Wear behaviour of polymeric materials reinforced with man-made fibres: A comprehensive review about fibre volume fraction influence on wear performance
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2022
Wear behaviour of polymeric materials reinforced with man-made fibres: A comprehensive review about fibre volume fraction influence on wear performance
In the mineral processing, mining, oil and gas industries, it is not uncommon to find mechanical components exposed to degradation and wear from slurries. Polymeric matrix composites (PMCs) are considered as potential alternatives to replace metallic materials in such severe environments because of their high strength to weight ratio, ease of production, high wear resistance and good corrosion/chemical resistance. Often, seemingly erratic wear behaviour is observed making preventive maintenance and time-to-failure difficult to manage. A major culprit is the complex physical and chemical interaction with the slurry, such as exposure to high temperatures, high alkalinity, high slurry density, insoluble inorganic contents, high hardness of suspended particles and humidity. It is well understood that the addition of reinforcing fibres greatly improves the stiffness and strength of polymeric matrix composites. However, the effect the reinforcement has on the wear performance is far less established and a framework to analyse the effect of fibre volume fraction is yet to be established. The difficulties in establishing such a framework lay in the multi-factorial contributions and the potential trade-offs with mechanical performance. This makes it much more difficult to isolate clear trends. The objective of the present work is to present a comprehensive review on the influence reinforcing fibres play on wear behaviour of PMCs. The influence of fibre volume fraction on wear performance of polymeric composites reinforced with man-made fibres is presented. The applied load, fibre length, coefficient of friction and chemical treatment of fibres are analysed with respect to wear performance of PMCs. Future trends in the use of fibre-reinforced polymeric composites in wear critical applications are identified. Research gaps in designing composites for wear applications are explained, aiming at motivating future research to address these gaps.
ThomasSJosephKMalhotraSK, et al. Advances in polymer composites: macro- and microcomposites – state of the art, new challenges, and opportunities. Polymer composites. 1st ed.. USA: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2012, Vol. 1.
2.
AsklandDRPhulePP. Composites. In: The science and engineering of materials. 4th ed.USA: Thomson Learning, 2003, pp. 721–765, 0-534-95373-5.
3.
WangRMZhengSRZhengYP. Introduction to polymer matrix composites. In: RM Wang, SR Zheng, and YP Zheng (eds). Polymer matrix composites and technology. UK: Woodhead Publishing ltd., 2011.
4.
ChaurasiaASahooNGWangM, et al.Fundamentals of polymers and polymer composite. In: NeeA (ed) Handbook of manufacturing engineering and technology. London: Springer; 2015, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-4670-4_19.
5.
MohamedYSEl-GamalHZaghloulMMY. Micro-hardness behavior of fiber reinforced thermosetting composites embedded with cellulose nanocrystals. Alex Eng J2018; 57(4): 4113–4119, DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2018.10.012.
6.
ZindaniDKumarK. Industrial applications of polymer composite materials. In: KumarKPaulo DavimJ (eds) Composites and advanced materials for industrial applications. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2018, pp. 1–15, DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5216-1.
7.
HashemiSJSadooghiARahmaniK, et al.Investigation on the mechanical behavior of fiber-metal laminates based on polyvinyl chloride reinforced by 3D glass fibers. Mater Today Commun2020; 25: 101273, DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101273.
8.
JoseJPJosephKThomasS, et al.Advances in polymer composites: macro- and microcomposites - state of the art, new challenges, and opportunities. In: ThomasSJosephKMalhotraSK, et al. (eds) Polymer composites. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2012, Vol. 1, pp. 1–16.
HollawayLC. The evolution of and the way forward for advanced polymer composites in the civil infrastructure. Constr Build Mater2003; 17(6): 365–437.
11.
WilliamsJCStarkeEA. Progress in structural materials for aerospace systems. Acta Materialia2003; 51: 5775–5799.
12.
ZaghloulMYMZaghloulMMYZaghloulMMY. Developments in polyester composite materials – An in-depth review on natural fibres and nano fillers. Composite Structures2021, doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114698, In press.
13.
PadenkoEvan RooyenLWetzelB, et al.“Ultralow” sliding wear polytetrafluoro ethylene nanocomposites with functionalized graphene. J Reinf Plast Compos2016; 35(11): 892–901. DOI: 10.1177/0731684416630817.
14.
