More than 1200 bamboo species are known; therefore, the question arises which species are suited for composites and which microstructural characteristics of the plant are decisive. Three different bamboo species are considered, each of two ages. Technical fibre tensile tests and impregnated fibre bundle tests were performed to characterize the fibres and maceration was applied to determine the length over diameter ratio of the elementary fibres. From the impregnated fibre bundle tests it is concluded that the stiffness of bamboo fibres from tropical species considered in this research is unaffected by the species nor the age of the plant. The strength is more affected by the region of growth, with the temperate bamboo species having lower strength as a result of a lower length over diameter ratio of the elementary fibre. Chemical analysis helped to investigate the age difference and it can be stated that the fibres are mature within one growing season.
PerremansDTrujilloEIvensJet al.
Effect of discontinuities in bamboo fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol2018;
155: 50–57.
2.
MüssigJ.Industrial applications of natural fibres.
West Sussex:
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2010.
3.
CampilhoRDSG.Introduction to natural fiber composites. Natural fiber composites.
Boca Raton, FL, USA:
CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 2016.
4.
JohnMJSabuT.Natural. Polymers volume 1: composites.
Cambridge:
The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2012.
5.
BourmaudABeaugrandJShahDUet al.
Towards the design of high-performance plant fibre composites. Prog Mater Sc2018;
97: 347–408.
6.
LobovikovMPaudelSPiazzaMet al. World bamboo resources.
Rome, Italy:
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2007.
7.
OhrnbergerD.The bamboos of the world: Bambus Buch. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1996.
8.
TrujilloE.Polymer composite materials based on bamboo fibers. PhD Thesis, KU Leuven, Leuven, 2014.
9.
MinkeG.Building with bamboo: design and technology of a sustainable architecture.
Basel, Switzerland:
Birkhäuser Verlag GmbH, 2016.
10.
LondoñoXCCamayoGCRiañoNMet al.
Characterization of the anatomy of Guadua angustifolia (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) culms. Bamboo Sci Culture2002;
16: 18–31.
11.
van der LugtP.Booming bamboo. Naarden.
The Netherlands:
Materia Exhibitions B.V., 2017.
12.
LieseWKöhlM.Bamboo: the plant and its uses.
Switzerland:
Springer International Publishing, 2015.
13.
GielisJ. Future possibilities for bamboo in European agriculture. Short report “Bamboo for Europe Project”: Oprins plant, 2000, Rijkevorsel, Belgium, 2000.
14.
YipingLYanxiaLBuckinghamKet al. Bamboo and climate change mitigation. Beijing, China:
International Network for Bamboo and Rattan (INBAR), 2010.
15.
ZakikhaniPZahariRSultanMTHet al.
Extraction and preparation of bamboo fibre-reinforced composites. Mater Des2014;
63: 820–828.
16.
van VuureAWOsorioLTrujilloEet al. Long bamboo fibre composites. In: 18th international conference on composite materials, Jeju Island, Korea, 21–26 August 2011.
17.
TrujilloEMoesenMOsorioLet al.
Bamboo fibres for reinforcement in composite materials: strength Weibull analysis. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2014;
61: 115–125.
18.
OsorioLTrujilloEVan VuureAWet al.
Morphological aspects and mechanical properties of single bamboo fibers and flexural characterization of bamboo/epoxy composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2011;
30: 396–408.
19.
LefeuvreABourmaudAMorvanCet al.
Elementary flax fibre tensile properties: correlation between stress–strain behaviour and fibre composition. Ind Crops Prod2014;
52: 762–769.
20.
MarrotLLefeuvreAPontoireBet al.
Analysis of the hemp fiber mechanical properties and their scattering (Fedora 17). Ind Crops Prod2013;
51: 317–327.
21.
LybeerBKochGVan AckerJet al.
Lignification and cell wall thickening in nodes of Phyllostachys viridiglaucescens and Phyllostachys nigra. Ann Bot2006;
97: 529–539.
22.
DixonPGAhvenainenPAijaziANet al.
Comparison of the structure and flexural properties of Moso, Guadua and Tre Gai bamboo. Constr Build Mater2015;
90: 11–17.
23.
WangXRenHZhangBet al.
Cell wall structure and formation of maturing fibres of moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) increase buckling resistance. J R Soc Interface2012;
9: 988–996.
24.
GrosserDLieseW.On the anatomy of Asian bamboos, with special reference to their vascular bundles. Wood Sci Technol1971;
5: 290–312.
25.
LieseW.The anatomy of bamboo culms. Beijing, China:
International Network for Bamboo and Rattan, 1998.
26.
CrowEMurphyRJ.Microfibril orientation in differentiating and maturing fibre and parenchyma cell walls in culms of bamboo (Phyllostachys viridi–glaucescens (Carr.) Riv. & Riv.). Bot J Linn Soc2000;
134: 339–359.
27.
RenDYuZLiWet al.
