There is an excessive demand for the rehabilitation of frame-type RC buildings which do not satisfy current seismic code provisions. Therefore, it is imperative to develop user-friendly strengthening methodologies which do not necessitate the evacuation of the building during rehabilitation period. The aim of this study was to strengthen the masonry infill walls by means of diagonal carbon fiber-reinforced polymer fabrics and to integrate them with the existing structural frame in order to form a new lateral load resisting system. This study investigated the possible effects of height-to-width ratio of the infills on the overall behavior attained by the previously developed rehabilitation methodology. In the first part of the study, eight 1/3 scaled, one-bay, two-story RC frames with two different aspect ratios were tested. The experimental results in terms of lateral stiffness, strength, drift, and energy dissipation characteristics of the specimens were discussed. In the second part, a numerical study of the frames was conducted to estimate the non-linear behavior of the specimens.
CanbayEErsoyUÖzcebeG. Contribution of reinforced concrete infills to the seismic behavior of structural systems. Struct J, ACI2003; 100(5): 637–643.
2.
SonuvarMOÖzcebeGErsoyU. Rehabilitation of reinforced concrete frames with reinforced concrete infills. Struct J, ACI2004; 101(4): 494–500.
3.
FroschRJLiWJirsaJOKregerME. Retrofit of non-ductile moment resisting frames using precast infill wall panels. Earthq Spectra1996; 12(4): 741–760.
4.
EhsaniMRSaadatmaneshH. Seismic retrofitting of URM walls with fiber composites. J Masonry Soc1996; 14(2): 63–72.
5.
ErdemİAkyüzUErsoyUÖzcebeG. An experimental study on two different strengthening techniques for RC frames. Eng Struct2006; 28: 1843–1851.
6.
Özcebe G, Binici B, Ersoy U, et al. Analysis of infilled reinforced concrete frames strengthened with FRP’s. Retrofitting of Concrete Structures by Externally Bonded FRP’s, FIB, Technical Report, April 2006, pp. 167–197.
7.
ÖzdenŞAkgüzelU. CFRP overlays in strengthening of frames with column rebar lap splice problem. Tanvir WastiSAdvances in earthquake engineering for urban risk reduction2006; Vol. 66Springer: NATO Science Series, Earth and Environmental Sciences275–284.
8.
Saatcioglu M, Serrato F and Foo S. Seismic performance of masonry infill walls retrofitted with CFRP sheets. In: 7th International Symposium on Fiber-Reinforced (FRP) Polymer Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, Paper ACI-SP230, Farmington Hills, MI, 2005, pp. 341–354.
9.
Binici B and Kobayashi K. Economical seismic retrofit schemes for vulnerable RC buildings with infill-brick wall using new FRP technologies. In: The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 12–17 October, Beijing, China, 2008, pp. 1–8.
10.
Kobayashi K. Innovative application of FRP’s to seismic retrofit of brick-infilled RC frames. In: Proceedings of FRPRCS-8, 16–18 July, University of Patras, Patras, Greece, 2007.
11.
El-DakhakhniWWHamidAAElgaalyM. Seismic retrofit of masonry-infilled steel frames using GFRP. ASCE J Struct Eng2004; 130(9): 1343–1352.
12.
Tateishi Y, Jinno Y, Kimoto Y and Hattori A. Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete frame with new CFRP units infilled wall. In: Proceedings of the ATC&SEI Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures, 9–11 December, San Francisco, California, 2009, Vol. 364, Paper No: 41084, pp. 1105–1116.
13.
Nateghi-Elahi F and Dehghani A. Analytical and numerical study of RC frames with URM infilled retrofitted by CFRP. In: Proceedings of 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 12–17 October, Beijing, China, 2008.
14.
YükselEÖzkaynakHBüyüköztürkOYalçınC. Performance of alternative CFRP retrofitting schemes used in infilled RC frames. Construct Build Mater2009; 24: 596–609.
15.
TriantafillouTC. Strengthening of masonry structures using epoxy bonded FRP laminates. ASCE J Compos Constr1998; 2(2): 96–104.
Tan M, Binici B and Özcebe G. Seismic strengthening of a mid-rise reinforced concrete using CFRPs: a real life application. In: Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Fiber Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-9), 13–15 July, Sydney, Australia, 2009.
19.
The Ministry of Public Works and SettlementTurkish code for buildings in seismic zones. Turkey: MPWS, 2007, 159–159.
20.
Özcebe G and Akın E. Strengthening of brick infilled R/C frames with CFRP reinforcement. In: 9th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 2007, Paper No: 1150.
21.
Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL, et al. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation user (OpenSees) Command-Language Manual, 2007, Version 2.0, University of California, Berkeley, California (http://opensees.berkeley.edu./OpenSees/manuals/usermanual/). Accessed on December 2009.
22.
ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-05) and Commentary (ACI 318R-05), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2005, p. 443.
23.
ÖzdemirGAkyüzUTanvir WastiS. Tensile capacity of CFRP anchors. Advances in earthquake engineering urban risk reduction. Springer: NATO Science, Earth and Environmental Sciences. Vol. 66, 2006, 471–489.
24.
DimovaSLNegroP. Seismic assessment of an industrial frame structure designed according to Eurocodes. Part 2: Capacity and vulnerability. Eng Struct2005; 27: 724–735.
25.
BiniciBMosalam KhalidM. Analysis of reinforced concrete columns retrofitted with fiber reinforced polymer lamina. Compos B Eng2007; 38: 265–276.
26.
BiniciBÖzcebeGÖzçelikR. Analysis and design of FRP composites for seismic retrofit of infill walls in reinforced concrete frames. Compos B Eng2007; 38: 575–583.
