Probabilistic Finite Element Analysis of ASTM D6641 Compression Test for Marine Grade Polymer Matrix Composites

Abstract

The variability of compressive mechanical properties of a polymer matrix composite material with woven fabric reinforcement is studied using both experimental work and numerical simulations. Four E-glass/vinyl ester composite plates were fabricated using the vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) by a US Navy contractor. The materials and process selected are representative of marine grade composites typically used by the US Navy. Standard ASTM D6641 coupons were obtained from the plates and the laboratory results were compared with those of a 3D probabilistic finite element analysis (FEA). In the probabilistic FEA model, elastic properties, strength parameters and geometric properties of the woven fabric E-glass/vinyl ester coupons were considered as random fields, and generated using Monte Carlo simulations. The study evaluates the effects of spatial correlation, finite element size, probability distribution functions (PDF) types and failure criteria on statistical strength properties of the [0/90]_2sf compression coupons. Comparisons of experimental and probabilistic FEA results provide useful information on how to assign mean, Coefficient of variance (COV) and PDF of material properties to individual finite elements within a mesh. The results are relevant in selecting proper test methods and developing design properties for these composites.

Keywords

vacuum-assisted resign transfer molding (VARTM)SCRIMP processing probabilistic finite element analysis (FEA)applications-marine composites.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Camata, G. , Corotis, R. and Spacone, E. (2004). Simplified Stochastic Modeling and Simulation of Unidirectional Fiber Reinforced Composites, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 19(1): 33-40.

Engelstad, S.P. and Reddy, J.N. (1993). Probabilistic Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Composite Structures, AIAA Journal , 31(2): 362-369.

Frangopol, D.M. and Recek, S. (2003). Reliability of Fiber-reinforced Composite Laminate Plates, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics , 18(2): 119-137.

Jeong, H.K. and Shenoi, R.A. (2000). Probabilistic Strength Analysis of Rectangular FRP Plates using Monte Carlo Simulation, Computers and Structures , 76(1-3): 219-235.

Jeong, H.K. and Shenoi, R.A. (2000). Structural Reliability of Thick FRP Plates Subjected to Lateral Pressure Loads, Journal of Ship & Ocean Technology (SOTECH), 4(2): 38-57.

Kam, T.Y. and Lin, S.C. (1993). Reliability Analysis of Nonlinear Laminated Composite Plate Structures, In: Composite Structures Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Composite Structures, Aug, 25(1-4): 503-510.

Liu, X. and Mahadevan, S. (2000). Ultimate Strength Failure Probability Estimation of Composite Structures, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 19(5): 403-426.

Wu, W.F. and Cheng, H.-C. (2000). Random Field Formulation of Composite Laminates, Composite Structures , 49(1): 87-93.

Nader, J. , Dagher, H. , Lopez-Anido, R. and Hess, P. (2006). Probabilistic Finite Element Analysis of Modified ASTM D3039 Tension Test for Marine Grade Polymer Matrix Composites, SAMPE (2006), SAMPE Fall Technical Conference, 38th ISTC, Dallas, TX.

10.

Bazant, Z.P. and Kim, J.K. (1991). Segmental Box Girder. Effect of Spatial Random Variability of Material on Deflections , Journal of Structural Engineering, 117(8): 2542-2547.

11.

Lopez-Anido, R. , El-Chiti, F.W. , Muszynski , L. , Dagher, H.D. , Thompson, L. and Hess, P.E. (2004). Composites 2004, American Composites Manufacturers Association, Tampa, Florida, p. 7.

12.

Astm (2000). Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials , Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 15.03, West Conshohocken, American Society of Testing Materials.

13.

Ansys (2004). ANSYS 9.0 University High Option, [CD-ROM] SAS IP, Inc. Available: ANSYS, Inc.

14.

Zienkiewicz, O.C. (1977). The Finite Element Method, McGraw-Hill, London.

15.

Ayyub, B.M. and Haldar, A. (1984). Practical Structural Reliability Techniques, Journal of Structural Engineering , 110(8): 1707-1724.

16.

Di Sciuva, M. and Lomario, D. (2003). A Comparison between Monte Carlo and FORMs in Calculating the Reliability of a Composite Structure , Composite Structures, 59(1): 155-162.

17.

Mansour, A. (1990). An Introduction to Structural Reliability Theory, SSC-351, Ship Structure Committee.

18.

Barbero, E.J. (1999). Introduction to Composite Materials Design, Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, PA.

19.

Daniel, I.M. (1994). Engineering Mechanics of Composite Materials, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.

20.

Kural, M.H. and Flaggs, D.L. (1983). Finite Element Analysis of Composite Compression Specimens, Composites Technology Review, 5(1): 11-17.