ZaghloulMMYZaghloulMMY. Influence of flame retardant magnesium hydroxide on the mechanical properties of high density polyethylene composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2017; 36(24): 1802–1816. DOI: 10.1177/0731684417727143.
15.
MouhmidBImadABenseddiqN, et al.A study of the mechanical behaviour of a glass fibre reinforced polyamide 6,6: experimental investigation. Polym Test2006; 25: 544–552.
16.
KumaresanKChandramohanGSenthilkumarM, et al.Dynamic mechanical analysis and three-body wear of carbon-epoxy composite filled with SiC particles. J Reinf Plast Compos2012; 31(21): 1435–1448. DOI: 10.1177/0731684412459250.
17.
ZaghloulMMYZaghloulMYMZaghloulMMY. Experimental and modeling analysis of mechanical-electrical behaviors of polypropylene composites filled with graphite and MWCNT fillers. Polym Test2017; 63: 467–474, DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.09.009.
18.
BlackmanBRKKinlochAJSohn LeeJ, et al.The fracture and fatigue behaviour of nano-modified epoxy polymers. J Mater Sci2007; 42(16): 7049–7051.
19.
MasalehdanTEskandarzadeMTutunchiA, et al.Two-dimensional clay nanosheet-reinforced polytetrafluoroethylene composites and their mechanical/tribological studies. Mater Today Commun2021; 26: 102026, DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102026.
20.
GuglaniLGuptaT. Wear and mechanical properties of Nylon 66-Al2O3 microcomposite. J Reinf Plast Compos2017; 36(17): 1254–1262. DOI: 10.1177/0731684417706107.
GuoYZhangZCaoZ, et al.Wear behavior of hollow glass beads (HGB) reinforced nitrile butadiene rubber: Effects of silane coupling agent and filler content. Mater Today Commun2019; 19: 366–373, DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.03.003.
23.
ChoiYKSugimotoKiSongSM, et al.Mechanical and physical properties of epoxy composites reinforced by vapor grown carbon nanofibers. Carbon2005; 43(10): 2199–2208.
24.
OcholaROMarcusKNurickGN, et al.Mechanical behaviour of glass and carbon fibre reinforced composites at varying strain rates. Compos Structures2004; 63: 455–467.
25.
SreekumarPASaiahRSaiterJM, et al.Dynamic mechanical properties of sisal fiber reinforced polyester composites fabricated by resin transfer molding. Polym Compos2009; 30(6): 768–775.
DickaTMJarPBChengJR. Predication of fatigue resistance of short-fiber-reinforced polymer. Int J Fatigue2009; 31: 184–191.
29.
VieiraPRCarvalhoEMLVieiraJD, et al.Experimental fatigue behavior of pultruded glass fibre reinforced polymer composite materials. Composites B Eng2018; 146: 69–75, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.040.
30.
GrimmerCSDharanCKH. High-cycle fatigue of hybrid carbon nanotube/glass fiber/polymer composites. J Mater Sci2008; 43(13): 4487–4492.
31.
PeiXQBennewitzRSchlarbAK. Mechanisms of friction and wear reduction by carbon fiber reinforcement of PEEK. Tribology Lett2015; 58(3): 1–10.
32.
PatnaikASatapathyAMahapatraSS, et al.Parametric optimization erosion wear of polyester-GF-alumina hybrid composites using the taguchi method. J Reinf Plast Compos2008; 27(10): 1039–1058. DOI: 10.1177/0731684407086867.
33.
ZaghloulMMYMohamedYSEl-GamalH. Fatigue and tensile behaviors of fiber-reinforced thermosetting composites embedded with nanoparticles. J Compos Mater2018; 53(6): 709–718, DOI: 10.1177/0021998318790093.
34.
BögerLSumflethJHedemannH, et al.Improvement of fatigue life by incorporation of nanoparticles in glass fibre reinforced epoxy. Composites Part A2010; 41(10): 1419–1424.
35.
RassmannSReidRGPaskaramoorthyR. Effects of processing conditions on the mechanical and water absorption properties of resin transfer moulded kenaf fibre reinforced polyester composite laminates. Composites Part A2010; 41(11): 1612–1619.
36.
ZaghloulMMYM. Mechanical properties of linear low-density polyethylene fire-retarded with melamine polyphosphate. J Appl Polym Sci2018; 135: 46770. DOI: 10.1002/app.46770.
37.
