Transverse impact behaviors of 3-D carbon/epoxy braided composite are reported in experimental and finite element analysis (FEA) approaches. In the experimental approach, the quasi-static penetration and transverse impact behaviors were tested to obtain load–displacement curves and fracture morphologies of the braided composite. In FEA, a unit cell model was established to derive the constitutive equation and failure criteria. Based on the model, a user-defined material subroutine (VUMAT) was written and connected with commercial FEA code ABAQUS/Explicit to calculate the impact damage. Good agreements between the experimental and FEA results prove the validity of the unit cell model and the subroutine VUMAT.
JenqSTKuoJTSheuLT. Ballistic impact response of 3-D four-step braided glass/epoxy composites. Key Eng Mater1998; 141-143: 349–366.
6.
FlanaganMPZikryMAWallJW. An experimental investigation of high velocity impact and penetration failure modes in textile composites. J Compos Mater1999; 33(12): 1080–1103.
7.
ShakerMKoFSongJ. Comparison of the low and high velocity impact response of Kevlar fiber-reinforced epoxy composites. J Compos Tech Res1999; 21(4): 224–229.
8.
TangGYYanYJChenXH. Dynamic damage and fracture mechanism of three-dimensional braided carbon fiber/epoxy resin composites. Mater Des2001; 22(1): 21–25.
9.
ZengTFangDNLuTJ. Dynamic crashing and impact energy absorption of 3D braided composite tubes. Mater Lett2005; 59(12): 1491–1496.
10.
LiXTBiniendaWKLittellJD. Methodology for impact modeling of triaxial braided composites using shell elements. J Aerosp Eng2009; 22(3): 310–317.
11.
LiXTBiniendaWKGoldbergRK. Finite-element model for failure study of two-dimensional triaxially braided composite. J Aerosp Eng2011; 24(2): 170–180.
12.
LittellJDBiniendaWKArnoldWA. Effect of microscopic damage events on static and ballistic impact strength of triaxial braid composites. Compos Part A -Appl Sci Manuf2009; 40(12): 1846–1862.
13.
McGregorCVaziriRXiaoX. Finite element modelling of the progressive crushing of braided composite tubes under axial impact. Int J Impact Eng2010; 37(6): 662–672.
14.
SmilauerVHooverCGBazantZP. Multiscale simulation of fracture of braided composites via repetitive unit cells. Eng Fract Mech2011; 78(6): 901–918.
15.
RenJKimYKRiceJ. Comparing the fracture toughness of 3-D braided preform composites with z-fiber-reinforced laminar composites. Text Res J2011; 81(4): 335–343.
16.
GuBHXuJY. Finite element calculation of 4-step 3-dimensional braided composite under ballistic perforation. Compos Part B - Eng2004; 35(4): 291–297.
17.
GuBHLiYL. Ballistic perforation of conically cylindrical steel projectile into three-dimensional braided composites. AIAA J2005; 43(2): 426–434.
18.
GuB. A microstructure model for finite-element simulation of 3D rectangular braided composite under ballistic penetration. Philos Mag2007; 87(30): 4643–4669.
19.
SunBLiuFGuB. Influence of the strain rate on the uniaxial tensile behavior of 4-step 3D braided composites. Compos Part A -Appl Sci Manuf2005; 36(11): 1477–1485.
20.
SunBGuB. High strain rate behavior of 4-step 3D braided composites under compressive failure. J Mater Sci2007; 42(7): 2463–2470.
21.
MeyersMA. Dynamic behavior of materials. New York: Wiley, 1994.
22.
CalardVLamonJ. Failure of fiber bundles. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64(5): 701–710.
23.
BažantZOhB. Crack band theory for fracture of concrete. Mater Struct1983; 16(3): 155–177.
24.
RosenBW. Tensile failure of fibrous composites. AIAA J1964; 11(2): 1985–1991.
