Determining effective interface fracture properties of 3D fiber reinforced foam core sandwich structures

Abstract

Foam core sandwich composites are finding a wider use in aerospace, automotive, and construction applications. These structures present unique challenges in terms of material failure and interaction and are sensitive to damage and imperfections introduced during manufacturing. An emerging class of 3D fiber reinforced foam core aims to replace monolithic foams used in sandwich structure cores particularly in demanding high-performance aerospace applications. This research is focused on investigating the development of testing methods capable of measuring the effective interface fracture properties between the facesheet and the core in 3D fiber reinforced foam cores. Double cantilever beam and end-notched flexure specimens are developed to evaluate the mode I and mode II fracture properties of a 3D fiber reinforced foam core. The design, development, and initial failure of a mode I interface fracture test for 3D fiber reinforced foam cores are presented. The digital image correlation results on the failed tests allowed for a different approach to be utilized in designing a new bonded double cantilever beam specimen for testing the mode I fracture of a 3D fiber reinforced foam core sandwich structure that resulted in a successful interface fracture test. The bonded DCB specimens exhibited relatively smooth crack propagation and produced GIc values similar to honeycomb sandwich structures and significantly higher than comparable foam structures.

Keywords

Fracture sandwich structures finite element mode I

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Nida-Core Corporation. NidaFusion SXO/SXF 2006-2008, http://home.nordnet.fr/∼jmaquet/french/fusiprod_sxosxf.htm (accessed 26 December 2017).

Nida-Core Corporation. NidaFusion STO, http://home.nordnet.fr/∼jmaquet/french/fusiprod_sto.htm (accessed 26 December 2017).

Milliken & Company. TYCOR | foam core fiberglass reinforced composite material, http://tycor.milliken.com/Pages/home.aspx= (accessed 26 December 2017).

Albany International Corp. Sandwich structures, www.albint.com/businesses/aec/ProductsAndTechnologies/Pages/Sandwich-Structures.aspx (accessed 26 December 2017).

Prasad

and Carlsson

LA.

Debonding and crack kinking in foam core sandwich beams – II. Experimental investigation. Eng Fract Mech 1994; 47: 825–841.

Cantwell

and Davies

A test technique for assessing core-skin adhesion in composite sandwich structures. J Mater Sci Lett 1994; 13: 203–205.

Cantwell

and Davies

A study of skin-core adhesion in glass fibre reinforced sandwich materials. Appl Compos Mater 1996; 3: 407–420.

Vaidya

Kamath

Mahfuz

et al . Low velocity impact response of resin infusion molded foam filled honeycomb sandwich composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 1998; 17: 819–849.

Carlsson

LA.

On the design of the cracked sandwich beam (CSB) specimen. J Reinf Plast Compos 1991; 10: 434–444.

10.

Zenkert

Strength of sandwich beams with interface debondings. Compos Struct 1991; 17: 331–350.

11.

Zenkert

Poly(vinyl chloride) sandwich core materials: fracture behaviour under mode II loading and mixed-mode conditions. Mater Sci Eng 1989; 108: 233–240.

12.

Zenkert

Strength of sandwich beams with mid-plane debondings in the core. Compos Struct 1990; 15: 279–299.

13.

Sundararaman

and Davidson

BD.

An unsymmetric double cantilever beam test for interfacial fracture toughness determination. Int J Solids Struct 1997; 34: 799–817.

14.

Sundararaman

and Davidson

BD.

An unsymmetric end-notched flexure test for interfacial fracture toughness determination. Eng Fract Mech 1998; 60: 361–377.

15.

Davidson

Waas

and Yerramalli

CS.

Experimental determination of validated, critical interfacial modes I and II energy release rates in a composite sandwich panel. Compos Struct 2012; 94: 477–483.

16.

Zenkert

Shipsha

and Burman

Fatigue of Closed Cell Foams. J Sandwich Struct Mater 2006; 8: 517–538.

17.

Goyal

Rome

Schubel

et al . Strength evaluation of foam core sandwich structures with butt joints. In: 25th annual technical conference, 2010. Dayton, Ohio: American Society of Composites.

18.

Cytec. AEROSPACE MATERIALS FM ® 300 Epoxy Film Adhesive, 2013.

19.

Liu

Deng

and Lu

TJ.

Analytical modeling and finite element simulation of the plastic collapse of sandwich beams with pin-reinforced foam cores. Int J Solids Struct 2008; 45: 5127–5151.

20.

Alfano

and Crisfield

MA.

Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues. Int J Numer Meth Eng 2001; 50: 1701–1736.

21.

Goyal

Johnson

and Dávila

CG.

Irreversible constitutive law for modeling the delamination process using interfacial surface discontinuities. Compos Struct 2004; 65: 289–305.

22.

Xie

and Waas

AM.

Discrete cohesive zone model for mixed-mode fracture using finite element analysis. Eng Fract Mech2006; 73: 1783–1796.

23.

Wang

and Vu-Khanh

Use of end-loaded-split (ELS) test to study stable fracture behaviour of composites under mode II loading. Compos Struct 1996; 36: 71–79.

24.

Heinrich

and Waas

AM.

Investigation of progressive damage and fracture in laminated composites using the smeared crack approach. In: 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures conference 14th AIAA, vol. 35, 2012, pp. 155–181.

25.

Kier

Waas

Rome

et al. Modeling failure of 3D fiber reinforced foam core sandwich structures with defects. In: 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures conference 14th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, 2012, pp. 1–11.

26.

Jones

RM.

Mechanics of composite materials. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press, 1998.

27.

Herakovich

CT.

Mechanics of fibrous composites. New York: Wiley, 1998.

28.

D5528-01 2001. Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. Am Soc Test Mater 2014; pp. 1–13.

29.

Martin

James

Daniel

et al . Characterizing Facesheet/Core Disbonding in Honeycomb Core Sandwich Structure. NASA Tech Report, NASA/CR-2013-217959, NIA Report No. 2013-0115, NF1676L-15992, 2013, p. 39.