The effect of ages on the tensile mechanical properties of elementary fibers extracted from two sympodial bamboo species. Ind Crops Prod2014;
62: 94–99.
28.
WangHKTianGLLiWJet al.
Sensitivity of bamboo fiber longitudinal tensile properties to moisture content variation under the fiber saturation point. J Wood Sci2015;
61: 262–269.
29.
ParameswaranNLieseW.On the fine structure of bamboo fibres. Wood Sci Technol1976;
10: 231–246.
30.
BourmaudAMorvanCBoualiAet al.
Relationships between micro-fibrillar angle, mechanical properties and biochemical composition of flax fibers. Ind Crops Prod2013;
44: 343–351.
31.
YuYWangHKLuFet al.
Bamboo fibers for composite applications: a mechanical and morphological investigation. J Mater Sci2014;
49: 2559–2566.
32.
GritschCSMurphyRJ.Ultrastructure of fibre and parenchyma cell walls during early stages of culm development in Dendrocalamus asperAnn Bot2005;
95: 619–629.
33.
ItohT.Lignification of bamboo (Phyllostachys heterocycla Mitf.) during its growth. Holzforschung1990;
44: 191–200.
34.
MurphyRJAlvinKL.Fibre maturation in the bamboo Gigantochloa scortechinii. IAWA J1997;
18: 147–156.
35.
GritschCSKleistGMurphyRJ.Developmental changes in cell wall structure of phloem fibres of the bamboo Dendrocalamus asper. Ann Bot2004;
94: 497–505.
36.
Li XbsTFPeterGFHseCYet al.
Chemical changes with maturation of the bamboo species Phyllostachys pubescens. J Trop For Sci2007;
19: 6–12.
37.
LinJXHeXQHuYXet al.
Lignification and lignin heterogeneity for various age classes of bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) stems. Physiol Plant2002;
114: 296–302.
38.
DepuydtDHendrickxKBiesmansWet al.
Digital image correlation as a strain measurement technique for fibre tensile tests. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2017;
99: 76–83.
39.
BuiDTPradhanBLofmanOet al.
Regional prediction of landslide hazard using probability analysis of intense rainfall in the Hoa Binh province, Vietnam. Nat Hazards2013;
66: 707–730.
HendrickxKRomianRGoedeméTet al. (eds) Rapid and effective methods for the screening of flax fibres for composite applications. In: Proceedings of the international conference on composite materials (ICCM),
Copenhagen,
Denmark, 19–24 July 2015, pp.1–9.
42.
BensadounFVerpoestIBaetsJet al.
Impregnated fibre bundle test for natural fibres used in composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2017; 36: 942–957.
43.
ShahDUNagRKCliffordMJ.Why do we observe significant differences between measured and ‘back-calculated’ properties of natural fibres?Cellulose2016;
23: 1481–1490.
44.
FranklinGL.Preparation of thin sections of synthetic resins and wood-resin composites, and a new macerating method for wood. Nature1945;
155: 51.
45.
Vazquez-CoozIMeyerRW.A differential staining method to identify lignified and unlignified tissues. Biotech Histochem2002;
77: 277–282.
46.
SweygersNSomersMHAppelsL.Optimization of hydrothermal conversion of bamboo (Phyllostachys aureosulcata) to levulinic acid via response surface methodology. J Environ Manage2018;
219: 95–102.
47.
WalkerJCF.Primary wood processing.
Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
Springer, 2006.
48.
DefoirdtNBiswasSDe VrieseLet al.
Assessment of the tensile properties of coir, bamboo and jute fibre. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2010;
41: 588–595.
49.
RaoKMMRaoKM.Extraction and tensile properties of natural fibers: Vakka, date and bamboo. Compos Struct2007;
77: 288–295.
50.
OkuboKFujiiTYamamotoY.Development of bamboo-based polymer composites and their mechanical properties. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2004;
35: 377–383.
51.
BergesMLegerRPlacetVet al.
Influence of moisture uptake on the static, cyclic and dynamic behaviour of unidirectional flax fibre-reinforced epoxy laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2016;
88: 165–177.
52.
ShahDU.Damage in biocomposites: stiffness evolution of aligned plant fibre composites during monotonic and cyclic fatigue loading. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2016;
83: 160–168.
53.
BlanchardJMFASSobdyAJBlakeJIR (eds) Assessing the feasibility of natural composite for structural applications.
Munich:
ECCM17, 2016.
54.
OksmanKWallstromLBerglundLAet al.
Morphology and mechanical properties of unidirectional sisal-epoxy composites. J Appl Polym Sci2002;
84: 2358–2365.
55.
CharletKBaleyCMorvanCet al.
Characteristics of Hermes flax fibres as a function of their location in the stem and properties of the derived unidirectional composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2007;
38: 1912–1921.
56.
OsorioLTrujilloELensFet al.
In-depth study of the microstructure of bamboo fibres and their relation to the mechanical properties. J Reinf Plast Compos2018; 37: 1099–1113.
