The effect of nanoclay content on the mechanism governing nanoclay dispersion was investigated through studying the interaction between nanoclay content and other factors. We hypothesized that at low nanoclay content, the dispersion was diffusion controlled; thus, increasing thermal diffusion and residence time, even when the shear intensity was compromised, were beneficial to nanoclay dispersion. At high nanoclay content, however, at which the process was found to be shear controlled, increasing shear intensity was essential to better dispersion, even when the thermal diffusion and residence time were sacrificed.
AlexandreMDuboisP. Polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites: Preparation, properties and uses of a new class of materials. Mater Sci Eng R: Reports2000; 28: 1–63.
IshidaHCampbellSBlackwellJ. General approach to nanocomposite preparation. Chem Mater2000; 12: 1260–1267.
5.
TjongSC. Structural and mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng2006; 53: 73–197.
6.
ChoudalakisGGotsisAD. Permeability of polymer/clay nanocomposites: a review. Euro Polym J2009; 45: 967–984.
7.
PavlidouSPapaspyridesCD. A review on polymer–layered silicate nanocomposites. Prog Polym Sci2008; 33: 1119–1198.
8.
ZanettiMLomakinSCaminoG. Polymer layered silicate nanocomposites. Macromol Mater Eng2000; 279: 1–9.
9.
RaySSOkamotoM. Polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites: a review from preparation to processing. Prog Polym Sci2003; 28: 1539–1641.
10.
ZhengXWilkieCA. Flame retardancy of polystyrene nanocomposites based on an oligomeric organically-modified clay containing phosphate. Polym Degrad Stabil2003; 81: 539–550.
11.
PantoustierNAlexandreMDegeeP. Poly(ɛ-caprolactone) layered silicate nanocomposites: effect of clay surface modifiers on the melt intercalation process. e-Polymer2001; 9: 1–9.
12.
BalazsACSinghCZhulinaE. Modeling the interactions between polymers and clay surfaces through self-consistent field theory. Macromolecules1998; 31: 8370–8381.
13.
HematiFGarmabiH. Compatibilised LDPE/LLDPE/nanoclay nanocomposites: I. Structural, mechanical, and thermal properties. Can J Chem Eng2010; 89: 187–196.
14.
FornesTDYoonPJKeskkulaH. Nylon 6 nanocomposites: the effect of matrix molecular weight. Polymer2001; 42: 9929–9940.
15.
MaitiPOkamotoM. Crystallization controlled by silicate surfaces in nylon 6–clay nanocomposites. Macromol Mater Eng2003; 288: 440–445.
16.
VarlotKReynaudEKloppferMHet almlmkl. Clay–reinforced polyamide: preferential orientation of the montmorillonite sheets and the polyamide crystalline lamellae. J Polym Sci: Polym Phys2001; 39: 1360–1370.
17.
LincolnDMVaiaRAWangZ-G. Secondary structure and elevated temperature crystallite morphology of nylon 6/layered silicate nanocomposites. Polymer2001; 42: 1621–1631.
YeiD-RKuoS-WFuH-K. Enhanced thermal properties of PS nanocomposites formed from Montmorillonite treated with a surfactant/cyclodextrin inclusion complex. Polymer2005; 46: 741–750.
20.
ChavarriaFShahRKHunterDL. Effect of melt processing conditions on the morphology and properties of nylon 6 nanocomposites. Polym Eng Sci2007; 47: 1847–1864.
21.
ChoJWPaulDR. Nylon 6 nanocomposites by melt compounding. Polymer2001; 42: 1083–1094.
22.
DennisHRHunterDLChangD. Effect of melt processing conditions on the extent of exfoliation in organoclay-based nanocomposites. Polymer2001; 42: 9513–9522.
23.
ShahabadiSISGarmabiH. Response surface analysis of structural, mechanical, and permeability properties of polyethylene/Na+-montmorillonite composites, prepared by slurry-fed melt intercalation. Expr Polym Lett2012; 6: 657–671.
24.
HejaziISharifFGarmabiH. Effect of material and processing parameters on mechanical properties of polypropylene/ethylene–propylene–diene–monomer/clay nanocomposites. Mater Des2011; 32: 3803–3809.
25.
MoghriMGarmabiH. Investigation of the effects of formulation and processing parameters on properties of PA6 nanocomposites using Taguchi method of experimental design. Int Polym Proc2008; 5: 430–438.
26.
ShahabadiSISGarmabiH. Polyethylene/Na+-montmorillonite composites prepared by slurry-fed melt intercalation: response surface analysis of rheological behavior. J Reinf Plast Compos2012; 31: 977–988.
27.
ShahabadiSISGarmabiH. Qualitative assessment of nanoclay dispersion using thermogravimetric analysis: A response surface study. J Thermo Compos Mater. In press. DOI: 10.1177/0892705712452742.
28.
LertwimolnunWVergnesB. Effect of processing conditions on the formation of polypropylene/organoclay nanocomposites in a twin screw extruder. Polym Eng Sci2006; 46: 314–323.
