It has been assumed that the fiber-reinforced polymer/concrete interface is subjected to in-plane shear condition when intermediate crack debonding failure occurs. Therefore, the single shear pull-out test results are often used to predict the intermediate crack debonding failure in beams. In this study, the behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer-strengthened concrete beams and single shear pull-out specimens were studied experimentally and numerically. The bond–slip behavior of the fiber-reinforced polymer/concrete interface was obtained by single shear pull-out and beam tests. In all beam specimens, a concrete wedge located at the edge of the notch detached with the fiber-reinforced polymer debonding failure. This phenomenon shows that the initiation of debonding is due to a diagonal crack formation close to the major flexural/shear crack inside the concrete. The diagonal crack formation is due to a local moment at the tip of the notch. This causes the different stress state and slip of the fiber-reinforced polymer/concrete interface of beam specimens from that of the pull-out specimens. It is found that the bond–slip relation obtained from the pull-out test does not represent the bond–slip relation of the fiber-reinforced polymer/concrete interface in the fiber-reinforced polymer-strengthened concrete beams, and it cannot be directly used for predicting the load capacity of the fiber-reinforced polymer-strengthened concrete beams.
TengJGSmithSTYaoJ. Intermediate crack-induced debonding in RC beams and slabs. Constr Build Mater2003; 17: 447–462.
2.
AbdelouahedT. Improved theoretical solution for interfacial stresses in concrete beams strengthened with FRP plate. Int J Solids Struct2006; 43: 4154–4174.
3.
TounsiAHassaine DaouadjiTBenyoucefS. Interfacial stresses in FRP-plated RC beams: effect of adhered shear deformations. Int J Adhes Adhes2009; 29: 343–351.
4.
YaoJTengJG. Plate end debonding in FRP-plated RC beams—I: experiments. Eng Struct2007; 29: 2457–2471.
5.
TengJGYaoJ. Plate end debonding in FRP-plated RC beams—II: strength model. Eng Struct2007; 29: 2472–2486.
6.
ChenJTengJ. Anchorage strength models for FRP and steel plates bonded to concrete. J Struct Eng2001; 127: 784–791.
7.
ChenJYangZHoltG. FRP or steel plate-to-concrete bonded joints: effect of test methods on experimental bond strength. Steel Compos Struct2001; 1: 231–244.
8.
Brosens K and Gemert D. Anchorage stresses between concrete and carbon fiber reinforced laminates. In: Non-metallic (FRP) reinforcement for concrete structures, proceedings of third international symposium, 1997, pp. 71–278.
9.
YoshizawaHWuZYuanH. Study on FRP–concrete interface bond performance. Trans Jpn Soc Civil Eng2000; 662: 105–119.
10.
NakabaKKanakuboTFurutaT. Bond behavior between fiber-reinforced polymer laminates and concrete. ACI Struct J2001; 98: 359–367.
11.
SerbescuAGuadagniniMPilakoutasK. Standardized double-shear test for determining bond of FRP to concrete and corresponding model development. Compos B: Eng2013; 55: 277–297.
12.
ChajesMJFinchWWJanuszkaTF. Bond and force transfer of composite material plates bonded to concrete. ACI Struct J1996; 93: 208–217.
13.
TaljstenB. Defining anchor lengths of steel and CFRP plates bonded to concrete. Int J Adhes Adhes1997; 17: 319–327.
14.
BizindavyiLNealeKW. Transfer lengths and bond strengths for composites bonded to concrete. J Compos Constr1999; 3: 153–160.
15.
LeungCKYTungWK. Three-parameter model for debonding of FRP plate from concrete substrate. J Eng Mech2006; 132: 509–518.
16.
MazzottiCSavoiaMFerracutiB. An experimental study on delamination of FRP plates bonded to concrete. Constr Build Mater2008; 22: 1409–1421.
17.