SainMPanthapulakkalS. Bioprocess preparation of wheat straw fibers and their characterization. Ind Crops Prod2006; 23(1): 1–8.
38.
KargarzadehHSheltamiRMAhmadI, et al.Cellulose nanocrystal: a promising toughening agent for unsaturated polyester nanocomposite. Polymer2015; 56: 346–357, DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.11.054.
39.
VuCMNguyenDDSinhLH, et al.Micro-fibril cellulose as a filler for glass fiber reinforced unsaturated polyester composites: fabrication and mechanical characteristics. Macromol Res2017; 26(1): 54–60, DOI: 10.1007/s13233-018-6006-3.
40.
D’AlmeidaACaladoVBarretoD, et al.Effect of surface treatments on the dynamic mechanical behavior of piassava fiber-polyester matrix composites. J Therm Anal Calorim2011; 103(1): 179–184.
41.
VollenbergPHTHeikensD. Particle size dependence of the Young’s modulus of filled polymers: 1. Preliminary experiments. Polymer1989; 30(9): 1656–1662.
42.
NjokuCEOmotoyinboJAAlanemeKK, et al.Physical and abrasive wear behaviour of Urena lobata fiber-reinforced polymer composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2020; 40: 341–351. DOI: 10.1177/0731684420960210.
43.
ZhangMQRongMZFriedrichK. Processing and properties of non-layered nanoparticle reinforced thermoplastic composites. In: NalwaHS (ed) Handbook of organic–inorganic hybrid materials and nanocomposites. Los Angeles: American Scientific Publishers, 2003.
44.
SureshaBRavishankarBSukanyaL. Dynamic mechanical analysis and three-body abrasive wear behavior of epoxy nanocomposites. J Reinf Plast Compos2013; 32(1): 61–71. DOI: 10.1177/0731684412464914.
45.
NalwaHS. Handbook of organic–inorganic hybrid materials and nanocomposites. Stevenson Ranch: American Scientific Publishers, 2003, Vol. 2.
46.
KimSYShimCSSturtevantC, et al.Mechanical properties and production quality of hand-layup and vacuum infusion processed hybrid composite materials for GFRP marine structures. Int J Naval Archit Ocean Eng2014; 6(3): 723–736, DOI: 10.2478/ijnaoe-2013-0208.
47.
KimDHenniganDJBeaversKD. Effect of fabrication processes on mechanical properties of glass fiber reinforced polymer composites for 49 meter (160 foot) recreational yachts. Int J Naval Archit Ocean Eng2010; 2(1): 45–56, DOI: 10.2478/ijnaoe-2013-0019.
48.
UnalHMimarogluAKadıogluU, et al.Sliding friction and wear behaviour of polytetrafluoroethylene and its composites under dry conditions. Mater Des2004; 25: 239–245.
49.
LuoWLiuQLiY, et al.Enhanced mechanical and tribological properties in polyphenylene sulfide/polytetrafluoroethylene composites reinforced by short carbon fiber. Composites Part B Eng2016; 91: 579–588, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.036.
50.
RajmohanTPalanikumarKDavimJ, et al.Modeling and optimization in tribological parameters of polyether ether ketone matrix composites using D-optimal design. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2016; 29(2): 161–188, DOI: 10.1177/0892705713518790.
51.
UnalHMimarogluA. Friction and wear characteristics of PEEK and its composite under water lubrication. J Reinf Plast Compos2006; 25(16): 1659–1667, DOI: 10.1177/0731684406068406.
52.
DysonCJPriestMFoxMF, et al.The tribological behaviour of carbon fibre reinforced polyaryletherketones (PAEKs) through their glass transitions. Proc Inst Mech Eng J: J Eng Tribology2016; 230(10): 1183–1196, DOI: 10.1177/1350650115619839.
53.
LiJXiaYC. The influence of carbon fiber content on the tribological properties of PA6 composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2010; 29(5): 771–778, DOI: 10.1177/0731684408100695.
54.
LiJXiaYC. The friction and wear properties of thermoplastic PA6 composites filled with carbon fiber. J Thermoplast Compos Mater; 23(3): 337–349, DOI: 10.1177/0892705708103397.
55.
PandaJNBijweJPandeyRK. Optimization of the amount of short glass fibers for superior wear performance of PAEK composites. Composites Part A2019; 116: 158–168, ISSN 1359-835X, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.10.034.
