Permeability characterization of a fabric preform is a key factor that affects the accuracy of process modeling of vacuum infusion. There are various flow types and boundary conditions (such as one-dimensional or radial flow under constant injection pressure or constant injection flow rate during unsaturated or saturated flow regimes) used in permeability measurement experiments in the literature. This study investigates the effect of using different flow and injection boundary conditions in permeability characterization on the results of coupled one-dimensional mold-filling and compaction model. The results of the model are compared with vacuum infusion mold-filling experiments. It is shown that using the permeability measured at constant injection pressure and unsaturated flow results in the closest fill time compared to the experiments for all three types of fabrics investigated in this study.
HammamiA. Effect of reinforcement structure on compaction behavior in the vacuum infusion process. Polym Compos2001; 22: 337–348.
2.
SomashekarAABickertonSBhattacharyyaD. An experimental investigation of non-elastic deformation of fibrous reinforcements in composites manufacturing. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2006; 37: 858–867.
3.
GovignonQBickertonSKellyPA. Simulation of the reinforcement compaction and resin flow during the complete resin infusion process. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2010; 41: 45–57.
4.
YalcinkayaMASozerEM. Effect of part thickness variation on the mold filling time in vacuum infusion process. J Reinf Plast Compos2014; 33: 2136–2150.
5.
YenilmezBSozerEM. Compaction of e-glass fabric preforms in the vacuum infusion process: (a) use of characterization database in a model and (b) experiments. J Compos Mater2012; 47: 1959–1975.
6.
CorreiaNCRobitailleFLongAC. Analysis of the vacuum infusion moulding process: I. analytical formulation. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2005; 36: 1645–1656.
7.
AchesonJASimacekPAdvaniSG. The implications of fiber compaction and saturation on fully coupled VARTM simulation. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2004; 35: 159–169.
8.
BayldonJMDanielIM. Flow modeling of the VARTM process including progressive saturation effects. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2009; 40: 1044–1052.
9.
CaglarBYenilmezBSozerEM. Modeling of post-filling stage in vacuum infusion using compaction characterization. J Compos Mater2015; 49: 1947–1960.
10.
KellyPAUmerRBickertonS. Viscoelastic response of dry and wet fibrous materials during infusion processes. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2006; 37: 868–873.
11.
BickertonSBuntainMJSomashekarAA. The viscoelastic compression behavior of liquid composite molding preforms. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2003; 34: 431–444.
12.
RobitailleFGauvinR. Compaction of textile reinforcements for composites manufacturing. I: Review of experimental results. Polym Compos1998; 19: 198–216.
13.
YalcinkayaMASariogluASozerEM. A novel mold design for continuous permeability measurement of fiber preforms. J Reinf Plast Compos2015; 34: 915–930.
14.
SharmaSSiginerDA. Permeability measurement methods in porous media of fiber reinforced composites. Appl Mech Rev2010; 63: 1–19.
15.
GebartBFLidstromP. Measurement of in-plane permeability of anisotropic fiber reinforcements. Polym Compos1996; 17: 43–51.
16.
LundströmTStenbergRBergströmR. In-plane permeability measurements: a nordic round-robin study. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2000; 31: 29–43.
17.
LawrenceJMBarrJKarmakarR. Characterization of preform permeability in the presence of race tracking. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2004; 35: 1393–1405.
18.
PomeroyRGroveSSummerscalesJ. Measurement of permeability of continuous filament mat glass–fibre reinforcements by saturated radial airflow. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2007; 38: 1439–1443.
19.
ShojaeiATrochuFGhaffarianS. An experimental study of saturated and unsaturated permeabilities in resin transfer molding based on unidirectional flow measurements. J Reinf Plast Compos2004; 23: 1515–1536.
20.
OliveroKAHamidiYKAktasL. Effect of preform thickness and volume fraction on injection pressure and mechanical properties of resin transfer molded composites. J Compos Mater2004; 38: 937–957.
21.
Sozer EM, Chen B, Graham PJ, et al. Characterization and prediction of compaction force and preform permeability of woven fabrics during the resin transfer molding process. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on flow processes in composite materials, Plymouth, 1999, pp. 25–36.
22.
StadtfeldHErningerMBickertonS. An experimental method to continuously measure permeability of fiber preforms as a function of fiber volume fraction. J Reinf Plast Compos2002; 21: 879–899.
23.
LiuQParnasRSGiffardHS. New set-up for in-plane permeability measurement. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2007; 41: 954–962.
24.
