In this study, oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB)-reinforced composites were subjected to a low-velocity impact test to study their energy absorption characteristics. Two sets of OPEFB-reinforced composite specimens were used, comprising 30:70 and 40:60 fiber/epoxy fractions. One set of specimens was treated with a 3% NaOH solution. The drop impact responses, fragmentation characteristics, energy absorptions, and residual strengths of both sets of specimens were analyzed. Drop impact tests were performed using three different energy levels, namely, 10, 13, and 16 J. In general, the results indicated that all the untreated specimens absorbed higher energy than that of the treated specimens, thus suffering severe surface and structural damage. This result is attributed to the treated specimens providing a better interlocking mechanism between the matrix and fibers and dissipating the impact energy through the impactor. Regarding fiber loading, all the 30:70 fiber/epoxy composites exhibited slightly less energy absorption than the 40:60 fiber/epoxy composites.
FaiziMKShahrimanAAbdul MajidM, et al.An overview of the oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) potential as reinforcing fibre in polymer composite for energy absorption applications. MATEC Web Conf2017; 90: 01064. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20179001064.
M.-G. C. of C. and Industry. Oil palm biomass & biogas in potentials for european SMES. EU-Malaysia Chamber of Commerce and Industry (EUMCCI), 2017.
13.
JawaidMAbdul KhalilHPSAbu BakarA. Mechanical performance of oil palm empty fruit bunches/jute fibres reinforced epoxy hybrid composites. Mater Sci Eng A2010; 527(29–30): 7944–7949. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.09.005.
14.
RozmanHDTayGSKumarRN, et al.Polypropylene-oil palm empty fruit bunch-glass fibre hybrid composites: a preliminary study on the flexural and tensile properties. Eur Polym J2001; 37(6): 1283–1291. DOI: 10.1016/s0014-3057(00)00243-3.
15.
RozmanHDAhmadhilmiKRAbubakarA. Polyurethane (PU)-oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB) composites: the effect of EFBG reinforcement in mat form and isocyanate treatment on the mechanical properties. Polym Test2004; 23(5): 559–565. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2003.11.004.
16.
KhalidMRatnamCTChuahTG, et al.Comparative study of polypropylene composites reinforced with oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber and oil palm derived cellulose. Mater Des2008; 29(1): 173–178. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.11.002.
17.
KhoshnavaSMRostamiRIsmailM, et al.Woven hybrid Biocomposite: mechanical properties of woven kenaf bast fibre/oil palm empty fruit bunches hybrid reinforced poly hydroxybutyrate biocomposite as non-structural building materials. Constr Build Mater2017; 154: 155–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.189.
18.
LatipNASofianAHAliMF, et al.Structural and morphological studies on alkaline pre-treatment of oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) fiber for composite production. Materials Today: Proceedings2019; 17: 1105–1111. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.529.
19.
SantosMJSantosJBAmaroAM, et al.Low velocity impact damage evaluation in fiber glass composite plates using PZT sensors. Compos Part B Eng2013; 55: 269–276. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.06.036.
20.
RidzuanM. Development and characterisation of hybrid napier/glass fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Ph.D. thesis. School of Mechatronic Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, 2016.
21.
ReisPNBFerreiraJAMSantosP, et al.Impact response of Kevlar composites with filled epoxy matrix. Compos Struct2012; 94(12): 3520–3528. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.025.
22.
RazaliNSazaliSSSultanMTH. The study of impact damage on C-Type and E-type of fibreglass subjected to low velocity impact2014; 3(8): 11–25.
23.
UdeAUAriffinAKAzhariCH. An experimental investigation on the response of woven natural silk fiber/epoxy sandwich composite panels under low velocity impact. Fibers Polym2013; 14(1): 127–132. DOI: 10.1007/s12221-013-0127-2.
24.
KumariPWangJHSaahil. Tensile after impact test of scarf-repaired composite laminates. Arab J Sci Eng2019; 44(9): 7677–7697. DOI: 10.1007/s13369-019-03857-z.
25.
KumariPWangJHSaahil. Residual tensile strength of the multi-impacted. Materials (Basel)2018; 11(12): 2351.
26.
DhakalHNZhangZYBennettN, et al.Low-velocity impact response of non-woven hemp fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites: influence of impactor geometry and impact velocity. Compos Struct2012; 94(9): 2756–2763. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.04.004.
27.
XieXZhouZYanY. Flexural properties and impact behaviour analysis of bamboo cellulosic fibers filled cement based composites. Constr Build Mater2019; 220: 403–414. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.029.
28.
YuanjianTIsaacDH. Impact and fatigue behaviour of hemp fibre composites. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67(15–16): 3300–3307. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.039.
29.
KuHWangHPattarachaiyakoopN, et al.A review on the tensile properties of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites. Composites Part B: Engineering2011; 42(4): 856–873. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.010.
30.
SanjayMRMadhuPJawaidM, et al.Characterization and properties of natural fiber polymer composites: a comprehensive review. J Clean Prod2018; 172: 566–581. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.101.
31.
KommulaVPKanchireddyORShuklaM, et al.Study on impact strength of untreated and alkali treated napier grass fiber strands reinforced epoxy composites. Int Conf Chem Environ Eng2013; 2(3): 101–106.
