In this study, the mechanical properties of composite materials obtained from carbon and carbon-aramid hybrid woven fabrics produced in different constructions with the same yarn and under the same production conditions were determined, and the effects of weaving structure and hybridization on the mechanical properties were investigated. For this purpose, the geometric properties of carbon fabrics made from 12 K carbon yarn with four different weaving structures and two carbon-aramid hybrid fabrics made of 12 K carbon yarn and aramid yarn with two different structures were defined, and the mechanical properties of the composite materials were investigated under uniaxial tensile loading. The mechanical properties of the composite materials produced from the carbon and carbon-aramid hybrid fabrics were compared. The effects of weaving structure and hybridization on the mechanical properties were determined. Based on the weaving construction, Young’s modulus and the tensile strength declined approximately 34–39% and 24–27%, respectively. However, Young’s modulus was 16–63% higher than the expected value for the hybrid composites.
Tennyson RC. Composites in space–challenges and opportunities. In: Proceedings of the tenth international conference on composite materials, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada, 14–18 August 1995, pp.35–36. The Tenth International Conference of Composite Materials Society, Woodhead Publishing Ltd.
2.
XiaYWangXYangB. Constitutive equation for unidirectional composites under tensile impact. Compos Sci Technol1996; 56: 155–160.
3.
KarahanMLomovSVBogdanovichAEVerpoestI. Fatigue tensile behavior of carbon/epoxy composite reinforced with non-crimp 3D orthogonal woven fabric. Compos Sci Technol2011; 71: 1961–1972.
4.
de PaivaJMFMayerSRezendeMC. Comparison of tensile strength of different carbon fabric reinforced epoxy composites. Mater Res2006; 9: 83–89.
5.
KarahanM. The effect of fibre volume fraction on damage initiation and propagation of woven carbon-epoxy multi-layer composites. Text Res J2011; 82: 45–62.
6.
KarahanM. Investigation of damage initiation and propagation in 2x2 twill woven carbon-epoxy multi-layer composites. Text Res J2011; 81: 412–428.
7.
KarahanMGodaraA. Influence of carbon nanotubes grown on the fibers on damage progression in woven carbon-epoxy composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2013; 32: 515–524.
8.
BogdanovichAEKarahanMLomovSVVerpoestI. Quasi-static tensile behavior and damage of carbon-epoxy composite reinforced with 3D non-crimp orthogonal woven fabric. Mech Mater2013; 62: 14–31.
9.
LeeBLeongKHHerszbergI. Effect of weaving on the tensile properties of carbon fibre tows and woven composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2001; 20: 652–670.
10.
ArakawaKKatoMMadaT. Tensile fracture testing and energy evaluation of a light-cured composite resin. Polym Test2010; 29: 1–6.
11.
YuanQ-LLiY-LLiH-J. Strain rate sensitivity of C/C composites under compression. J Inorg Mater2007; 22: 311–314.
12.
KarahanMLomovSVBogdanovichAEMungalovDVerpoestI. Internal geometry evaluation of non-crimp 3D orthogonal woven carbon fabric composite. Compos Part A2010; 41: 1301–1311.
13.
BunsellARHarrisB. Hybrid carbon and glass fibre composites. Composites1974; 5: 157–164.
14.
FariborzSJYangCLHarlowDG. The tensile behavior of intraply hybrid composites. I: model and simulation. Compos Mater1985; 19: 334–354.
15.
KretsisG. A review of the tensile, compressive, flexural and shear properties of hybrid fibre-reinforced plastics. Composites1987; 18: 13–23.
16.
KhatriSCKoczakMJ. Thick-section AS4-graphite/E-glass/pps hybrid composites: part I. Tensile behaviour. Compos Sci Technol1996; 56: 181–192.
17.
ChiangMYMWangXSchultheiszCR. Prediction and three-dimensional Monte-Carlo simulation for tensile properties of unidirectional hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65: 1719–1727.
18.
SakaKHardingJ. A simple laminate theory approach to the prediction of the tensile impact strength of woven hybrid composites. Composites1990; 21: 439–447.
19.
AhmedKSVijayaranganS. Elastic property evaluation of jute-glass fibre hybrid composite using experimental and CLT approach. Indian J Eng Mater Sci2006; 13: 435–442.
20.
VerpoestILomovSV. Virtual textile composites software WiseTex: integration with micro-mechanical, permeability and structural analysis. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65: 2563–2574.
21.
CurtisGJMilneJMReynoldsWN. Non-Hookean behaviour of strong carbon fibres. Nature1968; 220: 1024–1025.
22.
DjordevicJMSekulicDRMitricMN. Non-Hookean elastic behaviour and crystallite orientation in carbon fibers. J Compos Mater2010; 44: 1717–1727.
23.
ToyamaNTakasuboJ. An investigation of non-linear elastic behavior of CFRP laminates and strain measurement using lamb waves. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64: 2509–2516.
24.
Truong ChiTVettoriMLomovSV. Carbon composites based on multiaxial multiply stitched preforms, Part 4. Mechanical properties of composites and damage observation. Compos Part A2005; 36: 1207–1221.
25.
DadkhahMSFlintoffJGKnivetonT. Simple models for triaxially braided composites. Composites1995; 26: 91–102.
26.
CurtisPTBishopSM. An assessment of the potential of woven carbon fibre-reinforced plastics for high performance applications. Composites1984; 15: 259–265.
27.
Curtis PT and Moore BB. A comparison of the fatigue performance of woven and non-woven CFRP laminates. In: Proceeding of ICCM V, San Diego, 1985, pp.293–314. Metallurgical Society.
28.
Cox BN and Flanagan G. Handbook of analytical methods for textile composites, Version 1.0. Chapter 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: Rockwell Science Center, 1996.
29.
LeongKHLeeBHerszbergI. The effect of binder path on the tensile properties and failure of multilayer woven CFRP composites. Compos Sci Technol2000; 60: 149–156.
30.
PandyaKSVeerrajuChNaikNK. Hybrid composites made of carbon and glass woven fabrics under quasi-static loading. Mater Des2011; 32: 4094–4099.
31.
ZhangJChaisombatKHeS. Hybrid composite laminates reinforced with glass/carbon woven fabrics for lightweight load bearing structures. Mater Des2012; 36: 75–80.
32.
JonesRM. Mechanics of composite materials, Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis, 1999, pp. 163–167.
