New technologies and rising energy prices have resulted in many energy companies investing significant amounts of capital in rural America. Much of the recent focus of energy companies has been on the development of shale oil and natural gas. We examine the differences in levels of support and opposition to shale oil and gas development, building on the literatures of the growth-machine coalition, polluter-industrial complex, and environmental justice. Specifically, we examine different frames of shale development held by government leaders and the public who reside above the New Albany shale play in Southern Illinois and Northwest Kentucky. Using a combination of interview, survey, and participant observation data, we find that government officials emphasize economic growth and many support shale development. While most government leaders claimed that there was not a major division in their communities about shale development, we found the public to be split, with a large countercoalition to shale development in existence.
AllenLawrenceGibsonRobert. 1987. “Perceptions of Community Life and Services: A Comparison between Leaders and Community Residents.” Journal of the Community Development Society18:89–103.
2.
AndersonBrooklynn J.TheodoriGene L.2009. “Local Leaders’ Perceptions of Energy Development in the Barnett Shale.” Southern Rural Sociology24:113–29.
3.
BellElizabeth. 2013. Our Roots Run Deep as Ironweed: Appalachian Women and the Fight for Environmental Justice. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
4.
BellShannonYorkRobert. 2010. “Community Economic Identity: The Coal Industry and Ideology Construction in West Virginia.” Rural Sociology75(1):111–43.
5.
BenfordRobert D.1997. “An Insider’s Critique of the Social Movement Framing Perspective.” Sociological Inquiry67(4):409–30.
6.
BorahPorismita. 2011. “Conceptual Issues in Framing Theory: A Systematic Examination of a Decade’s Literature.” Journal of Communication61:246–63.
7.
BoudetHilaryClarkeChristopherBugdenDylanMaibachEdwardRoser-RenoufConnieLeiserowitzAnthony. 2013. “‘Fracking’ Controversy and Communication: Using National Survey Data to Understand Public Perceptions of Hydraulic Fracturing.” Energy Policy65:57–67. Retrieved December19, 2014 (https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.017).
8.
BrasierKathryn J.FilteauMatthew R.McLaughlinDianeJacquetJeffreyStedmanRichard C.KelseyTimothy W.GoetzStephan J.2011. “‘Residents’ Perceptions of Community and Environmental Impacts from Development of Natural Gas in the Marcellus Shale: A Comparison of Pennsylvania and New York Cases.” Journal of Rural Social Sciences26:32–61.
9.
BrasierKathryn J.McLaughlinDiane K.RhubartDanielleStedmanRichard C.FilteauMatthew R.JacquetJeffrey. 2013. “Risk Perceptions of Natural Gas Development in the Marcellus Shale.” Environmental Practice15:108–22.
10.
BrickJ. MichaelWilliamsDouglas. 2013. “Explaining Rising Nonresponse Rates in Cross-sectional Surveys.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science645:36–59.
11.
BrulleRobert J.PellowDavid N.2006. “Environmental Justice: Human Health and Environmental Inequalities.” Annual Review of Public Health27(1):103–24.
12.
BullardRobert D.1990. Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
13.
ČapekStella M.1993. “The ‘Environmental Justice’ Frame: A Conceptual Discussion and an Application.” Social Problems40(1):5–24.
FaberDaniel. 2008. Capitalizing on Environmental Injustice: The Polluter-industrial Complex in the Age of Globalization. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
FinkelMadelonHaysJakeLawAdam. 2013. “The Shale Gas Boom and the Need for Rational Policy.” American Journal of Public Health103:1161–63.
24.
FinkelMadelonLawAdam. 2011. “The Rush to Drill for Natural Gas: A Public Health Cautionary Tale.” Public Health101:784–85.
25.
Food & Water Watch. 2011. The Case for a Ban on Gas Fracking. Washington, DC: Food & Water Watch.
26.
FortmannLouiseKuselJonathan. 1990. “New Voices, Old Beliefs: Forest Environmentalism among New and Long-standing Rural Residents.” Rural Sociology55(2):214–32.
27.
FreudenburgWilliam. 1991. “Rural-urban Differences in Environmental Concern: A Closer Look.” Sociological Inquiry61(2):167–98.
28.
FreudenburgWilliamJonesRobert. 1991. “Criminal Behavior and Rapid Community Growth: Examining the Evidence.” Rural Sociology56(4):619–45.
29.
FreudenburgWilliamWilsonLisa. 2002. “Mining the Data: Analyzing the Economic Implications of Mining for Nonmetropolitan Regions.” Sociological Inquiry72:549–75.
30.
FrickelScottFreudenburgWilliam. 1996. “Mining the Past: The Historical Context and Changing Implications of Natural Resource Extraction.” Social Problems43(4):444–66.
GerhardsJurgenRuchtD.1992. “Mesomobilization: Organizing and Framing in Two Protest Campaigns in West Germany.” American Journal of Sociology98(3):555–95.
33.
GoffmanErving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
HightowerJim. 2012. “Oil and Gas Marauders Are Destroying Our Land, Water, and Communities All Over America.” The Hightower Lowdown14(7):1–8.
35.
HowarthRobert W.SantoroReneeIngraffeaAnthony. 2011. “Methane and the Greenhouse-gas Footprint of Natural Gas from Shale Formations.” Climatic Change106:679–90.
