The usage of composite materials has been growing widely over the years due to their excellent characteristics such as lightweight, high-energy absorption capability and corrosion resistance. In this study, the crashworthiness characteristics of square woven jute/epoxy composite tubes with different configuration of triggering mechanisms were tested and evaluated when subjected to quasi-static axial loading. The deformation morphology of each composite tube was captured by using high-resolution photography. The composite tubes were fabricated by using the combination of hand layup and compression bladder moulding techniques in which total of three layers of woven bi-directional natural jute fabric (plain weave mat) were used, each with wall thickness and length of 3 mm and 100 mm, respectively. To induce the progressive crushing of composite tubes, four different types of triggering mechanisms were used: the non-trigger, single chamfered trigger, double chamfered trigger and tulip trigger. The influence of energy absorption, crush force efficiency, peak load, mean load and load–displacement history was examined and discussed. From this study, most of the composite tubes failed in progressive manner rather than catastrophic failure. Overall, the tulip trigger configuration is considered the optimal design for crashworthy structure applications.
EshkoorRAOshkovrSASulongABet al.
Effect of trigger configuration on the crashworthiness characteristics of natural silk epoxy composite tubes. Compos Part B Eng2013;
55: 5–10.
2.
PalaniveluS, Van PaepegemW, DegrieeckJ, et al.
Numerical energy absorption study of composite tubes for axial impact loadings. In: 17th International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM-17), Edinburgh, UK 2009.
PalaniveluSPaepegemWVan DegrieckJet al.
Crushing and energy absorption performance of different geometrical shapes of small-scale glass/polyester composite tubes under quasi-static loading conditions. Compos Struct2011;
93: 992–1007.
5.
PalaniveluSVan PaepegemWDegrieckJet al.
Experimental study on the axial crushing behaviour of pultruded composite tubes. Polym Test2010;
29: 224–234.
6.
MamalisAGManolakosDEIoannidisMBet al.
On the crushing response of composite sandwich panels subjected to edgewise compression: experimental. Compos Struct2005;
71: 246–257.
7.
SenT andReddyHNJ.Application of sisal, bamboo, coir and jute natural composites in structural upgradation. Int J Innov Manag Technol2011;
2: 186–191.
8.
AlkbirMFMSapuanSMNurainiAAet al.
Fiber properties and crashworthiness parameters of natural fiber-reinforced composite structure: a literature review. Compos Struct2016;
148: 59–73.
SummerscalesJVirkA andHallW.A review of bast fibres and their composites: part 3 – modelling. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2013;
44: 132–139.
11.
WambuaPIvensJ andVerpoestI.Natural fibres: can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics?Compos Sci Technol2003;
63: 1259–1264.
12.
JoshiSVDrzalLTMohantyAKet al.
Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites?Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2004;
35: 371–376.
13.
MaY, YangY, SigharaT, et al. Crushing performance of carbon/aramid hybrid composite tube. In: 28th annual technical conference of the American Society for Composites 2013 (ASC 2013).Pennsylvania, USA 2013
14.
EsnaolaAUlaciaIAretxabaletaLet al.
Quasi-static crush energy absorption capability of E-glass/polyester and hybrid E-glass-basalt/polyester composite structures. Mater Des2015;
76: 18–25.
15.
StapletonSE andAdamsDO.Crush initiators for increased energy absorption in composite sandwich structures. J Sandwich Struct Mater2008;
10: 331–354.
16.
LaurenziS andMarchettiM.Advanced composite materials by resin transfer molding for aerospace applications. Compos Their Prop2012; 197–226.
17.
AbdewiEFSulaimanSHamoudaAMSet al.
Quasi-static axial and lateral crushing of radial corrugated composite tubes. Thin Walled Struct2008;
46: 320–332.
18.
SaidMRLauSTW andYaakobMY.Quasi static axial crushing of kenaf fibre reinforced epoxy composite fabricated by VARTM method. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci2017;
12: 4804–4808.
19.
AbosbaiaAASMahdiEHamoudaAMSet al.
Quasi-static axial crushing of segmented and non-segmented composite tubes. Compos Struct2003;
60: 327–343.
20.
LabanO andMahdiE.Energy absorption capability of cotton fiber/epoxy composite square and rectangular tubes. J Nat Fibers2016;
13: 726–736.
21.
MahdiEHamoudaAMSSahariBBet al.
On the collapse of cotton/epoxy tubes under axial static loading. Appl Compos Mater2003;
10: 67–84.
22.
GhoushjiMJ, AbdullahS, ZulkifliR, et al.
The failure mode of natural ramie epoxy triggered composite tubes. 2016; 14–16. Proceedings of 62nd The IIER International Conference Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
23.
MahdiEHamoudaASM andSenAC.Quasi-static crushing behaviour of hybrid and non-hybrid natural fibre composite solid cones. Compos Struct2004;
66: 647–663.
