Effect of blend ratio on the mechanical and sorption behaviour of polymer–polymer microfibrillar composites from low-density polyethylene and polyethylene terephthalate
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2012
Effect of blend ratio on the mechanical and sorption behaviour of polymer–polymer microfibrillar composites from low-density polyethylene and polyethylene terephthalate
The morphology of the neat blends, microfibrillar blends and the corresponding microfibrillar composites based on low-density polyethylene and polyethylene terephthalate was analyzed. As the polyethylene terephthalate concentration increased, an increase in the diameter of polyethylene terephthalate spheres/fibrils was observed. The fibrils with relatively uniform diameter distribution were obtained in the range of 15–25 wt% polyethylene terephthalate concentration. The tensile properties of the blends and microfibrillar composites increased with polyethylene terephthalate concentration up to an optimum level. The neat blends exhibited inferior tensile properties in comparison with the microfibrillar composites. As the polyethylene terephthalate concentration increased, the solvent uptake reduced. The diffusivity and permeability of the microfibrillar composites were lower than the corresponding blends. The solvent uptake was found to be lowest for the composite with 25 wt% polyethylene terephthalate concentration. The polyethylene terephthalate microfibrils in the microfibrillar composites offered a tortuous path for the diffusion of the solvent.
LiZMYangMBFengJM. Morphology of in situ poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polyethylene microfiber reinforced composite formed via slit-die extrusion and hot-stretching. Mater Res Bull2002; 37(13): 2185–2197.
2.
YangMBLiZMFengJM. Studies on high density polyethylene/polycarbonate blend system compatibilized with low density polyethylene grafted diallyl bisphenol A ether. Polym Eng Sci1998; 38(6): 879–883.
3.
MiglerKB. String formation in sheared polymer blends: coalescence, breakup, and finite size effects. Phys Rev Lett2001; 86: 1023–1026.
4.
EvstatievMFakirovSKrastevaB. Recycling of poly(ethylene terephthalate) as polymer–polymer composites. Polym Eng Sci2002; 42(4): 826–835.
5.
ShieldsRJBhattacharyyaDFakirovS. Fibrillar polymer–polymer composites: morphology, properties and applications. J Mat Sci2008; 43(20): 6758–6770.
ShieldsRJBhattacharyyaDFakirovS. Microfibril-reinforced composites from PE/PET blends: effect of reinforcement size on oxygen permeability. Adv Compos Mater Eng2007; 334–335: 249–252.
8.
JayanarayananKThomasSJosephK. In situ microfibrillar blends and composites of polypropylene and poly(ethylene terephthalate): morphology and thermal properties. J Polym Res2011; 18(1): 1–11.
9.
JayanarayananKBhagawanSSThomasS. Morphology development and non isothermal crystallization behaviour of drawn blends and microfibrillar composites from PP and PET. Polym Bull2008; 60(4): 525–532.
10.
GraceMP. Dispersion phenomena in high viscosity immiscible fluid systems and application of static mixers as dispersion devices in such systems. Chem Eng Commun1982; 14(3–6): 225–277.
11.
DrealVEVinogradovGVPlotnikovaEP. Deformation of melts of mixtures of incompatible polymers in a uniform shear field and the process of their fibrillation. Rheol Acta1983; 22(1): 102–107.
12.
DlabyIErnstBFroelichD. Droplet deformation in immiscible polymer blends during transient uniaxial elongational flow. Polym Eng Sci1996; 36(12): 1627–1635.
13.
LinXDCheungWL. Study of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polypropylene microfibrillar composites. I. Morphological development in melt extrusion. J Appl Polym Sci2003; 89(7): 1743–1752.
14.
LiZMYangMBXieBH. In-situ microfiber reinforced composite based on PET and PE via slit die extrusion and hot stretching: influences of hot stretching ratio on morphology and tensile properties at a fixed composition. Polym Eng Sci2003; 43(3): 615–628.
15.
LeungKLEastealABhattacharyyaD. In situ formation of poly (ethylene naphthalate) microfibrils in polyethylene and polypropylene during extrusion. Compos Part A2008; 39(4): 662–676.
16.
JayanarayananKJoseTThomasS. Effect of draw ratio on the microstructure, thermal, tensile and dynamic rheological properties of in situ microfibrillar composites. Eur Polym J2009; 45(6): 1738–1747.
17.
JayanarayananKThomasSJosephK. Mechanical and thermal properties of microfibrillar polymer-polymer composites. J Polym Mater2008; 25(3): 381–386.
18.
JiangCHXuXBLiZM. Application of in situ microfibrillization to recycling ultraviolet-aged poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and high density polyethylene (HDPE). J Macromol Sci B2008; 47(1): 10–25.
19.
LiWSchlarbAKEvstatievM. Study of PET/PP/TiO2 microfibrillar-structured composites, part 2: morphology and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci2009; 113(5): 3300–3306.
20.
LiWSchlarbAKEvstatievM. Study of PET/PP/TiO2 microfibrillar-structured composites, part 1: preparation, morphology, and dynamic mechanical analysis of fibrillized blends. J Appl Polym Sci2009; 113(3): 1471–1479.
21.
JayanarayananKThomasSJosephK. Dynamic mechanical analysis of in situ microfibrillar composites based on PP and PET. Polym Plast Technol Eng2009; 48(4): 455–463.
22.
JayanarayananKThomasSJosephK. Morphology, static and dynamic mechanical properties of in situ microfibrillar composites based on polypropylene/poly(ethylene terephthalate) blends. Compos Part A2008; 39(2): 164–175.
23.
FriedrichKEvstatievMFakirovS. Microfibrillar reinforced composites from PET/PP blends: processing, morphology and mechanical properties. Compos Sci Tech2005; 65(1): 107–116.