TiwariSBijweJPanierS. Polyetherimide composites with gamma irradiated carbon fabric: studies on abrasive wear. Wear2011; 270(9–10): 688–694, DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2011.01.035.
58.
SharmaMBijweJMäderE, et al.Strengthening of CF/PEEK interface to improve the tribological performance in low amplitude oscillating wear mode. Wear2013; 301(1–2): 735–739, DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2012.12.006.
59.
SharmaMBijweJ. Influence of fiber–matrix adhesion and operating parameters on sliding wear performance of carbon fabric polyethersulphone composites. Wear2011; 271(11–12): 2919–2927, DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2011.06.012.
60.
MaratheUNBijweJ. High performance polymer composites–Influence of processing technique on the fiber length and performance properties. Wear2020; 446–447: 203189, DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2020.203189.
61.
HarshaAWäscheRHarteltM. Tribological studies on polyetherketone composite under reciprocating sliding condition against steel cylinder. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J: J Eng Tribology2015; 229(7): 795–806, DOI: 10.1177/1350650115570403.
62.
ZhangANieSYangL. Evaluation of tribological properties on PEEK + CA30 sliding against 17-4PH for water hydraulic axial piston motor. Proc Inst Mech Eng C: J Mech Eng Sci2014; 228(13): 2253–2265, DOI: 10.1177/0954406213518746.
63.
HuangRMaSZhangM, et al.Wear evolution of the glass fiber-reinforced PTFE under dry sliding and elevated temperature. Materials2019; 12(7): 1082, DOI: 10.3390/ma12071082.
64.
ChengBKortschotM. An energy-based model for the wear of unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced epoxy. J Compos Mater2020; 54(28): 4535–4544, DOI: 10.1177/0021998320935486.
65.
RattanRBijweJFahimM. Optimization of weave of carbon fabric for best combination of strength and tribo-performance of polyetherimide composites in adhesive wear mode. Wear2008; 264: 96–105.
66.
BijweJRattanR. Influence of weave of carbon fabric in polyetherimide composites in various wear situations. Wear2007; 263: 984–991.
67.
SharmaMMohan RaoIBijweJ. Influence of fiber orientation on abrasive wear of unidirectionally reinforced carbon fiber-polyetherimide composites. Tribology Int2010; 43: 959–964.
68.
HarshaAPArjulaS. Influence of fibre orientation on three-body abrasive wear behaviour of unidirectional carbon fibre-reinforced polyetherimide composite. J Mater Sci2011; 46: 983–991.
69.
PandaPMantrySMohapatraS, et al.A study on erosive wear analysis of glass fiber-epoxy-AlN hybrid composites. J Compos Mater2014; 48(1): 107–118, DOI: 10.1177/0021998312469239.
70.
SureshaBRameshBNSubbayaKM, et al.Mechanical and three-body abrasive wear behavior of carbon-epoxy composite with and without graphite filler. J Compos Mater2010; 44(21): 2509–2519, DOI: 10.1177/0021998310369589.
71.
ArivalaganPSureshaBChandramohanG, et al.Mechanical and abrasive wear behavior of carbon fabric reinforced epoxy composite with and without fly ash cenospheres. J Compos Mater2013; 47(23): 2925–2935, DOI: 10.1177/0021998312459872.
72.
ChongCShangWCheY, et al.Effects of acrylamide on mechanical and tribological properties of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites. J Compos Mater2015; 49(12): 1461–1469, DOI: 10.1177/0021998314535453.
73.
SavaşSÜvezH. Structure and resultant mechanical and tribological performance of PP/PLA/carbon fiber/ethylene-butyl acrylate composites. J Compos Mater2019; 53(10): 1299–1317, DOI: 10.1177/0021998318800532.
74.
KechaouBSalviaMBenzartiK, et al.Role of fiber/matrix interphases on dielectric, friction, and mechanical properties of glass fiber-reinforced epoxy composites. J Compos Mater2012; 46(2): 131–144, DOI: 10.1177/0021998311410485.
75.
KhafidhMSchipperDJMasenMA, et al.Friction and wear mechanism of short-cut aramid fiber and silica reinforced elastomers. Wear2019; 428-429: 481–487, ISSN 0043-1648, DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2019.04.016.
76.
LertwassanaWParnklangTMoraP, et al.High performance aramid pulp/carbon fiber-reinforced polybenzoxazine composites as friction materials. Composites Part B: Eng2019; 177: 107280, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107280.
