Based on the anatomical and chemical properties, a representative volume unit was studied to predict the longitudinal elastic modulus of bamboo (Phyllostachys glauca McClure). Microstructure features and chemical characterization of bamboo were obtained. Elastic constant of cell wall in length was derived by the application of rule of mixture. Taking advantage of the representative volume unit model, the longitudinal elastic modulus prediction formula of bamboo was established, and the theoretical and experimental value were calculated. The results showed that modified formula was acceptable to predict the longitudinal elastic modulus value with the error rate between predicted and experimental values below 25%. It is feasible to simplify the microstructure to calculate the longitudinal elastic modulus by model.
AmadaSIchikawaTMunekataT. Fiber texture and mechanical graded structure of bamboo. Compos: Part B1997; 28B: 13–20.
2.
AmadaSMunekataTNagaseY. The mechanical structures of bamboo in viewpoint of functionally gradient and composite materials. J Compos Mater1996; 30: 800–819.
3.
Ghavami K and Hombeeck RV Application of bamboo as a construction material: Part I. Mechanical properties and water- repellent treatment of bamboo, Part II. Bamboo reinforced concrete beams. In: Proceedings of Latin American symposium on rational organization of building applied to low-cost housing, IPT/CIB, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 1981, pp. 49–66.
4.
LieseW. Characterization and utilization of bamboo: Production and utilization of bamboo and related species, Japan: Wood Biology University, 1986.
5.
Ghavami K and Rodrigues CS. Engineering materials and components with plants. In: The proceedings of CIB symposium, construction and environment, theory into practice, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2000, pp.1–16.
6.
Arce-Villalobos OA. Fundamentals of the design of bamboo structures. PhD Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Holland, 1993.
7.
GhavamiKMoreiraLEBuckling behavior of compression elements in bamboo space structure. In: ParkeGARDisneyP (eds). Spaces structures 5, London: Thomas Telford Ltd, 2002, pp. 133–144.
8.
YuWKChungKFChanSL. Axial buckling of bamboo columns in bamboo scaffolds. Eng Struct2005; 27: 61–73.
9.
Mitch DR. Structural behavior of Grouted-Bar Bamboo Column Bases. MS Thesis, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 2010.
AmadaSUntaoS. Fracture properties of bamboo. Compos: Part B2001; 32: 451–459.
12.
AhmadMKamkeFA. Analysis of Cacutaa bamboo for structural composite materials: Physical and mechanical properties. Wood Sci Technol2005; 39: 448–448.
13.
LowIMChenZYLatellaBA. Mapping the structure, composition and mechanical properties of bamboo. J Mater Res2006; 21: 1969–1969.
14.
YuHFeiBJiangHR. Various in tensile properties and relationship between tensile properties and air-dried density for moso bamboo. Front For China2008; 3: 127–127.
15.
ShaoZPFangCHHuangSX. Tensile properties of Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) and its components with respect to its fiber reinforced composite structure. Wood Sci Technol2009; 44: 655–655.
16.
GrosserDLieseW. On the anatomy of Asian bamboo with special reference to their vascular bundles. Wood Sci Technol1971; 5: 290–312.
17.
Adb LatifMMohd TamiziM. Variation in anatomical properties of three Malaysian bamboos from natural stand. J Trop Forest Sci1992; 5: 90–96.
18.
Ghavami K and Solorzano IG. Comparison between microstructure of bamboo culm and wood, In: Acta Microscopia, 3rd inter-American conference on electron microscopy and XV meeting of the Brazilian society for electron microscopy, Caxambu, M.G., Brazil, 1995.
19.
JanssenJJA. Designing and building with bamboo, Beijng, China: International Network for Bamboo and Rattan, 2000.
20.
QuirkJT. Dot-grid integrating eyepiece: two sampling technique for estimating cell wall area. Wood Sci1975; 8: 88–91.
21.
PrestonRD. The physical biology of plant cell walls, London: Chapman and Hall, 1974.
22.
NelkonM. Mechanics and properties of matter, Portsmouth: Heinemann Educational Books, 1978.
23.
MarkRE. Cell wall mechanics of tracheids, New Haven, CT: Yale Press, 1967.
24.
NishinoTTakanoKNakemaeK. Elastic modulus of the crystalline regions of cellulose polymorphs. J Polym Sci Part B-Polym Phys1995; 33: 1647–1651.
25.
CaveID. Modelling moisture-related mechanical properties of wood. Part I: Properties of the wood constituents. Wood Sci Technol1978; 12: 75–86.
26.
CousinsWJ. Elastic modulus of lignin as related to moisture content. Wood Sci Technol1976; 10: 9–17.
27.
OtaMSugiS. On the arrangement of the vascular bundle in the bamboo stem. Report Kyushi Univ Forests1953; 1: 79–86.
28.
ZeeSY. Distribution of vascular transfer cells in the culm nodes of bamboo. Canadian J Bot1974; 52: 345–347.
29.