24.
JayanarayananKArchanaRDhivyaR. Morphology and mechanical properties of normal blends and in situ microfibrillar composites from low density polyethylene and poly (ethylene terephthalate). Polym Plast Technol Eng2010; 49(5): 442–448.
25.
HuangWYShenJWChenXM. Effect of composition on phase morphology and mechanical properties of PP/PA66 in situ composites via extrusion-drawing-injection method. J Mat Sci2003; 38(3): 541–547.
26.
LiZMYangMBLuA. Tensile properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and polyethylene in situ microfibre reinforced composite formed via slit die extrusion and hot-stretching. Mater Lett2002; 56(5): 756–762.
27.
LiZMYangMBYangW. Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polyethylene composite based on in-situ microfibre formation. Polym Plast Technol Eng2002; 41(1): 19–32.
28.
LiZMYangWXieBH. Morphology and tensile strength prediction of in situ microfibrillar poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polyethylene blends fabricated via slit-die extrusion-hot stretching-quenching. Macromol Mater Eng2004; 289(4): 349–354.
29.
ZhuYTLoweTCBlumenthalWR. The tensile strength of short fibre-reinforced composites. J Mat Sci1997; 32(8): 2037–2043.
30.
LiWSchlarbAKEvstatievM. Influence of processing window and weight ratio on the morphology of the extruded and drawn PET/PP blends. Polym Eng Sci2009; 49(10): 1929–1936.
31.
VarugheseKTNandoGBDePP. Miscible blends from rigid poly(vinyl chloride) and epoxidized natural rubber. I: phase morphology. J Mat Sci1988; 23(11): 3894–3902.
32.
MolyKABhagawanSSGeorgeSC. Sorption and diffusion of aromatic solvents through linear low density polyethylene–ethylene vinyl acetate blend membranes. J Mat Sci2007; 42(12): 4552–4561.
33.
BegumMSiddaramaiah, KumarH. Molecular transport of n-alkanes into PU/PBMA interpenetrating polymer network systems. J Appl Polym Sci2003; 90(3): 739–746.
34.
Guerrica–EchevarríaGEguiazábalJINazábalJ. Solvent sorption effects on the structure and properties of PP/Rodrun blends. J Polym Sci B2000; 38(8): 1090–1100.
35.
EspertAVilaplanaFKarlssonS. Comparison of water absorption in natural cellulosic fibres from wood and one-year crops in polypropylene composites and its influence on their mechanical properties. Compos Part A2004; 35(11): 1267–1276.
36.
KarmakerAC. Effect of water absorption on dimensional stability and impact energy of jute fibre reinforced polypropylene. J Mat Sci Lett1997; 16(6): 462–464.
37.
CollingsTA. Moisture absorption–Fickian diffusion kinetics and moisture profiles. In: JonesFR (ed.) Handbook of polymer fibre composites. Harlow, UK: Longman Scientific and Technical, 1994, pp.366–371.
38.
ShenCHSpringerG. Moisture absorption and desorption of composite materials. J Compos Mater1976; 10(1): 2–20.
39.
MonticcioloACassagnauPMichelA. Fibrillar morphology development of PE/PBT blends: rheology and solvent permeability. Polym Eng Sci1998; 38(11): 1882–1889.
40.
ShieldsRJBhattacharyyaDFakirovS. Oxygen permeability analysis of microfibril reinforced composites from PE/PET blends. Compos Part A2008; 39(6): 940–949.
41.
PawlakAMorawiecJPazzagliF. Recycling of postconsumer poly(ethylene terephthalate) and high-density polyethylene by compatibilized blending. J Appl Polym Sci2002; 86(6): 1473–1485.
42.
PracellaMRollaLChionnaD. Compatibilization and properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polyethylene blends based on recycled materials. Macromol Chem Phys2002; 203(10/11): 1473–1485.
43.
ParkSHParkKYSuhKD. Compatibilizing effect of isocyanate functional group on polyethylene terephthalate/low density polyethylene blends. J Polym Sci B1998; 36(3): 447–453.
44.
LiWKarger-KocsisJSchlarbAK. Dispersion of TiO2 particles in PET/PP/TiO2 and PET/PP/PP-g-MA/TiO2 composites prepared with different blending procedures. Macromol Mater Eng2009; 294(9): 582–589.
45.
LiWKarger-KocsisJThomannR. Compatibilization effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on the phase structure of PET/PP/TiO2 nanocomposites. J Polym Sci B2009; 47(16): 1616–1624.
46.
UnnikrishnanGThomasSVargheseS. Sorption and diffusion of aromatic hydrocarbons through filled natural rubber. Polymer1996; 37(13): 2687–2693.
47.
HarogoppadSBAminabhaviTM. Diffusion and sorption of organic liquids through polymer membranes. 5. Neoprene, styrene-butadiene-rubber, ethylene-propylene-diene terpolymer, and natural rubber versus hydrocarbons (C8-C16). Macromolecules1991; 24(9): 2598–2605.
48.
GeorgeSCThomasSNinanKN. Molecular transport of aromatic hydrocarbons through crosslinked styrene-butadiene rubber membranes. Polymer1996; 37(26): 5839–5848.
49.
GeorgeSVarugheseKTThomasS. Molecular transport of aromatic solvents in isotactic polypropylene/acrylonitrile-co-butadiene rubber blends. Polymer2000; 41(2): 579–594.
50.
KamalMRJinnahIAUtrackiLA. Permeability of oxygen and water vapor through polyethylene/polyamide films. Polym Eng Sci1984; 24(17): 1337–1347.
51.
SekelikDJStepanovEVNazarenkoS. Oxygen barrier properties of crystallized and talc-filled poly(ethylene terephthalate). J Polym Sci B1999; 37(8): 847–857.