77.
PatnaikPKBiswasS. Effect of blast furnace slag content on mechanical and slurry abrasion behavior of needle-punched nonwoven fabric reinforced epoxy composites. Adv Polym Technol2017; 37(6): 1764–1773, DOI: 10.1002/adv.21835.
78.
JoshiAGKumarMPBasavarajappaS. Basavarajappa, influence of Al2O3 filler on slurry erosion behavior of glass/epoxy composites. Proced Mater Sci2014; 5: 863–872, DOI: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.372.ISSN 2211-8128
79.
JiangZZhangZ. Wear of multi-scale phase reinforced composites. In: DavimJ (ed) Tribology of nanocomposites. Materials forming, machining and tribology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2012, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33882-3_5.
80.
MyshkinNKKovalevAV. Friction and wear of polymers and polymer composites. In: TottenGE (ed) friction and wear of polymers and polymer composites, friction, lubrication, and wear technology. ASM handbook. ASM International; 2017, Vol. 18, pp. 559–567, DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v18.a0006373.
ZhangLCZarudiIXiaoKQ. Novel behaviour of friction and wear of epoxy composites reinforced by carbon nanotubes. Wear2006; 261: 806–811.
83.
WernerPAltstädtVJaskulkaR, et al.Tribological behaviour of carbon-nanofibre-reinforced poly(ether ether ketone). Wear2004; 257: 1006–1014.
84.
UnalHMimarogluAArdaT. Friction and wear performance of some thermoplastic polymers and polymer composites against unsaturated polyester. Appl Surf Sci2006; 252(23): 8139–8146.
85.
ZhangZBreidtCChangL, et al.Enhancement of the wear resistance of epoxy: short carbon fibre, graphite, PTFE and nano-TiO2. Compos Part A2004; 35: 1385–1392.
86.
MerglerYJSchaakeRPHuis in’t VeldAJ. Material transfer of POM in sliding contact. Wear2004; 256: 294–301.
87.
BijweJIndumathiJJohn RajeshJ, et al.Friction and wear behavior of polyetherimide composites in various wear modes. Wear2001; 249: 715–726.
88.
RajeshJJBijweJTewariUS. Abrasive wear performance of various polyamides. Wear2002; 252: 769–776.
89.
YousifBF. Design of newly fabricated tribological machine for wear and frictional experiments under dry/wet condition. Mater Des2013; 48: 2–13.
90.
BlickensderferRLairdG. A pin-on-drum abrasive wear test and comparison to other pin test. J Test Eval1988; 16: 516–526.
91.
KimYSYangJWangS, et al.Surface and wear behavior of bis-(4-hydroxyphenyl) cyclohexane (bis-Z) polycarbonate/polycarbonate-polydimethylsiloxane block copolymer alloys. Polymer2002; 43: 7207–7217.
92.
GuoFZhangZZhangH, et al.Tribological behavior of spun Kevlar fabric composites filled with fluorinated compounds. Tribology Int2010; 43(8): 1466–1471.
93.
StevensonANJHutchingsIM. Development of the dry sand/rubber wheel abrasion test. Wear1996; 195: 232–240.
94.
YousifBFNirmalUWongKJ. Three-body abrasion on wear and frictional performance of treated betelnut fibre reinforced epoxy (T-BFRE) composite. Mater Des2010; 31(9): 4514–4521.
95.
SuihkonenRPerolainenJLindgrenM, et al.Erosion wear of glass fibre reinforced vinyl ester. Tribologia–Finnish J Tribology2015; 33(2): 11–19.
96.
MuhandesHKalácskaG. A slurry-pot abrasive wear test device for several composite materials. Int J Eng Manag Sci2019; 4(1): 437–444, DOI: 10.21791/ijems.2019.1.54.
97.
OjalaN.ValtonenK.Kivikytö-ReponenP, et al.High speed slurry-pot erosion wear testing with large abrasive particles. Finnish J Tribology2015; 33: 36–44.
98.
SarlinELindgrenMSuihkonenR, et al.High-temperature slurry erosion of vinylester matrix composites–The effect of test parameters. Wear2015; 328-329: 488–497, DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2015.03.021.
99.
ArunAKumar SinghK. Friction and wear behaviour of glass fibre reinforced polymer composite (GFRP) under dry and oil lubricated environmental conditions. Mater Today Proc2017; 4(8): 7285–7292, DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.058.