24.
YanL andChouwN.Crashworthiness characteristics of flax fibre reinforced epoxy tubes for energy absorption application. Mater Des2013;
51: 629–640.
25.
SivagurunathanR, Lau Tze WayS, SivagurunathanL, et al
. The Effects of Triggering Mechanisms on the Energy Absorption Capability of Circular Jute/Epoxy Composite Tubes under Quasi-Static Axial Loading. Applied Composite Materials, 2018.
Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-018-9673-5
26.
RaghavendraGOjhaSAcharyaSet al.
Jute fiber reinforced epoxy composites and comparison with the glass and neat epoxy composites. JCompos Mater2014;
48: 2537–2547.
27.
MishraV andBiswasS.Physical and mechanical properties of bi-directional jute fiber epoxy composites. Procedia Eng2013;
51: 561–566.
28.
SivagurunathanR.Energy Absorption Capability of FRP Composite by Using Externally Designed Tiggering.
Multimedia University (MMU), 2017.
Melaka, Malaysia
YangY, NakaiA andHamadaH.Effect of collapse trigger mechanism on the energy absorption capability of FRP tubes. In: International conference on composite materials. 16th International Conference on Composite Materials, Kyoto, Japan 2007.
31.
LiuQXingHJuYet al.
Quasi-static axial crushing and transverse bending of double hat shaped CFRP tubes. Compos Struct2014;
117: 1–11.
32.
WangLFanXChenHet al.
Axial crush behavior and energy absorption capability of foam-filled GFRP tubes under elevated and high temperatures. Compos Struct2016;
149: 339–350.
33.
SiromaniDHendersonGMikitaDet al.
An experimental study on the effect of failure trigger mechanisms on the energy absorption capability of CFRP tubes under axial compression. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2014;
64: 25–35.
34.
PitarresiGCarruthersJJRobinsonAMet al.
A comparative evaluation of crashworthy composite sandwich structures. Compos Struct2007;
78: 34–44.
35.
JiménezMAMiraveteALarrodéEet al.
Effect of trigger geometry on energy absorption in composite profiles. Compos Struct2000;
48: 107–111.
36.
EshkoorRAUdeAUSulongABet al.
Energy absorption and load carrying capability of woven natural silk epoxy – triggered composite tubes. Compos Part B Eng2015;
77: 10–18.
37.
HuangJ andWangX.On a new crush trigger for energy absorption of composite tubes. Int J Crashworthiness2010;
15: 625–634.
38.
HuangJ-C andWangX-W.Effect of the SMA trigger on the energy absorption characteristics of CFRP circular tubes. J Compos Mater2010;
44: 639–651.
39.
PalaniveluSVan PaepegemWDegrieckJet al.
Parametric study of crushing parameters and failure patterns of pultruded composite tubes using cohesive elements and seam: part II – multiple delaminations and initial geometric imperfections. Polym Test2010;
29: 803–814.
40.
PalaniveluSPaepegemWVan DegrieckJet al.
Comparison of the crushing performance of hollow and foam-filled small-scale composite tubes with different geometrical shapes for use in sacrificial cladding structures. Compos Part B Eng2010;
41: 434–445.
41.
FarleyGL.Effect of specimen geometry on the energy absorption capability of composite materials. J Compos Mater1986;
20: 390–400.
42.
JacobGCFellersJFSimunovicSet al.
Energy absorption in polymer composites for automotive crashworthiness. J Compos Mater2002;
36: 813–850.
43.
FairfullAH andHullD.Effects of specimen dimensions on the specific energy absorption of fibre composite tubes. Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Composite Materials and Second European Conference on Composite Materials(ICCM & ECCM), London, UK,
Elsevies Applied Science, 1987; 336–345.
44.
MamalisAGRobinsonMManolakosDEet al.
Crashworthy capability of composite material structures. Compos Struct1997;
37: 109–134.
45.
CourteauMA.Investigating the Crashworthiness Characteristics of Carbon Fiber Epoxy Tubes.
The University of Utah, 2011.
46.
MeloJDDSilvaALdS. Energy absorption capability of composite tubes under compression load. In: Proceedings of COBEM.
HuDZhangCMaXet al.
Effect of fiber orientation on energy absorption characteristics of glass cloth/epoxy composite tubes under axial quasi-static and impact crushing condition. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2016;
90: 489–501.
52.
MishraA.Strength and corrosion testing of jute/glass-epoxy hybrid composite laminates. Plast Polym Technol2013;
2: 48–54.
53.
SanjayMR andYogeshaB.Studies on mechanical properties of jute/E-glass fiber reinforced epoxy hybrid composites. JMiner Mater Charact Eng2016;
4: 15–25.
54.
