On the assessment of the load-bearing capacity of Z-pinned composite T-joint under out-of-plane tension

Abstract

Z-pin technology, as a promising through-thickness reinforcement, offers an efficient solution for the weak composite parts joints, especially for large integrated composite structures. This paper presents a two-dimensional finite element model to analyze the enhancing efficiency of Z-pins for composite T-joints. The modeling used a new parameter definition method for delamination growth simulation in Z-pinned joining interface via a regional cohesive zone model. The finite element model was validated by experiments for unpinned and Z-pinned T-joints under web pullout tension. The parametric analysis on the structural configuration shows that shear stress ratio in Z-pins declines with the span ratio increasing and the skin thickness ratio decreasing, which leads to the failure mode change of a single pin from pull-out to shear fracture so that the improvement on the out-of-plane tension declines gradually. Within 1.7–2.1 span ratio (the constant 4 mm skin thickness) or 1.8–2.5 thickness ratio (the 200 mm constant span), the ultimate tension is improved by at least 15%, where Z-pins exhibit the best efficiency. When span ratio is above 2.4 or thickness ratio below 1.2 within the range studied herein, Z-pinned T-joints fail by skin fracture rather than the bonding interface in which cases further increasing of Z-pin reinforcements becomes unfavorable.

Keywords

Polymer composites T-joint Z-pin cohesive zone method tensile test

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cai X, Dervault F, Hoa SV et al. A comparison of current design concept of fulsage panels under typical load conditions. In: The 19th international conference on composite materials, Montreal, CA, 2013.

Mouritz AP. Design dilemma for Z-pinned composite structures. In: Proceedings of the 27th congress of the international council of the aeronautical science (ICAS), Nice, 2010, pp.19–24.

Greenhalgh E, Lewis A, Bowen R, et al. Evaluation of toughening concepts at structural features in CFRP – Part I: Stiffener pull-off. Compos A Appl Sci 2006; 37: 1521–1535.

Park

Lee

Kweon

et al.

The strength of composite bonded T-joints transversely reinforced by carbon pins. Compos Struct 2012; 94: 625–634.

Javier

Bruno

Jean-Jacques

et al.

Multi-level analysis of low-cost Z-pinned composite joints. Part 2. Joint behaviour. Compos A Appl Sci 2011; 42: 2082–2092.

Koh

Feih

Mouritz

. Experimental determination of the structural properties and strengthening mechanisms of z-pinned composite T-joints. Compos Struct 2011; 93: 2222–2230.

Koh

Isa

Feih

et al.

Experimental assessment of the damage tolerance of z-pinned T-stiffened composite panels. Compos B 2013; 44: 620–627.

Pegorin

Pingkarawat

Mouritz

. Comparative study of the mode I and mode II delamination fatigue properties of z-pinned aircraft composites. Mater Des 2015; 65: 139–146.

Cartié

DDR

Laffaille

J-M

Partridge

et al.

Fatigue delamination behaviour of unidirectional carbon fibre/epoxy laminates reinforced by Z-Fiber® pinning. Eng Fract Mech 2009; 76: 2834–2845.

10.

Mouritz

. Structural properties of z-pinned carbon-epoxy T-joints in hot-wet environment. J Compos Mater 2013; 48: 2905–2914.

11.

Koh

Isa

Chang

et al.

Improving the structural properties and damage tolerance of bonded composite joints using z-pins. J Compos Mater 2012; 46: 3255–3265.

12.

Yasaee

Lander

Allegri

et al.

Experimental characterisation of mixed mode traction–displacement relationships for a single carbon composite Z-pin. Comp Sci Technol 2014; 94: 123–131.

13.

Yasaee M, Bigg L, Mohamed G, et al. Influence of Z-pin embedded length on the interlaminar traction response of multi-directional composite laminates. Mater Design 2017; 115: 26-36.

14.

Bianchi

Koh

Zhang

et al.

Finite element modelling of z-pinned composite T-joints. Compos Sci Technol 2012; 73: 48–56.

15.

Cui

Koussios

et al.

Bridging micromechanisms of Z-pin in mixed mode delamination. Compos Struct 2011; 93: 2685–2695.

16.

Cui

Koussios

et al.

Mixed mode cohesive law for Z-pinned composite analyses. Comput Mater Sci 2013; 75: 60–68.

17.

Li M, Chen P, Kong B, et al. Influences of thickness ratios of flange and skin of composite T-joints on the reinforcement effect of Z-pin. Compos B 2016; 97: 216–225.

18.

Li M, Chen P, Kong B, et al. The effect of parameters of Z-pin on the pull-off carrying capacity of composite T-joints. Acta Mater Compos Sin 2014; 32: 571–578.

19.

Cartié

DDR

. Effect of Z-fibers on the delamination behavior of carbon fiber/epoxy laminates, Cranfield, UK: Cranfield University, 2000.

20.

Ranatunga V and Clay SB. Cohesive modeling of damage growth in z-pinned laminates under mode-I loading. J Compos Mater 2012; 47: 3269–3283.

21.

Dantuluri

Maiti

Geubelle

et al.

Cohesive modeling of delamination in Z-pin reinforced composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol 2007; 67: 616–631.

22.

Grassi

Zhang

. Finite element analyses of mode I interlaminar delamination in z-fibre reinforced composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol 2003; 63: 1815–1832.

23.

Bianchi

Zhang

. A cohesive zone model for predicting delamination suppression in z-pinned laminates. Compos Sci Technol 2011; 71: 1898–1907.

24.

Kou J, Xu F, Guo J, et al. Damage laws of cohesive zone model and selections of the parameters. J Mech Strength 2011; 33: 714–718.

25.

Barbero

. Finite element analysis of composite materials using Abaqus™, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2013. .

26.

ASTM D 5528-01: 2013. Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites.

27.

ASTM D7905/D7905M-14: 2014. Stander test method for determination of the mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites.

28.

Turon A, Dávila CG, Camanho PP, et al. An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models. Eng Fract Mech 2007; 74: 1665–1682.

29.

Falk ML, Needleman A and Rice JR. A critical evaluation of cohesive zone models of dy-namic fracture. In: Proceedings of the 5th European mechanics of materials conference on scale transitions from atomistics to continuum plasticity, Delft, The Netherlands, 2001, pp.43–50.

30.

Grassi

Zhang

Meo

. Prediction of stiffness and stresses in z-fibre reinforced composite laminates. Compos A Appl Sci 2002; 33: 1653–1664.

31.

Chang

Mouritz

Cox

. Properties and failure mechanisms of z-pinned laminates in monotonic and cyclic tension. Compos A Appl Sci 2006; 37: 1501–1513.

32.

Rugg KL, Cox BN and Massabò R. Mixed mode delamination of polymer composite laminates reinforced through the thickness by z-fibers. Compos A Appl Sci 2002; 33: 177–190.

33.

Fenster

Ugural

. Advanced strength and applied elasticity, 4th ed. London: Edward Arnold, 1975.

34.

Koh

Feih

Mouritz

. Strengthening mechanics of thin and thick composite T-joints reinforced with z-pins. Compos A Appl Sci 2012; 43: 1308–1317.

35.

Meng

et al.

Influential Factors of Z-pin Bridging Force. Appl Compos Mater 2013; 21: 615–631.