JacksonRobert B.VengoshAvnerDarrahThomas H.WarnerNathaniel R.DownAdrianPoredaRobert J.OsbornStephen G.ZhaoKaiguangKarrJonathan D.2013. “Increased Stray Gas Abundance in a Subset of Drinking Water Wells near Marcellus Shale Gas Extraction.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences110(28):11250–55.
38.
JacquetJeffrey B.StedmanRichard C.2013. “The Risk of Social-psychological Disruption as an Impact of Energy Development and Environmental Change.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management57:1–20.
39.
JasanoffSheilaKimSang-Hyun. 2009. “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea.” Minerva47(2):119–46.
40.
JennerSteffenLamadridAlberto. 2013. “Shale Gas vs. Coal: Policy Implications from Environmental Impact Comparisons of Shale Gas, Conventional Gas, and Coal on Air, Water, and Land in the United States.” Energy Policy53:442–53.
41.
JiangMohanGriffinW. MichaelHendricksonChrisJaramilloPaulinaVanBriesenJeanneVenkateshAranya. 2011. “Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Marcellus Shale Gas.” Environmental Research Letters6(3):034014.
42.
JonasAndrewWilsonDavid. 1999. “The City as a Growth Machine: Critical Reflections Two Decades Later.” Pp. 3–18 in The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives Two Decades Later, edited by JonasAndrewWilsonDavid. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
43.
KargboDavid M.WilhelmRon G.CampbellDavid J.2010. “Natural Gas Plays in the Marcellus Shale: Challenges and Potential Opportunities.” Environmental Science & Technology44:5679–84.
44.
KayDavid. 2011. “The Economic Impact of Marcellus Shale Gas Drilling: What Have We Learned? What Are the Limitations?”Working Paper Series: A Comprehensive Economic Analysis of Natural Gas Extraction in the Marcellus Shale, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
45.
KinchyAbbyPerrySimonaRhubartDanielleStedmanRichardBrasierKathrynJacquetJeffrey. Forthcoming. Edited by BaileyConnerJensenLeifRansomElizabeth. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Press, 2014. “New Natural Gas Development and Rural Communities: Key Issues and Research Priorities.” In Rural America in a Globalizing World: Problems and Prospects for the 2010s.
LaddAnthony. 2013. “Stakeholder Perceptions of Socioenvironmental Impacts from Unconventional Natural Gas Development and Hydraulic Fracturing in the Haynesville Shale.” Journal of Rural Social Sciences28(2):56–89.
48.
LichterDanielBrownDavid. 2011. “Rural America in an Urban Society: Changing Spatial and Social Boundaries.” Annual Review of Sociology37:565–92.
49.
LoganJohnMolotchHarvey. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Masterson-AllenSusanBrownPhil. 1990. “Public Reaction to Toxic Waste Contamination: Analysis of a Social Movement.” International Journal of Health Services: Planning, Administration, Evaluation20(3):485–500.
53.
McCrightAaron M.DunlapRiley E.2000. “Challenging Global Warming as a Social Problem: An Analysis of the Conservative Movement’s Counter-Claims.” Social Problems47(4):499–522.
54.
MolnarJosephSmithJohn. 1982. “Satisfaction with Rural Services: The Policy Preferences of Leaders and Community Residents.” Rural Sociology47:496–511.
55.
MolotchHarvey. 1976. “The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place.” American Journal of Sociology82:309–32.
56.
LoganJohnMolotchHarvey. 2007. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
57.
National Energy Technology Laboratory. 2011. “Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Inventory of Natural Gas Extraction, Delivery and Electricity Production.” Technical Report, U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Washington, DC.
58.
NixHaroldSeerleyNorma. 1973. “Comparative Views and Actions of Community Leaders and Nonleaders.” Rural Sociology38:427–38.
59.
PellowDavid. 2004. Garbage Wars: The Struggle for Environmental Justice in Chicago. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
60.
PerrySimona. 2012. “Development, Land Use and Collective Trauma: The Marcellus Shale Gas Boom in Rural Pennsylvania.” Culture, Agriculture, Food, and Environment34:81–92.
61.
PerrySimona. 2013. “Using Ethnography to Monitor the Community Health Implications of Onshore Unconventional Oil and Gas Developments: Examples from Pennsylvania’s Marcellus Shale.” New Solutions23(1):33–53.
SnowDavid A.2004. “Framing Processes, Ideology, and Discursive Fields.” Pp. 380–412 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by SnowDavid A.SouleSarah A.KriesiHanspeter. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
67.
SnowDavid A.Jr.RochfordE. BurkeWordenSteven K.BenfordRobert D.1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review51(4):464–81.
68.
SoederDaniel J.KappelWilliam M.2009. Water Resources and Natural Gas Production from the Marcellus Shale. Reston, VA: U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey.
SpiesSherrillMurdockSteveWhiteSteveKrannichRichardWulfhorstJ. D.WrigleyKrissaLeistritzF. LarrySellRandyThompsonJoAnn. 1998. “Support for Waste Facility Siting: Differences between Community Leaders and Residents.” Rural Sociology63(1):65–93.
71.
WeigleJason L.2011. “Resilience, Community, and Perceptions of Marcellus Shale Development in the Pennsylvania Wilds: Reframing the Discussion.” Sociological Viewpoints27:3–15.
WynveenBrooklynn J.2011. “A Thematic Analysis of Local Respondents’ Perceptions of Barnett Shale Energy Development.” Journal of Rural Social Sciences26:8–31.
