Over the past 2 decades, the legal profession in the United States and Australia has undergone critical changes including growth, specialization, the entry of women, increasing salaried employment, and the relaxation on advertising constraints. Many argue that these developments undermine the profession's autonomy, self-regulation, and control over the terms and organization of work and suggest that the law is becoming deprofessionalized. By accepting, albeit implicitly, the attribute model of the professions, these theorists necessarily interpret change as “profession damaging.” This article examines the implications of recent developments for the status of the legal profession in both societies and questions whether they diminish professional control and prerogative or constitute new forms of organization. It concludes that recent changes demonstrate that various segments within the profession are making jurisdictional claims and strengthening their positions vis-à-vis employers, competing occupational groups, clients, and other segments of the profession. Increasing heterogeneity within the legal profession enables greater flexibility and versatility in the long term. For the most part, short-term conflicts are contained within the profession.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbott, A.
(1981). Status and Status strain in the professions. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 810-835.
2.
Abbott, A.
(1986, Spring). Jurisdictional conflicts: A new approach to the development of the legal profession. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, pp. 187-224.
3.
Abbott, A.
(1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Abel, R. L.
(1979). The rise of professionalism. British Journal of Law and Society, 6, 82-98.
5.
Abel, R. L.
(1985, Winter). Comparative sociology of legal professions: An exploratory essay. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, pp. 1-80.
6.
Abel, R. L.
(1986). The transformation of the American legal profession. Law & Society Review, 20, 7-17.
7.
Aldrich, H.
(1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8.
Andrews, L. B.
(1981, Fall). Lawyer advertising and the First Amendment. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, pp. 967-1021.
9.
Aronowitz, S.
(1973). False promises: The shaping of American working class consciousness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10.
Auerbach, J. S.
(1976). Unequal justice: Lawyers and social change in modern America. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1987). Unpublished 1986 Census data.
12.
Bates and O'Steen v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977).
13.
Beyer, J. M.
, & Trice, H. M. (1979). A re-examination of the relations between size and various components of organizational complexity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 48-64.
14.
Blau, P. M.
(1970). A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. American Sociological Review, 35, 201-218.
15.
Braverman, H.
(1974). Labor and monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.
16.
Bucher, R.
, & Strauss, A. (1961). Professions in process. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 325-334.
17.
Cantor, D. J.
(1978). Law firms are getting bigger... and more complex. American Bar Association Journal, 64, 215-219.
18.
Carlin, J. E.
(1962). Lawyers on their own: A study of individual practitioners in Chicago. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
19.
Carlin, J. E.
(1966). Lawyers' ethics: A survey of the New York City bar. New York: Russell Sage.
20.
Curran, B.
, Rosich, K.J., Carson, C.N., & Puccetti, M. (1985). The lawyer statistical report: A statistical profile of the U.S. legal profession in the 1980s. Chicago: American Bar Association.
21.
Derber, C.
(1983). Managing professionals: Ideological proletarianization and post-industrial labor. Theory and Society, 12, 309-341.
22.
Disney, J.
, Redmond, P., Basten, J., & Ross, S. (Eds.). (1986). Lawyers. Sydney, NSW: Law Book Company.
23.
Dixon, M.
, & Davies, M. (1985). Career patterns in the legal profession and career expectations of male and female law students in Western Australia: A comparative study. Nedlands: University of Western Australia Law School.
24.
Donnell, J.
(1970). The corporate counsel: A role model. Bloomington: Indiana University Bureau of Business Research.
25.
Epstein, C. F.
(1983). Women in law. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
26.
Fischer, R. L.
(1984). The changing role of the corporate counsel. Journal of Law and Commerce, 4, 45-64.
27.
Freidson, E.
(1983). The reorganization of the professions by regulation. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 279-290.
28.
Freidson, E.
(1986). Professional powers: A study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Galanter, M.
(1983). Mega-law and mega-lawyering in the contemporary United States. In R. Dingwall & P. Lewis (Eds.), The sociology of the professions: Lawyers, doctors and others. New York: St. Martin's.
30.
Goldring, J.
(1988). Recognition of qualifications in law. Australian Law Journal, 62, 419-429.
31.
Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar, 421 U.S. (1975).
32.
Goode, W. J.
(1957). Community within a community: The professions. American Sociological Review, 20, 194-200.
33.
Haug, M. R.
(1973). Deprofessionalization: An alternative hypothesis for the future. In P. Halmos (Ed.), Sociological Review Monograph, No. 20, 195-211.
34.
Haug, M. R.
(1975, August). The deprofessionalization of everyone?Sociological Focus, pp. 197-213.
35.
Haug, M. R.
, & Sussman, M. B. (1971). Professionalization and unionism: A jurisdictional dispute. American Behavioral Scientist, 14, 525-540.
36.
Heinz, J. P.
, & Laumann, E. O. (1982). Chicago lawyers: The social structure of the bar. New York and Chicago: Russell Sage and American Bar Foundation.
