A numerical study was performed to investigate the tensile properties of unidirectional fiber-reinforced composites containing co-polypropylene and short glass fiber (SGF) using a three-dimensional representative volume element (RVE) and finite element method (FEM). The initiation and propagation of interfacial crack were simulated based on a bilinear cohesive zone method (CZM). The FE simulation indicated that the transverse tensile strength of composite reinforced by SGF was strongly affected by the interface strength, critical fracture energy owing to interfacial debonding as well as loading direction. By increasing of SGF aspect ratio, the anisotropy of tensile strength was slightly affected; however, the anisotropy of modulus was noticeably elevated. The results of FE analysis indicated the proposed CZM can be used to simulate the crack-induced softening mechanism of reinforced thermoplastic polymers.
WangXZhangJWangZ. Effects of interphase properties in unidirectional fiber reinforced composite materials. Mater Des2011; 32: 3486–3492.
2.
ZaïriFNaït-AbdelazizMGloaguenJM. Micromechanical modelling and simulation of chopped random fiber reinforced polymer composites with progressive debonding damage. Int J Solid Struct2008; 45: 5220–5236.
3.
HoushyarS. Modelling of polypropylene fibre-matrix composites using finite element analysis. eXPRESS Polym Lett2008; 3: 2–12.
4.
YuYZhangBTangZ. Stress transfer analysis of unidirectional composites with randomly distributed fibers using finite element method. Compos Part B2015; 69: 278–285.
5.
Shokrieh MM and Mohammadi ARG. Finite element modeling of residual thermal stresses in fiber-reinforced composites using different representative volume elements. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on engineering, London, UK, 30 June–2 July 2010.
6.
PanYIorgaLPelegriAA. Numerical generation of a random chopped fiber composite RVE and its elastic properties. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68: 2792–2798.
7.
LuZYuanZLiuQ. 3D numerical simulation for the elastic properties of random fiber composites with a wide range of fiber aspect ratios. Computat Mater Sci2014; 90: 123–129.
8.
BieniaśJDębskiHSurowskaB. Analysis of microstructure damage in carbon/epoxy composites using FEM. Computat Mater Sci2012; 64: 168–172.
9.
LiuXYangQSuL. Interface analysis and design in carbon nanotube array composite based on cohesive finite element approach. Mater Sci Eng A2014; 592: 83–87.
10.
KottnerRHynekRKroupaT. Identification of parameters of cohesive elements for modeling of adhesively bonded joints of epoxy composites. Appl Computat Mech2013; 7: 37–144.
11.
TvergaardVHutchinsonJW. The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic-plastic solids. Mech Phys Solids1992; 40: 1377–1397.
12.
RomanowiczM. Progressive failure analysis of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymers with inhomogeneous interphase and randomly distributed fibers under transverse tensile loading. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2010; 41: 1829–1838.
13.
LuZWangCXiaB. Effect of interfacial properties on the uniaxial tensile behavior of three-dimensional braided composites. Computat Mater Sci2013; 79: 547–557.
14.
WangXZhangJWangZ. Finite element simulation of the failure process of single fiber composites considering interface properties. Compos Part B: Eng2013; 45: 573–580.
15.
XuQLuZ. An elastic–plastic cohesive zone model for metal–ceramic interfaces at finite deformations. Int J Plastic2013; 41: 147–164.
16.
SafaeiMSheidaeiAAhziS. An interfacial debonding-induced damage model for graphite nanoplatelet polymer composites. Computat Mater Sci2015; 96: 191–199.
17.
WangKAhziSBoumbimbaRM. Micromechanical modeling of the elastic behavior of polypropylene based organoclay nanocomposites under a wide range of temperatures and strain rates/frequencies. Mech Mater2013; 64: 56–68.
18.
ZengXFanHZhangJ. Prediction of the effects of particle and matrix morphologies on Al2O3 particle/polymer composites by finite element method. Computat Mater Sci2007; 40: 395–399.
Zamani-ZakariaAShelesh-NezhadK. The effects of interphase and interface characteristics on the tensile behaviour of POM/CaCO3 nanocomposites. Nanomater Nanotechnol2014; 14: 1–10.
21.
AlfanoMFurgiueleFLeonardiA. Cohesive zone modeling of mode I fracture in adhesive bonded joints. Key Eng Mater2007; 348-349: 13–16.
22.
SockalingamSMoutushiDGillespieJ. Finite element analysis of the microdroplet test method using cohesive zone model of the fiber/matrix interface. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2014; 56: 239–247.
23.
KhokharZRAshcroftIASilberschmidtVV. Interaction of matrix cracking and delamination in cross-ply laminates: simulations with stochastic cohesive zone elements. Appl Compos Mater2010; 18: 3–16.
24.
LiSThoulessMDWaasAM. Mixed-mode cohesive-zone models for fracture of an adhesively bonded polymer–matrix composite. Eng Fract Mech2006; 73: 64–78.
25.
ANSYS-Inc. ANSYS Help system, Release 14.0. 2011.
26.
ZuberiaMJSEsatV. Investigating the mechanical properties of single walled carbon nanotube reinforced epoxy composite through finite element modelling. Compos: Part B2015; 71: 1–9.
27.
LiuYYanYYangL. Prediction on macroscopic elastic properties of interphase-contained long-fiber-reinforced composites and multiple nonlinear regression analysis. J Reinf Plastic Compos2012; 31: 1143–1157.
28.
MortazavianSFatemiA. Effects of fiber orientation and anisotropy on tensile strength and elastic modulus of short fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos: Part B2015; 72: 116–129.
29.
LiWHeDBaiJ. The influence of nano/micro hybrid structure on the mechanical and self-sensing properties of carbon nanotube-microparticle reinforced epoxy matrix composite. Compos: Part A2013; 45: 28–36.
30.
WongKKHZinke-AllmangMHutterJL. The effect of carbon nanotube aspect ratio and loading on the elastic modulus of electrospun poly(vinyl alcohol)-carbon nanotube hybrid fibers. Carbon2009; 47: 2571–2578.
31.
LuWBWuJSongJ. A cohesive law for interfaces between multi-wall carbon nanotubes and polymers due to the van der Waals interactions. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng2008; 197: 3261–3267.
32.
EirasDPessanLA. Mechanical properties of polypropylene/calcium carbonate nanocomposites. Mater Res2009; 12: 517–522.
33.
GilabertFAGarozDPaepegemWV. Stress concentrations and bonding strength in encapsulation-based self-healing materials. Mater Des2015; 67: 28–41.
34.
CamanhoPPDavilaCGMouraMFd. Numerical simulation of mixed-mode progressive delamination in composite materials. J Compos Mater2003; 37: 1415–1438.
35.
BulsaraVNTalrejaRQuJ. Damage initiation under transverse loading of unidirectional composites with arbitrarily distributed fibers. Compos Sci Technol1999; 59: 673–682.
36.
RomanowiczM. Effect of interfacial debonding on the failure behavior in a fiber-reinforced composite subjected to transverse tension. Computat Mater Sci2009; 47: 225–231.
37.
FuS-YFengX-QLaukeB. Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites. Compos Part B Eng2008; 39: 933–961.
38.
PanYIorgaLPelegriAA. Analysis of 3D random chopped fiber reinforced composites using FEM and random sequential adsorption. Computat Mater Sci2008; 43: 450–461.
