Stress Fields in Fiber Reinforced Laminate Beams Due to Bending and Torsion Moments

Abstract

A model of fiber reinforced composite laminate beam with sections of orthogonal shape is presented, in which the stresses due to simultaneously applied torsional and bending moments are found by an analytical solution. The technique followed is based on Sokolnikoff ’s approach in conjunction with the theory of anisotropic elasticity. The results derived permit the evaluation of the off-axis-strength elastic constants for the material. The evaluation of 3-D stress distributions in beams with sections characterized by various aspect ratios reveals variations of stresses, which depend on the warping combined with flexure in these laminate composite beams. In addition, useful information gained from the study of variation of the elastic properties as well as torsional rigidity for fiber reinforced laminate beams leads to further knowledge for the profile of stress distribution allover the beam. Specifically, the results have revealed that the torsional rigidity of the fiber reinforced laminate composite beam reaches an optimal value at a -lamination angle between 20° and 30°. Thus, the normal stresses vary in higher values versus the lamination angle of the composite than the shear stresses do. Also, the stresses allover the beam become so intensive as the bending-to-torsion moments ratio increases.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Reissner, E. and Stravsky, Y. (1961). Bending and stretching of certain types of heterogeneous aelotropic elastic plates. J. Appl. Mech., 28: 402-408.

2. Dong, S.B., Matthiesen, R.B., Pister, K.S. and Taylor, R.L. (1961). Analysis of structural laminates. Air Force Report ARL-76.

3. Ashton, J.E. and Whitney, J.M. (1970). Theory of Laminated Plates. Stanford, CT: Technomic Publ.

4. Mansfield, E.H. and Sobey, A.J. (1979). The fiber composite helicopter blade, Part 1: Stiffness properties, Part 2: Prospects of aeroelastic tailoring. Aeronautical Q., 30: 413-449.

5. Chang, S.I. and Libove, C. (1988). Shear flows, strain and rate of twist in single-cell thin-walled beams with anisotropic composite walls: Simple theory compared with nastran and experiment. ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Chicago, Il, 27, November-2 December, pp. 49-70.

6. Libove, C. (1988). Stresses and rate of twist in single-cell thin-walled beams with anisotropic walls. AIAA J., 26: 107-118.

7. Whiney, J.M. and Sun, C.T. (1973). A higher order theory for experimental motion of laminated composites. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 30: 85-97.

8. Lo, K.H. , Christensen, R.M. and Wu, E.M. (1977). A higher order theory of plate deformation, Part 2: Laminated plates. J. Appl. Mech., 669-676.

9. Reddy, J.N. (1984). A simple higher-order theory for laminated composite plates. J. Appl. Mech., 51: 745-752.

10.

10. Reddy, J.N. (1989). On refined computational models of composite laminates. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 27: 361-382.

11.

11. Noor, A.K. and Burton, W.S. (1989). Assessment of shear deformation theories for multilayered composite plates. Appl. Mech. Rev., 42(1): 125-136.

12.

12. Librescu, L. and Song, O. (1991). Behaviour of thin-walled beams made of advanced composite materials and incorporating non-classical effects. Appl. Mech. Rev., 44(11): Part 2.

13.

13. Schmidt, R. and Librescu, L. (1994). Further results concerning the refined theory of anisotropic laminated composite plates. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 407-425.

14.

14. Song, O. and Librescu, L. (1993). Dynamic refined theory of thin-walled beams of open-cross sections. ASME Winter Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 28 November- 3 December, pp. 233-240.

15.

15. Kim, C. and White, S.R. (1996). Analysis of thick hollow composite beams under general loadings. Comp. Struct., 34: 263-277.

16.

16. Sokolnikoff, I.S. (1956). Mathematical Theory of Elasticity. 2nd Edn.

McGraw-Hill Co.

17.

17. Theocaris, P.S. and Demakos, C.B. (1984). Determination of elastic constants of plasticized epoxy polymers under impact loading. Materialpruefung, 26(4): 104-107.

18.

18. Lekhnitskii, S.G. (1963). Theory of Elasticity of an Anisotropic Elastic Body. San Francisco: Holden-DayInc.

19.

19. Hull, D. and Clyne, T.W. (1996). An Introduction to Composite Materials. 2nd Edn. Cambridge University Press, UK.

20.

20. Spencer, A. (1986). The transverse moduli of fibre composite material. Comp. Sci. and Technology, 27: 93-109.

21.

21. Halpin, J.C. and Tsai, S.W. (1967). Environmental factors in composite design. Air Force Materials Laboratory, Technical Report, AFML-TR-67-423, Washington.

22.

22. Nye, J.F. (1985). Physical Properties of Crystals - Their Representation by Tensors and Matrices. Oxford: Clarendon.

23.

23. Jones, R.M. (1975). Mechanics of Composite Materials. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha Co, Japan.

24.

24. Reuter, R.C. Jr. (April 1971). Coincise property transformation relations for an anisotropic lamina. J. Comp. Mats., 270-272.

25.

25. Timoshenko, S.P. and Goodier, J.N. (1970). Theory of Elasticity. 3rd Edn.

McGraw-Hill Co.

26.

26. Hashin, Z. (1983). Analysis of composite materials - A survey. Trans. ASME J. Appl. Mech., 50: 481-505.

27.

27. Pipes, R.B. and Cole, B.W. (April 1973). On the off-axis strength test for anisotropic materials. Journal of Composite Materials, 246-256.

28.

28. Jones, R.M. (January 1974). Stiffness of orthotropic materials and laminated fiber - reinforced composites. AIAA J., 112-114.