37.
Hetherton, M.
(1978). Victoria's lawyers: The first report of a research project on “Lawyers in the community.”Melbourne: Victoria Law Foundation.
38.
Heydon, J. D.
(1976, February). Lawyers' fees and the Trade Practices Act s. 45. Australian Current Law Digest, pp. 27-31.
39.
Johnson, T. J.
(1972). Professions and power. London: Macmillan.
40.
Johnson, T. J.
(1980). Work and power. In G. Esland & G. Salaman (Eds.), The politics of work and occupations. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
41.
Klegon, D.
(1978). The sociology of the professions: An emerging perspective. Work and Occupations, 5, 259-283.
42.
Ladinsky, J.
(1963). Careers of lawyers, law practice and legal institutions. American Sociological Review, 28, 47-54.
43.
Lancaster, H.
(1982, March 1). Companies expanding legal staffs as the cost of outside work soars. Wall Street Journal, p. 25.
44.
Larson, M. S.
(1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
Law Society
(South Australia). (1983, January-February). Salaries and conditions for first year employed solicitors. Law Society Bulletin, pp. 3-6.
46.
Law Reform Commission of New South Wales
. (1982). Third report on the legal profession: Advertising and specialization. Sydney, NSW: Law Society.
47.
Lewis, P.S.C.
(1986). A comparative perspective on legal professions in the 1980s. Law & Society Review, 20, 79-91.
48.
MacKinnon, C.
(1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
Margolick, D.
(1985, August 18). Matchbook ads succeed for lawyer. New York Times, p. A46.
50.
Mendelsohn, O.
, & Lippman, M. (1979). The emergence of the corporate law firm in Australia. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 3, 78-98.
51.
Meyer, M. W.
(1972). Size and the structure of organizations: A causal analysis. American Sociological Review, 39, 434-441.
52.
Nelson, R. L.
(1981, Winter). Practice and privilege: Social change and the structure of large law firms. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, pp. 97-140.
53.
Nelson, R. L.
(1983, Winter). The changing structure of opportunity: Recruitment and careers in large law firms. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, pp. 109-142.
54.
Nelson, R. L.
(1988). Partners with power: Social transformation of the large law firm. Berkeley: University of California Press.
55.
Oppenheimer, M.
(1973). The proletarianization of the professional. In P. Halmos (Ed.), Sociological Review Monograph, No. 20, 213-217.
56.
Pearce, D.
, Campbell, E., & Harding, D. (1987). Australian law schools: A discipline assessment for the Commonwealth Tertiary Education Commission. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
57.
Powell, M. J.
(1985). Developments in the regulation of lawyers: Competing segments and market, client and government controls. Social Forces, 64, 281-305.
58.
Price, H. H.
(1983). What do corporations want from their lawyers?Law Institute Journal Victoria, pp. 836-838.
59.
Rothman, R. A.
(1984). Deprofessionalization: The case of law in America. Work and Occupations, 11, 183-206.
60.
Rueschemeyer, D.
(1973). Lawyers and their society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
Sexton, M.
, & Maher, L. (1982). The legal mystique: The role of lawyers in Australian society. Sydney, NSW: Angus & Robertson.
62.
Shuchman, P.
(1968-1969). Ethics and legal ethics: The propriety of the canons as a group moral code. George Washington Law Review, 37, 244-269.
63.
Smigel, E. O.
(1964). The Wall Street lawyer: Professional organization man?New York: Free Press.
64.
Solomon, D.
(1988, December 17-18). Barristers challenge state law. Weekend Australian, p. 5.
65.
South Australian Young Lawyers' Association. (1984). [Survey]. Unpublished raw data.
66.
South Australian Young Lawyers' Association. (1985). [Young lawyers' survey]. Unpublished raw data.
67.
Spangler, E.
(1986). Professionals for hire. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
68.
Stevens, R.
(1971). American medicine and the public interest. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
69.
Tarr, A.
(1984, August 6). Five firms join ranks of the largest 50. National Law Journal, pp. 13, 15.
70.
Tomasic, R.
(1983). Social organization amongst Australian lawyers. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 19, 447-475.
71.
Tomasic, R.
, & Bullard, C. (1978). Lawyers and their work. Sydney: Law Association of New South Wales.
72.
U.S. Department of Commerce
. (1986). Statistical abstract of the United States: 1987 (107th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
73.
Waters, M.
(1989). Collegiality, bureaucratization and professionalization: A Weberian analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 945-972.
74.
Weber, M.
(1978). Economy and society (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds., Vol. 2). Berkeley: University of California Press.
75.
Weisbrot, D.
(1986). The changing face of Australian legal practice. Australian Quarterly, 58, 426-439.
76.
Wood, C.
(1988, January 23). Two city law firms to merge. Advertiser, p. 4.
77.
Young, B.
(1988, March 3). Salary rise for tyro lawyers. Australian Financial Review, p. 8.
