The use of discontinuous carbon fibre plastics (DCFP) in automotive applications is increasing. The material offers a light weight and stiff alternative to conventional short-fibre glass-reinforced composites such as sheet moulding compounds (SMC). Prohibiting factors to wider utilisation of this material are cost and formability. Carbon moulding compounds available commercially are expensive containing high fibre volume fractions (Vf) which hinders or stops flow during moulding. This study examines the flexural and impact performance of cheaper carbon fibre (CFSMC) and cellulosic SMC grades produced using a standard, polyester, SMC production route where flow during moulding has be retained.
Mechanical properties were assessed relative to increasing fibre length, volume fraction and bundle morphology. It was found that although much lower Vfs were employed, the new CFSMC grades offered superior impact strength when compared to commercially available DCFPs. The optimal impact performance achieved by CFSMC and cellulosic SMC samples were 103 KJ/m2 and 76 KJ/m2, respectively. These CFSMC and cellulosic SMCs had an average density of 1.62 g/cm3 and 1.57 g/cm3 compared to an average commercial value of 1.50 g/cm3, respectively. The developed SMCs have the potential as a cost-effective replacement to commercial carbon fibre SMC grades in semi- and non-structural applications where impact rather than stiffness is paramount.
BerseeHEComposite aerospace manufacturing processes. In: BlockleyRShyyW (eds). Encyclopaedia of aerospace engineering2010; vol. 6, Part 31.Chicester, England: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 311–311.
3.
Kang PJ. A technical and economic analysis of structural composite use in automotive body-in-white applications. Master’s Thesis, Massachusetts institute of technology, USA, 1998.
4.
MarissenRLinsenJ. Variability of the Flexural strength of sheet moulding compounds. Comp Sci Tech1999; 59: 2093–2100.
5.
BoylanSCastroJM. Effect of reinforcement type and length on physical properties, surface quality, and cycle time for sheet moulding compound (SMC), compression moulded parts. J Appl Polym Sci2003; 90: 2557–2557.
6.
Cabrera-Rıos M and Castro JM. The balance between durability, reliability, and affordability in structural composites manufacturing. Polymer Compos 2007; 28(2): 233--240.
7.
Cabrera-RıosMCastroJM. An economical way of using carbon fibres in sheet molding compound. Compression molding for automotive applications. Polym Compos2006; 27: 718–722.
Stachel P and Schäfer C. A unique carbon fibre reinforced product for the automotive industry. American composites manufacturers association, Composites 2004 convention and trade show 2004. Menzolit-Fibron GmbH, 7 October 2004, Tampa Convention Center, FL, USA.
10.
McConnellVP. New recipes for SMC innovation. Reinf Plastics2008; 52: 34–39.
Harper LT. Discontinuous carbon fibre composites for automotive applications. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham, UK, 2006.
13.
TurnerTAPickeringSJWarriorNA. Development of recycled carbon fibre moulding compounds – Preparation of waste composites. Compos Part B Eng2011; 42: 517–552.
14.
PalmerJSavageLGhitaOR. Sheet moulding compound (SMC) from carbon fibre recyclate. Compos Part A-Appl Sci2010; 41: 1232–1237.
15.
Van VoornBSmitHHGSinkeRJ. Natural fibre reinforced sheet moulding compound. Compos Part A-Appl Sci2001; 32: 1271–1279.
16.
HudaMDrzalLTRayD. Natural-fibre composites in the automotive sector. In: Pickering K (ed.). Properties and performance of natural fibre composites, Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Ltd, 2008, pp. 221–268.
17.
Brouwer WD. Natural fibre composites saving weight and cost with renewable materials. In: Proceedings of ICCM-13 conference, Beijing, China, 2001. Paper ID 1414.
18.
SavageLEvansKE. The importance of the mesostructure in toughening cellulosic short fibre composites. Compos Sci Technol2014; 93: 97–105.
19.
ISO: 179-1 Plastics – Determination of Charpy impact properties.
20.
ISO: 178 Plastics – Determination of flexural properties.
London∼o-HurtadoAOsswaldTAHernandez-OrtízJ. Modeling the behavior of fiber suspensions in the molding of polymer composites. J Reinf Plastic Comp2011; 30: 781–790.
45.
ShokriehMMMosalmaniR. Modeling of sheet molding compound compression molding under non-isothermal conditions. J Reinf Plastic Comp2014; 33: 1183–1198.
46.
BurnsR. Polyester moulding compounds, New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, 1982.
BradleyWLCohenRNMatrix deformation and fracture in graphite reinforced epoxies. In: JohnsonWS (ed.). Delamination and debonding of materials, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, STP 876, 1985, pp. 389–410.
49.
CrickRALeachDCMeakinPJ. Interlaminar fracture morphology of carbon fibre/PEEK composites. J Mater Sci1987; 22: 2094–2094.
50.
FriedrichKWalterRCarlssonLA. Mechanisms for rate effects on inter-laminar fracture toughness of carbon/epoxy and carbon/PEEK composites. J Mater Sci1989; 24: 3387–3387.
51.
TrussRHHinePJDuckettRA. Interlaminar and intralaminar fracture toughness of uniaxial continuous and discontinuous carbon fibre/epoxy composites. Compos Part A-Appl Sci1997; 28 A: 627–636.
52.
BledzkiAKGassanJ. Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Prog Polym Sci1999; 24: 221–274.
53.
MatherRRWardmanRH. The chemistry of textile fibres, Cambridge, UK: RSC Publishing, 2011.
54.
SmoleMHribernikSStana KleinschekK. Plant fibres for textile and technical applications. In: Grundas S and Stepniewski A (eds). Advances in agrophysical research, Rijeka, Croatia: Intech Open Science, 2013, pp. 376–377.