100.
PandaJNBijweJPandeyRK. On the significant enhancement in the performance properties of PAEK composite by inclusion of a small amount of nano-mica particles. Tribology Int2019; 136: 87–104, DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2019.03.033.
101.
LiuCDongYLinY, et al.Enhanced mechanical and tribological properties of graphene/bismaleimide composites by using reduced graphene oxide with non-covalent functionalization. Compos Part B: Eng2019; 165: 491–499, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.005.
102.
LiuCLinYDongY, et al.Fabrication and investigation on Ag nanowires/TiO2 nanosheets/graphene hybrid nanocomposite and its water treatment performance. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater2020; 3(3): 402–414, DOI: 10.1007/s42114-020-00164-2.
103.
ASTM Standard D 3171-99: Test Methods for Constituent Content of Composite Materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
104.
EdaanAAl-DahmashyIMuhammadS, et al.studying the effect of polymeric fibers and powders addition on the sliding wear of unsaturated polyester resin. In: Proceedings of the first international conference and scientific third of college of science, University of Tikrit, 2018.
105.
BasavarajappaSEllangovanS. Dry sliding wear characteristics of glass-epoxy composite filled with silicon carbide and graphite particles. Wear2012; 296(1–2): 491–496, ISSN 0043-1648, DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2012.08.001.
106.
ChauhanSGaurBDassK. Effect of fiber loading on mechanical properties, friction and wear behaviour of vinylester composites under dry and water lubricated conditions. Int J Mater Sci2011; 1: 1–8.
107.
SavaşSGurbanovNDoğanM. Effect of fiber type, fiber content, and compatibilizer on two-body abrasive wear performance of HDPE matrix composites. J Compos Mater2019; 53(19): 2743–2760, DOI: 10.1177/0021998319839135.
108.
SrinathGGnanamoorthyR. Effect of short fibre reinforcement on the friction and wear behaviour of nylon 66. Appl Compos Mater2005; 12(6): 369–383, DOI: 10.1007/s10443-005-5824-6.
109.
CallaghanDJVaziriANayeb-HashemiH. Effect of fiber volume fraction and length on the wear characteristics of glass fiber-reinforced dental composites. Dental Mater2006; 22(1): 84–93, DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.011.
110.
ZhangHZhangZFriedrichK. Effect of fiber length on the wear resistance of short carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 222–230, DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.001.
111.
KumarSPanneerselvamK. Research on tribological behaviors of pure and glass fiber reinforced Nylon 6 composites against polymer disc. J Mater Sci Mech Eng2015; 2(6): 24–28.
112.
XingYZhangGMaK, et al.Study on the friction and wear behaviors of modified PA66 composites. Polymer-Plastics Technol Eng2009; 48(6): 633–638, DOI: 10.1080/03602550902824481.
113.
LiJ. Effect of PA6 content on mechanical and tribological properties of PA6-reinforced PTFE composites. Plast Rubber Compos2009; 38(5): 201–205, DOI: 10.1179/174328909x387991.
114.
LiJChengX. The effect of carbon fiber content on the friction and wear properties of carbon fiber reinforced polyimide composites. J Appl Polym Sci2008; 107: 1737–1743, DOI: 10.1002/app.27273.
115.
BahadurSPolineniV. Tribological studies of glass fabric-reinforced polyamide composites filled with CuO and PTFE. Wear1996; 200(1–2): 95–104, DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(96)07327-9.
116.
PalabiyikMBahadurS. Tribological studies of polyamide 6 and high-density polyethylene blends filled with PTFE and copper oxide and reinforced with short glass fibers. Wear2002; 253: 369–376.
117.
ReinickeRHaupertFFriedrichK. On the tribological behaviour of selected, injection moulded thermoplastic composites. Composites Part A1998; 29: 763–771.
118.
RathodASapateSGkhatirkarRK. Shape factor analysis of abrasive particles used in slurry abrasion testing. IJMIE2013; 3: 127–131, DOI: 10.47893/ijmie.2013.1141.
119.
MadsenBW. Measurement of erosion-corrosion synergism with a slurry wear test apparatus. Wear1988; 123: 127–142, DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(88)90095-6.
120.
ClarkHMHartwichRB. A re-examination of the ‘particle size effect’ in slurry erosion. Wear2001; 248: 147–161, DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00556-1.
