In this paper, micromechanical modelling and simulation were performed for unidirectional fibre reinforced composites subjected to transverse and in-plane shear by finite element method. Representative volume element consisting of fibre, matrix and interface was established for the simulation, considering random fibre distribution. The two dominant damage mechanisms of fibre reinforced composites, matrix plastic deformation and interfacial debonding were taken into account in the simulation. Periodic boundary conditions were applied to the representative volume elements. The simulation results indicate that the failure behaviour of the composites under transverse shear is dominated by matrix plastic damage, while the in-plane shear damage is initiated by interfacial debonding and then ultimate failure is caused by matrix damage. Fibre distribution is found to have a more significant effect on the failure behaviour of the composites under transverse shear than in-plane shear. The predicted in-plane shear strength and failure strain show reasonable agreement with the experimental results.
FoliasES. On the prediction of failure at a fiber/matrix interface in a composite subjected to a transverse tensile load. J Compos Mater1991; 25: 869–886.
2.
KingTRBlackketterDMWalrathDE. Micromechanics prediction of the shear strength of carbon fiber/epoxy matrix composites: the influence of the matrix and interface strengths. J Compos Mater1992; 26: 558–573.
3.
Van den HeuvelPWJWubboltsMKYoungRJ. Failure phenomena in two-dimensional multi-fibre model composite: 5. A finite element study. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf1998; 29A: 1121–1135.
4.
HayesSALaneRJonesFR. Fibre/matrix stress transfer through a discrete interphase. Part 1: single-fibre model composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2001; 32: 379–389.
5.
LaneRHayesSAJonesFR. Fibre/matrix stress transfer through a discrete interphase: 2. High volume fraction systems. Compos Sci Technol2001; 61: 565–578.
6.
FiedlerBHojoMOchiaiS. Finite-element modeling of initial matrix failure in CFRP under static transverse tensile load. Compos Sci Technol2001; 61: 95–105.
7.
HobbiebrunkenTHojoMAdachiT. Evaluation of interfacial strength in CF/epoxies using FEM and in-situ experiments. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2006; 37: 2248–2256.
8.
ZhangYFXiaZH. Micromechanical analysis of interphase damage for fiber reinforced composite laminates. Comput Mater Con2004; 2: 213–226.
9.
ZhangYFXiaZHEllyinF. Nonlinear viscoelastic micromechanical analysis of fibre-reinforced polymer laminates with damage evolution. Int J Solids Struct2005; 42: 591–604.
10.
AspLEBerglundLATalrejaR. Effects of fiber and Interphase on matrix initiated transverse failure in polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol1996; 56: 657–665.
11.
ChohanVGaliotisC. Effects of interface, volume fraction and geometry on stress redistribution in polymer composites under tension. Compos Sci Technol1997; 57: 1089–1101.
12.
SuXFChenHRKennedyD. Effects of interphase strength on the damage modes and mechanical behaviour of metal--matrix composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf1999; 30: 257–266.
13.
SjögrenBABerglundLA. The effects of matrix and interface on damage in GRP cross-ply laminates. Compos Sci Technol2000; 60: 9–21.
14.
MalignoARWarriorNALongAC. Effects of interphase material properties in unidirectional fibre reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70: 36–44.
15.
YangLYanYLiuYJ. Microscopic failure mechanisms of fibre-reinforced polymer composites under transverse tension and compression. Compos Sci Technol2012; 72: 1818–1825.
16.
YangLYanYMaJ. Effects of inter-fiber spacing and thermal residual stress on transverse failure of fiber-reinforced polymer-matrix composites. Comp Mater Sci2013; 68: 255–262.
17.
YangLYanYKuangNH. Experimental and numerical investigation of aramid fibre reinforced laminates subjected to low velocity impact. Polym Test2013; 32: 1163–1173.
18.
TotryEMolina-AldareguíaJMGonzálezC. Effect of fiber, matrix and interface properties on the in-plane shear deformation of carbon-fiber reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70: 970–980.
19.
O’DwyerDJO’DowdNPMcCarthyCT. Investigation of strain hardening effects under in-plane shear of unidirectional composite materials. Comp Mater Sci2012; 64: 179–182.
20.
VaughanTJMcCarthyCT. A micromechanical study on the effect of intra-ply properties on transverse shear fracture in fibre reinforced composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2011; 42: 1217–1228.
21.
TotryEGonzálezCLLorcaJ. Failure locus of fiber-reinforced composites under transverse compression and out-of-plane shear. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68: 829–839.
22.
CanalLPSeguradoJLLorcaJ. Failure surface of epoxy-modified fiber-reinforced composites under transverse tension and out-of-plane shear. Int J Solids Struct2009; 46: 2265–2274.
23.
YangLYanYRanZG. A new method for generating random fibre distributions for fibre reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2013; 76: 14–20.
24.
BuryachenkoVAPaganoNJKimRY. Quantitative description and numerical simulation of random microstructures of composites and their effective elastic moduli. Int J Solids Struct2003; 40: 47–72.
25.
GonzálezCLLorcaJ. Mechanical behavior of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymers under transverse compression: microscopic mechanisms and modeling. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 2795–2806.
26.
HuangHSTalrejaR. Effects of void geometry on elastic properties of unidirectional fiber reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65: 1964–1981.
SodenPHintonMKaddourA. Lamina properties lay-up configurations and loading conditions for a range of fibre-reinforced composites laminates. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58: 1225–1254.
29.
VaughanTJMcCarthyCT. Micromechanical modelling of the transverse damage behaviour in fibre reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2011; 71: 388–396.
30.
AspLEBerglundLATalrejaR. A criterion for crack initiation in glassy polymers subjected to a composite-like stress state. Compos Sci Technol1996; 56: 1291–1301.
31.
AspLEBerglundLAGudmundsonP. Effects of a composite-like stress state on the fracture of epoxies. Compos Sci Technol1995; 53: 27–37.
32.
ABAQUS theory manual, HKS Inc., 2010.
33.
JiangHXieYL. A note on the Mohr–Coulomb and Drucker–Prager strength criteria. Mech Res Commun2011; 38: 309–314.
34.
FiedlerBHojoMOchiaiS. Failure behavior of an epoxy matrix under different kinds of static loading. Compos Sci Technol2001; 61: 1615–1624.
