31, 367-394.
19.
Haley, H., Perry-Jenkins, M., & Armenia, A. (2001). Workplace policies and the psychological well-being of first-time parents: The case of working-class families. In R. Hertz & N. Marshall (Eds.), Working families: The transformation of the American home (pp. 207-226). Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
Harrington, B., & James, J.B. (2006). The standards of excellence in work-life integration: From changing policies to changing organizations. In M. Pitt-Catsouphes, E. E. Kossek, & S. Sweet (Eds.), The work and family handbook: Multi-Disciplinary perspectives and approaches (pp. 665-684). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Head, S. (2003). The new ruthless economy: Work and power in the digital age. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Hochschild, A. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.
23.
Jacobs, J.A., & Gerson, K. (2004). The time divide: Work, family, and gender inequality . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Kossek, E.E., & Friede, A. (2006). The business case: Managerial perspectives on work and the family. In Pitt-Catsouphes, E. E. Kossek, & S. Sweet (Eds.), The work and family handbook: Multi-disciplinary perspectives and approaches (pp. 611-626). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Kossek, E.E., Lautsch, B.A., & Eaton, S.C. (2005). Flexibility enactment theory: Implications of flexibility type, control, and boundary management for work-family effectiveness . In E. E. Kossek & S. J. Lambert (Eds.), Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives (pp. 243-261). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Lambert, S. (1999). Lower-wage workers and the new realities of work and family. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 562, 174-190.
27.
Lambert, S.J., & Kossek, E.E. (2005). Future frontiers: Enduring challenges and established assumptions in the work-life field. In E. E. Kossek & S. J. Lambert (Eds.), Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives (pp. 513-532). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Moen, P., & Roehling, P.V. (2005). The career mystique: Cracks in the American dream. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
29.
Padavic, I., & Reskin, B. (2002). Women and men at work (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
30.
Perlow, L. (1997). Finding time: How corporations, individuals, and families can benefit from New Work practices. Ithaca, NY : IRL Press.
31.
Perry-Smith, J.E., & Blum, T.C. (2001). Work-family human resource bundles and perceived organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal , 43, 1107-1117.
32.
Rothausen, T.J., Gonzalez, J.A., Clarke, N.E., & O'Dell, L.L. (1998). Family friendly backlash: Fact or fiction. Personnel Psychology, 51, 685-706.
33.
Secret, M. (2000). Identifying the family, job, and workplace characteristics of employees who use work-family benefits. Family Relations , 49, 217-226.
34.
Spain, D., & Bianchi, S. (1996). Balancing act: Motherhood, marriage, and employment among American women. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
35.
Thompson, C., Beauvais, L., & Lyness, K. (1999). When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 392-415.
36.
Wharton, A.S., & Blair-Loy, M. (2002). The overtime culture in a global corporation: A cross national study of finance professionals' interest in working part-time . Work and Occupations, 29, 32-63.
37.
Williams, J. (1999). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. New York: Oxford Press.