121.
ClarkHMLlewellynRJ. Assessment of the erosion resistance of steels used for slurry handling and transport in mineral processing applications. Wear2001; 250: 32–44, DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00628-7.
122.
DesaleGRGandhiBKJainSC. Slurry erosion of ductile materials under normal impact condition. Wear2008; 264: 322–330, DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2007.03.022.
123.
Burson-ThomasCBWoodRJK. Developments in erosion–corrosion over the past 10 years. J Bio Tribo Corrosion2017; 3(2): 14, DOI: 10.1007/s40735-017-0073-4.
124.
RajahramSSHarveyTJWoodRJK. Evaluation of a semi-empirical model in predicting erosion-corrosion. Wear2009; 267: 1883–1893, DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2009.03.002.
125.
PennefatherRCHankeySEHutchingsR, et al.Recent observations of the erosion of hard materials. Mater Sci Eng A1988; 105-106: 389–394, ISSN 0921-5093, DOI: 10.1016/0025-5416(88)90722-7.
126.
YadavPKDixitG. Investigation of high stress abrasive and erosive wear behaviour of AA336/TiB2/SiC Ex situ composites. J Bio Tribo Corrosion2019; 5(3): 74, DOI: 10.1007/s40735-019-0256-2.
127.
SelvarajSKNagarajanMKKumaraswamidhasLA. An investigation of abrasive and erosion behaviour of AA 2618 reinforced with Si3N4, AlN and ZrB2 in situ composites by using optimization techniques. Arch Civil Mech Eng2017; 17(1): 43–54, DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2016.08.003.
128.
ShitolePPGawandeSHDesaleGR, et al.Effect of impacting particle kinetic energy on slurry erosion wear. J Bio Tribo Corrosion2015; 1(4): 29, DOI: 10.1007/s40735-015-0028-6.
129.
PopoolaLGremaALatinwoG, et al.Corrosion problems during oil and gas production and its mitigation. Int J Ind Chem2013; 4(1): 35, DOI: 10.1186/2228-5547-4-35.
130.
LlewellynRJYickSKDolmanKF. Scouring erosion resistance of metallic materials used in slurry pump service. Wear2004; 256: 592–599, DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2003.10.002.
131.
AimingFJinmingLZiyunT. Failure analysis of the impeller of a slurry pump subjected to corrosive wear. Wear1995; 181-183: 876–882, DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(95)90210-4.
132.
PourariaHDarihakiFParkKH, et al.CFD modelling of the influence of particle loading on erosion using dense discrete particle model. Wear2020; 460-461: 203450, DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2020.203450.
133.
MacchiniRBradleyMSADengT. Influence of particle size, density, particle concentration on bend erosive wear in pneumatic conveyors. Wear2013; 303: 21–29, DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2013.02.014.
134.
WoodRJKWalkerJCHarveyTJ, et al.Influence of microstructure on the erosion and erosion-corrosion characteristics of 316 stainless steel. Wear2013; 306: 254–262.
135.
SalehBAbouel-KasemAAhmedSM. Effect of surface properties modification on slurry erosion–corrosion resistance of AISI 5117 steel. J Tribology2015; 137(3): 031105, DOI: 10.1115/1.4029997.
136.
HassanAMTashtoushGMAl-KhalilJA. Effect of graphite and/or silicon carbide particles addition on the hardness and surface roughness of Al-4 wt% Mg Alloy. J Compos Mater2007; 41(4): 453–465, DOI: 10.1177/0021998306063804.
137.
RongHPengZHuY, et al.Dependence of wear behaviors of hardmetal YG8B on coarse abrasive types and their slurry concentrations. Wear2011; 271: 1156–1165.
138.
BursteinGTSasakiK. Effect of impact angle on the slurry erosion–corrosion of 304L stainless steel. Wear2000; 240(1–2): 80–94, DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00344-6.
139.
LiangLPangYTangY, et al.Combined wear of slurry erosion, cavitation erosion, and corrosion on the simulated ship surface. Adv Mech Eng2019; 11(3): 168781401983445, DOI: 10.1177/1687814019834450.
140.
YouYLLiDXSiGJ, et al.Improvement in the tribological properties of polyamide 6: Talc, glass fiber, graphite, and ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2016; 29(4): 494–507, DOI: 10.1177/0892705713519120.