KhalidAA.Behaviour of hybrid jute-glass/epoxy composite tubes subjected to lateral loading. IOP conference series: materials science and engineering,
vol. 100, 2015, p. 12068. 3rd International Conference of Mechanical Engineering Research (ICMER 2015) Kuantan, Malaysia
55.
HarteAMFleckNA andAshbyMF.Energy absorption of foam-filled circular tubes with braided composite walls. Eur J Mech A/Solids2000;
19: 31–50.
56.
AbdullahN andIsmailAE.Axial quasi-static crushing behaviour of cylindrical woven kenaf fiber reinforced composites. IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol. 165, 2017, p. 12004. Colloquium of Advanced Mechanics (CAMS2016) Johor, Malaysia
57.
ConzattiLGiuncoFStagnaroPet al.
Polyester-based biocomposites containing wool fibres. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2012;
43: 1113–1119.
RachchhNVUjeniyaPS andMisraRK.Mechanical characterisation of rattan fibre polyester composite. Procedia Mater Sci2014;
6: 1396–1404.
60.
BakarNHHyieKMMohamedAFet al.
Kenaf fibre composites using thermoset epoxy and polyester polymer resins: energy absorbed versus tensile properties. Mater Res Innov2014;
18: S6-505–S6-509.
61.
WarriorNATurnerTARobitailleFet al.
Effect of resin properties and processing parameters on crash energy absorbing composite structures made by RTM. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2003;
34: 543–550.
62.
Lima SobrinhoLFerreiraM andBastianFL.The effects of water absorption on an ester vinyl resin system. Mat Res2009;
12: 353–361.
63.
BenmokraneBAliAHMohamedHMet al.
Laboratory assessment and durability performance of vinyl-ester, polyester, and epoxy glass-FRP bars for concrete structures. Compos Part B Eng2017;
114: 163–174.
64.
ChiuLNSFalzonBGRuanDet al.
Crush responses of composite cylinder under quasi-static and dynamic loading. Compos Struct2015;
131: 90–98.
65.
MahdiEHamoudaAMS andSebaeyTA.The effect of fiber orientation on the energy absorption capability of axially crushed composite tubes. Mater Des2014;
56: 923–928.
66.
UdeAUEshkoorRA andAzhariCH.Crashworthy characteristics of axial quasi-statically compressed Bombyx mori composite cylindrical tubes: experimental. Fibers Polym2017;
18: 1594–1601.
67.
IsmailAE.Crushing performances of winding square kenaf fiber reinforced composites. Int J Mech Mechatronics Eng2016;
16: 65–69.
68.
FarleyGL. Energy absorption of composite materials. J Compos Mater1983;
1717(3): 267–279.
69.
FarleyGL.Effect of fiber and matrix maximum strain on the energy absorption of composite materials. J Compos Mater1986;
20: 322–334.
70.
AlkbirMFMSapuanSMNurainiAAet al.
The effect of fiber content on the crashworthiness parameters of natural kenaf fiber-reinforced hexagonal composite tubes. J Eng Fibers Fabr2016;
11: 75–86.
LauSTWSaidMR andYaakobMY.On the effect of geometrical designs and failure modes in composite axial crushing: a literature review. Compos Struct2012;
94: 803–812.
73.
AbdewiEF, SulaimanS, HamoudaAMS, et al.
An experimental investigation of the effect of specimen shape and geometry on the energy absorption of fiberglass composite tubes. Jurnal Fizik Malaysia. 2008;
29: 29–34.
74.
LiuQMoZWuYet al.
Crush response of CFRP square tube filled with aluminum honeycomb. Compos Part B Eng2016;
98: 406–414.
75.
CzaplickiMJRobertsonRE andThorntonPH.Comparison of bevel and tulip triggered pultruded tubes for energy absorption. Compos Sci Technol1991;
40: 31–46.
76.
ThorntonPH. Effect of trigger geometry on energy absorption in composite tubes. In: Fifth international conference on composite materials: ICCM-V, San Diego, USA, 1985, pp. 1183–1199.
77.
YanLWangB andKasalB.Can plant-based natural flax replace basalt and E-glass for fiber-reinforced polymer tubular energy absorbers? A comparative study on quasi-static axial crushing. Front Mater2017;
4: 1–10.
FarleyG. Relationship between mechanical-property and energy-absorption trends for composite tubes. NASA Technical Paper. 1992
80.
MamalisAGManolakosDEIoannidisMBet al.
On the response of thin-walled CFRP composite tubular components subjected to static and dynamic axial compressive loading: experimental. Compos Struct2005;
69: 407–420.
GhasemnejadHBlackmanBRKHadaviniaHet al.
Experimental studies on fracture characterisation and energy absorption of GFRP composite box structures. Compos Struct2009;
88: 253–261.
83.
GuiLJZhangPFanZJ.Energy absorption properties of braided glass/epoxy tubes subjected to quasi-static axial crushing. Int J Crashworthiness2009;
14: 17–23.