GrossingHFausterEWeningerM. Influence of textile parameters on the in-plane permeability characteristics of non-crimped fabric preforms. Polym Compos2016; 37: 1854–1863.
25.
MorrenGBossuytSSolH. 2D permeability tensor identification of fibrous reinforcements for RTM using an inverse method. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2008; 39: 1530–1536.
26.
VernetNRuizEAdvaniS. Experimental determination of the permeability of engineering textiles: benchmark II. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2014; 61: 172–184.
27.
ArbterRBeraudJMBinetruyC. Experimental determination of the permeability of textiles: a benchmark exercise. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2011; 42: 1157–1168.
28.
SunXLiSLeeLJ. Mold filling analysis in vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding. Part I: SCRIMP based on a high-permeable medium. Polym Compos1998; 19: 807–817.
29.
MathurRHeiderDHoffmannC. Flow front measurements and model validation in the vacuum assisted resin transfer molding process. Polym Compos2001; 22: 477–490.
30.
ChenRDongCLiangZ. Flow modeling and simulation for vacuum assisted resin transfer molding process with the equivalent permeability method. Polym Compos2004; 25: 146–164.
31.
HsiaoK-TMathurRAdvaniSG. A closed form solution for flow during the vacuum assisted resin transfer molding process. J Manuf Sci Eng2000; 122: 463–475.
32.
CorreiaNCRobitailleFLongAC. Use of resin transfer molding simulation to predict flow, saturation, and compaction in the VARTM process. J Fluids Eng2004; 126: 210–215.
33.
HammamiAGebartBR. Analysis of the vacuum infusion molding process. Polym Compos2000; 21: 28–40.
34.
KangMKLeeWIHahnHT. Analysis of vacuum bag resin transfer molding process. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2001; 32: 1553–1560.
35.
YenilmezBSenanMSozerEM. Variation of part thickness and compaction pressure in vacuum infusion process. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 1710–1719.
36.
OkonkwoKSimacekPAdvaniSG. Characterization of 3D fiber preform permeability tensor in radial flow using an inverse algorithm based on sensors and simulation. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2011; 42: 1283–1292.
37.
NedanovPBAdvaniSG. A method to determine 3D permeability of fibrous reinforcements. J Compos Mater2002; 36: 241–241.
38.
YenilmezBAkyolTCaglarB. Minimizing thickness variation in the vacuum infusion (VI) process. Adv Compos Lett2011; 20: 157–168.
39.
LiWKrehlJGillespieJW. Process and performance evaluation of the vacuum-assisted process. J Compos Mater2004; 38: 1803–1814.
40.
YangJXiaoJZengJ. Compaction behavior and part thickness variation in vacuum infusion molding process. Appl Compos Mater2012; 19: 443–458.
41.
YenilmezBSozerEM. Compaction of e-glass fabric preforms in the vacuum infusion process, A: characterization experiments. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2009; 40: 499–510.
42.
TackittKDWalshSM. Experimental study of thickness gradient formation in the VARTM process. Mater Manuf Process2005; 20: 607–627.
43.
ParnasRSWalshSM. Vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding model. Polym Compos2005; 26: 477–485.
44.
HubertPPoursartipA. Method for the direct measurement of the fibre bed compaction curve of composite prepregs. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2001; 32: 179–187.
45.
ZhangS. Recent progresses on real-time 3D shape measurement using digital fringe projection techniques. Opt Lasers Eng2010; 48: 149–158.
46.
MichaudV. A review of non-saturated resin flow in liquid composite moulding processes. Transp Porous Media2016; 115: 581–581.
47.
Diallo L, Gauvin R and Trochu F. Key factors affecting the permeability measurement in continuous fiber reinforcements. In: Proceedings of ICCM-11, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia, 14–18 July 1997.
48.
BinétruyCHilaireBPabiotJ. The interactions between flows occurring inside and outside fabric tows during rtm. Compos Sci Technol1997; 57: 587–596.
49.
PatelNRohatgiVLeeLJ. Micro scale flow behavior and void formation mechanism during impregnation through a unidirectional stitched fiberglass mat. Polym Eng Sci1995; 35: 837–851.
50.
PhelanFRLeungYParnasRS. Modeling of microscale flow in unidirectional fibrous porous media. J Thermoplast Compos Mater1994; 7: 208–218.
51.
AmicoSLekakouC. Mathematical modelling of capillary micro-flow through woven fabrics. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2000; 31: 1331–1344.
52.
WilliamsCDGroveSMSummerscalesJ. The compression response of fibre-reinforced plastic plates during manufacture by the resin infusion under flexible tooling method. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf1998; 29: 111–114.
