Investigative Study on Machinability Aspects of Unreinforced and Reinforced PEEK Composite Machining using ANN Model

Abstract

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composite material is widely used in structural components due to high specific strength and temperature properties. In order to enhance mechanical and tribological properties, short fibers are added to unreinforced thermoplastics. Unreinforced and reinforced PEEK composites are generally manufactured by extrusion and hence need additional machining operations. This paper presents application of artificial neural network (ANN) model to study the machinability aspects of unreinforced polyetheretherketone (PEEK), reinforced polyetheretherketone with 30% of carbon fibers (PEEK CF 30) and 30% of glass fibers (PEEK GF 30) machining. A multilayer feed forward ANN has been employed to study the effect of parameters such as tool material, work material, cutting speed and feed rate on two aspects of machinability, namely, power and specific cutting pressure. The input-output patterns required for training are obtained from the experiments planned through full factorial design. The analysis reveals that minimum power results from a combination of lower values of cutting speed and feed rate for all work-tool combinations. However, higher values of feed rate are required to achieve minimum specific cutting pressure. The investigation results also show that, K10 tool provides better machinability for PEEK and PEEK CF 30 materials, while PCD tool is preferred for PEEK GF 30 material.

Keywords

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)polycrystalline diamond (PCD) tool cemented carbide (K10) tool power specific cutting pressure artificial neural network (ANN).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kim, D. , Ramulu, M. and Doan, X. (2005). Influence of Consolidation Process on the Drilling Performance and Machinability of PIXA-M and PEEK Thermoplastic Composites , J. Therm. Compos. Mater., 18: 195-217.

Cogswell, F.N. (1992). Thermoplastic Aromatic Polymer Composites, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston.

Harsha, A.P. and Tewari, U.S. (2003). Two-Body and Three-Body Abrasive Wear Behaviour of Polyaryletherketone Composites, Polym. Test, 22: 403-408.

Jahanmir, S. , Ramulu, M. and Koshy, P. (1998). Machining of Ceramics and Composites, Marcel Dekker, New York.

Davim, J.P. , Reis, P. , Lapa, V. and Antonio, C.C. (2003). Machinability Study on Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Unreinforced and Reinforced (GF30) for Applications in Structural Components, Comp. Struct., 62: 67-73.

Davim, J.P. and Reis, P. (2004). Machinability Study on composite (Polyetheretherketone Reinforced with 30% Glass Fibre-PEEK GF 30) using Polycrystalline Diamond (PCD) and Cemented Carbide (K20) tools, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 23: 412-418.

Park, D.C. , Lee, S.M. , Kim, B.C. , Kim, S.H. and Lee, D.G. (2006). Development of Heavy Duty Hybrid Carbon-Phenolic Hemispherical Bearings, Compos. Struct., 73: 88-98.

Lee, M. , Park, D.C. , Kim, B.C. and Lee, D.G. (2006). Strength of Functionally Gradient Composite Hemispherical Bearings, Compos. Struct., 73: 145-152.

Groover, M.P. (1996). Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing Materials, Processes and Systems, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

10.

Rahman, M. , Ramakrishna, S. and Thoo, H.C. (1999). Machinability Study of Carbon/PEEK composites, Machin. Sci. Technol., 3: 49-59.

11.

Chambers, A. and Bishop, G. (1995). The Drilling of Carbon Fibre Polymer Matrix, Compos. Proces. Manufact. , 3: 565-572.

12.

Davim, J.P. and Mata, F. (2006). Physical Cutting Model of Polyetheretherketone Composites, Mater. Des., 27: 847-852.

13.

Montgomery, D.C. (2001). Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

14.

Schalkoff, R.B. (1997). Artificial Neural Networks , McGraw-Hill International Edition, Singapore.

15.

Lee, S.S. and Chen, J.C. (2003). On-line Surface Recognition System Using Artificial Neural Networks System in Turning Operations. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 22: 498-509.

16.

Sarkar, S. , Mitra, S. and Bhattacharyya, B. (2006). Parametric Optimization of Wire Electrical Discharge Machining of γ Titanium Aluminide Alloy Through an Artificial Neural Network Model, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. , 27: 500-508.

17.

Math Works Incorporation ( 2005). MATLAB User Manual, Version 7.1 R14, Math Works Incorporation, Natick, MA.