Self-reinforced poly(ethylene terephthalate) laminates were prepared from woven fabric by compression moulding. The fabric was stretched to different degrees during heating before hot consolidation to simulate a manufacturing process where the material is stretched through forming. High tenacity poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibres with different degrees of stretching were prepared for a comparison to laminates. Tensile tests were made to characterize mechanical properties, while dynamical mechanical analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, FTIR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis were employed to study microstructural changes caused by the stretching. Tensile tests show that 13% stretching of the fabric increases the laminate tensile stiffness by 34%. However, same degree of stretching for pure fibres increases the fibre tensile stiffness by 111%. Crystallinity and molecular conformations are not influenced by stretching while shrinkage upon heating increases with degree of stretching. Shrinkage is known to be related to disorientation of non-crystalline regions whereof the conclusion from this study is that the increased tensile properties are due to orientation of the non-crystalline regions of the fibre.
AlcockBPeijsT. Technology and development of self-reinforced polymer composites. Adv Polym Sci2013; 251: 1–76.
2.
Karger-KocsisJBárányT. Single-polymer composites (SPCs): status and future trends. Compos Sci Technol2014; 92: 77–94.
3.
ZhangJMPeijsT. Self-reinforced poly(ethylene terephthatale) composites by hot consolidation of Bi-component PET yarns. Compos Part A2010; 41: 964–972.
4.
AlcockBCabreraNBarkoulaNM. Direct forming of all-polypropylene composites products from fabrics made of co-extruded tapes. Appl Compos Mater2009; 16: 117–134.
5.
CabreraNReynoldsCAlcockB. Non-isothermal stamp forming of continuous tape reinforced all-polypropylene composite sheet. Compos Part A2008; 39: 1455–1466.
6.
ProsserWHinePJWardIM. Investigation into thermoformability of hot compacted polypropylene sheet. Plast Rubber Compos2000; 29: 401–410.
7.
JerpdalLÅkermoM. Influence of fibre shrinkage and stretching on the mechanical properties of self-reinforced poly(ethylene terephthalate) composite. J Reinf Plast Comp2014; 33: 1644–1655.
8.
MilitkyJThe chemistry, manufacture and tensile behaviour of polyester fibers. In: BunsellAR (ed). Handbook of tensile properties of textile and technical fibres, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2009, pp. 223–314.
KeumJKSongHH. Thermal deformations of oriented noncrystalline poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibers in the presence of mesophase structure. Polymer2005; 46: 939–945.
11.
ZhangXTianXYaoX. Isothermal and non-isothermal shrinkage behaviors of highly oriented PET yarns. Fiber Polym2008; 9: 360–364.
12.
PrevorsekDCTirpakGAHargetPJ. Effects of thermal contraction on structure and properties of PET fibers. J Macromol Sci Phys1974; B9: 733–759.
LefevreTPellerinCPezoletMCharacterization of molecular orientation. In: ChalmersJMMeierRJ (eds). Comprehensive analytical chemistry, volume 53: Molecular characterization and analysis of polymers, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2008, pp. 295–335.
15.
WardIM. Determination of molecular orientation by spectroscopic techniques. Adv Polym Sci1985; 66: 81–115.
16.
CunninghamAWardIMWillisHA. An infra-red spectroscopic study of molecular orientation and conformational changes in poly(ethylene terephthalate). Polymer1974; 15: 749–756.
17.
LuXFHayJN. Crystallization orientation and relaxation in uniaxial drawn poly(ethylene terephthalate). Polymer2001; 42: 8055–8067.
18.
ColeKCGuevremontJAjjiA. Characterization of surface orientation in poly(ethylene terephthalate) by front-surface reflection infrared spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc1994; 48: 1513–1521.
19.
EverallNMacKerronDWinterD. Characterisation of biaxial orientation gradients in poly(ethylene terephthalate) films and bottles using polarised attenuated total reflection FTIR spectroscopy. Polymer2002; 43: 4217–4223.
20.
WallsDJ. Application of ATR-IR to the analysis of surface structure and orientation in uniaxially drawn poly(ethylene terephthalate). Appl Spectrosc1991; 45: 1193–1198.
21.
WallsDJCoburnJC. Influence of uniaxial draw on near-surface structure in poly(ethyleneterephthalate). J Polym Sci Pol Phys1992; 30: 887–897.
22.
SmithMRCooperSJWinterDJ. Detailed mapping of biaxial orientation in polyethylene terephthalate bottles using polarised attenuated total reflection FTIR spectroscopy. Polymer2006; 47: 5691–5700.
23.
MomoseMAndoS. Quantitative analysis of near surfaces three-dimensional orientation of polymer chains in PET and PEN films using polarized ATR FTIR spectroscopy. J Polym Sci Pol Phys2010; 48: 870–879.
24.
Sperling LH. Introduction to physical polymer science. 4th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2006, pp. 368–369.
25.
JingAJZhangAWoYThermal analysis of polymer fibers. In: ChengSZD (ed). Handbook of thermal analysis and calorimetry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V., 2002, pp. 434–435.
26.
KhannaYPTaylorTJKumarR. Dynamic mechanical analysis of fibers. II Estimation of fiber orientation and characterization of heat set PET yarns. J Appl Polym Sci1991; 42: 693–699.
27.
KawakamiDHsiaoBSRanS. Structural formation of amorphous poly(ethylene terephthalate) during uniaxial deformation above glass temperature. Polymer2004; 45: 905–918.
28.
SalemDR. Orientation and crystallization in poly(ethylene terephthalate) during drawing at high temperatures and strain rates. Polym Eng Sci1999; 39: 2419–2430.
29.
AjjiAGuevremontJColeKC. Orientation and structure of drawn poly(ethylene terephthalate). Polymer1996; 37: 3707–3714.
30.
Matthews R, Ajji A, Cole KC, et al. Roll and tensile drawing of PET: effect of process conditions on structure and properties. In: Conference proceedings at ANTEC ’98 Volume 1, Atlanta, USA, 26–30 April 1998, pp.1614–1618. Brookfield: Society of Plastics Engineers.
31.
AjjiAColeKCDumoulinMM. Amorphous orientation of poly(ethylene terephthalate) by X-ray diffraction in combination with fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy. Polymer1995; 36: 4023–4030.
32.
HajiASemnani RahbarR. Crystallinity and orientation development upon hot multistage drawing of PET multifilament yarn. J Text I2012; 104: 231–238.
33.
HajiASemnani RahbarR. Structure evolution and mechanical behaviour of poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibers drawn at different numbers of drawing stages. Chem Ind Chem Eng Q2012; 18: 233–243.
34.
BhatNVNaikSG. Effect of drawing of poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibre on molecular orientation. Text Res J1984; 54: 868–874.
35.
YazdanianMWardIMBrodyH. An infra-red study of the structure of oriented poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibres. Polymer1985; 26: 1779–1790.