HsiungWYQuiaoSYLiYF. The anatomical structure of culms of Phyllostachys pubescens Mazel ex H. de Lehaie. Acta Bot Sin1980; 22: 343–348.
30.
Younus-uzzamanM. Anatomical features of Arundinaria falconeri and Sinobambusa tootsik with reference to their effects on penetration of preservatives. J Forest Sci1991; 20: 39–44.
31.
DingYLLieseW. On the nodal structure of bamboo. J Bamboo Res1995; 14: 24–32.
32.
GrosserDZamucoGI. Anatomy of some bamboo species in the Philippines. Philip J Sci1973; 100: 57–72.
33.
LieseW. Anatomy and utilization of bamboo. Eur Bamboo Soc J Meise, Belgium1995; 1: 5–12.
34.
AndréJP. Investigations on the vascular organization of the bamboos (Phyllostachys sp.) by application of the micro-casting method. IAWA J1996; 17: 233–233.
35.
SaikiaSNGoswamiTAliF. Evaluation of pulp and paper making characteristics of certain fast growing plants. Wood Sci Technol1997; 31: 467–475.
36.
Man VuTHPakkanenHAlenR. Delignification of bamboo (Bambusa procera acher) Part 1. Kraft pulping and the subsequent oxygen delignification to pulp with a low kappa number. Ind Crops Prod2004; 19: 49–57.
37.
Runge T, Houtman C and Heinricher J. Timber bamboo pulp. In: 2012 TAPPI PRRES conference, 14–18 October 2012, Savannah, GA, 2012, pp.864–871.
38.
MadakadzeICRadiotisTLiJ. Kraft pulping characteristics and pulp properties of warm season grasses. Bioresour Technol1999; 69: 75–85.
39.
Ireana Y. Cell wall architecture, properties and characteristics of bamboo, kenaf and rice straw fibers. MSc Thesis, USM, 2009.
40.
Abd Latif M. Some selected properties of two Malaysia bamboo species in relation to age, height, site and seasonal variation. PhD Thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 1995, 282 p.
41.
LieseWGrosserD. Untersuchungen zur Variabilitat der Faserlange bei Bambus (Variation of fibre length and fibre width within one internodes in bamboo species). Holzforsch1972; 26: 202–211.
42.
HornRASetterholmVCFiber morphology and new crops. In: JanickJSimonJE (eds). Advances in new crops, Portland, Origen: Timber Press, 1990, pp. 270–275.
43.
VerverisCGeorghiouKChristodoulakisN. Fiber dimensions, lignin and cellulose content of various plant materials and their suitability for paper production. Ind Crops Prod: Int J2004; 19: 245–254.
44.
VienaLSTrugilhoPFGherardi HeinPR. Predicting the morphology characteristics and basic density of Eucalytus Wood using the NIRS technique. Cerne2009; 15: 421–429.
45.
Liese W. Anatomy and properties of bamboo. Proceedings of the International Bamboo Workshop 1985: 196--208.
46.
GongHR. Wood characteristics and storage methods of poplar residue. China Wood-Based Panels2007; 14: 29–30.
47.
LeeCLChinTC. Anatomical studies on some Chinese bamboos. Acta Bot Sin1960; 9: 76–95.
48.
TomalangFNLopezARSemaraJA. Properties and utilization of Philippine erect bamboo. In: International seminar on bamboo research in Asia held in Singapore1980, pp. 266–275.
49.
Chen YD, Qin WL, et al. The chemical composition of Ten Bamboo Species. In: Recent research on bamboo. Proceedings of the international bamboo workshop (eds AN Rao, et al.), Hangzhou, China, 6–14 October, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing China; International Development Research Center, Ottawa, Canada, 1985, pp.110–113.
50.
LieseWPreservation of bamboos. In: LessardGChouinardA (eds). Bamboo research in Asia, Canada: IDRC, 1980, pp. 165–172.
51.
LieseWWeinerGModifications of bamboo culm structures due to ageing and wounding. In: ChapmanG (ed). The bamboos, London: The Linnean Society, 1997, pp. 313–322.
52.
LeeAWCChenGTainterFH. Comparative treatability of Moso bamboo and Southern pine with CCA preservative using a commercial schedule. Bioresour Technol2001; 77: 87–88.
53.
CaveIDHuttL. The anisotropic elasticity of the plant cell wall. Wood Sci Technol1968; 2: 268–278.
54.
KoponenSTorattiTKanervaP. Modelling longitudinal elastic and shrinkage properties of wood. Wood Sci Technol1989; 23: 55–63.
55.
KoponenSTorattiTKanervaP. Modelling elastic and shrinkage properties of wood based on cell structure. Wood Sci Technol1991; 25: 25–32.
56.
SalménLRuvoA. A model for the prediction of fiber elasticity. Wood Fiber Sci1985; 3: 336–350.
57.
SalménL. Micromechanical understanding of the cell-wall structure. C Rendus Biol2004; 327: 873–880.
58.
YuWKChungKFChanSL. Column buckling of structural bamboo. Eng Struct2003; 25: 133–144.
