Tensile,Impact and Fiber Length Properties of Injection-Molded Short and Long Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polyamide 6,6 Composites

Abstract

Injection molding of fiber-reinforced polymer composites is associated with the problem of fiber breakage. If the fiber length retained in the finish product is too short, it will limit the expected improvement in the property. Extrusion and pultrusion are two methods normally employed for the melt compounding of polymer composite feedstock for the injection molding and produced short- and long-fiber composites (SFCs and LFCs), respectively. In this work, short- and long-glass fiber-reinforced polyamide 6,6 composites were injection molded at different fiber loading and tested for the tensile properties, impact properties and fiber length characteristics. It was found that both tensile strength and tensile modulus of LFCs improved compared to the SFCs counterpart despite reduction in fracture strain, while pultrusion compounded composites also showed superior fiber characteristics, in terms of fiber length distribution, L_n, L_w, etc. compared to the extrusion compounded composites counterpart. Fiber length characteristics were also in agreement with the improvement in tensile strength and tensile modulus of LFCs over the SFCs. Impact properties of LFCs also show some improvement compared to the SFCs counterpart with equivalent composition, despite longer fiber retained in composites.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Cantwell, W.J. and Morton, J. (1991). J. Composites, 22: 347-362 .

2. Milewski, J.V. (May/June 1982). Plastics Compounding, p. 53.

3. Nangarani, K.J. (1985). SPE ANTEC Papers, 31: 1142 .

4. Zettler, M. and Doring, E. (1989). German Plastics, 79(9): 19-22 .

5. Cogswell, F.N., Hezzell, D.J. and Williams, P.J. (1985). Fiber Reinforced Compositions and Methods for Producing Such Compositions, United States Patent, No. US 4,559,262.

6. Cogswell, F.N. and Hezzell, D.J. (1985). Method for Impregnating Filaments with Thermoplastic, United States Patent, No. US 4,549,920.

7. Price, H.L. and Cupschalk, S.G. (1980). In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Reactive Processing of Polymers, 28-30 October 1980, The University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

8. Standard Test Method For Tensile Properties of Plastics, ASTM Standard, D638-80, Part 35, pp. 228-244.

9. Curtis, P.T. (1976). Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Surrey, U.K.

10.

10. Curtis, P.T., Bader M.G. and Bailey, J.E. (1978). Journal of Materials Science, 13: 377-390 .

11.

11. Denault, J., Vu-Khanh, T. and Foster, B. (1989). Polymer Composites, 10: 313-321 .

12.

12. Jones, D.P., Leach, C.D. and Moore, D.R. (1986). Plastics and Rubber Processing and Applications, 6(1): 67-79 .

13.

13. Folkes, M.J. (1982). Short Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics, Research Studies Press, Hertfordshire, UK .

14.

14. Marshall, G.P., Williams, J.G. and Turner, C.E. (1973). Journal of Materials Science, 8: 949 .

15.

15. Carling, M.J. and Williams, J.G. (1990). Polymer Composites, 11: 307-313 .

16.

16. Crosby, M., Talley, K. and Drye, T.R. (1987). Advanced Materials and Processes, 131(2): 57-61 .

17.

17. Jones, D.P., Leach, C.D. and Moore, D.R. (1986). Plastics and Rubber Processing and Applications, 6(1): 67-79 .

18.

18. Gupta, V.B., Mittal, R.K., Sharma, P.K., Mennig, G. and Wolters J. (1989). Polymer Composites, 10: 16-27 .