Fukuzawa K, Numao T, Wu Z, et al. Critical strain energy release rate of interface debonding between carbon fiber sheet and mortar. In: Non-metallic (FRP) reinforcement for concrete structures, proceedings of third international symposium 1997, vol. 1, pp. 295–301.
18.
BenjeddouOOuezdouMBBeddayA. Damaged RC beams repaired by bonding of CFRP laminates. Constr Build Mater2007; 21: 1301–1310.
19.
GartnerALDouglasEPDolanCW. Small beam bond test method for CFRP composites applied to concrete. ASCE J Compos Constr2011; 15: 52–61.
20.
Harries K, Hamilton HR, Kasan J, et al. Development of standard bond capacity test for FRP bonded to concrete. In: 6th international conference on fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites in civil engineering (CICE), Rome, Italy, 2012.
21.
DavalosJFMadabhusi-RamanPQiaoP. Characterization of mode-I fracture of hybrid material interface bonds by contoured DCB specimens. Eng Fract Mech1997; 58: 173–192.
22.
WanBPetrouMFHarriesKA. Effect of the presence of water on the durability of bond between CFRP and concrete. J Reinf Plast Compos2006; 25: 875–890.
23.
OuyangZWanB. Experimental and numerical study of moisture effects on thebond fracture energy of FRP/concrete joints. J Reinf Plast Compos2008; 27: 205–223.
24.
KarbhariVMEngineerM. Investigation of bond between concrete and composites: use of a peel test. J Reinf Plast Compos1996; 15: 208–227.
25.
WanBSuttonMAPetrouMF. Investigation of bond between fiber reinforced polymer and concrete undergoing global mixed mode I/II loading. J Eng Mech2004; 130: 1467–1475.
26.
GuoTSongYChenW. Experimental study on bond behavior between SMPM and concrete using dual-beam speckle interferometry. J Reinf Plast Compos2011; 30: 671–684.
27.
DaiJUedaTSatoY. Development of the nonlinear bond stress–slip model of fiber reinforced plastics sheet-concrete interface with a simple methods. J Compos Constr2005; 9: 52–62.
28.
ZhouYWWuYFYunY. Analytical identification of the bond–slip relationship at FRP–concrete interfaces for adhesively-bonded joints. Composites Part B2010; 41: 423–433.
29.
ShamsSSEl-HajjarRF. overlay patch repair of scratch damage in carbon fiber/epoxy laminated composites. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf2013; 49: 148–156.
30.
ShamsSSEl-HajjarRF. Adhesive repair for surface gouges and cracks in continues carbon fiber/epoxy laminated composites. Joining Compos Adhes Theory Appl2015; Chapter 8: 173–195.
31.
MohammadiTWanBDaiJG. Prediction of load capacity variation in FRP bonded concrete specimens using brownian motion. Math Probl Eng2015; 2015: 632912 (9pp.)–632912 (9pp.).
32.
D’AntinoTPellegrinoC. Bond between FRP composites and concrete: assessment of design procedures and analytical models. Composites Part B2014; 60: 440–456.
33.
MohammadiTWanB. Sensitivity analysis of stress state and bond strength of FRP/concrete interface to boundary conditions in single shear pull-out test. Adv Mech Eng2015; 2015: 585419–585419.
34.
FIB Task Group 9.3. Externally bonded FRP reinforcement for RC structures. Technical Report, Fib Bulletin 14, 2001. CEB-FIP: Lausanne, Switzerland.
35.
Mohammadi T. Failure mechanisms and key parameters of FRP debonding from cracked concrete beams. PhD Dissertation, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, 2014.
36.
CoronadoCLopeM. Experimental characterization of concrete–epoxy interfaces. J Mater Civil Eng2008; 20: 303–312.
37.
MohammadiTWanBDaiJ. Modeling of CFRP–concrete interface subjected to coupled pull-out and push-off actions. ACI Spec Publ2011; 275: 1–18.
38.
WittmannFH. Crack formation and fracture energy of normal and high strength concrete. Sadhana (India)2002; 27: 413–423.
