Characterization and modeling of compression behavior of syntactic foam-filled honeycombs

Abstract

Processing and compression behavior of lightweight syntactic foam-filled aluminum honeycomb composites is presented. Different foam-filled honeycomb composites are prepared by varying the volume fraction of microballoons in the syntactic epoxy foam while keeping the volume fraction of the metallic network the same. Uniaxial compression tests are then carried out on syntactic foam and foam-filled honeycomb composites. The latter shows improvement in elastic modulus and plateau stress values by 26—31% and 36—39% when compared to the syntactic foam with the same volume fraction of microballoons. The maximum increase in energy absorption for syntactic foam-filled honeycomb composite is found to be approximately 48%. The compression response and stress-strain characteristics of the foam-filled honeycombs are also examined relative to a 3D variant, namely, an interpenetrating aluminum-syntactic foam composite. Elasto-plastic finite element models are developed to simulate experiments performed on syntactic foam-filled honeycomb composite. The numerical model based on stress-strain responses of the constituents of the composite is shown to successfully capture the overall behavior.

Keywords

honeycombs foam-filling syntactic foam compression tests stress-strain response finite element modeling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gibson LJ and Ashby MF Cellular solids: structure and properties. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 2001.

Santosa S. and Wierzbicki T. Crash behavior of box columns filled with aluminum honeycomb or foam. Comput Struct 1998; 68(4): 343-367.

Seitzberger M. , Rammerstorfer FG , Gradinger R. , Blaimschein M. and Walch C. Experimental studies on the quasi-static axial crushing of steel columns filled with aluminium foam. Int J Solids Struct 2000; 37(30): 4125-4147.

Wu C. , Weeks C. and Sun C. Improving honeycomb-core sandwich structures for impact resistance. J Adv Mater-Covina 1995; 26: 41-47.

Vaidya U. , Kamath M. , Mahfuz H. and Jeelani S. Low velocity impact response of resin infusion molded foam filled honeycomb sandwich composites. J Reinf Plast Comp 1998 ; 17(9): 819-849.

Vaidya U. , Ulven C. , Pillay S. and Ricks H. Impact damage of partially foam-filled co-injected honeycomb core sandwich composites. J Compos Mater 2003; 37(7): 611-626.

Jhaver R. Compression response and modeling of interpenetrating phase composites and foam-filled honeycombs, MS Thesis, 2010, Auburn University, AL.

Jhaver R. and Tippur H. Processing, compression response and finite element modeling of syntactic foam based interpenetrating phase composite (IPC). Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 2009; 499: 507-517.

Shutov FA Syntactic polymer foams. In: Advances in Polymer Science. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin, 1986, vol. 73, pp. 63-123.

10.

Gupta N. A functionally graded syntactic foam material for high energy absorption under compression. Mater Lett 2007; 61(4-5): 979-982.

11.

Kirugulige MS , Kitey R. and Tippur HV Dynamic fracture behavior of model sandwich structures with functionally graded core: A feasibility study. Compos Sci Technol 2005; 65: 1052-1068.

12.

Song B. and Chen W. Dynamic compressive response and failure behavior of an epoxy syntactic foam . J Compos Mater 2004; 38(11): 915-936.

13.

Prakash O. , Bichebois P. , Brechet Y. , Louchet F. and Embury J. A note on the deformation behaviour of two-dimensional model cellular structures . Philos Mag A 1996; 75(3): 739-751.

14.

Papka S. and Kyriakides S. Experiments and full-scale numerical simulations of in-plane crushing of a honeycomb. Acta Mater 1998; 46: 2765-2776.

15.

Abaqustm. User’s Manual (Version 6.7). ABAQUS Inc, Providence, RI.

16.

Papka S. and Kyriakides S. In-plane compressive response and crushing of honeycomb. J Mech Phys Solids 1994; 42: 1499-1532.