Acoustic Attenuation for Ultrasonic NDI Detection of Delaminations on Composite Laminates

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to show the importance of the acoustic attenuation and probe frequency for the reliable evaluation of delaminations on composite materials subjected to NDI ultrasonic investigation.

An original ultrasonic NDI methodology has been applied to some composite materials of wide application, characterized by a high acoustic attenuation. The materials are based on Kevlar/polyester and glass/polyester systems; the fiber form is woven fabric, and the thicknesses are between 5 and 6 mm. All the specimens are made by RTM technology. The specimens have been subjected to low-velocity impact tests, and then the extension of delaminated areas has been evaluated.

The ultrasonic test apparatus operates in the form of reflection, using two different probes at 5 and 15 MHz. The results point out how the higher frequency probe has a greater resolution and higher sensibility; nevertheless, the higher attenuation at 15 MHz causes a lower inspection depth along the specimen thickness. Thus, for materials with high attenuation the 5 MHz probe is preferable in order to have accurate ultrasonic maps along the thickness and reliable values for the delaminated areas.

Keywords

ultrasonic NDI frequency attenuation delamination kevlar glass fiber polyester

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Scarponi, C. and G. Briotti , 1997. “Ultrasonic detection of delaminations on composite materials,” Jrnl. of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, vol. 16, n. 9, pp. 768–790.

2. Scarponi, C. , G. Briotti and R. Barboni , A. Marcone and M. Iannone , 1996. “Impact testing on composites laminates and sandwich panels,” Jrnl. of Composite Materials, vol. 30, n. 17, pp. 1873–1911.

3. Jeong, H. , 1997. “Effect of void on the mechanical strength and ultrasonic attenuation of laminated composites,” Jrnl. of Composite Materials, 31:277–292.

4. Hsu, D. K. and M. S. Hughes , 1992. “Simultaneous ultrasonic velocity and sample thickness measurement and applications in composites,” Jrnl. of Acoustical Society of America, vol. 92, n. 2, August, p. 669-669.

5. Kaczmarek, H. , 1995. “Ultrasonic detection of damage in CFRPs,” Jrnl. of Composite Materials, 29:59–95.

6. Krautkrämer, J. and H. Krautkrämer , 1990. Ultrasonic Testing of Materials, Ed. Springer Verlag .

7. Brown, A. E. , “Rationale and summary of methods for determining ultrasonic properties of materials at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,” UCRL-ID-119958 L. Livermore Nat. Lab.

8. Lhermitte, T. D. , S. M. Handley , M.R. Holland and J.G. Miller , 1992. “Anisotropy of the Frequency-Dependent Ultrasonic Attenuation in Unidirectional Graphite/Epoxy Composite Material,” Proc. IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Orlando, pp. 819–823.

9. Selfridge, A. R.

“Approximate Material Properties in Isotropic Materials,”

IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics, vol. SU-32, N. 3, May 1985.

10.

10. Iannone, M. , A. Marcone , M. de Leo and P. Ferraro , 1993. “Impact damage in composites—controlling factors,” Ninth Intrnl. Conference on Composite Materials, 12–16 July, Madrid, Spain.

11.

11. Kumar, P. and B. Rai , 1993. “Delaminations of barely visible impact damage in CFRP laminates,” Composite Structures, vol. 23, pp. 313–318.

12.

12. NTA 62463. Alenia internal technical note.

13.

13. Christoforou, A. P. and A. S. Yigit , 1994. “Normalized impact response and damage in a thin composite laminate supported by a rigid substrate,” Jrnl. of Composite Materials, 28:1553–1573.

14.

14. Sjöblom, P. O. , J. T. Hartness and T. M. Cordell , 1988. “On low-velocity impact testing of composite materials,” Jrnl. of Composite Materials, 22:30–52.

15.

15. Wang, T. Vu-Khanh , 1994. “Damage extension in carbon fiber/PEEK crossply laminates under low-velocity impact,” Jrnl. of Composite Materials, 28:684–707.

16.

16. Scarponi, C. , G. Briotti , R. Barboni and A. Marcone . “Reduction of tensile strength in angle-ply composite laminates due to low-velocity impact,” Jrnl. of Reinforced Plastics, vol. 18, n. 1/1999, pp. 63–85.